Skip to content

ORthopaedic Trauma Anemia With Conservative Versus Liberal Transfusion

ORthopaedic Trauma Anemia With Conservative Versus Liberal Transfusion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02972593
Acronym
ORACL
Enrollment
161
Registered
2016-11-23
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2022-06-24
Last updated
2023-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in outcomes between liberal transfusion (transfusing when hemoglobin drops below a set higher value number) and conservative transfusion (transfusing when hemoglobin drops below a set lower value number).

Detailed description

Transfusion of Orthopaedic trauma patients is routinely done in asymptomatic individuals as there is no accepted national standard or recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons or the Orthopaedic Trauma Association for what level of anemia is appropriate in an asymptomatic patient. Individual practitioners typically make this decision based on anecdotal experiences and expert opinion. No prospective study has been performed to date to answer this question in this patient population. The null hypothesis of this proposed pilot study is that no difference will be seen with a liberal transfusion strategy to keep a patient's hemoglobin above 7 g/dL versus a conservative strategy to keep the patient's hemoglobin above 5.5 g/dL in patients asymptomatic at rest. The primary outcome of this pilot study will be infection; defined as postoperative wound infection (superficial or deep) or other perioperative infection but not surgical site (urinary tract infection or pneumonia). Deep infection is defined as the need for intravenous antibiotics or a return to surgery for debridement. Superficial infection is defined as the use of oral antibiotics only successfully treat a surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes will include pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, acute renal failure or insufficiency, nonunion, delayed union, compartment syndrome, osteomyelitis, nerve palsy, anoxic brain injury, cardiac ischemia or infarct, pancreatitis, or death, and the musculoskeletal functional assessment.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBlood and blood products for transfusion

Randomization would not occur until the patient's Hgb dropped below 7 g/dL. If the patient is randomized to the liberal arm, they would be transfused to keep their Hgb \>7 g/dL. If the patient is randomized to the conservative arm, they would not be transfused until their Hgb drops below 5.5 g/dL. If the patient's Hgb does not drop below 7.0 g/dL, randomization will not be done.

Sponsors

Atlanta Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Trauma patients admitted to participating hospital with any Orthopaedic injury who have been determined to be stable by the Trauma Service (General Surgery) and are no longer within the resuscitation phase of initial treatment. This is defined as a normal urine output (greater than 0.5 ml/kg/hr) and a systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg for greater than 6 hours without fluid bolus or transfusion during that time * Age 18-50 * Hemoglobin less than 9 g/dL or expected drop below 9 g/dL with planned surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant ( urine pregnancy test will be done as standard of care) * Prisoner * Head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale less than 8 over 48 hours from presentation) * Known cardiac (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, stent placement, congestive heart failure), renal (acute or chronic renal insufficiency or failure, defined as having Serum Creatinine \>1.2 at time of enrollment), liver (Childs C cirrhosis) or pulmonary disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormal pulmonary function tests or history of poor pulmonary function from any cause including acute traumatic conditions such as ARDS) * Unlikely to follow up in the surgeon's estimation * Sickle Cell Anemia * History of cancer * Preexisting weakness, paresthesias, deformities, or other conditions which might affect functional outcome in the surgeon's opinion * Spinal cord injury * Patients with burns expected to require operative treatment * COVID positive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Wound Infection (Superficial or Deep) or Other Perioperative Infectionone yearDeep infection is defined as the need for intravenous antibiotics and/or a return to surgery for debridement. Superficial infection is defined as clinical diagnosis of cellulitis or other superficial infection treated with oral antibiotics only.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined Secondary Outcomesone yearCombined (any) Secondary Outcomes: pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, acute renal failure or insufficiency, nonunion, delayed union, compartment syndrome, osteomyelitis, nerve palsy, anoxic brain injury, cardiac ischemia or infarct, pancreatitis, or death.
Musculoskeletal Function Assessmentone yearThe Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) evaluates the health status of patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities, including patients with fractures and soft tissue injuries, repetitive motion disorders, osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. It describes patient functioning, assesses outcomes of surgical interventions and clinical trials, and monitors patients' functional status over time. The MFA is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing no dysfunction. Higher MFA scores/values represent a higher levels of dysfunction or worse outcome.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on physician referral at 3 level 1 trauma centers between March 2014 and May 2021. The first patient was enrolled on March 11, 2014 and the last participant was enrolled on May 7, 2021.

Pre-assignment details

Screening/IC done on 161 patients with a Hgb of ≤9g/dL or whose Hgb was expected to drop below 9g/dL with planned procedures/continued (controlled) bleeding. Randomization assignment occurred once patient's Hgb dropped below 7g/dL. Out of the 161 patient that consented, there were 61 whose Hgb did not drop below 7g/dL and randomization was not performed on. Those 61 patients were considered screen failures, leaving 100 patients who were randomized to either liberal or conservative transfusion.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liberal Transfusion
Transfusion will be done to keep Hgb \>7 g/dL.
49
Conservative Transfusion
Transfusion will be done to keep Hgb \> 5.5 g/dL.
50
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1915
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiberal TransfusionConservative TransfusionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
49 Participants50 Participants99 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants4 Participants49 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants41 Participants43 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants18 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants29 Participants56 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
49 participants50 participants99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants19 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants31 Participants64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 490 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 490 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 496 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Postoperative Wound Infection (Superficial or Deep) or Other Perioperative Infection

Deep infection is defined as the need for intravenous antibiotics and/or a return to surgery for debridement. Superficial infection is defined as clinical diagnosis of cellulitis or other superficial infection treated with oral antibiotics only.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LiberalPostoperative Wound Infection (Superficial or Deep) or Other Perioperative Infection12 Participants
ConservativePostoperative Wound Infection (Superficial or Deep) or Other Perioperative Infection3 Participants
p-value: 0.0122Fisher Exact
Secondary

Combined Secondary Outcomes

Combined (any) Secondary Outcomes: pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, acute renal failure or insufficiency, nonunion, delayed union, compartment syndrome, osteomyelitis, nerve palsy, anoxic brain injury, cardiac ischemia or infarct, pancreatitis, or death.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LiberalCombined Secondary Outcomes7 Participants
ConservativeCombined Secondary Outcomes6 Participants
p-value: 0.7742Fisher Exact
Secondary

Musculoskeletal Function Assessment

The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) evaluates the health status of patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities, including patients with fractures and soft tissue injuries, repetitive motion disorders, osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. It describes patient functioning, assesses outcomes of surgical interventions and clinical trials, and monitors patients' functional status over time. The MFA is scored from 0 to 100 with 0 representing no dysfunction. Higher MFA scores/values represent a higher levels of dysfunction or worse outcome.

Time frame: one year

Population: Sixty five patients completed 1 year follow up but 5 declined to complete the MFA, leaving sixty patients that completed 1 year MFA.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiberalMusculoskeletal Function Assessment35.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
ConservativeMusculoskeletal Function Assessment28.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
p-value: 0.1443t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026