Skip to content

Investigation of Novel Procedure for Methacholine Challenge Testing

Volumetric Versus Standard Two Minute Tidal Breathing Methodology for Methacholine Challenge Testing

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02965482
Enrollment
15
Registered
2016-11-16
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2017-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

methacholine, airway hyperresponsiveness

Brief summary

The study will compare a novel volumetric method (performed with the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer) with the standard two-minute tidal breathing protocol (performed with the Wright jet nebulizer) for methacholine challenge testing. The results will then give an indication as to whether the novel technique accurately assesses a given dose of methacholine with the new Aerogen Solo device. In addition, the reproducibility of test results with each method will be examined. Altogether, the findings from this investigation may provide means for better standardization of current testing guidelines.

Detailed description

Fifteen asthmatics will be recruited and tested at the University of Saskatchewan for this randomized, two-way crossover study. Two testing methodologies will be performed, the volumetric method with the Aerogen Solo nebulizer and the two-minute tidal breathing method with the Wright nebulizer. Participants will undergo four methacholine challenges plus a screening methacholine challenge. However, screening is omitted with participants who have completed a methacholine challenge in the last six months. Of the four study challenges, two will utilize the Wright nebulizer with the two-minute tidal breathing method outlined in the 1999 American Thoracic Society Guidelines for Methacholine Challenge Testing. The remaining two challenges will utilize the Aerogen Solo nebulizer with the volumetric method. The timing of the spirometric manoeuvers and the duration of each inhalation cycle will be consistent with both testing methods. Each challenge will be stopped when the participant's forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) drops by at least 20%. This allows determination of aPC20 (provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1), which will be converted to aPD20 (provocative dose). A minimum 24-hour washout period between challenges will be used.

Interventions

Roxon Medi-Tech, Montreal, QC, Canada

DEVICEAerogen Solo Nebulizer

Aerogen Ltd., Galway, Ireland

Sponsors

University of Saskatchewan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women aged 18 or older * Stable asthma * Baseline methacholine PC20 less than or equal to 16mg/mL * Baseline lung function equal or greater than 65% of predicted FEV1

Exclusion criteria

* Use of long-acting bronchodilators within 7 days of visit 1 * Pregnant or nursing women * Cardiovascular problems * Upper respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks of visit 1 * Allergy-induced asthma exacerbation within 4 weeks of visit 1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Methacholine PD20 values of two nebulizers, each with a different testing protocol2 weeksDo the nebulizers produce similar responses at the same dose

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparability of PD20 values with a single nebulizer over two methacholine challenges2 weeksDoes a nebulizer produce similar PD20 results with repeat testing

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026