Skip to content

A Comparison of Three Different Treatment Options for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

The Role of CARbohydrates in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (CARIBS): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Different Treatment Options

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02970591
Acronym
CARIBS
Enrollment
300
Registered
2016-11-22
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2022-04-29
Last updated
2022-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

FODMAPS, carbohydrates, metabolomics, microbiota

Brief summary

Irritable Bowel Syndrome is a common disease to which there is no curable treatment. Diet is considered to trigger symptoms associated with the clinical picture of IBS, and dietary treatment is thus believed to relieve the symptoms of IBS. As the disease is very heterogeneous in its manifestation, different treatment options might be indicated depending on the predominant symptom. To investigate the response to different dietary treatment options, a randomized controlled intervention trial will be carried out in adult patients (\>18 y) with IBS according to Rome IV criteria. The aim of this study is to compare the response to two different dietary treatments or optimized medical treatment.

Detailed description

The study is a randomized controlled trial comparing three different treatments during four weeks: 1. Combination of low FODMAP diet + traditional dietary advice (based on NICE recommendations) * Eat at regular hours; 3 main meals and 3 snacks * Eat in peace, chew the food properly * Peel all fruits and vegetables * Limit intake of spicy and fatty foods, coffe, alcohol, avoid fizzy drinks and chewing gum * Choose soluble rather than insoluble fibres * Avoid foods high in FODMAPs 2. Diet low in carbohydrates * 10 E% carbohydrates, 23 E% protein, 67 E% fat * Larger amounts of fish, shellfish, meat, egg, dairy products (lactose free if wanted) nuts, seeds, oil, vegetables * No sugary or starchy foods, e.g pasta, potatoes, bread, rice, most fruits * No specific consideration about FODMAP content 3. Optimized pharmacological tretament based on predominant symptom and previous experience with pharmacological treatmment. Pain/discomfort: * Pain: Amitriptyline 25 mg. Increase to 50 mg if needed * Episodic pain: Hyoscyamine 0,2mg 2x2; adjust dose if needed * Pain with diarrhea: Amitriptyline 25 mg. Increase dose if needed * Pain with constipation: Linaclotide 290 microgram 1x1 Constipation: * Bulking agent (Sterculia gum (Inolaxol) 1x1. Increase to 1x3 if needed * Osmotic laxative (Macrogol (Movicol) 1x1 * Linaclotide 290 microgram 1x1 Diarrhea * Loperamide 1x2 . Adjust dose if needed * Cholestyramine 1x1. Increase ever 3-5 d as needed * Ondansetron 4mg 1x1. Increase to 1x2-3 if needed * Eluxadoline 100mg 1x2 Primary endpoint: IBS-SSS reduction \>50 points

Interventions

OTHERTraditional dietary advice and low FODMAP content

Traditional dietary advice according to the Brittish Dietetic Association including reducing the intake of fermentable carbohydrates.

OTHERLow carbohydrate diet

Diet that contains a maximum of 10 energy percent of carbohydrates, 23 energy % proteins and 67 energy % fat.

Standard consultation by physician and if needed patients will receive medical treatment based on the most prominent symptom. Constipation: osmotic laxatives, linaclotide. Diarrhea: loperamid, bile acid binders. Pain: anti depressent, antispasmodics, linaclotide.

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* IBS according to ROME IV criteria, BMI 18-35, ability to communicate in Swedish, Gothenburg region resident

Exclusion criteria

* Heart, liver, neurologic or psychiatric disease or illness * Serious gastrointestinal diseases * Celiac disease * Diabetes * Other conditions or surgery that affects the gastrointestinal function * Hyperlipidemia * Food allergy or intolerance other than lactose * Adherence to a specific diet * Being pregnant or breastfeeding * Previously been treated with any of the intervention arms, including having tested all of the pharmacological treatment options of relevance for the symptom profile of the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion (%) of patients who respond to treatmentBaseline to 4 weeksA responder is defined as having an IBS-SSS reduction \>50 points @ 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in symptom severityBaseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsAbsolute and percentage change in IBS-SSS
Determinants for GI symptoms by IBS-SSSBaseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsGI symptoms measured by IBS-SSS
Determinants for GI symptoms by GSRS-IBSBaseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsGI symptoms measured by GSRS-IBS
Predictors of response to treatmentBaseline to 4 weeksPotential predictors include demographics, questionnaire data, microbiota, metabolites, immunology
Change in microbiota contentBaseline, 4 weeks, 6 monthsFecal microbiota analysis using 16S technique
Change in extra-intestinal symptoms and quality of lifeBaseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsAs assessed by IBS specific questionnaires
Change in metabolic profileBaseline, 4 weeks, 6 monthsMetabolomics in serum and urine samples
Adherence to allocated interventionBaseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 monthsIncluding compliance to dietary intervention during 4 weeks, and long-term adherence during follow-up

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative assessmentApprox. at 3 months follow-upPatient's subjective experiences related to the dietary intervention described by qualitative methods.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026