Skip to content

Efficacy of Mirasol-treated Apheresis Platelets in Patients With Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia

Clinical Effectiveness of Conventional Versus Mirasol-treated Apheresis Platelets in Patients With Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02964325
Acronym
MIPLATE
Enrollment
422
Registered
2016-11-16
Start date
2017-05-05
Completion date
2020-06-25
Last updated
2021-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematologic Malignancies, Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia

Keywords

hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia, hematologic malignancies, thrombocytopenia, platelet therapy, apheresis, pathogen reduction therapy

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, controlled, randomized, non-inferiority study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of Conventional versus Mirasol-treated apheresis platelets in subjects with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia who are expected to have platelet count(s) ≤ 10,000/μL requiring ≥ 2 platelet transfusions.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to Mirasol-treated platelets (test platelets) or to conventional, untreated platelets (control platelets). The blood centers will collect the apheresis donor platelets and supply the test platelets to the hospital sites for transfusion into patients. Hospital sites will order control platelets as per their normal process, from their standard vendor. The target population for the MIPLATE study are patients with hematologic malignancies with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia who are expected to have platelet (PLT) count(s) of ≤ 10,000/μL requiring ≥ 2 PLT transfusions. The primary objective of MIPLATE is to determine if the hemostatic efficacy of Mirasol-treated plasma stored Trima Accel® Aph PLTs are non-inferior to Conventional plasma stored Aph PLTs in subjects with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia requiring PLT transfusions. The secondary objectives include comparing other efficacy and safety endpoints between the treatment groups. Subjects with hematologic malignancies with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia are anticipated to experience a transfusion episode where they will require PLT transfusion support until bone marrow recovery. During this period all PLT transfusions required for a study subject will be given according to the subject's treatment allocation for 28 days after the initial PLT transfusion OR until transfusion independence (10 days without PLT transfusion) prior to Day 28. Additionally, serum samples for HLA antibody testing will be collected on Days 14, 28 and 56. At a minimum, the initial post-randomization prophylactic PLT transfusion will be initiated for a PLT count ≤ 10,000/µL. Thereafter, indications for PLT transfusions may be PLT count-related prophylaxis, intervention-related prophylaxis, or therapeutic (treatment of active bleeding) as determined by the treating physician(s). The indication(s) for the transfusion(s) will be captured.

Interventions

DEVICEMirasol platelets (MIR PLTs)

The final product to be transfused to the subject will be leukoreduced (LR), apheresis (Aph) single-donor platelets (PLTs) at the standard therapeutic dose of 1 unit of Aph PLTs containing ≥ 3.0 × 1.0E11 PLTs. MIR PLTs will be treated with the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system.

DEVICEReference platelets (REF PLTs)

The final product to be transfused to the subject will be LR-Aph single-donor PLTs at the standard therapeutic dose of 1 unit of Aph PLTs containing ≥ 3.0 × 1.0E11 PLTs.

Sponsors

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
CollaboratorFED
Terumo BCTbio
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Though this is not a blinded study, treatment assignment is obtained through electronic system and should not be shared those performing the primary outcome assessment or assessors of adverse events.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Weight \> 10 kg (22 lbs) 2. Subject has a hematologic malignancy with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia and is expected to have PLT count(s) ≤ 10,000/µL requiring ≥ 2 PLT transfusions 3. Laboratory results within 5 days prior to anticipated initiation of the first post randomization PLT transfusion: 1. Prothrombin time (PT) and/or international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.3 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) 2. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤ 1.3 × ULN 3. Fibrinogen ≥ 100 mg/dL 4. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and agree to practice a medically acceptable contraception regimen for the study duration. Women who are postmenopausal for at least 1 year (\> 12 months since last menses) or are surgically sterilized do not require this test 5. IC from the subject or assent from the subject and consent from a parent or guardian, if the subject is \< 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

1. Treatment with pathogen-reduced blood products within previous 6 months 2. Subject has been previously enrolled in this study and received at least 1 per protocol PLT transfusion 3. a.) Subject is receiving therapeutic doses of antiplatelet agents, antifibrinolytics, and/or PLT specific growth factors within 10 days prior to randomization or b.) Subject is receiving therapeutic doses of anticoagulant, pro-coagulant or antithrombotic agents within 10 days prior to randomization. Subjects can be included if receiving the following: prophylactic dosing of anticoagulants (heparin, any low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, or fondaparinux), anticoagulants/thrombolytic agents used to maintain or re-establish the patency of catheters (heparin flushes or tissue-plasminogen activase \[TPA\], therapeutic doses of anticoagulants with a half-life of \< 24 hours if it will be discontinued at least 24 hours prior to the first study transfusion, single periprocedural doses of anticoagulants with a half-life of \< 24 hours or low dose aspirin (81 mg per day) 4. Subject has ≥ grade 2 bleeding at the time of randomization 5. Planned administration of bedside LR PLT transfusion(s) 6. Presently with or a history of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), or hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) 7. HLA and/or HPA-alloimmunization and/or platelet refractory as determined by the investigator 8. Hypersplenism as evidenced by splenomegaly based on investigator assessment at baseline 9. History or diagnosis of a disease affecting hemostasis 10. Currently taking, or participating in a clinical study involving PLT substitutes, PLT growth factors, or pharmacologic agents intended to enhance (i.e, antifibrinolytic agents) or decrease PLT hemostatic function 11. Acute or chronic medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would impair the ability of the subject to receive protocol treatment 12. Subject is pregnant or lactating 13. Inability of the subject to comply with study procedures and/or follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingFrom the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.Number of days of Grade 2 or higher bleeding recorded from treatment start date through 28 days following the first transfusion, until transfusion independence (10 days without PLT transfusion) prior to Day 28, or study termination, whichever occurred first. Subjects who obtained transfusion independence prior to Day 28 were assumed to have zero bleeding events between the date of transfusion independence and Day 28. Observed and simulated data for off-protocol transfusion intervals were included.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) AlloimmunizationHLA antibodies were measured at Baseline and Days 14, 28, and 56.The outcome was the development of a new HLA Class I antibodies among subjects negative at baseline within each treatment group. Positivity for Class I HLA antibodies was determined by the 5 SD normalized background ratio cutoffs assay threshold (\>59.2, LABScreen Mixed LSM12, One Lambda).
Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 2 BleedingFrom the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.The number and percentage of subjects with at least 1 day of ≥ Grade 2 bleeding from Day 0 through Day 27 (or until transfusion independence was achieved) by treatment group
Number and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingFrom the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.The time to first ≥ Grade 2 bleeding was analyzed using a log-rank test comparing survival curves stratified by treatment group.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With PLT RefractorinessFrom the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.The number and percentage of subjects with PLT refractoriness defined as 2 sequential transfusions, each with corrected count increments (CCIs) \< 5000 measured 1 hour post-transfusion.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Immune Platelet RefractorinessInitial post-randomization platelet transfusion through high Class I HLA development.The number and percentage of subjects with PLT refractoriness for each treatment group. Subjects were defined as immune PLT refractoriness based on 2 sequential transfusion episodes, each with CCIs \< 5000 measured 1 hour post transfusion, and who also had a positive antibody test within 14 days before or after the onset of PLT refractoriness.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 3 BleedingFrom the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.The number and percentage of subjects with at least 1 day of ≥ Grade 3 bleeding from Day 0 through Day 27 (or until transfusion independence was achieved).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)From initial post-randomization PLT transfusion through 72 hours following the last per protocol PLT transfusion.UADEs are identified as treatment emergent adverse events reported by the investigator as serious, unanticipated, at least possibly related to study device or at least possibly related to treatment. UADEs were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 19.1

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred at 11 hospital sites within the US. Enrollment occurred between 05 MAY 2017 and 07 APR 2020.

Pre-assignment details

Full Analysis Set (FAS) - all randomized subjects. Safety Set (SS) - randomized subjects who received at least 1 PLT transfusion post-randomization, independent of the outcome or successful completions of the procedure. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) - all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group. 422 subjects consented, 92 screen failed, 330 FAS, 28 received no transfusion, 302 SS, 5 received no transfusion per assigned group, 297 mITT.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MIRASOL
Randomized to leukoreduced, Trima Accel® apheresis platelets stored in 100% plasma, pathogen reduced with the Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology (PRT) System Mirasol platelets (MIR PLTs): The final product to be transfused to the subject will be leukoreduced (LR), apheresis (Aph) single-donor platelets (PLTs) at the standard therapeutic dose of 1 unit of Aph PLTs containing ≥ 3.0 × 1.0E11 PLTs. MIR PLTs will be treated with the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology system.
141
CONTROL
Randomized to leukoreduced, apheresis platelets stored in 100% plasma Reference platelets (REF PLTs): The final product to be transfused to the subject will be LR-Aph single-donor PLTs at the standard therapeutic dose of 1 unit of Aph PLTs containing ≥ 3.0 × 1.0E11 PLTs.
161
Total302

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath13
Overall StudyDid not require PLT transfusion, had HLA positive1012
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up33
Overall StudyPhysician Decision54
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMIRASOLCONTROLTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
6 Participants10 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
41 Participants51 Participants92 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
94 Participants100 Participants194 Participants
Age, Continuous54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.32
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.24
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.34
Body Surface Area (BSA)1.975 square meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3157
1.934 square meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3613
1.953 square meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3408
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
130 Participants147 Participants277 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Height (cm)170.29 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.039
167.88 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.472
169.01 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.972
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
16 Participants10 Participants26 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
120 Participants137 Participants257 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
141 Participants161 Participants302 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants56 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants105 Participants193 Participants
Weight (kg)86.96 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.876
84.95 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.4
85.89 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.68

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1413 / 161
other
Total, other adverse events
97 / 141100 / 161
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 14133 / 161

Outcome results

Primary

Days of ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding

Number of days of Grade 2 or higher bleeding recorded from treatment start date through 28 days following the first transfusion, until transfusion independence (10 days without PLT transfusion) prior to Day 28, or study termination, whichever occurred first. Subjects who obtained transfusion independence prior to Day 28 were assumed to have zero bleeding events between the date of transfusion independence and Day 28. Observed and simulated data for off-protocol transfusion intervals were included.

Time frame: From the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set was used for this analysis. Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set = all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MIRASOLDays of ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding1.7 DaysStandard Deviation 4.05
CONTROLDays of ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding0.6 DaysStandard Deviation 1.51
Comparison: The MIRASOL and CONTROL groups were compared with respect to the number of days of WHO ≥ Grade 2 bleeding. This was carried out by fitting a negative binomial regression model with an offset defined as the natural logarithm (LN) of the number of days that bleeding was assessed in order to account for the fact that subjects had different numbers of bleeding assessment days.95% CI: [1.67, 4.67]
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding

The time to first ≥ Grade 2 bleeding was analyzed using a log-rank test comparing survival curves stratified by treatment group.

Time frame: From the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.

Population: The mITT Set was used for this analysis. Subjects that did not experience a ≥ Grade 2 bleed were censored at Day 27 or at date of transfusion independence (10th day without a PLT transfusion prior to last follow-up day or Day 27, whichever occurred earlier), where appropriate. Subjects that did not complete the study or were lost to follow-up were censored on the date of their last study visit in the treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 1272 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 2011 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 892 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 245 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 1633 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 284 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 4115 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 2811 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 4128 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 8110 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 1285 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 1648 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 2027 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects at the First Timepoint of ≥ Grade 2 BleedingDay 2413 Participants
p-value: 0.07Log-rank test
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding

The number and percentage of subjects with at least 1 day of ≥ Grade 2 bleeding from Day 0 through Day 27 (or until transfusion independence was achieved) by treatment group

Time frame: From the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set was used for this analysis. Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set = all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding58 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 2 Bleeding46 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was H0: pt/pc \> 1.2 (ie, MIRASOL had more than a 20% higher probability of a patient experiencing at least one WHO ≥ Grade 2 bleed compared to CONTROL).p-value: 0.727495% CI: [0.97, 1.81]Wald Non-inferiority Test
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 3 Bleeding

The number and percentage of subjects with at least 1 day of ≥ Grade 3 bleeding from Day 0 through Day 27 (or until transfusion independence was achieved).

Time frame: From the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set was used for this analysis. Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set = all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 3 Bleeding6 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With ≥ Grade 3 Bleeding2 Participants
p-value: 0.1649Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization

The outcome was the development of a new HLA Class I antibodies among subjects negative at baseline within each treatment group. Positivity for Class I HLA antibodies was determined by the 5 SD normalized background ratio cutoffs assay threshold (\>59.2, LABScreen Mixed LSM12, One Lambda).

Time frame: HLA antibodies were measured at Baseline and Days 14, 28, and 56.

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set was used for this analysis. Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set = all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group. Subjects who tested positive at the high assay threshold (5 SD normalized background ratio cutoffs \>59.2, LABScreen Mixed LSM12, One Lambda) at Baseline were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization4 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization2 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Immune Platelet Refractoriness

The number and percentage of subjects with PLT refractoriness for each treatment group. Subjects were defined as immune PLT refractoriness based on 2 sequential transfusion episodes, each with CCIs \< 5000 measured 1 hour post transfusion, and who also had a positive antibody test within 14 days before or after the onset of PLT refractoriness.

Time frame: Initial post-randomization platelet transfusion through high Class I HLA development.

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set was used for this analysis. Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set = all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Immune Platelet Refractoriness1 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Immune Platelet Refractoriness1 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With PLT Refractoriness

The number and percentage of subjects with PLT refractoriness defined as 2 sequential transfusions, each with corrected count increments (CCIs) \< 5000 measured 1 hour post-transfusion.

Time frame: From the first post-randomization platelet transfusion through 28 days following the first transfusion.

Population: The Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set was used for this analysis. Modified Intent-to-Treat Analysis Set = all randomized subjects who had at least 1 study transfusion according to randomized study group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With PLT Refractoriness41 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With PLT Refractoriness20 Participants
p-value: 0.001595% CI: [1.32, 3.49]Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)

UADEs are identified as treatment emergent adverse events reported by the investigator as serious, unanticipated, at least possibly related to study device or at least possibly related to treatment. UADEs were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 19.1

Time frame: From initial post-randomization PLT transfusion through 72 hours following the last per protocol PLT transfusion.

Population: The Safety Set was used for this analysis. Safety Set = randomized subjects who received at least 1 PLT transfusion post-randomization, independent of the outcome or successful completions of the procedure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders/ Febrile Neutropenia1 Participants
MIRASOLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)No UADEs140 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders/ Febrile Neutropenia0 Participants
CONTROLNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs)No UADEs161 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026