Skip to content

Effectiveness of Non-surgical Interventions for the Trigger Finger: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of Non-surgical Interventions for the Trigger Finger: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02972879
Enrollment
132
Registered
2016-11-25
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2017-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigger Finger

Keywords

trigger finger, Therapeutic Modalities, Corticosteroid Injection, non-surgical treatment, physical therapy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic modalities (paraffin, ultrasound and orthotics) versus corticosteroid injection for trigger finger.

Detailed description

There are several forms of nonsurgical treatment for trigger finger, the most used are: * Oral nonsteroidal and steroidal antiinflammatory's drugs use to resolve the inflammatory process * Corticosteroids local injection: that proposes to control the inflammation, these injections have shown good effectiveness for trigger finger treatment. * Orthotic: with the aim of to immobilize the affected joint until the resolution of the inflammatory process. * Electrotherapeutic modalities: * Paraffin that increases cellular metabolism and promotes peripheral vasodilatation, favoring the transduction tissue fluid, lymph flow, hyperemia and consequent absorption of exsudato. * LASER -Lower Level Laser Therapy (LLLT): the absorption of light through the skin's photoreceptors stimulates mitochondrial chain reactions, promoting adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, acting on gene expression, which raises the level of growth factors and Tissue repair Although the non-surgical treatment is often used there is no evidence in the literature of which is the most effective conservative treatment for trigger finger. Thus, it is necessary use appropriate methodology to define the benefits and harms of each treatment modality and assess the effectiveness of these nonsurgical treatments, and may define which one has a higher resolution and lower rates of trigger finger recurrences in short, medium and long term.

Interventions

PROCEDURETherapeutic modalities: Orthotic (Group 1)

participants will be instructed to remove the orthosis only two hours in the morning, two hours in the afternoon and two hours at night to avoid joint stiffness

PROCEDURETherapeutic modalities: LLLT (Group 2)

The LLLT parameters are: * LASER 904nm * P: 1.5W/cm² * 30mV/cm² * Area 2 cm² * 1 Joule por ponto ( in the A1 pulley)

PROCEDURETherapeutic modalities: Paraffin (Group 3)

Paraffin will be heated and maintained at 50 ° C. Participants will immerse their affected hand 10 times in heated paraffin, then they will roll up their affected hand in a towel that they will bring, after 20 minutes timed by a trained professional, the subjects will remove the towel and paraffin glove:

PROCEDURECorticosteroid injection (Group 4)

The injection solution is composed of 1 ml of betamethasone and 1 ml of 2% lidocaine.This group may repeat the procedure in two weeks if they report that there was no improvement of the triggering or pain.

Sponsors

Federal University of São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER
Beatriz Sernajoto Cristiani Pedro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 2-3 grade of trigger finger (Quinnell´s classification) * Signing the Terms of Consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of finger trigger in children * Presence of traumatic finger trigger * Secondary causes (patients with tumor of the tendon sheath, synovitis tuberculosis, etc ...)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the Resolution/cure of the trigger finger until the six months of the treatment1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 monthThe patient must extend and flex the affected finger 10 times to verify the presence or absence of the trigger finger and determine the degree of commitment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in SF-12 (quality of life)1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in the numbers of the Complications1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month
Changes in the numbers of the Relapses1, 5, 12 weeks and 6 month

Contacts

Primary ContactBeatriz S C Pedro
bscristiani@gmail.com05511998035668

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026