Skip to content

The Stanford Parkinson's Disease Plasma Study

The Stanford Parkinson's Disease Plasma (SPDP) Study: Intravenously-Administered Plasma From Young Donors for Treatment of Moderate Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02968433
Acronym
SPDP
Enrollment
16
Registered
2016-11-18
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2020-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease(PD)

Keywords

Young Male Plasma

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that young plasma infusions can be performed safely in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Secondary outcomes will include behavioral and laboratory data that will support the next study that will inquire whether young plasma infusions improve or slow the progression of cognitive, mood and/or motor impairment and rate markers of the disease.

Detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects over 1.6 million people in the United States and whose incidence increases with age, affecting over 1% of people over the age of 65. The neuropathological processes involved in PD are widespread throughout the brain, and are reflected in a constellation of motor, cognitive, mood and other non-motor symptoms. Treatments to date have largely focused on dopamine replacement strategies or deep brain stimulation, both symptomatic treatments. As neurodegenerative diseases progress, there are major changes throughout the body and brain. These changes are transmitted in the body via the circulatory system between organs, tissues and cells. Recent findings from multiple laboratories have shown that infusions of young plasma into aging rodents can have beneficial effects on cognitive functions. This suggests that the circulating components of plasma can improve cognitive and disease-relevant symptoms. This has motivated the field to treat multiple disorders with blood products and their constituent active components. The established safety of blood transfusions allows the investigators to test whether infusions of young plasma can ease the neurological symptoms in human subjects with neurodegenerative diseases. A related study of plasma infusions has already been completed at Stanford in patients with Alzheimer's disease (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02256306). The investigator proposes to test the safety and efficacy of transfusing young plasma into PD participants, in order to establish its effects on motor and cognitive functions in participants in a Phase 1 study. The successful completion of this study will inform the design of future, larger and multicenter studies with the goal to determine whether infusions of young plasma can ameliorate the neurodegenerative symptoms and underlying pathophysiology in Parkinson's disease.

Interventions

DRUGInfusions of young plasma

Participants will receive four twice- weekly infusions of 1 unit young plasma (male, ages between 18-25)

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of clinically probable or established Parkinson's Disease (MDS criteria) * Subject must be on a stable dose of dopaminergic medication and/or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) parameters for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and for the duration of the study * Subject must be competent to sign consent * Subject must be willing to commit to being available for testing and infusions for 6 consecutive weeks (2 testing consecutive weeks, 4 infusion consecutive weeks) followed by two visits a month after final infusion. * The availability of a study partner who knows the patient well and is willing to accompany the subject to all trial (optional if participant is able to consent and travel by self)

Exclusion criteria

* The participation in any other interventional clinical trial * The inability to travel to Stanford * Inability to walk without assistance in the off or on medication state * The clinically determined presence of dementia * A clinical suspicion/diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), Essential Tremor (ET) * Subject's pregnancy or likelihood of pregnancy within the next 6 months. * Subject's positive test results for Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or HIV at screening * Any other condition or situation that the investigator believes may interfere with the safety of the subject or the intent and conduct of the study * Subject's medical history of: Stroke Anaphylaxis Gout- may cause an increase in uric acid Prior adverse reaction to any human blood product Any history of a blood coagulation disorder or hypercoagulability Congestive heart failure Uncontrolled hypertension Renal failure Prior intolerance to intravenous fluids Recent history of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation immunoglobulin A deficiency (by history) * Subject's relation to medications or other treatments: * Any concurrent use of an anticoagulant therapy. Antiplatelet drugs (e.g., aspirin or clopidogrel) are acceptable. * The use of Inosine, which may alter urate levels * Initiation or change in the dosage of a cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine during the trial. A participant already on a cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine must be on a stable dose for at least one month prior to Screening. * Concurrent participation in another interventional treatment trial for Parkinson's disease. If there was prior participation, the last dose of the investigational agent must have been at least 6 months prior to Screening. * Treatment with any human blood product, including intravenous immunoglobulin, during the 6 months prior to Screening or during the trial. * Concurrent daily treatment with benzodiazepines, typical or atypical antipsychotics, long-acting opioids, or other medications that, in the investigator's opinion, interfere with cognition. Intermittent treatment with short-acting benzodiazepines or atypical antipsychotics may be permitted, provided that no dose is administered within the 72 hours preceding any cognitive assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Related and Unrelated Adverse Events8 weeksThe primary outcome measure is the number of adverse events across all participants that might be related to young plasma infusions as a novel treatment to Parkinson's Disease symptoms. Adverse events were categorized as probably, possibly, or not related to the study intervention.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)8 weeksChange in quantitative data of cognitive ability. Raw scores and normative scores were calculated for all measures according to standardized procedures across all 3 time points. The cognitive test battery included: * Trail Making Test Part A (0-92; lower scores indicate better performance) and B (0-300; lower scores indicate better performance) * Digit Symbol Modalities Test (Oral: 0-110 and Written: 0-110; higher scores indicate better performance) * Animal Naming Test (0-no maximum; higher scores indicate better performance) * Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) (0-no maximum; higher score indicates better performance) * CogStateTM Groton Maze Learning Test (GML) (minimum score is 0; lower scores indicate better performance) * Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-II (WASI-II) Block Design (0-71; higher scores indicate better performance) and Matrix Reasoning (0-30; higher scores indicate better performance)
Change in Quality of Life8 weeksQuality of life (QOL) changes were tracked using the self-report Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). The PDQ-39 includes 8 sub-scales: Mobility (raw score range 0-40), Activities of Daily Living (raw score range 0-24), Emotional Well-Being (raw score range 0-24), Stigma (raw score range 0-16), Social Support (raw score range 0-12), Cognition (raw score range 0-16), Communication (raw score range 0-12), and Bodily Discomfort (raw score range 0-12). Subscales scores are totaled then converted to a percentage to calculate the Total score (0 to 100, higher scores indicating the more problems). Ratings are based on participant experiences over the course of the prior month. Lower scores represent better quality of life for all scores.
Change in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 Weeks8 weeksThe second outcome measure is the change in the quantitative data of current motor movement ability. Patients completed a repetitive Wrist Flexion Extension (rWFE) task with both hands, off therapy at the baseline, immediate-post, and delayed-post visits. Patients were instructed to flex and extend their hands at the wrist as quickly as possible after a Go command was given and to stop when instructed. This movement was self-paced, lasted 30 seconds, and was measured using wearable sensors attached to the dorsum of each hand (Motus Bioengineering, Inc.). Variables of interest included the mean angular velocity (Vrms), the variability of mean angular velocity, (CV Vrms), and rhythmicity, defined as the regularity of the interstrike interval (CV ISI). MA = more affected; LA = less affected.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Infusions of Young Plasma
All participants will undergo neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, and kinematic assessments prior to receiving infusions of young plasma as the treatment. Participants will receive 1 unit of young plasma, twice a week over a four week duration. After the four weeks of plasma infusions, participants will undergo neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric and kinematic reassessments. No deception will be used. Infusions of young plasma: Participants will receive four twice- weekly infusions of 1 unit young plasma (male, ages between 18-25)
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInfusions of Young Plasma
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Related and Unrelated Adverse Events

The primary outcome measure is the number of adverse events across all participants that might be related to young plasma infusions as a novel treatment to Parkinson's Disease symptoms. Adverse events were categorized as probably, possibly, or not related to the study intervention.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Infusions of Young PlasmaNumber of Related and Unrelated Adverse EventsNumber of probably related AEs14 events
Infusions of Young PlasmaNumber of Related and Unrelated Adverse EventsNumber of possibly related AEs3 events
Infusions of Young PlasmaNumber of Related and Unrelated Adverse EventsNumber of unrelated AEs36 events
Other Pre-specified

Change in Quality of Life

Quality of life (QOL) changes were tracked using the self-report Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). The PDQ-39 includes 8 sub-scales: Mobility (raw score range 0-40), Activities of Daily Living (raw score range 0-24), Emotional Well-Being (raw score range 0-24), Stigma (raw score range 0-16), Social Support (raw score range 0-12), Cognition (raw score range 0-16), Communication (raw score range 0-12), and Bodily Discomfort (raw score range 0-12). Subscales scores are totaled then converted to a percentage to calculate the Total score (0 to 100, higher scores indicating the more problems). Ratings are based on participant experiences over the course of the prior month. Lower scores represent better quality of life for all scores.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Participants who completed the protocol are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeMobility17.33 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeCommunication5.33 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeSocial support5.57 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeTotal PDQ-39 Score71.81 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeCognition6.90 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeEmotional Well-Being10.60 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeActivities of Daily Living12.05 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeBodily Discomfort6.53 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quality of LifeStigma7.42 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeMobility16.47 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeActivities of Daily Living11.60 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeEmotional Well-Being10.13 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeStigma6.20 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeSocial support5.00 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeCognition6.87 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeCommunication5.20 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeBodily Discomfort5.27 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeTotal PDQ-39 Score66.73 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeMobility15.80 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeCommunication4.60 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeEmotional Well-Being10.00 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeTotal PDQ-39 Score64.40 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeBodily Discomfort5.80 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeSocial support5.33 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeActivities of Daily Living10.53 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeCognition6.80 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quality of LifeStigma5.53 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Change in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)

Change in quantitative data of cognitive ability. Raw scores and normative scores were calculated for all measures according to standardized procedures across all 3 time points. The cognitive test battery included: * Trail Making Test Part A (0-92; lower scores indicate better performance) and B (0-300; lower scores indicate better performance) * Digit Symbol Modalities Test (Oral: 0-110 and Written: 0-110; higher scores indicate better performance) * Animal Naming Test (0-no maximum; higher scores indicate better performance) * Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) (0-no maximum; higher score indicates better performance) * CogStateTM Groton Maze Learning Test (GML) (minimum score is 0; lower scores indicate better performance) * Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-II (WASI-II) Block Design (0-71; higher scores indicate better performance) and Matrix Reasoning (0-30; higher scores indicate better performance)

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Participants who completed the protocol are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)WASI-II Matrix Reasoning17.47 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Phonemic fluency (COWAT; Letters-FAS)43.13 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Trail Making Test-A32.53 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)WASI-II Block Construction34.73 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Semantic fluency (Animal naming)21.40 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)CogState (GML)71.47 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Symbol Digit Modalities Test - Written44.80 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Trail Making Test-B83.20 score on a scale
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Symbol Digit Modalities Test - Oral53.67 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Symbol Digit Modalities Test - Oral57.40 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Semantic fluency (Animal naming)22.40 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Trail Making Test-A29.27 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Trail Making Test-B72.87 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Phonemic fluency (COWAT; Letters-FAS)44.73 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)WASI-II Block Construction35.60 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)WASI-II Matrix Reasoning17.27 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Symbol Digit Modalities Test - Written47.07 score on a scale
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)CogState (GML)54.87 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Symbol Digit Modalities Test - Oral57.73 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)WASI-II Matrix Reasoning20.13 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Trail Making Test-A29.07 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)CogState (GML)60.53 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Symbol Digit Modalities Test - Written49.40 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Phonemic fluency (COWAT; Letters-FAS)48.07 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Semantic fluency (Animal naming)23.07 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)WASI-II Block Construction37.47 score on a scale
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Cognitive Ability (Neuropsychological Battery)Trail Making Test-B73.53 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Change in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 Weeks

The second outcome measure is the change in the quantitative data of current motor movement ability. Patients completed a repetitive Wrist Flexion Extension (rWFE) task with both hands, off therapy at the baseline, immediate-post, and delayed-post visits. Patients were instructed to flex and extend their hands at the wrist as quickly as possible after a Go command was given and to stop when instructed. This movement was self-paced, lasted 30 seconds, and was measured using wearable sensors attached to the dorsum of each hand (Motus Bioengineering, Inc.). Variables of interest included the mean angular velocity (Vrms), the variability of mean angular velocity, (CV Vrms), and rhythmicity, defined as the regularity of the interstrike interval (CV ISI). MA = more affected; LA = less affected.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Patients who completed the rWFE task at baseline and at both outcome visits and who had analyzable data are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA Vrms305.13 Degrees/sec
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA CV Vrms0.29 Degrees/sec
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA CV ISI0.16 Degrees/sec
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA Vrms414.47 Degrees/sec
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA CV Vrms0.16 Degrees/sec
Infusions of Young PlasmaChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA CV ISI0.09 Degrees/sec
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA CV ISI0.09 Degrees/sec
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA Vrms339.66 Degrees/sec
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA Vrms411.26 Degrees/sec
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA CV Vrms0.17 Degrees/sec
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA CV Vrms0.19 Degrees/sec
Immediate-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA CV ISI0.11 Degrees/sec
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA CV Vrms0.26 Degrees/sec
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA CV ISI0.17 Degrees/sec
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA CV ISI0.10 Degrees/sec
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA Vrms403.00 Degrees/sec
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksMA Vrms312.39 Degrees/sec
Delayed-post EvaluationChange in Quantitative Data of Motor Movements up to 8 WeeksLA CV Vrms0.18 Degrees/sec

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026