Skip to content

Feasibility Trial Testing the Bionic Pancreas With ZP4207

The Bionic Pancreas Feasibility Trial Testing the Bionic Pancreas With ZP4207

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02971228
Acronym
dasiglucagon
Enrollment
13
Registered
2016-11-22
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-06-07
Last updated
2021-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

glucagon, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, Bionic Pancreas, diabetes, iLet, iPhone, Beta Bionics, Anti-hypoglycemia, Glucagon Analog

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Bionic Pancreas with ZP4207 (dasiglucagon\*) was feasible to improve glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. \*dasiglucagon is the proposed International Nonproprietary Name (pINN) for ZP4207

Detailed description

This was a single-center, open-label, 2-part, randomized cross-over trial. The trial was to enrol up to 20 adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and assess the safety and efficacy of the Bionic Pancreas (BP) using either the iLet or iPhone platform when used with the glucagon analogue ZP4207 (dasiglucagon) versus Lilly glucagon. In Part 1, patients participated in two 1-day treatment arms in random order (iPhone-based BP using ZP4207 (dasiglucagon) and iPhone-based BP using Lilly glucagon) according to a pre-generated randomization scheme. In Part 2, it was planned to enrol additional patients to participate in two 1-day treatment arms in random order (iLet using ZP4207 (dasiglucagon) and iLet using Lilly glucagon) according to a pre-generated randomization scheme. However, due to unavailability of the iLet, the sponsor decided to stop the trial upon completion of Part 1. Part 2 of the trial using the iLet was consequently not conducted. One day the BP will use glucagon analogue ZP4207 (dasiglucagon) and the other day the BP will use Lilly glucagon. Subjects will also receive insulin lispro through the BP on both days. The trial will be conducted at single center, the Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Center in Boston, MA.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin Lispro

Used to lower blood glucose. Commercially available by prescription and is indicated for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), but not for use in a bionic pancreas. Individualized dose based on metabolic needs and frequent monitoring of blood glucose.

DRUGZP4207 (dasiglucagon)

A glucagon analog not yet approved by the FDA. Subcutaneous administration in one BP arm.

DRUGGlucagon

A hormone normally made by the pancreas to raise blood glucose. Used to treat low blood sugar. Commercially available by prescription and is indicated for patients with T1DM in severe hypoglycemia, but not for use in a BP. Subcutaneous administration in one BP arm.

DEVICEiPhone-based bionic pancreas

An experimental device.

DEVICEiLet-based bionic pancreas

An experimental device.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beta Bionics, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Zealand Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with T1DM for at least 1 year, as defined by the American Diabetes Association 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Prescription medication regimen stable for \>1 month (except for medications not expected to affect trial safety or outcome, in the judgment of the investigator) 4. Diabetes managed using an insulin pump for \>=6 months 5. Patients in good health according to age (medical history, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms \[ECGs\], laboratory assessments), as judged by the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous exposure to ZP4207 or adverse reaction to glucagon 2. History of liver disease or current abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) 3. Renal failure 4. Anemia 5. History of coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure (class III or IV) 6. History of transient ischemic attack or stroke 7. Seizure disorder 8. Cystic fibrosis, pancreatitis, or any other pancreatic disease besides T1DM 9. Other endocrine disorders 10. Use of oral anti-diabetic medications 11. Electronically powered implants 12. Hypertension (≥160/100 mm Hg despite treatment) 13. Inadequate venous (vein) access as determined by trial nurse or physician at time of screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersUp to 50 daysSafety and tolerability of ZP4207 in the BP using either the iPhone or the iLet platform, as measured by adverse events (AEs), local tolerability of infusion site reactions, and clinical laboratory parameters. See adverse events section for results on AEs by system organ class and preferred term. Clinical laboratory parameters in terms of overall 'investigations' AEs and abnormal hematology parameters that did not resolve by the follow-up visit are presented below. LLN = lower limit of the normal range. Investigations and vital signs AEs by preferred term are presented in the AE section. Participants with infusion site pain and nausea measured by visual analog scales (VAS) are presented below; mean values are presented under secondary outcomes. For the VAS, individuals marked on a 10-cm line corresponding to the amount of pain or nausea being experienced, with low scores (cm) indicating no feelings of pain or nausea and high scores (cm) indicating high feelings of pain or nausea.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)16 hoursThe VAS scale was used to measure nausea at the end of the visit (16 hours) for patients in both treatment groups. The VAS was a psychometric response scale used to measure subjective characteristics of nausea. Patients marked a location on a 0 to 10-cm line that corresponded to the amount of nausea being experienced, with low scores (cm) indicating no feelings of nausea and high scores (cm) indicating high feelings of nausea. Actual values are shown. The maximum values in both groups were recorded at hour 6, the start of the exercise period.
Glycemic Regulation16 hoursMeasure glycemic regulation, including hypoglycemia exposure (percent of time spent with continuous glucose monitor \[CGM\] glucose\<60mg/dL)
Average Percent Glucagon Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.16 hoursSecondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.
Average Percent Insulin Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.16 hoursSecondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.
Average Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally in All Respects Based on Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Data16 hoursSecondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.
Average Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally With or Without a New CGM Glucose Reading Captured16 hoursSecondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.
CGM Reliability Index, Calculated as Percentage of Possible Values Actually Recorded by CGM16 hoursSecondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.
CGM Mean Absolute Relative Difference Versus Time-stamped Blood Glucose (BG) Values From Meter Download16 hoursSecondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.
Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)16 hoursThe VAS scale was used to measure pain at the end of the visit (16 hours) for patients in both treatment groups. The VAS was a psychometric response scale used to measure subjective characteristics of pain. Patients marked a location on a 0 to 10-cm line that corresponded to the amount of pain being experienced, with low scores (cm) indicating no feelings of pain and high scores (cm) indicating high feelings of pain. Actual values are shown. The maximum value in the Lilly glucagon group was recorded at hour 3.
Number of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Connectivity Issues16 hoursTechnical faults related to connectivity issues were listed
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - StatusUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - ChangeUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
T1-Diabetes Distress ScaleUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
Problem Areas in Diabetes SurveyUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
Hypoglycemia Fear SurveyUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
Impact of Daily Diabetes DemandsUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
Bionic Pancreas User Opinion SurveyUp to 3 monthsThis questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.
Number of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Calibration Issues16 hoursTechnical faults in terms of calibration issues were listed by patient.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In Part 1, it was planned to enrol 10 patients in two 1-day treatment arms in random order (iPhone-based bionic pancreas using ZP4207 or Lilly Glucagon) according to a pre-generated randomization scheme. The trial had a crossover design. In all, 19 patients were screened and 13 were randomized, but 1 patient withdrew before treatment. Thus, 12 patients were randomized and treated.

Pre-assignment details

Part 2 was designed to enroll up to 10 new patients in two 1-day treatment arms in random order (iLet using ZP4207 or Lilly Glucagon). However, due to unavailability of the iLet, the sponsor decided to stop the trial upon completion of Part 1. Part 2 of the trial using the iLet was consequently not conducted.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1, All Participants
In Part 1, 12 patients participated in 1-day treatment arms in random order (iPhone-based Bionic Pancreas using Lilly glucagon and iPhone-based Bionic Pancreas using ZP4207 (dasiglucagon) {experimental drug} with insulin lispro) according to pre-generated randomization scheme. Note: 13 patients were enrolled and 1 patient withdrew prior to treatment with either trial drug; thus, 12 patients were randomized and treated. Insulin Lispro: Used to lower blood glucose. Commercially available by prescription and is indicated for patients with T1DM, but not for use in a bionic pancreas. Individualized dose based on metabolic needs and frequent monitoring of blood glucose. ZP4207 (dasiglucagon): A glucagon analog not yet approved by the FDA. Subcutaneous administration in one BP arm. Glucagon: A hormone normally made by the pancreas to raise blood glucose. Used to treat low blood sugar. Commercially available by prescription and is indicated for patients with T1DM in severe hypoglycemia, but not for use in a BP. Subcutaneous administration in one BP arm. iPhone-based bionic pancreas: An experimental device.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyLogistical challenges01000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1, All Participants
Age, Continuous42.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.47
BMI27.36 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.301
Body weight80.28 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.357
Diabetes duration28.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.72
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
HbA1c7.18 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.462
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 1012 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory Parameters

Safety and tolerability of ZP4207 in the BP using either the iPhone or the iLet platform, as measured by adverse events (AEs), local tolerability of infusion site reactions, and clinical laboratory parameters. See adverse events section for results on AEs by system organ class and preferred term. Clinical laboratory parameters in terms of overall 'investigations' AEs and abnormal hematology parameters that did not resolve by the follow-up visit are presented below. LLN = lower limit of the normal range. Investigations and vital signs AEs by preferred term are presented in the AE section. Participants with infusion site pain and nausea measured by visual analog scales (VAS) are presented below; mean values are presented under secondary outcomes. For the VAS, individuals marked on a 10-cm line corresponding to the amount of pain or nausea being experienced, with low scores (cm) indicating no feelings of pain or nausea and high scores (cm) indicating high feelings of pain or nausea.

Time frame: Up to 50 days

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with AEs8 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with antibodies0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with edema infusion site reactions0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with erythema infusion site reactions0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with investigations AEs2 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with erythrocytes <LLN0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with hematocrit <LLN0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with hemoglobin <LLN0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with lymphocytes <LLN0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with infusion site pain (VAS)0 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with nausea (VAS)4 Participants
Part 1, ZP4207Safety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with vascular disorders1 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with nausea (VAS)2 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with AEs12 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with hematocrit <LLN1 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with antibodies0 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with infusion site pain (VAS)2 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with edema infusion site reactions0 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with hemoglobin <LLN2 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with erythema infusion site reactions0 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with vascular disorders1 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with investigations AEs2 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with lymphocytes <LLN1 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonSafety and Tolerability as Measured by Adverse Events, Local Tolerability of Infusion Site Reactions, and Clinical Laboratory ParametersParticipants with erythrocytes <LLN1 Participants
Secondary

Average Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally in All Respects Based on Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Data

Secondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Average Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally in All Respects Based on Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Data95.41 percentage of time functioning nominallyStandard Deviation 1.846
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonAverage Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally in All Respects Based on Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Data94.26 percentage of time functioning nominallyStandard Deviation 3.966
Secondary

Average Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally With or Without a New CGM Glucose Reading Captured

Secondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Average Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally With or Without a New CGM Glucose Reading Captured97.86 percentage of time functioning nominallyStandard Deviation 1.125
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonAverage Percentage of Time During Which the Bionic Pancreas is Functioning Nominally With or Without a New CGM Glucose Reading Captured96.31 percentage of time functioning nominallyStandard Deviation 3.891
Secondary

Average Percent Glucagon Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.

Secondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Average Percent Glucagon Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.96.73 Percentage of treatment deliveredStandard Deviation 4.021
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonAverage Percent Glucagon Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.97.01 Percentage of treatment deliveredStandard Deviation 2.851
Comparison: A paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test for comparison of means with normally or non normally distributed residuals, respectively, was used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normality of the residuals for each comparison. The residuals were obtained from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group as the fixed effect. If the p-value of the test was \<0.001, the non-parametric method was utilized to analyze the endpoint parameter.p-value: 0.850895% CI: [-3.55, 2.99]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Non-parametric method p-value was from a Wilcoxon signed rank text. The normality of the residuals was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, where the residuals were obtained from an ANOVA model with treatment group as the fixed effect. A patient was required to have data for both periods to be included in the pre-specified analysis for a given endpoint.p-value: >0.999995% CI: [-4.12, 3.13]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Average Percent Insulin Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.

Secondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Average Percent Insulin Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.98.36 Percentage of treatment deliveredStandard Deviation 1.114
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonAverage Percent Insulin Dose Amounts Calculated by the Bionic Pancreas Control Algorithm That Are Successfully Delivered by the Pump.97.73 Percentage of treatment deliveredStandard Deviation 2.051
Comparison: A paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test for comparison of means with normally or non normally distributed residuals, respectively, was used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normality of the residuals for each comparison. The residuals were obtained from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group as the fixed effect. If the p-value of the test was \<0.001, the non-parametric method was utilized to analyze the endpoint parameter.p-value: 0.184795% CI: [-0.36, 1.62]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Non-parametric method p-value was from a Wilcoxon signed rank text. The normality of the residuals was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, where the residuals were obtained from an ANOVA model with treatment group as the fixed effect. A patient was required to have data for both periods to be included in the pre-specified analysis for a given endpoint.p-value: 0.078195% CI: [-0.01, 3.09]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Bionic Pancreas User Opinion Survey

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Secondary

CGM Mean Absolute Relative Difference Versus Time-stamped Blood Glucose (BG) Values From Meter Download

Secondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207CGM Mean Absolute Relative Difference Versus Time-stamped Blood Glucose (BG) Values From Meter Download12.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.13
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonCGM Mean Absolute Relative Difference Versus Time-stamped Blood Glucose (BG) Values From Meter Download12.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.43
Secondary

CGM Reliability Index, Calculated as Percentage of Possible Values Actually Recorded by CGM

Secondary endpoint of bionic pancreas function, presented by treatment group. The analysis of bionic pancreas function endpoints was on an intention-to-treat basis.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207CGM Reliability Index, Calculated as Percentage of Possible Values Actually Recorded by CGM97.55 percentage of recorded valuesStandard Deviation 1.219
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonCGM Reliability Index, Calculated as Percentage of Possible Values Actually Recorded by CGM97.94 percentage of recorded valuesStandard Deviation 1.076
Secondary

Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Change

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Secondary

Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Status

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Secondary

Glycemic Regulation

Measure glycemic regulation, including hypoglycemia exposure (percent of time spent with continuous glucose monitor \[CGM\] glucose\<60mg/dL)

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Glycemic Regulation12.78 percentage of time pointsStandard Deviation 17.262
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonGlycemic Regulation17.60 percentage of time pointsStandard Deviation 14.08
Comparison: A paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test for comparison of means with normally or non normally distributed residuals, respectively, was used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normality of the residuals for each comparison. The residuals were obtained from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group as the fixed effect. If the p-value of the test was \<0.001, the non-parametric method was utilized to analyze the endpoint parameter.p-value: 0.251895% CI: [-19.63, 5.84]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Non-parametric method p-value was from a Wilcoxon signed rank text. The normality of the residuals was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, where the residuals were obtained from an ANOVA model with treatment group as the fixed effect. A patient was required to have data for both periods to be included in the pre-specified analysis for a given endpoint.p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-25.85, 10.68]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Secondary

Impact of Daily Diabetes Demands

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Secondary

Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The VAS scale was used to measure nausea at the end of the visit (16 hours) for patients in both treatment groups. The VAS was a psychometric response scale used to measure subjective characteristics of nausea. Patients marked a location on a 0 to 10-cm line that corresponded to the amount of nausea being experienced, with low scores (cm) indicating no feelings of nausea and high scores (cm) indicating high feelings of nausea. Actual values are shown. The maximum values in both groups were recorded at hour 6, the start of the exercise period.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 10.12 cmStandard Deviation 0.379
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 50.02 cmStandard Deviation 0.063
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 30.11 cmStandard Deviation 0.348
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 60.29 cmStandard Deviation 0.917
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 20.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 70.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 40.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Visit end (16 hours)0.11 cmStandard Deviation 0.348
Part 1, ZP4207Nausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Visit end (16 hours)0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 10.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 20.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 30.04 cmStandard Deviation 0.144
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 40.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 50.09 cmStandard Deviation 0.215
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 60.18 cmStandard Deviation 0.522
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNausea Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 70.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Calibration Issues

Technical faults in terms of calibration issues were listed by patient.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1, ZP4207Number of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Calibration Issues9 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNumber of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Calibration Issues11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Connectivity Issues

Technical faults related to connectivity issues were listed

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1, ZP4207Number of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Connectivity Issues3 Participants
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonNumber of Patients With Technical Faults Associated With the BP Including Cause and Resolution: Connectivity Issues2 Participants
Secondary

Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The VAS scale was used to measure pain at the end of the visit (16 hours) for patients in both treatment groups. The VAS was a psychometric response scale used to measure subjective characteristics of pain. Patients marked a location on a 0 to 10-cm line that corresponded to the amount of pain being experienced, with low scores (cm) indicating no feelings of pain and high scores (cm) indicating high feelings of pain. Actual values are shown. The maximum value in the Lilly glucagon group was recorded at hour 3.

Time frame: 16 hours

Population: The full analysis set (intent-to-treat population) consisted of all randomized patients: 10 patients received ZP4207 treatment and 12 patients received Lilly Glucagon treatment in a crossover design. Results are presented by treatment received. Only Part 1 of the trial was conducted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 10.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 50.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 30.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 60.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 20.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 70.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 40.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Visit end (16 hours)0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, ZP4207Pain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Visit end (16 hours)0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline0.01 cmStandard Deviation 0.0029
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 10.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 20.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 30.06 cmStandard Deviation 0.202
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 40.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 50.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 60.00 cmStandard Deviation 0
Part 1, Lilly GlucagonPain Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Hour 70.02 cmStandard Deviation 0.058
Secondary

Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Secondary

T1-Diabetes Distress Scale

This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Population: This questionnaire was not assessed as per protocol amendment 7.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026