Skip to content

Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Child

Tolerability and Side Effects for a New Device in Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Child

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02965612
Enrollment
36
Registered
2016-11-17
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2016-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis, Grass Allergy

Keywords

Grass Allergy, Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Asthma, Paediatric

Brief summary

The recent interest that the Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) has aroused is due to the positive potential role that could be played, in particular in the forms of allergic asthma, because this method constitute the only intervention (unlike that pharmacologic) able to act on the same causes of the disease, altering the natural history. To achieve this the investigator has tried to use the specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), to which there are studies that, with scientific rigor, have demonstrated the benefits.

Detailed description

The Investigator proposes to compare, in children with allergic rhinitis and / or allergic asthma to grasses, the pain caused by the administration of the Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) via epicutaneous with autoinjector (INJEX) pressure without needle vs. the traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).

Interventions

DEVICEInjex

administration of Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) with car pressure injector without a needle

PROCEDURESCIT

administration of Specific Immunotherapy (ITS) via traditional subcutaneous

Sponsors

Bial Aristegui Italia srl
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
OPBG Contract and Research Organization
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mariella Enoc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent from both parents / legal guardian; * Of both sexes; * Between the ages of 5 to 18 sensitized to grasses Awareness for grasses will be established with prick test; * Rhinitis established according to the ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) guidelines and / or stage 1 or 2 Asthma according to GINA classification (Global Initiative for Asthma) * It may, or not, be going on ITS with s.c. administration

Exclusion criteria

* Children under age 5 and age\> 18 years; * Autoimmune diseases and immunodeficiencies; * Neoplasms; * Severe psychological problems; * Treatment with β-blockers; * Poor compliance, including language training; * Severe asthma uncontrolled by medication or irreversible airway obstruction (FEV1 less than 70% of the predicted value); * Severe cardiovascular diseases in which may be hazardous in the administration of adrenaline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prevalence of painmonthly for 6 monthquestionnaire of the pain scale monthly at each seat vaccination soon after every administration : the Wong-Baker scale for children aged 3 to 8 years and the classical analogue scale from 8 years and 1 day to 18 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prevalence of pain20 minutes after every administrationquestionnaire of the pain scale monthly at each seat vaccination: the Wong-Baker scale for children aged 3 to 8 years and the classical analogue scale from 8 years and 1 day to 18 years.
Incidence of procedure adverse eventswithin 24-48 hours after every administrationadverse events related to the different procedure used for the administration of the specific immunotherapy

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactAlessandro Fiocchi
agiovanni.fiocchi@opbg.net0039 06.6859.
Backup ContactChiara Mennini
chiara.mennini@opbg.net0039 06.6859.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026