Skip to content

Rehabilitation of Patient With Acute Isolated PCL Rupture

Kneelaxity and Self-reported Knee Function After Rehabilitation With the Use of Dynamic Kneeorthosis for Patients With Acute Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02974205
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-11-28
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2016-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PCL

Brief summary

The posterior cruciate ligament injuries (PCL) is rare and rehabilitation methods are varying. The purpose of the study is to explore if one rehabilitation option is preferable to one other for patients with acute PCL injury, by examining whether there will be differences in laxity in the knee joints and patient-reported knee function by three different rehabilitation protocols. A randomized controlled trial with 75 patients enrolled will be followed up 3 and 12 months after injury. The groups will be compared using kneelaxity (stress - X) and subjective knee function (KOOS, IKDC-2000)

Detailed description

The posterior cruciate ligament injuries (PCL) is rare and rehabilitation methods are varying. The purpose of the study is to explore if one rehabilitation option is preferable to one other for patients with acute PCL injury, by examining whether there will be differences in laxity in the knee joints and patient-reported knee function by three different rehabilitation protocols. A randomized controlled trial with 75 patients enrolled will be followed up 3 and 12 months after injury. The groups will be compared using kneelaxity (stress - X) and subjective knee function (KOOS, IKDC-2000) to indicate whether one rehabilitation alternative is preferable in terms of less knee joint laxity and improve knee function. Participants considered included in the study if he or she agrees to participate in the study by signing the informed consent. Inclusion criteria will be whether the patient has an acute isolated PCL injury. Exclusion is additional injuries of ligaments, cartilage and meniscus of the knee. Randomization to groups is done continuously.

Interventions

PROCEDUREJack brace

Rehabilitation after acute isolated PCL rupture with orthosis

DEVICERehabilitation

Rehabilitation after acute isolated PCL rupture without orthosis

DEVICEössur brace

Rehabilitation after acute isolated PCL rupture

Sponsors

University Hospital, Akershus
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Acute isolated PCL injury : 0- 3 weeks ( maximum 21 days) from the initial injury * Isolated PCL rupture (grade I, II and III) * Patient age should be between 16-60 years ( with closed epiphyseal plate ) * Understood and accepted written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Injury to the ACL or other ligaments in the knee * Extensive injury to the cartilage or meniscus , requiring repairs * Unfit to understand or to sign consent * History of alcohol or drug abuse in the past three years * Current serious illness or injury that makes rehabilitation difficult.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PCL stress-radiograph12 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score)12 month
IKDC-2000 (Subjective Knee Evaluation Form)12 month
One leg hop (in meters)12 month

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Primary ContactIngrid Trøan, PT
ingrid.troan@ous-hf.no+479888593
Backup ContactKarin Bredland, PT, MSc

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026