Osteodensitometry
Conditions
Keywords
DXA, DMS, DMS Imaging, STRATOS, Horizon A, QDR4500A
Brief summary
The main objectives of this study are: * to assess the concordance of body composition measures between two bone densitometry devices: the STRATOS by Diagnostic Medical Systems (DMS) and the Hologic QDR 4500 A by Hologic inc. * to assess the concordance of body composition measures between two bone densitometry devices: the STRATOS by Diagnostic Medical Systems (DMS) and the Hologic HORIZON A by Hologic inc.
Detailed description
The secondary objectives of this study are: * the assessment of the consistency of body composition measurements at local level (arms, trunk, legs) between the Stratos and Hologic 4500 A, * the assessment of the consistency of body composition measurements at local level (arms, trunk, legs) between the Stratos and Hologic HORIZON A, * Monitoring the evolution of body composition in patients receiving at least two evaluations of DXA Hologic QDR 4500A on: patients treated for obesity or anorexia nervosa, sports people and other patient with prescription DXA and the assessment the consistency of body composition measurements in terms, * Monitoring the evolution of body composition in patients receiving at least two evaluations of DXA Hologic HORIZON A on: patients treated for obesity or anorexia nervosa, sports people and other patient with prescription DXA and the assessment the consistency of body composition measurements in terms.
Interventions
DEVICEHologic HORIZON A
A machine made by Hologic inc.
DEVICEHologic QDR 4500A
A machine made by Hologic inc.
DEVICEStratos
A machine made by DMS group.
Sponsors
Diagnostic Medical Systems
University Hospital, Montpellier
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent * The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * The patient is referred by a doctor for the performance of an osteodensitometry examination or sportsmen coming through a protocol where the nuclear medicine department is the investigator center
Exclusion criteria
* The patient is pregnant or nursing * The patient is unable to sign or refuse to sign the informed consent * The patient has a coronary stent or metal sutures in the heart * The patient has any type of metal objects in the body such as an artificial joint, a pin or a metal plate * The patient has a pacemaker or defibrillator * Patient weighing more than 200 kg or more than 2 meters high by 65 centimeters wide * The patient is using an insulin pump or with insulin-necked * The patient has undergone X-ray examination using a contrast medium such as barium in the previous seven days visit, * Patient who underwent an examination using x rays in the 15 days preceding the visit * Patient suffering from generalized edema
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lin concordance coefficient | Day 0 | In order to get a first idea of the adequacy of the two techniques measurements of the two bone densitometers, a calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients will be done. To supplement this data, a correlation study between the two techniques will be performed. For this we will use the Bland-Altman technique and a study of LIN concordance correlation coefficient |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactLaurent MAIMOUN, Phd.
Backup ContactSana EL OUAZGHARI, Bsc.
Outcome results
None listed