Alcohol-Related Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Mass Screening, Counseling, Primary Health Care
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of an implementation program specifically designed to increase alcohol screening and brief intervention rates in primary health care.
Detailed description
Alcohol is an important risk factor for several diseases, even when consumed moderately. Screening and advising at-risk drinkers to cut-down is a highly effective and cost-effective intervention when conducted in primary healthcare settings. However, these interventions are seldom implemented at the primary care level. Twelve out of the 26 primary health care units of the Dão Lafões Grouping of Primary Health Care Centres will be randomized to two groups: the intervention arm will receive the new implementation program; the control group will be on a waiting list for receiving the implementation program and will receive the intervention after the testing phase of the trial is completed. The study will last for one year, starting in January 2017. The implementation program was designed in order to overcome known barriers for implementing alcohol screening and brief advice in primary health care. The Behaviour Change Wheel and the Theoretical Domains Framework were used to pinpoint the constructs and behaviour change techniques most suited to address the barriers in order to achieve practice changes.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALImplementation program
Health professionals in the intervention arm will receive up to four training sessions in the first three months of the implementation period. Practice support will be continuously available throughout the project. Posters specifically designed for this project will be added to the primary health care units aiming to facilitate eliciting alcohol issues during the consultations, and to help professionals remembering to conduct alcohol screening and brief intervention. Leaflets to be handed-in to patients were also specifically produced for this project, aiming to aid professionals in advising at-risk drinkers to cut down. The research team will schedule with each primary health care unit regular visits for feedback on the progress of the program.
Sponsors
University of Cambridge
University of Stirling
Université Catholique de Louvain
Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde de Dão Lafões
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Primary health care units of the Dão Lafões Grouping of Primary Health Care Centres (family physicians/general practitioners, family medicine residents, practice nurses and receptionists)
Exclusion criteria
* Primary health care units with four or less general practitioners * Primary health care units that have a specific alcohol program already implemented
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol screening rate | 12 months | Percentage of eligible patients visiting the primary health care centre for an appointment with a general practitioner or nurse who were screened for alcohol use with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement of general practitioners attitudes toward at-risk drinkers | 12 months | Short Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Perception Questionnaire given before and after intervention. General practitioners are classified into a more positive or more negative attitudes group based on the answers given. The groups will be compared before and after. |
| Improvement in knowledge related to alcohol screening and brief intervention | 12 months | Four multiple choice questions. These questions will measure the theoretical knowledge of health professionals to key concepts related to alcohol screening and brief intervention. The groups will be compared before and after. |
| Improvement in barriers for implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention | 12 months | Level of agreement with 33 statements. Each statement can be mapped to a specific domain of the Theoretical Domains Framework. The groups will be compared before and after. |
| Utility of materials used in the trial | Through study completion, an average of 12 months | Level of agreement with 6 statements. Participants (intervention arm only) will be asked to rate the impact of the materials that were specifically produced to be used during the trial. |
| Brief intervention rate | 12 months | Percentage of patients who screened positive that were offered at least one brief intervention |
Countries
Portugal
Outcome results
None listed