Skip to content

A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab (TEV-48125) for the Prevention of Chronic Cluster Headache (CCH)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Dose Regimens (Intravenous/Subcutaneous and Subcutaneous) of TEV-48125 Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Chronic Cluster Headache

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02964338
Enrollment
259
Registered
2016-11-16
Start date
2017-01-17
Completion date
2018-07-18
Last updated
2021-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Cluster Headache

Brief summary

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fremanezumab (TEV-48125), in the prevention of CCH in adult participants.

Interventions

DRUGFremanezumab

Fremanezumab will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo matching to fremanezumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arms.

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participant has a history of CCH according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders - 3 beta criteria (Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society \[IHS\] 2013) for greater than or equal to (≥)12 months prior to screening. * The participant has a total body weight of ≥45 kilograms (kg) (99 pounds \[lbs\]). * The participant is in good health in the opinion of the Investigator. * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) whose male partners are potentially fertile (that is, no vasectomy) must use highly effective birth control methods for the duration of the study. * Men must be sterile, or if they are potentially fertile/reproductively competent (not surgically \[for example, vasectomy\] or congenitally sterile) and their female partners are of childbearing potential, must agree to use, together with their female partners, acceptable birth control. * If a participant is receiving Botox, it should be in a stable dose regimen, which is considered as having ≥2 cycles of Botox prior to screening. The participant should not receive Botox during the run-in period up to the evaluation period (12 weeks) where the primary endpoint is evaluated. * Additional criteria apply, please contact the Investigator for more information.

Exclusion criteria

* The participant has used systemic steroids for any medical reason (including treatment of the current cluster headache (CH) cycle within less than or equal to (≤)7 days prior to screening. The participant has used an intervention/device (for example, scheduled nerve blocks) for headache during the 4 weeks prior to screening. * The participant has clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, immunologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, cardiovascular, neurologic, hepatic, or ocular disease at the discretion of the Investigator. * The participant has evidence or medical history of clinically significant psychiatric issues determined at the discretion of the Investigator. * The participant has a past or current history of cancer or malignant tumor in the past 5 years, except for appropriately treated non-melanoma skin carcinoma. * The participant is pregnant or lactating. * The participant has a history of hypersensitivity reactions to injected proteins, including monoclonal antibodies. * The participant has participated in a clinical study of a monoclonal antibody within 3 months or 5 half-lives before administration of the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP), whichever is longer, unless it is known that the participant received placebo during the study. * The participant has a history of prior exposure to a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway (AMG 334, ALD304, LY2951742, or fremanezumab). If participant has participated in a clinical study with any of these monoclonal antibodies, it has to be confirmed that the participant received placebo in order to be eligible for this study. * The participant is an employee of the sponsor/participating study center who is directly involved in the study or is the relative of such an employee. * The participant has an active implant for neurostimulation used in the treatment of CH. * The participant is a member of a vulnerable population (for example, people kept in detention). * The participant has a history of alcohol abuse prior to screening and/or drug abuse that in the Investigator's opinion could interfere with the study evaluations or the participant's safety. * Additional criteria apply, please contact the Investigator for more information.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Overall Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Up to Week 12A CH attack was defined as a severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes with either or both of the following 2 categories: 1) at least 1 of the following symptoms or signs, ipsilateral to the headache: -conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation; -nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea; -eyelid edema; -forehead and facial sweating; -forehead and facial flushing; -sensation of fullness in the ear; -miosis and/or ptosis. 2) a sense of restlessness or agitation. Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline preventive medication use (yes or no), sex, region (United States \[US\]/Canada or other), and treatment as fixed effects and the baseline number of CH attacks as a covariate. Change from baseline in the overall monthly average number of CH attacks during the 12-week period after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 12 data) is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Week 4 and Week 12A CH attack was defined as a severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes with either or both of the following 2 categories: 1) ≥1 of the following symptoms or signs, ipsilateral to the headache: -conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation; -nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea; -eyelid edema; -forehead and facial sweating; -forehead and facial flushing; -sensation of fullness in the ear; -miosis and/or ptosis. 2) a sense of restlessness or agitation. Mean change from baseline in monthly average number of CH attacks during 4-week period after administration of first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 4 data) and during 4-week period after administration of third dose of study drug (based on Week 8 to 12 data) is reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Up to Week 12A maximum of 2 concomitant preventive medications for CH were allowed during the study. Participants must have been on a stable dose and regimen of the concomitant medication for at least 2 weeks before screening and throughout the study. Baseline data and the mean change from baseline in the overall weekly average number of days with the use of cluster-specific acute headache medications (triptans and ergot compounds) during the 12-week period after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 12 data) is reported.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Up to Week 12Baseline data and the mean change from baseline in the overall weekly average number of days oxygen was used to treat CCH during the 12-week period after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 12 data) is reported.
Number of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12The PPSI assessment was developed to measure pain intensity and was adjusted for CH symptoms improvement. Participants marked the level of CH-associated pain and indicated if pain is 1=much worse, 2=moderately worse, 3=slightly worse, 4=unchanged, 5=slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, or 7=much improved compared with 4 weeks prior. PPSI was defined as the change in pain that corresponds with a minimal rating of 5=slightly improved. Data at Week 1 was recorded on Day 7 in the electronic diary device at home. Week 12 data also included assessment at the early withdrawal visit for participants who discontinued the study early.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 12An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the Investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe as an AE that prevents usual activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the Investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0) up to Week 12A CH attack was defined as a severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes with either or both of the following 2 categories: 1) at least 1 of the following symptoms or signs, ipsilateral to the headache: -conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation; -nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea; -eyelid edema; -forehead and facial sweating; -forehead and facial flushing; -sensation of fullness in the ear; -miosis and/or ptosis. 2) a sense of restlessness or agitation.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsBaseline up to Week 12Coagulation parameters included: prothrombin time (PT) (seconds) and prothrombin international normalized ratio (INR). Shifts represented as Baseline - endpoint value (last observed post-baseline value). Shifts from baseline to endpoint were summarized using participant counts grouped into three categories: - Low (below normal range) - Normal (within the normal range of 9.4 to 12.5 seconds) - High (above normal range). Missing PT and prothrombin INR shift data are also presented. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs ValuesBaseline up to Week 12Potentially clinically significant abnormal vital signs findings included: pulse rate ≤50 beats/minute (bpm) and decrease of ≥15 bpm, or ≥120 bpm and increase of ≥15 bpm; systolic blood pressure ≤90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and decrease of ≥20 mmHg, or ≥180 mmHg and increase of ≥20 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure ≤50 mmHg and decrease of ≥15 mmHg, or ≥105 mmHg and increase of ≥15 mmHg; respiratory rate \<10 breaths/minute; and body temperature ≥38.3 degrees centigrade and change of ≥1.1 degrees centigrade. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersBaseline to Week 12ECG parameters included: heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB) and RR interval. Shifts represented as Baseline - endpoint value (last observed post-baseline value). Abnormal NCS indicated an abnormal but not clinically significant finding. Abnormal CS indicated an abnormal and clinically significant finding. Missing ECG shift data are also presented. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Number of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who reported treatment-emergent injection site reactions are summarized. Preferred terms from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 18.1 were offered without a threshold applied. Injection site reactions included injection site erythema, induration, pain, haemorrhage, bruising, hypersensitivity, swelling, rash, and flushing. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS)Baseline up to Week 12eC-SSRS is a questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. Suicidal behavior was defined as a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal ideation was defined as a yes answer to any one of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent, any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsBaseline up to Week 12Serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis laboratory tests with potentially clinically significant abnormal findings included: Alanine Aminotransferase (units/liter \[U/L\]) ≥3\*upper limit of normal (ULN); Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) ≥3\*ULN; Bilirubin (Total) ≥34.2 micromole/liter (umol/L); Blood Urea Nitrogen ≥10.71 millimole (mmol)/L; Creatinine ≥177 umol/L; Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (U/L) ≥3\*ULN; hemoglobin less than (\<)115 grams (g)/L (males) or less than or equal to (≤)95 g/L (females); leukocytes ≥20\*10\^9/L or ≤3\*10\^9/L; Eosinophils/Leukocytes ≥10%; Hematocrit \<0.37 L/L (males) and \<0.32 L/L (females); platelets ≥700\*10\^9/L or ≤75\*10\^9/L; blood ≥2 unit increase from baseline; urine glucose (milligrams/decilitre \[mg/dL\]) ≥2 U increase from baseline; ketones (mg/dL) ≥2 U increase from baseline; urine protein (mg/dL) ≥2 U increase from baseline. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Finland, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with a history of chronic cluster headache (CCH) were enrolled. Eligible participants entered baseline cluster headache (CH) attack information into an electronic diary device daily for greater than or equal to (≥)4 weeks during the Baseline Period.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 259 participants were randomly assigned with stratification based on sex, country, and baseline concomitant preventive medication use (yes/no) to either placebo, fremanezumab 675/225/225 milligrams (mg), or fremanezumab 900/225/225 mg treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo via an approximately 1-hour intravenous infusion and as 3 subcutaneous injections at Week 0 followed by placebo administered as single subcutaneous injections at Weeks 4 and 8.
84
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mg
Participants received placebo via an approximately 1-hour intravenous infusion and fremanezumab at 675 mg as 3 subcutaneous injections (225 mg/1.5 mL) at Week 0 followed by fremanezumab at 225 mg administered as single subcutaneous injections (225 mg/1.5 mL) at Weeks 4 and 8.
88
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mg
Participants received fremanezumab at 900 mg via an approximately 1-hour intravenous infusion and placebo administered as 3 subcutaneous injections at Week 0 followed by fremanezumab at 225 mg administered as single subcutaneous injections (225 mg/1.5 mL) at Weeks 4 and 8.
87
Total259

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event211
Overall StudyDid not meet criteria100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy030
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up103
Overall StudyNon-compliant with e-diary010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation010
Overall StudySponsor terminated study for futility121514
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject131

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFremanezumab 675/225/225 mgPlaceboTotalFremanezumab 900/225/225 mg
Age, Continuous45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.92
Number of CH Attacks During the Baseline Period33.9 CH attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.37
38.0 CH attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.88
38.6 CH attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.75
44.0 CH attacks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.78
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska native
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 participants4 participants16 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
9 participants5 participants18 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing Ethnicity
1 participants2 participants3 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
78 participants77 participants238 participants83 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
83 participants79 participants241 participants79 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants35 Participants107 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants49 Participants152 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 830 / 880 / 87
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 8322 / 8819 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 832 / 883 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Overall Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12

A CH attack was defined as a severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes with either or both of the following 2 categories: 1) at least 1 of the following symptoms or signs, ipsilateral to the headache: -conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation; -nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea; -eyelid edema; -forehead and facial sweating; -forehead and facial flushing; -sensation of fullness in the ear; -miosis and/or ptosis. 2) a sense of restlessness or agitation. Least Squares (LS) mean calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline preventive medication use (yes or no), sex, region (United States \[US\]/Canada or other), and treatment as fixed effects and the baseline number of CH attacks as a covariate. Change from baseline in the overall monthly average number of CH attacks during the 12-week period after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 12 data) is reported.

Time frame: Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Up to Week 12

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments by the Week 12 assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12-12.2 CH attacks/monthStandard Error 2.32
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12-8.7 CH attacks/monthStandard Error 2.26
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12-15.5 CH attacks/monthStandard Error 2.24
p-value: 0.274195% CI: [-2.8, 9.82]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.304795% CI: [-9.59, 3.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12

A CH attack was defined as a severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes with either or both of the following 2 categories: 1) ≥1 of the following symptoms or signs, ipsilateral to the headache: -conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation; -nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea; -eyelid edema; -forehead and facial sweating; -forehead and facial flushing; -sensation of fullness in the ear; -miosis and/or ptosis. 2) a sense of restlessness or agitation. Mean change from baseline in monthly average number of CH attacks during 4-week period after administration of first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 4 data) and during 4-week period after administration of third dose of study drug (based on Week 8 to 12 data) is reported.

Time frame: Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Week 4 and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments by the Week 12 assessment. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Change at Week 4-10.4 CH attacks/monthStandard Deviation 17.22
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Change at Week 12-12.6 CH attacks/monthStandard Deviation 25.72
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Change at Week 4-7.7 CH attacks/monthStandard Deviation 19.53
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Change at Week 12-3.1 CH attacks/monthStandard Deviation 34.42
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Change at Week 4-15.0 CH attacks/monthStandard Deviation 24.17
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks at Week 4 and Week 12Change at Week 12-17.9 CH attacks/monthStandard Deviation 25.98
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12

A maximum of 2 concomitant preventive medications for CH were allowed during the study. Participants must have been on a stable dose and regimen of the concomitant medication for at least 2 weeks before screening and throughout the study. Baseline data and the mean change from baseline in the overall weekly average number of days with the use of cluster-specific acute headache medications (triptans and ergot compounds) during the 12-week period after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 12 data) is reported.

Time frame: Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Up to Week 12

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments by the Week 12 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Baseline2.4 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 2.42
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Change at Week 12-0.7 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 1.34
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Change at Week 12-0.8 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 1.57
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Baseline2.4 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 2.18
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Baseline2.2 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 2.27
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Overall Weekly Average Number of Days With Use of Cluster-Specific Acute Headache Medications (Triptans and Ergot Compounds) Up to Week 12Change at Week 12-0.8 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12

Baseline data and the mean change from baseline in the overall weekly average number of days oxygen was used to treat CCH during the 12-week period after administration of the first dose of study drug (based on Week 0 to 12 data) is reported.

Time frame: Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0), Up to Week 12

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments by the Week 12 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Baseline2.2 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 2.59
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Change at Week 12-0.5 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 1.35
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Change at Week 12-0.5 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 1.35
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Baseline1.9 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 2.53
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Change at Week 12-0.5 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 1.09
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgMean Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average Number of Days Oxygen Was Used to Treat CCH Up to Week 12Baseline1.9 days of use/weekStandard Deviation 2.59
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12

The PPSI assessment was developed to measure pain intensity and was adjusted for CH symptoms improvement. Participants marked the level of CH-associated pain and indicated if pain is 1=much worse, 2=moderately worse, 3=slightly worse, 4=unchanged, 5=slightly improved, 6=moderately improved, or 7=much improved compared with 4 weeks prior. PPSI was defined as the change in pain that corresponds with a minimal rating of 5=slightly improved. Data at Week 1 was recorded on Day 7 in the electronic diary device at home. Week 12 data also included assessment at the early withdrawal visit for participants who discontinued the study early.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments by the Week 12 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 81 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 83 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 1213 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 48 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 135 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Baseline3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 412 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 128 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 112 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 45 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 40 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 430 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 424 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 815 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 84 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Baseline69 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 1221 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Baseline5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 810 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 818 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 1229 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 827 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 124 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 83 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 813 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Baseline5 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 42 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 49 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 83 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 1227 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Baseline1 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Baseline4 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Baseline72 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Baseline3 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Baseline1 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Baseline0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Baseline0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 13 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 12 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 12 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 131 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 120 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 14 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 113 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 111 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 41 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 42 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 424 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 417 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 418 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 413 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 82 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 84 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 818 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 812 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 812 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 822 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 122 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 125 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 126 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 1218 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 1211 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 1214 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 123 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 18 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 85 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Baseline0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 1212 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 824 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Baseline0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 1215 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 813 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Baseline3 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Baseline75 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 814 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Baseline4 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 132 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 815 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Baseline4 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 11 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 813 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Baseline1 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 1211 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 121 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 83 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 126 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 123 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 42 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 425 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 40 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 128 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly improved, Week 425 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 14 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 412 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately improved, Week 18 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 126 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much improved, Week 411 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Slightly worse, Week 15 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Moderately worse, Week 43 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Week 49 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Unchanged, Week 1231 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 80 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Much worse, Week 13 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants Who Perceived Improvement of CH-Associated Pain From Baseline as Measured by the Patient-Perceived Satisfactory Improvement (PPSI) Scale at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Missing, Baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the Investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe as an AE that prevents usual activities. Relationship of AE to treatment was determined by the Investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Severe AE3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious AE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE43 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE51 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Severe AE1 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE23 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious AE2 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation1 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE28 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE49 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation2 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious AE3 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Severe AE3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

Number of participants who reported treatment-emergent injection site reactions are summarized. Preferred terms from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 18.1 were offered without a threshold applied. Injection site reactions included injection site erythema, induration, pain, haemorrhage, bruising, hypersensitivity, swelling, rash, and flushing. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site hypersensitivity0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site erythema3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site rash1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site flushing0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site pain6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site bruising0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site induration3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site swelling2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site haemorrhage0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site pain5 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site hypersensitivity1 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site haemorrhage0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site induration6 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site rash0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site erythema7 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site bruising0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site flushing1 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site swelling0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site flushing0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site haemorrhage2 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site swelling0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site erythema5 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site induration6 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site pain2 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site bruising1 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site hypersensitivity0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsInjection site rash0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values

Potentially clinically significant abnormal vital signs findings included: pulse rate ≤50 beats/minute (bpm) and decrease of ≥15 bpm, or ≥120 bpm and increase of ≥15 bpm; systolic blood pressure ≤90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and decrease of ≥20 mmHg, or ≥180 mmHg and increase of ≥20 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure ≤50 mmHg and decrease of ≥15 mmHg, or ≥105 mmHg and increase of ≥15 mmHg; respiratory rate \<10 breaths/minute; and body temperature ≥38.3 degrees centigrade and change of ≥1.1 degrees centigrade. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values3 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal Results

Serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis laboratory tests with potentially clinically significant abnormal findings included: Alanine Aminotransferase (units/liter \[U/L\]) ≥3\*upper limit of normal (ULN); Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) ≥3\*ULN; Bilirubin (Total) ≥34.2 micromole/liter (umol/L); Blood Urea Nitrogen ≥10.71 millimole (mmol)/L; Creatinine ≥177 umol/L; Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (U/L) ≥3\*ULN; hemoglobin less than (\<)115 grams (g)/L (males) or less than or equal to (≤)95 g/L (females); leukocytes ≥20\*10\^9/L or ≤3\*10\^9/L; Eosinophils/Leukocytes ≥10%; Hematocrit \<0.37 L/L (males) and \<0.32 L/L (females); platelets ≥700\*10\^9/L or ≤75\*10\^9/L; blood ≥2 unit increase from baseline; urine glucose (milligrams/decilitre \[mg/dL\]) ≥2 U increase from baseline; ketones (mg/dL) ≥2 U increase from baseline; urine protein (mg/dL) ≥2 U increase from baseline. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 hematology abnormality2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 serum chemistry abnormality1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 urinalysis abnormality0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 hematology abnormality1 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 serum chemistry abnormality2 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 urinalysis abnormality0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 serum chemistry abnormality0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 urinalysis abnormality0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, and Urinalysis) Abnormal ResultsWith at least 1 hematology abnormality3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test Results

Coagulation parameters included: prothrombin time (PT) (seconds) and prothrombin international normalized ratio (INR). Shifts represented as Baseline - endpoint value (last observed post-baseline value). Shifts from baseline to endpoint were summarized using participant counts grouped into three categories: - Low (below normal range) - Normal (within the normal range of 9.4 to 12.5 seconds) - High (above normal range). Missing PT and prothrombin INR shift data are also presented. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at the timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-Normal70 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-Normal5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-High5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Missing2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Missing2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-Normal0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-Normal5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-Normal68 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-High2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-High3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-High4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-Normal7 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-High0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-Normal69 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-High2 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-Normal8 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-High4 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Missing5 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-High0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-Normal71 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-High2 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-High3 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Missing5 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Missing6 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-Normal69 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-High5 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-High1 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Normal-High5 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-Normal62 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Normal-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-Low0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Missing6 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: Low-High0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-High3 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: High-Normal6 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsProthrombin INR: Low-High0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint in Coagulation Laboratory Test ResultsPT: High-Normal11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

ECG parameters included: heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB) and RR interval. Shifts represented as Baseline - endpoint value (last observed post-baseline value). Abnormal NCS indicated an abnormal but not clinically significant finding. Abnormal CS indicated an abnormal and clinically significant finding. Missing ECG shift data are also presented. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at the timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / CS0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / Normal10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / Normal0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / NCS15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / Normal47 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersMissing3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / NCS0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / NCS8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / CS0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / CS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / NCS11 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / Normal46 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / CS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / Normal7 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / NCS20 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / CS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / NCS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / CS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersMissing4 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / Normal0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / Normal45 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / NCS14 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / NCS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / Normal8 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / CS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNCS / NCS12 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersNormal / CS0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersMissing8 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Assessment) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersCS / CS0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS)

eC-SSRS is a questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. Suicidal behavior was defined as a yes answer to any of 5 suicidal behavior questions: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt, and completed suicide. Suicidal ideation was defined as a yes answer to any one of 5 suicidal ideation questions: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent, any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS)0 Participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS)0 Participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Electronic Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS)0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 12

A CH attack was defined as a severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 minutes with either or both of the following 2 categories: 1) at least 1 of the following symptoms or signs, ipsilateral to the headache: -conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation; -nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea; -eyelid edema; -forehead and facial sweating; -forehead and facial flushing; -sensation of fullness in the ear; -miosis and/or ptosis. 2) a sense of restlessness or agitation.

Time frame: Baseline Period (from at least Week -4 to Week 0) up to Week 12

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments by the Week 12 assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 1240 percentage of participants
Fremanezumab 675/225/225 mgPercentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 1240 percentage of participants
Fremanezumab 900/225/225 mgPercentage of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Average Number of CH Attacks Up to Week 1245 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026