Skip to content

Salvage Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients With Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients With Nodal Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy With Curative Intent - a Prospective Single Center Phase I/II Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02974075
Enrollment
65
Registered
2016-11-28
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2025-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Recurrent

Brief summary

Despite continuous technical improvements in urologic surgery, up to 40% of prostate cancer patients will develop biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), potentially because of micro metastasis at the time of the primary surgery. With improved radiological modalities and nuclear medicine tracers like 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, which allow the localization of the site of recurrence, there is increasing interest in metastasis directed therapies, such as salvage lymph node dissection. The pelvic extended salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) is a promising option for treating prostate cancer patients with local recurrence after radical prostatectomy with curative intent. Several retrospective series has been published to determine the local value of sLND. Despite the first data seem to be feasible and promising, to date no prospective evaluation has been made. Thus sLND is still experimental according to the guidelines and is considered as an off label therapy. This prospective single center phase I/II study was conducted to investigate the safety and early efficacy of salvage lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients with local pelvic recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) with curative intention.

Interventions

Open pelvic surgery to dissect pelvic lymph nodes. The landmarks for dissection are: 1. Inferior mesenteric artery 2. Ilioinguinal nerve 3. Inguinal ligament 4. Dorsal pelvic floor 5. Urinary bladder

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis in pelvic imaging * Status post radical prostatectomy with curative intent * Ability for informed consent * No sign for bone or visceral metastasis * Male \> 18 years * ECOG performance status 0 or 1

Exclusion criteria

* Male \< 18 years * No ability for informed consent * Sign for bone or visceral metastasis * Deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within the last 6 months before study screening * ECOG performance status 2 or more

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The rate of periperative complications within 90 days after surgery90 days
The Prostate specific antigen value after 6 weeks.6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Prostate Specific Antigen doubling time2 years
Time until development of castration resistance2 years
Time until development of distant metastasis2 years

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026