Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Anemic Myelofibrosis Patients.

A Multicenter Phase II, Open Label, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Anemic Myelofibrosis Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02966353
Acronym
REALISE
Enrollment
51
Registered
2016-11-17
Start date
2017-03-31
Completion date
2019-02-15
Last updated
2020-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, Post-Polycythemia Vera-Myelofibrosis, Primary Myelofibrosis

Keywords

Ruxolitinib, anemia, Primary Myelofibrosis, PMF, Post-Polycythemia Vera-Myelofibrosis, PPV-MF, Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, PET-MF, adult, INC424

Brief summary

This was a study of treatment with ruxolitinib in patients who presented with transfusion dependent or independent anemia. Starting dose was 10 mg BID. This dose was maintained for the first 12 weeks of the study and up-titrated thereafter unless the subject met criteria for dose hold or dose reduction

Detailed description

This was a study of treatment with ruxolitinib in patients who present with transfusion dependent or independent anemia at screening defined as an hemoglobin \<10 g/dL with 10 mg BID starting dose with subsequent up titrations (maximum dose 25 mg BID) depending on safety and efficacy. This dosing approach for anemic MF patients will be systematically studied in this prospective multicenter phase II open label single arm trial to determine if the levels of spleen length reduction and symptom improvement are consistent with those reported in previous clinical trials with ruxolitinib in patients with anemia and doses according to platelet counts at the moment of treatment initiation, and whether this lower starting dose and up titration approach may minimize the initial hemoglobin and platelet declines and transfusion requirements.

Interventions

DRUGruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib was supplied in 5 mg tablets to be taken orally approximately 12 hours apart (morning and night)

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Written informed consent must be obtained prior to any screening procedures. 1. Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years of age. 2. Patients must have been diagnosed with PMF, according to the 2016 revised International Standard Criteria, PPV MF or PET-MF, irrespective of JAK2 mutation status. 3. Patients must have had palpable splenomegaly that is equal to or greater than 5 cm below the left costal margin. 4. Patients must have had hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL 5. Patients must have had a history of transfusions must have a documented transfusion record in the previous 12 weeks to baseline. 6. Patients must have had ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2. 7. Patients must have had a peripheral blood blast percentage count of \< 10%. 8. Patients must have recovered or stabilized sufficiently from any adverse drug reactions associated with prior treatments before beginning treatment with ruxolitinib.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who had prior treatment with any JAK1 or JAK2 inhibitor. 2. Patients who had known hypersensitivity to ruxolitinib or other JAK1/JAK2 inhibitors, or to their excipients. 3. Patients who had been eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (suitable candidate and a suitable donor is available). 4. Patients who had inadequate bone marrow reserve at baseline as demonstrated by at least one of the following: 1. ANC that is ≤ 1,000/µL. 2. Platelet count that is \<50,000/µL without the assistance of growth factors, thrombopoietic factors or platelet transfusions. 3. Hemoglobin count that is ≤ 6.5 g/dL despite transfusions. 5. Patients who had severely impaired renal function defined by: Creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min. 6. Patients who had inadequate liver function defined by any of these: 1. Total bilirubin ≥ 2.5 x ULN and subsequent determination of direct bilirubin ≥ 2.5 x ULN; 2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.5 x ULN; 3. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 2.5 x ULN. 7. Patients who were being treated concurrently with a strong (potent) systemic inhibitor or inducer of CYP3A4 at the time of Screening. 8. Presence of active bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infection which requires therapy. 9. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or other immunodeficiency syndromes such as X-linked agammaglobulinemia and common variable immune deficiency. 10. Acute viral hepatitis or active chronic hepatitis B or C infection. Patients with inactive chronic infection (without viral replication) can be enrolled 11. History of progressive multifocal leuko-encephalopathy. 12. Impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of ruxolitinib . 13. History or current diagnosis of uncontrolled or significant cardiac disease, including any of the following: 1. Myocardial infarction within last 6 months 2. Uncontrolled congestive heart failure 3. Unstable angina within last 6 months 4. Clinically significant (symptomatic) cardiac arrhythmias (e.g. bradyarrhythmias, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and clinically significant second or third degree AV block without a pacemaker) 14. Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would have jeopardized the safety of the patient or compliance with the protocol. 15. Patients who were undergoing treatment with another investigational medication or had been treated with an investigational medication within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study drug. 16. Patients who had a history of malignancy in the past 3 years, except for treated early stage squamous or basal cell carcinoma. 17. Patients who were unable to comprehend or are unwilling to sign an ICF. 18. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women 19. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they were using highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study duration inclusive of 30 day safety follow up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length From Baseline at Week 24Baseline up to week 24Percentage of participants achieving a 50% reduction in spleen length at week 24. For subjects with palpable spleen at baseline and non-palpable at post-baseline, the post-baseline spleen are imputed as 0. Subjects who had palpable, but missing spleen length at baseline is excluded from the analysis. Subjects with missing spleen length at Week 24 or who withdraw earlier from the study are considered as a non-responder. The 95% CI is computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length From Baseline at Week 48Baseline up to week 48Percentage of participants achieving a 50% reduction in spleen length at week 48. For subjects with palpable spleen at baseline and non-palpable at post-baseline, the post-baseline spleen is imputed as 0. Subjects who had palpable, but missing spleen length at baseline is excluded from the analysis. Subjects with missing spleen length at Week 48 or who withdraw earlier from the study are considered as a non-responder. The 95% CI is computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48baseline, weeks 24 and 48Participants who achieved a ≤ 50% reduction in spleen length at week 24 and 48 (reduction) and participants who had no increase greater than or equal to 50% (increase). The edge of the spleen shall be determined by palpation, measured in centimeters, using a soft ruler, from the costal margin to the point of greatest splenic protrusion. For subjects with palpable spleen at baseline and non-palpable at post-baseline, the post-baseline spleen is imputed as 0.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Myelofibrosis 7 Item Symptom Scale (MF-7) and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) at Week 24Baseline and week 24The MF-7 is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 7 items that measures the severity of seven of the most prevalent associated symptoms including: tiredness, early satiety, abdominal discomfort, night sweats, itching (pruritus), bone pain (diffuse not joint or arthritis) and pain under ribs on left side. Each item was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The MF-7 score is computed as the sum of the observed scores in the individual items to achieve a 0 to 70 score. There would be one recall period of 24 hours used in this questionnaire. A separate question on Inactivity was to be measured for severity of this symptom on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). This would allow the computation of the MFSAF v2.0 questionnaire results, as 6 out of 7 items in the latter PRO are in overlap with MF7 (they also share same 0-10 range Likert scale and ascending order, absent to worst imaginable).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Baseline up to week 48The PGIC is comprised of a single question intended to measure a subject's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where '1' equals very much improved and '7' equals very much worse.
Percentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Baseline up to week 96Percentage is based on number of subjects who are transfusion dependent at baseline. Transfusion dependence (TD) is defined as subjects receiving 6 or more units of transfusions 12 weeks prior to baseline. Transfusion independence (TI) rate is defined as subjects who are transfusion dependent at baseline and require no unit of transfusion for ≥ 12 weeks at any time during the study. Transfusion response rate is defined as subjects who are TD at baseline and have 5 or less units of transfusion for ≥ 12 weeks at any time during the study.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Russia, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Screening evaluations were performed to determine the eligibility for the study and establish a baseline prior to dosing.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
10 mg BID (2 tablets of 5mg) was self-administered as starting dose for all patients. This dose was maintained for the first 12 weeks and titrated up thereafter unless they had met criteria for dose hold or dose reduction. Dose was to have been increased or decreased per standardized dosing paradigm and not to have exceeded 25 mg bid.
51
Total51

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event4
Overall StudyDeath4
Overall StudyPhysician Decision3
Overall StudyProgressive disease2
Overall StudyProtocol deviation2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
31 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
Bone Marrow Fibrosis Grade at Diagnosis
Grade 0
0 participants
Bone Marrow Fibrosis Grade at Diagnosis
Grade 1
6 participants
Bone Marrow Fibrosis Grade at Diagnosis
Grade 2
26 participants
Bone Marrow Fibrosis Grade at Diagnosis
Grade 3
18 participants
Bone Marrow Fibrosis Grade at Diagnosis
Missing
1 participants
Constitutional symptoms
Absent
22 participants
Constitutional symptoms
Present
29 participants
Hemoglobin level88.6 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74
Palpable spleen length (cm) below costal margin11.7 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Platelets236.7 10E9/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 176.88
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants
Time since intial diagnosis32.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.16
Type of myelofibrosis
Post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis
11 participants
Type of myelofibrosis
Post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis
6 participants
Type of myelofibrosis
Primary myelofibrosis
34 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length From Baseline at Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving a 50% reduction in spleen length at week 24. For subjects with palpable spleen at baseline and non-palpable at post-baseline, the post-baseline spleen are imputed as 0. Subjects who had palpable, but missing spleen length at baseline is excluded from the analysis. Subjects with missing spleen length at Week 24 or who withdraw earlier from the study are considered as a non-responder. The 95% CI is computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 24

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length From Baseline at Week 2456.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48

The PGIC is comprised of a single question intended to measure a subject's perspective of improvement or deterioration over time relative to treatment. The PGIC uses a seven-point scale where '1' equals very much improved and '7' equals very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48

Population: Participants with PGIC response at that time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 Very much improved5 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 Much improved20 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 Minimally improved9 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 No change6 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 Minimally worse1 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 Much worse0 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 24 n=41 Very much worse0 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 Very much improved5 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 Much improved15 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 Minimally improved9 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 No change4 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 Minimally worse0 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 Much worse0 Participants
All SubjectsPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 24 and Week 48Week 48 n=33 Very much worse0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48

Participants who achieved a ≤ 50% reduction in spleen length at week 24 and 48 (reduction) and participants who had no increase greater than or equal to 50% (increase). The edge of the spleen shall be determined by palpation, measured in centimeters, using a soft ruler, from the costal margin to the point of greatest splenic protrusion. For subjects with palpable spleen at baseline and non-palpable at post-baseline, the post-baseline spleen is imputed as 0.

Time frame: baseline, weeks 24 and 48

Population: Full analysis set n: participants with a value at both Baseline and that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 ≤ -50% reduction n=4365.1 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 -50%, -25% reduction n=4311.6 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 -25%, -5% reduction n=439.3 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 -5%, 5% reduction, increase n=434.7 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 5%, 25% increase n=439.3 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 25%, 50% increase n=430 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 >50% increase n=430 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 remained non-palpable n=430 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 24 became palpable n=430 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 ≤ -50% reduction n=3650.0 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 -50%, -25% reduction n=3622.2 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 -25%, -5% reduction n=3616.7 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 -5%, 5% reduction, increase n=365.6 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 5%, 25% increase n=362.8 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 25%, 50% increase n=362.8 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 >50% increase n=360 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 remained non-palpable n=360 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants by Spleen Length Reduction or no Increase From Baseline Category at Week 24 and Week 48Wk 48 became palpable n=360 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96

Percentage is based on number of subjects who are transfusion dependent at baseline. Transfusion dependence (TD) is defined as subjects receiving 6 or more units of transfusions 12 weeks prior to baseline. Transfusion independence (TI) rate is defined as subjects who are transfusion dependent at baseline and require no unit of transfusion for ≥ 12 weeks at any time during the study. Transfusion response rate is defined as subjects who are TD at baseline and have 5 or less units of transfusion for ≥ 12 weeks at any time during the study.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 96

Population: Number of participants that were transfusion dependent at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 24 transfusion independent rate0 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 24 transfusion responder rate44.4 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 48 transfusion independent rate0 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 48 transfusion responder rate66.7 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 72 transfusion independent rate0 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 72 transfusion responder rate66.7 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 96 transfusion independent rate0 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants Transfusion Independency From Baseline up to Week 96Week 96 transfusion responder rate66.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length From Baseline at Week 48

Percentage of participants achieving a 50% reduction in spleen length at week 48. For subjects with palpable spleen at baseline and non-palpable at post-baseline, the post-baseline spleen is imputed as 0. Subjects who had palpable, but missing spleen length at baseline is excluded from the analysis. Subjects with missing spleen length at Week 48 or who withdraw earlier from the study are considered as a non-responder. The 95% CI is computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.

Time frame: Baseline up to week 48

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length From Baseline at Week 4836.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Myelofibrosis 7 Item Symptom Scale (MF-7) and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) at Week 24

The MF-7 is a disease specific questionnaire comprised of 7 items that measures the severity of seven of the most prevalent associated symptoms including: tiredness, early satiety, abdominal discomfort, night sweats, itching (pruritus), bone pain (diffuse not joint or arthritis) and pain under ribs on left side. Each item was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The MF-7 score is computed as the sum of the observed scores in the individual items to achieve a 0 to 70 score. There would be one recall period of 24 hours used in this questionnaire. A separate question on Inactivity was to be measured for severity of this symptom on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). This would allow the computation of the MFSAF v2.0 questionnaire results, as 6 out of 7 items in the latter PRO are in overlap with MF7 (they also share same 0-10 range Likert scale and ascending order, absent to worst imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Myelofibrosis 7 Item Symptom Scale (MF-7) and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) at Week 24MF-7 Total Symptom score51.1 percentage of participants
All SubjectsPercentage of Participants With at Least a 50% Reduction in Myelofibrosis 7 Item Symptom Scale (MF-7) and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) at Week 24Modified MFSAF v2.0 Total symptom score55.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026