Skip to content

ESWL Versus ESWL and Endoscopic Treatment

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Combined With Endoscopic Treatment for Painful Calcified Chronic Pancreatitis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02971475
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-11-23
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2018-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis

Keywords

Extracorporeal Shock Wave lithotripsy(ESWL), Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography(ERCP), chronic pancreatitis, pain relief

Brief summary

The study wants to compare ESWL alone with ESWL and endoscopic drainage of the MPD for treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

Detailed description

The combination mode of ESWL and ERCP is an established method of treatment of painful obstructive calcified chronic pancreatitis. However, the investigators notice that patients after ESWL alone in calcified CP is followed by spontaneous elimination of stone fragments and pain relief. Inui reported that 40% of 555 patients spontaneous eliminate stone fragments. Dumonceau found that combining systematic endoscopy with ESWL adds to the cost of patient care, without improving the outcome of the pancreatic pain. So the investigators design such a prospective and randomized controlled trial. People diagnosed with uncomplicated painful chronic pancreatitis and calcifications obstructing the MPD will be randomly assigned to the ESWL or endoscopy group according to a table of random numbers. ESWL will be performed in all patients using a electromagnetic lithotriptor. ESWL sessions will be repeated if necessary, until stone fragmentation is obtained. Patients in the endoscopy group will undergo endoscopy in 48 hours with possible stent insertion. In the ESWL group, if pain continues or aggravates, endoscopic drainage of the MPD will be carried out. Follow-up will consists of telephone interview1 after treatment and clinical examination every 6 months thereafter. Data collected will include clinical presentation, ESWL, endoscopic and surgical procedures, life quality. In addition, S-MRCP will be performed 6 months after treatment. Blood glucose, insulin, stool elastase will be taken each clinical examination.

Interventions

People in this group would be treated with ESWL only.

People in this group would be treated with ESWL followed be endoscopic drainage in 48 hours.

DRUGAnalgesics

Analgesics administrated include morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid. They will only be administrated as needed.

Sponsors

Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* painful chronic pancreatitis(abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months); * at least 1 calcified stone greater than 5 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct with upstream duct dilation; * no ERCP or ESWL carried out before admission

Exclusion criteria

* suspected to have malignant tumors; * history of pancreatic surgery or gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II); * pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT scan; * age below 18 years; * pregnancy or lactation; * refuse to write informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline pain score as accessed by izbichi pain score at 12 month12 monthsWhether pain is relieved depends on the change of Izbicki pain score at the baseline and 12 months after the procedure(ERCP alone or ERCP combined with ERCP). Izbicki pain score is composed of 4 parts, that is frequency of pain attacks(daily counts for 100, several times a week counts for 75, several times a month counts for 50, several times a year counts for 25 and several times a year counts for 0), VAS(subjective evaluation of pain by patients from no pain which is 0 points to imaginative maximum of pain which is 100 points), analgesic medication(morphine consumption is 100, buprenorphine is 80, pethidine is 20, tramaldol is 15, metamizole is 3 and acetylsalicylacid is 1) and time of disease-related inability to work(permanet is 100, ≤1 month is 50, ≤1 week is 25 and no inability to work during the last year is 0). Each part counts for 100 points in all.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
exocrine function of the pancreas through determination of fecal elastase as assessed by fecal elastase kit12 monthsPancreatic exocrine function insufficiency(PEI) is defined as fecal elastase \<200 μg/g. The result wii be divided into 4 conditions, that is exocrine function normal, PEI develop, PEI resolve, PEI persist.
clearance of pancreatic stones12 monthsClearance of pancreatic stone is regarded as complete when clearance rate is more than 90%, partial is regarded as 50% to 90%, the rest is unsuccessful.
decompression rate of the pancreatic duct as the change of pancreatic duct diameter assessed by S-MRCP12 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
complication rate1 monthsComplications involve pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation, infection and steinstrasse.
BMI in kg/m^212 months
endocrine function as assessed by the combination of fasting blood glucose, insulin, C peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin12 monthsAs mentioned earlier, the result of pancreatic endocrine function can also be divided into 4 parts similar to that of pancreatic exocrine function.
treatment-related cost from initial treatment to the end of the study(12 months)12 months
life quality as assessed by SF-36 questionnaire12 months

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactZhao-shen Li
zhaoshen-li@hotmail.com
Backup ContactZhuan Liao
liaozhuan@smmu.edu.cn

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026