Skip to content

Contribution of Hyperinsulinemia vs. Hyperglycemia to Insulin Resistance in Type 1 Diabetes and Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young, Type 2 (MODY2)

A Novel Cross-sectional Analysis of Insulin Sensitivity Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes, MODY2, and Normal Controls: the Contribution of Hyperinsulinemia vs. Hyperglycemia to Insulin Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02971202
Enrollment
33
Registered
2016-11-22
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2019-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insulin Resistance, Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young, Type 2, MODY2, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

o-glcnacylation, hexosamine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the key factors influencing insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and maturity onset diabetes of the young, type 2 (MODY2). Our study tests the hypothesis that decreased insulin sensitivity is primarily driven by chronically elevated insulin levels in the blood rather than chronic elevations in blood sugar.

Detailed description

This research will determine whether insulin resistance (IR) in T1DM is predominantly an effect of chronic hyperglycemia, as is commonly accepted, or a consequence of iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia in the peripheral circulation, as alternatively hypothesized. IR is a consistent but under-recognized finding in T1DM. Despite its independent contribution to micro- and macrovascular disease, its underlying cause has not been established nor have strategies to mitigate it been developed. This research will also characterize IR in maturity onset diabetes of the young, type 2 (MODY2), a population for whom IR has been inadequately studied to date. Insulin therapy in T1DM attempts to achieve euglycemia but does so in an unphysiologic way, by delivering insulin into the subcutaneous tissue as compared to physiologic delivery directly into the hepatic portal circulation. Although life-saving, peripheral insulin delivery in T1DM results in a loss of the normal insulin distribution; the physiologic state maintains insulin at 3-fold higher concentrations in the portal circulation compared with the peripheral circulation. IR in T1DM could therefore occur in response to peripheral hyperinsulinemia, a mechanism that would protect against hypoglycemia and ensure adequate glucose delivery to the central nervous system. MODY2 is a condition that results a mutation in the gene encoding glucokinase (GCK), which in turn causes a defect in β-cell sensitivity to glucose due to reduced glucose phosphorylation. This effectively raises the set point for insulin secretion in response to increased glycemia. Because MODY2 patients retain pancreatic insulin secretion, they usually require no insulin therapy and have a normal insulin distribution between the portal and peripheral circulations. We therefore hypothesize that IR in T1DM 1) is a homeostatic response to increased peripheral insulin concentrations resulting from peripheral insulin delivery and not significantly attributable to hyperglycemia and 2) results primarily from peripheral tissue IR (especially muscle) and not primarily from hepatic IR. Further, we anticipate that patients with MODY2, a population that has hyperglycemia without hyperinsulinemia, will have insulin sensitivity similar to that of otherwise healthy, nondiabetic individuals. To test this hypothesis, the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp will be used to assess IR in a cross-sectional study of 3 groups of subjects: 1. non-diabetic control subjects, 2. patients with well controlled T1DM, and 3. patients with MODY2 Key metabolic differences between these 3 groups will enable us to parse out the relative contributions of peripheral hyperinsulinemia vs. hyperglycemia to IR in T1DM and MODY2. Further, the proposed research will provide information on whether novel therapeutic strategies to restore the normal portal to peripheral insulin distribution can normalize insulin sensitivity (e.g. hepatopreferential insulin analogs, intraperitoneal insulin delivery).

Interventions

DRUGHyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp

Participants will undergo an 8-hour hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp to quantify insulin sensitivity at whole-body and tissue-specific levels. The following hormones will be infused in the study: * insulin (12 mU/m\^2/min \[3x basal\] for 150 minutes, then 40 mU/m\^2/min \[10x basal\] for 180 minutes) * glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min \[1x basal\] for 330 minutes) * somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min) These infusions will maintain a basal glucagon level and an increased insulin level in the blood that will be equal between all 3 cohorts.

DRUG20% dextrose

A variable infusion of 20% dextrose will be used to maintain plasma glucose within the euglycemic range throughout the hyperinsulinemic portion of the clamp. 6,6-H2 glucose will be infused at a low rate (0.033-0.22 µmol/kg/min) to determine glucose flux during the study.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 51 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for all subjects: \- BMI 19-28 kg/m\^2 Additional inclusion criteria for T1DM subjects: * Age 13-51 * T1DM duration 1-20 years * HbA1c 5.9-8.0% Additional inclusion criteria for MODY2 subjects: * age 13-51 * positive GCK genetic sequencing * HbA1c 5.9-8.0% Additional inclusion criteria for control subjects: * age 18-5.1 * HbA1c \< 5.5%

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Whole-body Glucose Utilization (Rd)End of clamp study (the study will last 8 hours)The primary outcome is the degree to which Rd (determined using isotopic glucose tracer techniques) during maximal insulin stimulation differs between cohorts.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity4 1/2 hours into clamp studyGlucose production (Ra) will be determined using stable isotopic tracer techniques. The extent to which Ra is suppressed at the end of 4 1/2 hours (when glucose Ra by liver has been submaximally suppressed) compared to basal (ΔRa) is directly proportional to hepatic insulin sensitivity.
Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity4 1/2 hours into clamp studyInsulin sensitivity at fat is directly proportional to insulin's ability to suppress lipolysis. Thus, we will determine the extent to which submaximal insulin stimulation (4 1/2 hours into the study) suppresses glycerol and non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFAs) compared to baseline. The extent to which these two metabolites are suppressed is directly proportional to insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue. Here the suppression of NEFA is taken as the secondary outcome parameter.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp: T1DM
Participants will undergo an 8-hour hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp to quantify insulin sensitivity at whole-body and tissue-specific levels. The following hormones will be infused in the study: * insulin (12 milliunit (mU)/m\^2/min \[3x basal\] for 150 minutes, then 40 mU/m\^2/min \[10x basal\] for 180 minutes) * glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min \[1x basal\] for 330 minutes) * somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min) These infusions will maintain a basal glucagon level and an increased insulin level in the blood that will be equal between all 3 cohorts. A variable infusion of 20% dextrose will be used to maintain plasma glucose within the euglycemic range throughout the hyperinsulinemic portion of the clamp. 6,6-H2 glucose will be infused at a low rate (0.033-0.22 µmol/kg/min) to determine glucose flux during the study.
12
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp:MODY2
Participants will undergo an 8-hour hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp to quantify insulin sensitivity at whole-body and tissue-specific levels. The following hormones will be infused in the study: * insulin (12 mU/m\^2/min \[3x basal\] for 150 minutes, then 40 mU/m\^2/min \[10x basal\] for 180 minutes) * glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min \[1x basal\] for 330 minutes) * somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min) These infusions will maintain a basal glucagon level and an increased insulin level in the blood that will be equal between all 3 cohorts. A variable infusion of 20% dextrose will be used to maintain plasma glucose within the euglycemic range throughout the hyperinsulinemic portion of the clamp. 6,6-H2 glucose will be infused at a low rate (0.033-0.22 µmol/kg/min) to determine glucose flux during the study.
10
Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp:Control
Participants will undergo an 8-hour hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp to quantify insulin sensitivity at whole-body and tissue-specific levels. The following hormones will be infused in the study: * insulin (12 mU/m\^2/min \[3x basal\] for 150 minutes, then 40 mU/m\^2/min \[10x basal\] for 180 minutes) * glucagon (0.65 ng/kg/min \[1x basal\] for 330 minutes) * somatostatin (60 ng/kg/min) These infusions will maintain a basal glucagon level and an increased insulin level in the blood that will be equal between all 3 cohorts. A variable infusion of 20% dextrose will be used to maintain plasma glucose within the euglycemic range throughout the hyperinsulinemic portion of the clamp. 6,6-H2 glucose will be infused at a low rate (0.033-0.22 µmol/kg/min) to determine glucose flux during the study.
11
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyPregnancy100
Overall Studyscreen fail after consent101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp: T1DMHyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp:MODY2Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp:ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants6 Participants11 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants10 Participants11 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants10 Participants9 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants10 participants11 participants33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants9 Participants8 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants1 Participants3 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 100 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 123 / 103 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 100 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Whole-body Glucose Utilization (Rd)

The primary outcome is the degree to which Rd (determined using isotopic glucose tracer techniques) during maximal insulin stimulation differs between cohorts.

Time frame: End of clamp study (the study will last 8 hours)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp: T1DMWhole-body Glucose Utilization (Rd)8.5 mg/kg FFM/min
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp:MODY2Whole-body Glucose Utilization (Rd)11.0 mg/kg FFM/min
Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp:ControlWhole-body Glucose Utilization (Rd)12.1 mg/kg FFM/min
Secondary

Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity

Insulin sensitivity at fat is directly proportional to insulin's ability to suppress lipolysis. Thus, we will determine the extent to which submaximal insulin stimulation (4 1/2 hours into the study) suppresses glycerol and non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFAs) compared to baseline. The extent to which these two metabolites are suppressed is directly proportional to insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue. Here the suppression of NEFA is taken as the secondary outcome parameter.

Time frame: 4 1/2 hours into clamp study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp: T1DMAdipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity122.4 μmol/L
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp:MODY2Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity382.3 μmol/L
Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp:ControlAdipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity392.7 μmol/L
Secondary

Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity

Glucose production (Ra) will be determined using stable isotopic tracer techniques. The extent to which Ra is suppressed at the end of 4 1/2 hours (when glucose Ra by liver has been submaximally suppressed) compared to basal (ΔRa) is directly proportional to hepatic insulin sensitivity.

Time frame: 4 1/2 hours into clamp study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp: T1DMHepatic Insulin Sensitivity1.9 mg/kg FFM/min
Hyperinsulinemic, Euglycemic Clamp:MODY2Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity2.1 mg/kg FFM/min
Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp:ControlHepatic Insulin Sensitivity1.7 mg/kg FFM/min

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026