Skip to content

Patients' Preferences for Repair Versus Replacement Restorations

Patients' Preferences for Repair Versus Replacement Restorations

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02975635
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-11-29
Start date
2017-03-15
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2020-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient Preference

Keywords

Patients' Preferences

Brief summary

Partially defective dental restorations might either be treated by complete replacement or by repair of the affected region. Repair restorations are a scientifically proven approach to manage failed restorations, but probably unknown to most patients. Results from this study and findings on the predictors of patients' therapy decisions might improve future patient information documents.

Detailed description

Handling insufficient restorations contributes up to 2/3 of all treatments in dentistry. Formerly, defective restorations were completely removed and replaced. Today, repair restorations are an alternative choice. During repair treatment, only the defective portion of a restoration (instead of the complete restoration) is removed and replaced. By performing repair restorations dental hard tissue can be conserved and the risk of treatment associated complications is reduced. Recent studies have shown that survival rates of repair restorations are slightly lower compared to replacement fillings. Nevertheless, in certain clinical situations repair restorations are more cost-effective than replacement. Further studies have shown that patients' decisions differ with regard to a variety of factors. This applies to decisions regarding dental treatments as well. However, patients' decisions between both possible therapy options (repair or replacement) of partially defective restorations are not yet investigated.

Interventions

OTHERQuestionnaire

Patients are given a questionnaire with items related to personality and behaviour.

Sponsors

Georg-Elias-Mueller-Institute of Psychology, University Goettingen
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Göttingen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participant are selected by consecutive patient sampling. Inclusion Criteria: * At least one partially defective dental restoration which can either be repaired or replaced

Exclusion criteria

* Non-fulfillment of the inclusion criteria * Lack of capacity to consent * No German language skills in written and spoken language * Age \<18 years * Defective restoration must be completely replaced in any event or is not suitable for repair

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Completion of a questionnaire15 minutes

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026