Skip to content

Evaluation of a Night Spectacle Correction Concerning an Improvement of Mesopic Vision Quality

Evaluation of a Night Spectacle Correction Concerning an Improvement of Mesopic Vision Quality

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02965534
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-11-16
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2019-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia-Night Blindness

Keywords

night vision, mesopic visual acuity, aberrometry, mesopic spectacle correction, night myopia

Brief summary

Reduced quality of vision and glare in twilight or night are frequently mentioned complaints within the optometric examination. A reason for these problems could be a myopic refractive shift in dark light conditions, commonly known as night myopia or twilight myopia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether quality of vision in twilight or night could be improved by a spectacle correction optimized for mesopic light conditions. Moreover, objective refraction in large pupils measured by aberrometry was compared to subjective mesopic refraction.

Detailed description

After obtaining informed consent, aberrometry was performed in a darkened room (0.1 lux). Subjective photopic refraction and visual acuity were measured before light was turned off and mesopic refraction was obtained after a dark adaptation period of five minutes. Finally, frames and lenses were fitted by a centration system. Lens grinding was executed centralized by a grinding workshop. In the course of this study, subjects were randomly assigned to wear two glasses double-masked in turn. One with photopic subjective refraction data and another with mesopic subjective refraction data. Both were worn for 14 ± 2 days each. Follow Up 1: After two weeks, participants were asked for their subjective experiences with the first correction by a visual analogue scale questionnaire. After the evaluation, glasses were changed. Follow Up 2: Two weeks later, subjective experiences were evaluated again. After visual analogue scale questionnaire, subjects were asked to compare the two glasses concerning quality of mesopic vision and subjective safety level during night driving.

Interventions

DEVICESpectacle/Glasses

Sponsors

IGA OPTIC EG
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Applied Sciences Jena
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Visual Acuity at least 0.8 (5/6) * Binocular Vision

Exclusion criteria

* refraction more than sph +/- 6 D and cyl 2 D * Difference between habitual correction and actual refraction more than 0.5 D * Medication with an influence on visual system * Disease or eye disease with an effect on the visual system * pregnancy or other hormonal variances * influence of drugs * mental handicap

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Night MyopiaBaseline onlyValue of refractive shift (SE) when changing luminance from a photopic to a mesopic level. At Baseline, participants were not separated into arms as the Randomization Process was carried out at a later time point after participants picked up study glasses. Therefore, data are presented for All Participants in one Arm/Group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mesopic Visual Acuity ImprovementBaseline onlyDifference of visual acuity (monocular and binocular) in a darkened room (0.1 lux) after a dark adaption period of 5 min. with photopic spectacle correction (classic refraction obtained in photopic light conditions) compared to mesopic spectacle correction (correction of night myopia) Scale: logMAR visual acuity, using Landolt C optotypes. At Baseline, participants were not separated into arms as the Randomization Process was carried out at a later time point after participants picked up study glasses. Therefore, data are presented for All Participants in one Arm/Group.
Subjective Vision Comfort in Dark Light ConditionsTest Period (4 weeks)Evaluation of subjective perceived vision comfort with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate vision comfort with the tested glasses in dark light conditions? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (insufficient) to 100 (very good)
Subjective Vision Sharpness in Dark Light ConditionsTest Period (4 weeks)Evaluation of subjective perceived vision sharpness with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate vision sharpness with the tested glasses in dark light conditions? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (insufficient) to 100 (very good)
Subjective Glare Sensitivity in Dark Light ConditionsTest Period (4 weeks)Evaluation of subjective perceived glare sensitivity with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate glare sensitivity with the tested glasses in dark light conditions? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (no glare) to 100 (strong glare)
Subjective Driving Safety in Dark Light ConditionsTest Period (4 weeks)Evaluation of subjective perceived driving safety sense with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate driving safety sense when driving in twilight or night with the tested glasses? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (not safe) to 100 (very safe)

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
All subjects were included in Baseline and all investigations were obtained at these 100 subjects
100
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Aberrometry SE at small pupil OS-1.36 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.86
Aberrometry Spherical Equivalent (SE) large pupil OD-1.67 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68
Aberrometry Spherical Equivalent (SE) large pupil OS-1.58 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83
Aberrometry Spherical Equivalent (SE) small pupil OD-1.44 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
Age, Continuous27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Binocular photopic Visual Acuity-0.2 logMAR Visual Acuity
J0 Aberrometry OD large pupil-0.02 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
J0 Aberrometry OD small pupil-0.03 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26
J0 Aberrometry OS large pupil0.03 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
J0 Aberrometry OS small pupil0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29
J0 Subjective Mesopic Refraction OD-0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
J0 Subjective Mesopic Refraction OS0.03 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.27
J0 Subjective Photopic Refraction OD-0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26
J0 Subjective Photopic Refraction OS0.03 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.23
J45 Aberrometry OD large pupil0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
J45 Aberrometry OD small pupil0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.35
J45 Aberrometry OS large pupil0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
J45 Aberrometry OS small pupil0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
J45 Subjective Mesopic Refraction OD-0.02 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
J45 Subjective Mesopic Refraction OS-0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22
J45 Subjective Photopic Refraction OD0.01 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21
J45 Subjective Photopic Refraction OS0.05 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.23
Max. pupil size aberrometry OD5.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Max. pupil size aberrometry OS5.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Mesopic Visual Acuity with Mesopic Refraction Binocular0.0 logMAR Visual Acuity
Mesopic Visual Acuity with Mesopic Refraction OD0.0 logMAR Visual Acuity
Mesopic Visual Acuity with Mesopic Refraction OS0.0 logMAR Visual Acuity
Mesopic Visual Acuity with photopic refraction Binocular0.1 logMAR Visual Acuity
Mesopic Visual Acuity with photopic refraction OD0.1 logMAR Visual Acuity
Mesopic Visual Acuity with photopic refraction OS0.1 logMAR Visual Acuity
Photopic Visual Acuity OD-0.1 logMAR Visual Acuity
Photopic Visual Acuity OS-0.1 logMAR Visual Acuity
Pupil size in mesopic light conditions OD6.5 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Pupil size in mesopic light conditions OS6.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Pupil size in photopic light conditions OD4.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Pupil size in photopic light conditions OS4.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants
Spherical Aberration OD0.100 µm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
Spherical Aberration OS0.093 µm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14
Subjective Mesopic Refraction SE OD-1.42 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
Subjective Mesopic Refraction SE OS-1.37 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76
Subjective photopic Refraction SE OD-1.10 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
Subjective photopic Refraction SE OS-1.03 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1000 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1000 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1000 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Night Myopia

Value of refractive shift (SE) when changing luminance from a photopic to a mesopic level. At Baseline, participants were not separated into arms as the Randomization Process was carried out at a later time point after participants picked up study glasses. Therefore, data are presented for All Participants in one Arm/Group.

Time frame: Baseline only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsNight MyopiaRight Eye (OD): shift in SE-0.30 DStandard Deviation 0.2
All SubjectsNight MyopiaLeft Eye (OS): shift in SE-0.32 DStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Mesopic Visual Acuity Improvement

Difference of visual acuity (monocular and binocular) in a darkened room (0.1 lux) after a dark adaption period of 5 min. with photopic spectacle correction (classic refraction obtained in photopic light conditions) compared to mesopic spectacle correction (correction of night myopia) Scale: logMAR visual acuity, using Landolt C optotypes. At Baseline, participants were not separated into arms as the Randomization Process was carried out at a later time point after participants picked up study glasses. Therefore, data are presented for All Participants in one Arm/Group.

Time frame: Baseline only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
All SubjectsMesopic Visual Acuity ImprovementRight Eye (OD): visual acuity improvement0.1 logMAR visual acuity
All SubjectsMesopic Visual Acuity ImprovementLeft Eye (OS): visual acuity improvement0.1 logMAR visual acuity
All SubjectsMesopic Visual Acuity ImprovementBinocular visual acuity improvement0.1 logMAR visual acuity
Secondary

Subjective Driving Safety in Dark Light Conditions

Evaluation of subjective perceived driving safety sense with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate driving safety sense when driving in twilight or night with the tested glasses? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (not safe) to 100 (very safe)

Time frame: Test Period (4 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsSubjective Driving Safety in Dark Light Conditions57 scores on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 32
Spectacle Correction for Photopic Light ConditionsSubjective Driving Safety in Dark Light Conditions73 scores on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 25
Secondary

Subjective Glare Sensitivity in Dark Light Conditions

Evaluation of subjective perceived glare sensitivity with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate glare sensitivity with the tested glasses in dark light conditions? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (no glare) to 100 (strong glare)

Time frame: Test Period (4 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsSubjective Glare Sensitivity in Dark Light Conditions48 scores on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 32
Spectacle Correction for Photopic Light ConditionsSubjective Glare Sensitivity in Dark Light Conditions37 scores on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 31
Secondary

Subjective Vision Comfort in Dark Light Conditions

Evaluation of subjective perceived vision comfort with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate vision comfort with the tested glasses in dark light conditions? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (insufficient) to 100 (very good)

Time frame: Test Period (4 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsSubjective Vision Comfort in Dark Light Conditions60 scores on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 31
Spectacle Correction for Photopic Light ConditionsSubjective Vision Comfort in Dark Light Conditions73 scores on a scale (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 26
Secondary

Subjective Vision Sharpness in Dark Light Conditions

Evaluation of subjective perceived vision sharpness with the study and control glasses. Both glasses (study and control glasses) were tested for two weeks each. After the two weeks test, each of the glasses was evaluated. For evaluation a visual analogue scale questionnaire (Scale 0 - 100) was used. Question: How would you evaluate vision sharpness with the tested glasses in dark light conditions? Answer: visual analogue scale slider from 0 (insufficient) to 100 (very good)

Time frame: Test Period (4 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All SubjectsSubjective Vision Sharpness in Dark Light Conditions59 evaluation points (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 30
Spectacle Correction for Photopic Light ConditionsSubjective Vision Sharpness in Dark Light Conditions73 evaluation points (0 to 100)Standard Deviation 27

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026