Skip to content

Echinacea Junior vs Vitamin C in Children 4-12 Years Old

Controlled, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicentre Study on Efficacy and Safety of Echinaforce Junior Tablets in Comparison With Vitamin C for the Prevention of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections in Children (4-12 Years)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02971384
Enrollment
203
Registered
2016-11-23
Start date
2016-11-25
Completion date
2018-07-03
Last updated
2021-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Tract Infection Viral

Brief summary

Aim of this study is to investigate efficacy and safety of Echinaforce Junior Tablets (250mg) in comparison with Vitamin C tablets in the prevention of acute viral respiratory tract infections.

Detailed description

200 children aged 4-12 years are recruited by pediatricians and general practitioners and are allocated to preventive treatment with either Echinaforce Junior tablets or Vitamin C. Children take 3 x 1 tablet per day over a period of 2 months followed by 1 week treatment break and an intermediate study visit (V2). Thereafter children continue with preventive Treatment for another 2 months, followed by exclusion visit (V3). Parents are required to contact a study coordinator at the occurrence of acute respiratory Symptoms to initiate symptom recording via internet-based e-diary. On day 1 - 3 of episode parents will sample nasal secretion, which will be analysed for common respiratory agents.

Interventions

DRUGEchinaforce

Sponsors

A. Vogel AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 4-12 years * written informed consent by parents and optionally by child * daily Access to computer/email * german language skills

Exclusion criteria

* 13 years or older, younger than 4 years * participation in a clinical study during past 30 days * intake of antimicrobial, antiviral, immunosuppressive substances, salicylic medicaments (like Aspirin) * surgical intervention 3 months Prior to inclusion or planned intervention during the observation period * known Diabetes mellitus * known and treated atopy or Asthma * cystic fibrosis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * diseases of the immunosystem (like autoimmune disorders, degenerative illnesses (like AIDS or leucosis)) * Metabolic or Resorption disorders * Liver or kidney diseases * Serious health Problems (e.g. neurological Problems) * known allergies against compositae (e.g. camomile or dandelion) or any of the substances of the investigational product

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cumulative number of cold days4 months preventiontotal number of days with cold symptoms as per diary entries

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of duration and severity of respiratory episodes (single Symptoms and total symptom score)4 months preventionPatients will rate respiratory symptoms in a diary at occurrence of acute respiratory tract infections and the entries will be analysed descriptively for the two treatment groups
Incidence of respiratory tract infections (viral RTIs)4 months preventionOccurrence of colds and flu episodes
Acceptance in the view of the parents4 months preventionParents will judge the acceptance after 4 months (would you use the medicament again?)
Occurrence of adverse drug reactions4 months preventionOccurrence of adverse drug reactions will be analysed by descriptive methods
Tolerability in view of the physician4 months preventionphysicians will judge tolerability as bad, moderate, good or very good
Occurrence of adverse events4 months preventionOccurrence of adverse events will be analysed by descriptive methods
Efficacy in the view of the parents/children4 months preventionParents/children will give their subjective impression of efficacy by ratings bad, moderate, good or very good.
accompanying virus analytics4 months preventionnasal samples will be taken at occurrence of cold Symptoms and will be analysed for the presence of respiratory viruses
effects on the endogenous defense4 months preventionQuestion will be asked do you think that the prevention had the follwing effects on the endogenous defense in your child? (unchanged; improved; significantly improved)
Concomitant treatment and therapies4 months preventionConcomitant treatment and therapies will be coded using medical dictionary for Regulatory Agencies and will be analysed descriptively for the two treatment groups
Tolerability in view of the parentsAfter 4 months preventionparents will judge the tolerability after 2 and 4 months treatment as bad, moderate, good or very good

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026