Skip to content

Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Amifampridine Phosphate in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS)

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amifampridine Phosphate in Patients With Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02970162
Enrollment
26
Registered
2016-11-21
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2018-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome

Keywords

LEMS

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effect of withdrawing amifampridine phosphate treatment from patients with LEMS. One half of the patients will continue to receive amifampridine phosphate and the other half will receive placebo, during this double-blind study.

Detailed description

This was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, withdrawal study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amifampridine phosphate in patients diagnosed with LEMS. The study was planned to include approximately 28 male and female patients. Prior to the study, patients were receiving unblinded treatment in the expanded access program (EAP-001). Patients had to be on a stable dose and frequency of amifampridine phosphate for at least 1 week prior to randomization into LMS-003. Screening and randomization (Day 0) may have been into a single visit. Patients who met eligibility criteria were randomized 1:1 to amifampridine phosphate (at the patient's optimal dose) or placebo on Day 0. Baseline assessments were obtained on Study Day 0, while the patient has been on open-label amifampridine phosphate and in relationship to the usual dosing schedule. Patients took blinded study medication on Day 1 through Day 3. On Day 4, a dose of blinded study medication was administered by the site study personnel. This was the same medication that the patient took on Day 1 through Day 3. The assessments listed below were performed following either the second, third, or fourth dose of medication taken on Day 4, and this should be the same dose after which Day 0 assessments were performed. For example, if the patient took their second dose of amifampridine in the clinic on Day 0 and had assessments started 40 minutes later, then on Day 4, that patient should be assessed after taking their second dose of investigational product (IP). Beginning with the next dose after all Day 0 baseline assessments were completed, the patient received IP through Day 4, with a clinic visit on the last day (Day 4) for assessments. The planned duration of participation for each patient was up to 12 days, including screening (up to 7 days), Day 0 assessments and randomization, and IP administration (Day 1 through Day 4).

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo Oral Tablet

Sponsors

Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female ≥18 years of age and currently receiving amifampridine phosphate for LEMS. 2. Diagnosis of LEMS by antibody testing or electromyography (EMG). 3. Completion of anti-cancer treatment at least 3 months (90 days) prior to Screening. 4. If receiving peripherally acting cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g. pyridostigmine), a stable dose of cholinesterase inhibitors is required for at least 7 days prior to randomization and throughout the study. 5. If receiving permitted oral immunosuppressants (prednisone or other corticosteroid), a stable dose is required for at least 30 days prior to randomization and throughout the study. 6. Female patients of childbearing potential must practice an effective, reliable contraceptive regimen during the study. 7. Able to perform all study procedures and assessments. 8. Willing and able to travel to study site and attend all clinic study visits. 9. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinically significant long corrected QT (QTc) interval on ECG in previous 12 months. 2. Seizure disorder. 3. Active brain metastases. 4. Unable to ambulate. 5. Pregnant or lactating females. 6. Any other condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, might interfere with the patient's participation in the study or confound the assessment of the patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scorechange from baseline in QMG score at end of day 4The QMG is a physician-rated test including 13 assessments such as facial strength, swallowing, grip strength, and duration of time that limbs can be maintained in outstretched positions. Each assessment is graded as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), for a total range of 0-39. A higher total score indicates a worse outcome.
Subject Global Impression (SGI) Scorechange from baseline in SGI score at end of day 4The SGI is a 7-point scale on which the patient rates their global impression of the effects of a study treatment (1=terrible to 7=delighted). The SGI was assessed by the patient or the patient's parent/guardian/caregiver if the patient was unable to complete the SGI. The SGI has demonstrated concordance with the physician's assessment of improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Day 4 Compared to Baselinechange from baseline in CGI-I score at end of day 4The CGI-I captures the Investigator's global impression of the patient's improvement or worsening from baseline status. The 7-point scale is scored by the Investigator based on changes in symptoms, behavior, and functional abilities. Each symptom is rated as 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), or 7 (very much worse). The total score can range from 0 to 49. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Triple Timed Up and Go Walk Test (3TUG)change from baseline in 3TUG at end of day 4The 3TUG is a functional mobility test that requires a patient to stand up from a straight-backed armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down in the chair. A modification of this is where the individual performs the test 3 times without pause, and the measurement is the average time required to complete each of the 3 repetitions. Based upon literature reports that a significant change in gait for a similar walk-test is an increase in time of more than 20%, this has been incorporated into the endpoint.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Amifampridine Phosphate
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days Amifampridine Phosphate
13
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days Placebo Oral Tablet
13
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAmifampridine PhosphatePlacebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Total
Age, Continuous54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Weight77.62 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.312
93.95 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.449
85.78 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.545

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 1310 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score

The QMG is a physician-rated test including 13 assessments such as facial strength, swallowing, grip strength, and duration of time that limbs can be maintained in outstretched positions. Each assessment is graded as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), for a total range of 0-39. A higher total score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: change from baseline in QMG score at end of day 4

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Amifampridine PhosphateQuantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) ScoreDay 47.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.94
Amifampridine PhosphateQuantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) ScoreChange from baseline0.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
Amifampridine PhosphateQuantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) ScoreBaseline7.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) ScoreBaseline8.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.43
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) ScoreDay 415.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) ScoreChange from baseline6.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.82
p-value: 0.0004Least square means
Primary

Subject Global Impression (SGI) Score

The SGI is a 7-point scale on which the patient rates their global impression of the effects of a study treatment (1=terrible to 7=delighted). The SGI was assessed by the patient or the patient's parent/guardian/caregiver if the patient was unable to complete the SGI. The SGI has demonstrated concordance with the physician's assessment of improvement.

Time frame: change from baseline in SGI score at end of day 4

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Amifampridine PhosphateSubject Global Impression (SGI) ScoreBaseline6.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Amifampridine PhosphateSubject Global Impression (SGI) ScoreDay 45.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Amifampridine PhosphateSubject Global Impression (SGI) ScoreChange from baseline to Day 4-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Subject Global Impression (SGI) ScoreBaseline5.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Subject Global Impression (SGI) ScoreDay 42.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Subject Global Impression (SGI) ScoreChange from baseline to Day 4-3.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [1.53, 4.38]Fixed effects linear model
Secondary

Change in Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Day 4 Compared to Baseline

The CGI-I captures the Investigator's global impression of the patient's improvement or worsening from baseline status. The 7-point scale is scored by the Investigator based on changes in symptoms, behavior, and functional abilities. Each symptom is rated as 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), or 7 (very much worse). The total score can range from 0 to 49. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: change from baseline in CGI-I score at end of day 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Amifampridine PhosphateChange in Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Day 4 Compared to Baseline3.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Change in Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Day 4 Compared to Baseline5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Other Pre-specified

Triple Timed Up and Go Walk Test (3TUG)

The 3TUG is a functional mobility test that requires a patient to stand up from a straight-backed armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down in the chair. A modification of this is where the individual performs the test 3 times without pause, and the measurement is the average time required to complete each of the 3 repetitions. Based upon literature reports that a significant change in gait for a similar walk-test is an increase in time of more than 20%, this has been incorporated into the endpoint.

Time frame: change from baseline in 3TUG at end of day 4

Population: The number and proportion of patients with a ≥20% increase in 3TUG average time

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amifampridine PhosphateTriple Timed Up and Go Walk Test (3TUG)1 Participants
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)Triple Timed Up and Go Walk Test (3TUG)8 Participants
p-value: 0.0112Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026