Skip to content

Cognitive Style and Mobile Technology in E-learning in Undergraduate Medical Education

Cognitive Style and Mobile Technology in E-learning in Undergraduate Medical Education- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Otolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02971735
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-11-23
Start date
2016-11-23
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medical Education

Keywords

cognitive style, e-learning, mobile technology, randomized controlled trial, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

Brief summary

New designs of 6-year undergraduate medical education (UME) in Taiwan mainly include (1) integral curricula of body organ system, (2) multiple methods of clinical teaching and assessment, and (3) generalism in UME. Accompany with decreasing educational hours in the classrooms and hospital, essential but minor components of primary healthcare such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) is disproportionately under-represented in UME. Novel medical education stresses on enabling self-directory learning and increasing learning hours outside the classrooms. Accordingly, we hypothesize that innovations in educational technology can enhance the learning outcomes of ORL-HNS. This study is aimed to determine whether mobile technology in e-learning (M-TEL) is an effective tool for the instruction of ORL-HNS and to compare effects of different cognitive styles on learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education. This is a randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 60 UME students without previous training in ORL-HNS to undergo the Group Embedded Figures Test to determine their cognitive styles such as field dependence or field-independence. After blinded randomization, students are instructed on two modules of emergent ORL-HNS disorders, using either a standard e-learning of text-figure Power Point show or an interactive multimedia module. Subjects are evaluated on emergent ORL-HNS disorders using text-based assessment and multimedia assessment take place prior to and following instruction. After 7 days later, they will be assessed using global satisfaction score and AttrakDiff2 questionnaire. We anticipate that this study can confirm M-TEL can enhance the efficiency of the instruction of ORL-HNS and understand differences in learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education between field dependence and filed independence using this platform.

Detailed description

Background: New designs of 6-year undergraduate medical education (UME) mainly include (1) integral curricula of body organ system, (2) multiple methods of clinical teaching and assessment, and (3) generalism in UME. UME is meant to enable graduates to become undifferentiated general physicians. Accompany with decreasing educational hours in the classrooms and hospital, essential but minor components of primary healthcare such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) is disproportionately under-represented in UME. In Canada, substantial downstream effects on managing ORL-HNS problems have been noted in family medicine residents. In order to improve learning insufficiency and enhance clinical competency without increasing extra-hours in the classrooms and hospitals, novel medical education stresses on enabling self-directory learning and increasing learning hours outside the classrooms. Accordingly, we hypothesize that innovations in educational technology can enhance the learning outcomes of ORL-HNS. Purposes: This study is aimed to determine whether mobile technology in e-learning (M-TEL) is an effective tool for the instruction of ORL-HNS and to compare effects of different cognitive styles on learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education. Material and Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial. Firstly, we have been setup a e-learning platform of the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders with translating into an application (APP) function that can execute in mobile devices. Secondly, we will recruit 60 UME students without previous training in ORL-HNS to undergo the Group Embedded Figures Test to determine their cognitive styles such as field dependence or field-independence. After blinded randomization, students are instructed on two modules of emergent ORL-HNS disorders, using either a standard e-learning of text-figure Power Point show or an interactive multimedia module. Subjects are evaluated on emergent ORL-HNS disorders using a text-based assessment and a multimedia assessment take place prior to and following instruction. Anticipating Outcome: This study can (1) establish a M-TEL of ORL-HNS that can deliver an innovatively mobile e-learning to supplement the deficiency of the classroom hours, (2) confirm M-TEL can enhance the efficiency of the instruction of ORL-HNS, and (3) understand differences in learning outcomes of M-TEL with various modules of medical education between field dependence and filed independence using this platform.

Interventions

OTHERmobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL)

UME students learn the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders using the M-TEL including the IM module or the PPS module.

Sponsors

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 20 years old; 2. UME students (defined as the three or four years of medical school training).

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous ORL-HNS training; 2. Declining to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Multiple-choice Question (MCQ) Scoresbefore and immediately after the M-TEL interventionSubjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MCQ tests before after the M-TEL Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MCQ tests 15 minutes before the M-TEL intervention with either the IM module or the PPS module and immediately after the M-TEL intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Satisfaction Score7 days after the M-TEL interventionGlobal satisfaction score is measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) after 7 days post M-TEL.
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Pragmatic Quality Score7 days after the M-TEL interventionFor more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
Percentage Change in Multimedia Situation Test (MST) Scoresbefore and immediately after the M-TEL interventionSubjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MST tests 15 minutes before the M-TEL intervention with either the IM module or the PPS module and immediately after the M-TEL intervention.
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Identification7 days after the M-TEL interventionFor more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Attractiveness7 days after the M-TEL interventionFor more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).
AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Stimulation7 days after the M-TEL interventionFor more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 60 consecutive volunteers were recruited from a teaching clinic for the validation study from November 23, 2016 to July 5, 2017.

Pre-assignment details

All of the volunteers had at least a basic level of computer literacy, and they were shown the practical aspects of using tablets and applications. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age \>20 years; and 2) undergraduate medical students (clerkship). The exclusion criteria were: 1) previous ORL-HNS training; and 2) declining to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interactive Multimedia Module
Subjects allocated to this experimental group will receive an intervention of mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL) using the interactive multimedia (IM) module consist of integrated text, images, and small game tests (intervention) for 100 minutes. The module is a non-linearity of learning with interaction (student-based choice and pop-up feedback). This context has been adjusted to the same level to that of the PPS module. mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL): UME students learn the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders using the M-TEL including the IM module or the PPS module.
30
Power Point Show Module
Subjects allocated to this experimental group will receive an intervention of mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL) using the Power Point show (PPS) module consist of integrated text, images, and audio (intervention) for 100 minutes. The module is a linear learning without interaction. This context has been adjusted to the same level to that of the IM module. mobile technology of e-learning (M-TEL): UME students learn the Top 10 emergent ORL-HNS disorders using the M-TEL including the IM module or the PPS module.
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalInteractive Multimedia ModulePower Point Show Module
Age, Continuous23 years23 years23 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants10 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants20 Participants16 Participants
The cognitive style was assessed using the 25-item group embedded figures test after enrollment.17 units on a scale18 units on a scale17 units on a scale

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change in Multiple-choice Question (MCQ) Scores

Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MCQ tests before after the M-TEL Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MCQ tests 15 minutes before the M-TEL intervention with either the IM module or the PPS module and immediately after the M-TEL intervention.

Time frame: before and immediately after the M-TEL intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModulePercentage Change in Multiple-choice Question (MCQ) Scores40 percentage of MCQ change
Power Point Show ModulePercentage Change in Multiple-choice Question (MCQ) Scores45 percentage of MCQ change
Secondary

AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Attractiveness

For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).

Time frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Attractiveness1.0 units on a scale
Power Point Show ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Attractiveness0.9 units on a scale
Secondary

AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Identification

For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).

Time frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Identification1.4 units on a scale
Power Point Show ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Identification0.3 units on a scale
Secondary

AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Stimulation

For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).

Time frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Stimulation1.5 units on a scale
Power Point Show ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Hedonic Stimulation-0.3 units on a scale
Secondary

AttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Pragmatic Quality Score

For more delicately evaluate the acceptance of technical innovations, we will assess user experience using the AttrakDiff2. AttrakDiff2 is developed as a tool by Hassenzahl's research group to be able to quantify attractive, identifiable, stimulating, and pragmatic qualities. The tool consists of 28 seven-step items whose poles are opposite adjectives (e.g. confusing - clear, unusual - ordinary, good - bad). Each set of adjective items is ordered into a scale of intensity. Each of the mean values of an item group creates a scale value for pragmatic quality (PQ), hedonic stimulation (HQ-S), hedonic identification (HQ-I), and attractiveness (ATT) (range: -3-3).

Time frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention

Population: Pragmatic quality

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Pragmatic Quality Score1.7 score on a scale
Power Point Show ModuleAttrakDiff2 Questionnaire: Pragmatic Quality Score0.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Global Satisfaction Score

Global satisfaction score is measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) after 7 days post M-TEL.

Time frame: 7 days after the M-TEL intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModuleGlobal Satisfaction Score8 score on a scale
Power Point Show ModuleGlobal Satisfaction Score6 score on a scale
Secondary

Percentage Change in Multimedia Situation Test (MST) Scores

Subjects will undergo the duplicated 15-minute MST tests 15 minutes before the M-TEL intervention with either the IM module or the PPS module and immediately after the M-TEL intervention.

Time frame: before and immediately after the M-TEL intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interactive Multimedia ModulePercentage Change in Multimedia Situation Test (MST) Scores0 percentage of MST change
Power Point Show ModulePercentage Change in Multimedia Situation Test (MST) Scores25 percentage of MST change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026