Skip to content

Effect and Safety of Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Subjects With Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Basal Insulin

Effect and Safety of Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Subjects With Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Basal Insulin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02963922
Acronym
SCALE™ Insulin
Enrollment
396
Registered
2016-11-15
Start date
2017-02-06
Completion date
2018-09-25
Last updated
2020-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder, Obesity

Brief summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to investigate effect and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg in subjects with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with basal insulin.

Interventions

Injected subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Injected subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial - Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus - Treatment with up to 2 OADs (oral anti-diabetic) (metformin, glitazone, SGLT-2 inhibitor (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) or sulphonylurea) - Stable treatment with basal insulin according to its label (no requirement of minimum or maximum dose) for at least 90 days prior to screening, as judged by the investigator - HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 6.0-10.0% (both inclusive) - BMI (body mass index) equal to or above 27 kg/m\^2 - Age at least 18 years at the time of signing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes - Known hypoglycaemic unawareness as indicated by the investigator according to Clarke's questionnaire question 8 (see Section 8.2.3) - Recurrent severe hypoglycaemic episodes within the last year as judged by the investigator - Unable or unwilling to perform self-monitoring of plasma glucose according to the protocol and to keep a diabetes diary - Treatment with any hypoglycaemic medications other than OADs and basal insulin within the past 90 days prior to screening - Treatment with a DPP-IV (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitor within the past 90 days prior to screening - Recent history of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 6 months), severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class III, IV), or second degree or greater heart block - Personal or family history of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC) or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) - Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measure as required by local regulation or practice) - For Germany: Only highly effective methods of birth control are accepted (i.e. one that results in less than 1% per year failure rate when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine device), or sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner - Use in past 90 days of medications known to induce significant weight loss (e.g., prescription weight loss medications) or weight gain (e.g., chronic use of oral steroids, second generation antipsychotics) - History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) - History of major depressive disorder within the past 2 years - Any lifetime history of a suicide attempt - Inadequately treated blood pressure defined as Grade 3 hypertension or higher (Systolic above or equal to 180 mmHg or diastolic above or equal to110 mmHg). - History of malignancy (except for non-melanoma skin cancer) within the past 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight (%)Week 0, week 56Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for adverse events \[AEs\]) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).
Participants Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body WeightWeek 56The estimated percentage of participants losing at least 5% of baseline (week 0) body weight at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for adverse events \[AEs\]) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1cWeek 0, week 56Change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).
Change in FPGWeek 0, week 56Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).
Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning ScoreWeek 0, week 56SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in SF-36 physical functioning score was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT), Physical Function Domain (5-items) ScoreWeek 0, week 56Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain (5-items) score. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. The endpoint was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).
Change in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U)Week 0, week 56Change in total daily insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (% of Pre-trial Dose in U)Week 0, week 56Change in total daily basal insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (U/kg)Week 0, week 56Change in total daily basal insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U/kg)Week 0, week 56Change in total daily insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in 7-point SMPG Profile Mean Daytime Glucose ValueWeek 0, week 56Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner and at bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile mean daytime glucose value was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in sBP and dBPWeek 0, week 56Change in systolic blood pressure (sBP) and diastolic blood pressure (dBP) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAWeek 0, week 56Change in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, triglycerides and free fatty acids (FFA) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in SF-36: Sub-domainsWeek 0, week 56SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores was presented based on in-trial data. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)Week 0, week 56Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain physical component summary (PCS) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. It consists of 2 component summary measures that further summarize 8 health domain scales. The physical component summary (PCS) measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Change in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)Week 0, week 56Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain mental component summary (MCS) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. SF- 36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The mental component summary (MCS) measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Pain/Discomfort Domain ScoreWeek 0, week 56Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT pain and discomfort domain from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Psychosocial Domain ScoreWeek 0, week 56Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT psychosocial domain from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Total ScoreWeek 0, week 56Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT total score from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Weight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0, week 56The WRSS measure is a questionnaire under development. The version applied in this study has 10 items that measure the presence and bothersomeness of 10 weight-related symptoms. Each item has a categorical part with answers on the following 5 possible levels: 'Never/Almost never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often' and 'Almost always/Always'. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 56 was presented. Scoring algorithm was not available prior to database lock and therefore it was decided and documented in the statistical analysis plan that WRSS total score was not to be calculated and analyzed.
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7% and Weight Loss ≥5%Week 56Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and weight loss ≥5% from baseline at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7%, Weight Loss ≥5% and no Documented Symptomatic HypoglycaemiaWeek 56Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7%, weight loss ≥5% from baseline and no documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.3 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute Physical Functioning ScoreWeek 56Percentage of participants who achieved ≥4.3 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 acute physical functioning score at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥3.8 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute PCSWeek 56Percentage of participants who achieved ≥3.8 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 acute PCS at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.6 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute MCSWeek 56Percentage of participants who achieved ≥4.6 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 acute MCS at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Responder Definition Value for IWQoL-Lite for CT Physical Function Domain ScoreWeek 56Percentage of participants who achieve responder definition value for IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain score was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Adverse Events (AEs)Week 0 to week 56 + 30 daysAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Number of AEs from randomisation to until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (30 days). Results based on in-trial data was presented. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Number of Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0 to week 56 + 30 daysNumber of hypoglycaemic episodes was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Physical ExaminationWeek -1, week 56Physical examination parameters are categorised as abdomen; gastrointestinal system; cardiovascular system; central and peripheral nervous system; general appearance; head, eyes, ears, nose, throat (ENT) and neck; lymph node palpation; musculoskeletal system; respiratory system; skin and thyroid gland. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at baseline (week -1) and week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Resting PulseWeek -1, week 56Change from baseline (week -1) to week 56 in resting pulse was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Week -1, week 56The ECGs were interpreted by the investigator at baseline (week -1) and week 56 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 56 were presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - HaemoglobinWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in haemoglobin was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - HaematocritWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in Haematocrit was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - ErythrocytesWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in erythrocytes was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Thrombocytes, LeukocytesWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in thrombocytes and leukocytes was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - AlbuminWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in albumin was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase and lipase was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in bicarbonate, total calcium, potassium, sodium and urea was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Total Bilirubin and CreatinineWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in total bilirubin and creatinine was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - High Sensitive C-reactive ProteinWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in high sensitive C-reactive protein was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Participants Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56Week 56The estimated percentage of participants losing more than 10% of baseline (week 0) body weight at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for adverse events \[AEs\]) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Uric AcidWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in uric acid was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - CalcitoninWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in calcitonin was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Thyroid Stimulating HormoneWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in thyroid stimulating hormone was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - eGFRWeek 0, week 56Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in estimated GFR serum using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.
Change in Waist CircumferenceWeek 0, week 56Change in waist circumference from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Countries

Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 53 sites in Canada (7), Germany (7), Israel (6), Italy (4), Mexico (2), Turkey (7) and United States (20).

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomised in a 1:1 manner to receive either liraglutide or placebo as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity as part of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention program.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide 3.0 mg
Participants received liraglutide once daily by subcutaneous injection irrespective of the timing of meals. Participants received 0.6 mg liraglutide during the first week. The dose was escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg until the maintenance dose of 3.0 mg was reached after 4 weeks. The treatment period was 56 weeks.
198
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo once daily by subcutaneous injection irrespective of the timing of meals. Dose escalation for placebo matched that of liraglutide. The treatment period was 56 weeks.
198
Total396

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event156
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23
Overall StudyOther814
Overall StudyProtocol deviation66

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiraglutide 3.0 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Body weight100.6 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.8
98.9 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9
99.7 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants29 Participants72 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
155 Participants169 Participants324 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
17 Participants11 Participants28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
174 Participants180 Participants354 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
108 Participants99 Participants207 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
90 Participants99 Participants189 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1950 / 197
other
Total, other adverse events
162 / 195141 / 197
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 19519 / 197

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Body Weight (%)

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for adverse events \[AEs\]) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Body Weight (%)In-trial observation period-6.0 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 6
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Body Weight (%)On-drug observation period-6.5 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (%)In-trial observation period-1.5 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.4
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (%)On-drug observation period-1.7 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 5.2
Comparison: Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the placebo arm based on a jump to reference multiple (x100) imputation approach. Week 56 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, body mass index (BMI) groups and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.48, -3.16]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of on-drug before first drug discontinuation date using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, BMI groups and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate, all nested within visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.3, -3.91]MMRM
Primary

Participants Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body Weight

The estimated percentage of participants losing at least 5% of baseline (week 0) body weight at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for adverse events \[AEs\]) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body WeightIn-trial observation period51.80 Percentage of participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body WeightOn-drug observation period56.92 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body WeightIn-trial observation period23.98 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body WeightOn-drug observation period21.83 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the placebo arm based on a jump to reference multiple (x100) imputation approach. Week 56 responses were analysed using a logistic regression model with treatment, BMI groups and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.19, 5.31]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Analysis of on-drug before first drug discontinuation date using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, BMI groups and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate, all nested within visit. The MMRM was used to classify responders and analysed with a logistic regression with treatment as the only factor.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.04, 7.36]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Number of AEs from randomisation to until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (30 days). Results based on in-trial data was presented. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0 to week 56 + 30 days

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgAdverse Events (AEs)1223 Adverse events
PlaceboAdverse Events (AEs)1148 Adverse events
Secondary

Change in 7-point SMPG Profile Mean Daytime Glucose Value

Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner and at bedtime. Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile mean daytime glucose value was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in 7-point SMPG Profile Mean Daytime Glucose Value-2.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.6
PlaceboChange in 7-point SMPG Profile Mean Daytime Glucose Value-1.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

The ECGs were interpreted by the investigator at baseline (week -1) and week 56 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 56 were presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week -1, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Normal (week -1)113 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal NCS (week -1)78 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal CS (week -1)4 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Normal (week 56)118 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal NCS (week 56)62 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal CS (week 56)5 Participants
PlaceboChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal NCS (week 56)57 Participants
PlaceboChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Normal (week -1)133 Participants
PlaceboChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Normal (week 56)126 Participants
PlaceboChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal NCS (week -1)60 Participants
PlaceboChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal CS (week 56)3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Abnormal CS (week -1)4 Participants
Secondary

Change in FPG

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in FPGIn-trial observation period-0.91 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.13
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in FPGOn-drug observation period-1.05 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.08
PlaceboChange in FPGIn-trial observation period-0.68 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.04
PlaceboChange in FPGOn-drug observation period-0.96 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.68
Secondary

Change in HbA1c

Change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in HbA1cIn-trial observation period-1.1 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.2
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in HbA1cOn-drug observation period-1.2 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChange in HbA1cIn-trial observation period-0.5 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange in HbA1cOn-drug observation period-0.7 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT), Physical Function Domain (5-items) Score

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain (5-items) score. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. The endpoint was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT), Physical Function Domain (5-items) ScoreIn-trial observation period7.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT), Physical Function Domain (5-items) ScoreOn-drug observation period8.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
PlaceboChange in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT), Physical Function Domain (5-items) ScoreIn-trial observation period6.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
PlaceboChange in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT), Physical Function Domain (5-items) ScoreOn-drug observation period6.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Secondary

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Pain/Discomfort Domain Score

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT pain and discomfort domain from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Pain/Discomfort Domain Score4.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Pain/Discomfort Domain Score4.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Secondary

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Psychosocial Domain Score

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT psychosocial domain from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Psychosocial Domain Score5.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Psychosocial Domain Score4.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Secondary

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Total Score

Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT total score from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. IWQoL-Lite for CT is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Total Score5.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
PlaceboChange in IWQoL-Lite for CT: Total Score4.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Erythrocytes

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in erythrocytes was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Erythrocytes-0.07 10^12 cells per liter (10^12 cells/L)Standard Deviation 0.27
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Erythrocytes-0.04 10^12 cells per liter (10^12 cells/L)Standard Deviation 0.28
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Haematocrit

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in Haematocrit was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Haematocrit-0.4 Percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Haematocrit-0.2 Percentage of red blood cellsStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Haemoglobin

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in haemoglobin was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Haemoglobin-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Haemoglobin-0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Thrombocytes, Leukocytes

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in thrombocytes and leukocytes was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Thrombocytes, LeukocytesThrombocytes7 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 45
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Thrombocytes, LeukocytesLeukocytes-0.22 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Thrombocytes, LeukocytesThrombocytes7 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 46
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Measurements (Haematology) - Thrombocytes, LeukocytesLeukocytes-0.24 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.28
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Albumin

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in albumin was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Albumin-0.1 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Albumin-0.1 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Lipase

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase and lipase was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAspartate aminotransferase-3 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 11
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAlkaline Phosphatase-1 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 16
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAlanine Aminotransferase-5 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 15
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAmylase13 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 73
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseLipase30 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 143
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseLipase-8 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 47
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAmylase-1 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 22
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAlkaline Phosphatase-0 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 15
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAspartate aminotransferase-3 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 14
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and LipaseAlanine Aminotransferase-6 Units per liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 18
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and Urea

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in bicarbonate, total calcium, potassium, sodium and urea was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaTotal Calcium-0.00 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaSodium-1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaPotassium-0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaUrea0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.5
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaBicarbonate serum0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaUrea0.1 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaBicarbonate serum-0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaTotal Calcium-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.14
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaPotassium-0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Bicarbonate, Total Calcium, Potassium, Sodium and UreaSodium-0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Calcitonin

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in calcitonin was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Calcitonin0.0 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Calcitonin0.0 Nanograms per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - eGFR

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in estimated GFR serum using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - eGFR0 Milliliters per minute per 1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - eGFR1 Milliliters per minute per 1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - High Sensitive C-reactive Protein

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in high sensitive C-reactive protein was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - High Sensitive C-reactive Protein-1.40 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 8.02
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - High Sensitive C-reactive Protein-1.29 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 10.07
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Thyroid Stimulating Hormone

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in thyroid stimulating hormone was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Thyroid Stimulating Hormone-0.0842 Milli-international units per literStandard Deviation 1.2233
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Thyroid Stimulating Hormone0.1002 Milli-international units per literStandard Deviation 0.9493
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in total bilirubin and creatinine was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal Bilirubin1.0 Micromoles per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 3.9
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine-0.1 Micromoles per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 8.7
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Total Bilirubin and CreatinineTotal Bilirubin0.6 Micromoles per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 3.6
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Total Bilirubin and CreatinineCreatinine-0.2 Micromoles per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 8.4
Secondary

Change in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Uric Acid

Change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in uric acid was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Uric Acid-0.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange in Laboratory Parameters (Biochemistry) - Uric Acid-0.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Change in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFA

Change in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, triglycerides and free fatty acids (FFA) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAVLDL cholesterol-0.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.35
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAHDL cholesterol0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFATriglycerides-0.21 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.89
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFATotal cholesterol-0.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.82
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAFree fatty acids-0.10 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.27
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFALDL cholesterol-0.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAFree fatty acids-0.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFATotal cholesterol0.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAHDL cholesterol0.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFAVLDL cholesterol-0.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFATriglycerides-0.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChange in Lipids -Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, VLDL, Triglycerides and FFALDL cholesterol0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.57
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination

Physical examination parameters are categorised as abdomen; gastrointestinal system; cardiovascular system; central and peripheral nervous system; general appearance; head, eyes, ears, nose, throat (ENT) and neck; lymph node palpation; musculoskeletal system; respiratory system; skin and thyroid gland. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at baseline (week -1) and week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week -1, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week 56) Abnormal NCS13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week 56) Abnormal, CS3 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week -1) Normal150 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week -1) Abnormal NCS10 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week 56) Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week -1) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week -1) Normal176 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week 56) Normal175 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week -1) Normal192 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week 56) Abnormal NCS10 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week 56) Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week -1) Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week -1) Abnormal NCS3 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week-1) Normal183 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week-1) Abnormal CS2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week -1) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week 56) Abnormal CS1 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week -1) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week -1) Normal158 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week 56) Normal183 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week -1) Abnormal NCS26 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week -1) Abnormal CS11 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week 56) Abnormal NCS22 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week 56) Normal185 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week 56) Abnormal CS13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week -1) Normal155 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week -1) Abnormal NCS39 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week 56) Abnormal NCS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week -1) Abnormal CS6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week -1) Abnormal NCS36 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week 56) Normal156 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week 56) Abnormal NCS23 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week -1) Abnormal CS4 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week 56) Abnormal CS6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week-1) Abnormal NCS10 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week 56) Normal150 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week -1) Abnormal NCS17 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week -1) Normal180 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week -1) Abnormal CS2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week 56) Abnormal NCS28 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week 56) Normal168 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week 56) Abnormal NCS15 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week 56) Normal178 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week 56) Abnormal CS2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week -1) Normal195 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week 56) Abnormal CS7 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week -1) Abnormal CS2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week 56) Normal150 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week -1) Abnormal NCS13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week -1) Abnormal, NCS25 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week 56) Abnormal NCS2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week -1) Normal183 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week -1) Abnormal CS5 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week -1) Abnormal NCS10 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week 56) Normal171 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week -1) Abnormal CS2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week 56) Normal167 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week 56) Normal180 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week -1) Normal185 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week 56) Abnormal NCS5 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week 56) Abnormal, NCS15 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week -1) Normal165 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week 56) Abnormal CS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week -1) Abnormal, NCS25 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week 56) Abnormal, CS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week 56) Normal175 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week 56) Abnormal NCS12 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week 56) Normal173 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week -1) Abnormal CS13 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week 56) Abnormal CS14 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week 56) Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week -1) Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week -1) Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week -1) Normal180 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week -1) Abnormal CS1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week 56) Normal171 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week 56) Abnormal NCS14 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week 56) Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week -1) Normal192 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week 56) Normal185 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week -1) Abnormal NCS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week -1) Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week 56) Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationRespiratory System (week 56) Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week -1) Normal156 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week -1) Abnormal NCS33 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week -1) Abnormal CS8 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week 56) Normal149 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week 56) Abnormal NCS29 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationSkin (week 56) Abnormal CS9 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week -1) Normal169 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week -1) Abnormal CS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week 56) Normal160 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationAbdomen (week 56) Abnormal, NCS24 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week -1) Normal187 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week -1) Abnormal NCS10 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week -1) Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week 56) Normal177 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week 56) Abnormal NCS8 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGastrointestinal System (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week-1) Normal182 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week-1) Abnormal NCS15 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week-1) Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationCardiovascular System (week 56) Abnormal CS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week -1) Normal159 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week -1) Abnormal NCS25 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week 56) Normal149 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationNervous System (week 56) Abnormal NCS24 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week -1) Normal150 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week -1) Abnormal NCS36 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week -1) Abnormal CS11 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week 56) Normal151 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week 56) Abnormal NCS27 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationGeneral Appearance (week 56) Abnormal CS9 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week -1) Normal182 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week -1) Abnormal NCS13 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week -1) Abnormal CS2 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationHead, eyes, ENTand Neck (week 56) Abnormal NCS12 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week -1) Normal197 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week 56) Normal186 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationLymph Node Palpation (week 56) Abnormal NCS0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationMusculoskeletal System (week -1) Abnormal NCS16 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week -1) Normal187 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week -1) Abnormal NCS7 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week -1) Abnormal CS3 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week 56) Normal178 Participants
PlaceboChange in Physical ExaminationThyroid Gland (week 56) Abnormal NCS6 Participants
Secondary

Change in Resting Pulse

Change from baseline (week -1) to week 56 in resting pulse was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week -1, week 56

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug. Number analyzed = participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Resting Pulse2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Resting Pulse-0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Change in sBP and dBP

Change in systolic blood pressure (sBP) and diastolic blood pressure (dBP) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in sBP and dBPsBP-6 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in sBP and dBPdBP-3 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in sBP and dBPsBP-2 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15
PlaceboChange in sBP and dBPdBP-1 Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
Secondary

Change in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain mental component summary (MCS) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. SF- 36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The mental component summary (MCS) measure is derived from domain scales of vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Mental Component Summary (MCS)-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Secondary

Change in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)

Change in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain physical component summary (PCS) from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. It consists of 2 component summary measures that further summarize 8 health domain scales. The physical component summary (PCS) measure is derived from domain scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Physical Component Summary (PCS)2.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Secondary

Change in SF-36: Sub-domains

SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores was presented based on in-trial data. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsBodily Pain1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsRole-physical0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsMental Health-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsRole Lim Emotion Prob-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsGeneral Health1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsSocial Functioning-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsVitality1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsPhysical Functioning2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsVitality-0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsBodily Pain1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsGeneral Health0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsPhysical Functioning2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsRole-physical0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsMental Health-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsSocial Functioning-0.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboChange in SF-36: Sub-domainsRole Lim Emotion Prob-0.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Secondary

Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning Score

SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in SF-36 physical functioning score was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning ScoreIn-trial observation period2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning ScoreOn-drug observation period2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
PlaceboChange in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning ScoreIn-trial observation period2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
PlaceboChange in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning ScoreOn-drug observation period2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Change in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (% of Pre-trial Dose in U)

Change in total daily basal insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (% of Pre-trial Dose in U)19 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 121
PlaceboChange in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (% of Pre-trial Dose in U)64 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 139
Secondary

Change in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (U/kg)

Change in total daily basal insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (U/kg)0.05 Units of insulin dose per kilogram(U/kg)Standard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboChange in Total Daily Basal Insulin Dose (U/kg)0.15 Units of insulin dose per kilogram(U/kg)Standard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U)

Change in total daily insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U)3 Units of insulin dose (U)Standard Deviation 30
PlaceboChange in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U)18 Units of insulin dose (U)Standard Deviation 38
Secondary

Change in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U/kg)

Change in total daily insulin dose from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U/kg)0.05 U/kgStandard Deviation 0.33
PlaceboChange in Total Daily Insulin Dose (U/kg)0.18 U/kgStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceIn-trial observation period-5.40 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 6.06
Liraglutide 3.0 mgChange in Waist CircumferenceOn-drug observation period-5.71 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 6.05
PlaceboChange in Waist CircumferenceIn-trial observation period-2.60 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 5.72
PlaceboChange in Waist CircumferenceOn-drug observation period-2.78 Centimeters (cm)Standard Deviation 5.63
Secondary

Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Number of hypoglycaemic episodes was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 0 to week 56 + 30 days

Population: SAS included all randomised participants exposed to at least one dose of trial drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgNumber of Hypoglycaemic Episodes1538 Hypoglycaemic episodes
PlaceboNumber of Hypoglycaemic Episodes1973 Hypoglycaemic episodes
Secondary

Participants Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56

The estimated percentage of participants losing more than 10% of baseline (week 0) body weight at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data and on-drug data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which participants are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for adverse events \[AEs\]) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56In-trial observation period22.77 Percentage of participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56On-drug observation period22.56 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56In-trial observation period6.55 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56On-drug observation period5.58 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥3.8 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute PCS

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥3.8 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 acute PCS at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥3.8 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute PCS37.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥3.8 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute PCS31.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.3 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute Physical Functioning Score

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥4.3 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 acute physical functioning score at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.3 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute Physical Functioning Score28.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.3 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute Physical Functioning Score26.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.6 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute MCS

Percentage of participants who achieved ≥4.6 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 acute MCS at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.6 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute MCS14.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): ≥4.6 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Acute MCS11.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7% and Weight Loss ≥5%

Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7% and weight loss ≥5% from baseline at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7% and Weight Loss ≥5%39.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7% and Weight Loss ≥5%13.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7%, Weight Loss ≥5% and no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia

Percentage of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7%, weight loss ≥5% from baseline and no documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia at week 56 was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7%, Weight Loss ≥5% and no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia10.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved (Yes/no): HbA1c <7%, Weight Loss ≥5% and no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia3.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Responder Definition Value for IWQoL-Lite for CT Physical Function Domain Score

Percentage of participants who achieve responder definition value for IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain score was presented based on in-trial data. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgResponder Definition Value for IWQoL-Lite for CT Physical Function Domain Score25.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboResponder Definition Value for IWQoL-Lite for CT Physical Function Domain Score24.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Weight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical Responses

The WRSS measure is a questionnaire under development. The version applied in this study has 10 items that measure the presence and bothersomeness of 10 weight-related symptoms. Each item has a categorical part with answers on the following 5 possible levels: 'Never/Almost never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often' and 'Almost always/Always'. Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 56 was presented. Scoring algorithm was not available prior to database lock and therefore it was decided and documented in the statistical analysis plan that WRSS total score was not to be calculated and analyzed.

Time frame: Week 0, week 56

Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Number analyzed=participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireOften13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painRarely47 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireRarely35 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingAlmost always/Always6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireSometimes23 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painSometimes49 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireAlmost always/Always6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingNever/Almost never119 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireNever/Almost never105 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painAlmost always/Always6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireOften18 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathOften3 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireRarely34 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painNever/Almost never95 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireSometimes24 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireNever/Almost never119 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingNever/Almost never101 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painOften12 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingOften15 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingSometimes32 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingSometimes40 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painRarely35 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingAlmost always/Always1 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingNever/Almost never104 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingNever/Almost never98 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painSometimes39 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingRarely51 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingSometimes30 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaAlmost always/Always2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaRarely56 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathAlmost always/Always0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaSometimes45 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathNever/Almost never131 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaAlmost always/Always3 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathRarely28 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaNever/Almost never77 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaOften15 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painRarely47 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathSometimes19 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathAlmost always/Always1 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaSometimes35 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaNever/Almost never73 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painAlmost always/Always5 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathNever/Almost never137 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingAlmost always/Always2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painOften17 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathOften5 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painRarely34 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyOften19 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painSometimes28 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaOften22 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painAlmost always/Always2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painNever/Almost never106 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathSometimes16 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityAlmost always/Always8 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painRarely29 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingRarely40 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painSometimes35 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityNever/Almost never106 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingOften11 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingRarely30 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyOften16 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivitySometimes37 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingAlmost always/Always6 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityOften13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingOften15 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityRarely34 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingRarely38 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathRarely45 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingSometimes24 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyRarely49 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painAlmost always/Always8 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityAlmost always/Always2 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painNever/Almost never96 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaRarely57 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painOften13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painRarely49 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityNever/Almost never92 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painSometimes32 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painAlmost always/Always11 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painAlmost always/Always5 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityOften12 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painNever/Almost never93 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painNever/Almost never114 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painOften13 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityRarely42 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painSometimes29 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painNever/Almost never74 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyAlmost always/Always0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivitySometimes39 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyNever/Almost never102 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyRarely46 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painOften15 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energySometimes31 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireAlmost always/Always8 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyAlmost always/Always0 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painOften17 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyNever/Almost never82 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energySometimes40 Participants
Liraglutide 3.0 mgWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingOften7 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energySometimes41 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathOften3 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathSometimes21 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathSometimes27 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityOften16 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireSometimes25 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingRarely38 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingOften16 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingRarely48 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaAlmost always/Always8 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaNever/Almost never78 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaOften14 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaNever/Almost never65 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painSometimes40 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingNever/Almost never111 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingOften10 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingNever/Almost never98 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painOften8 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painRarely45 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyNever/Almost never90 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyOften12 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyNever/Almost never77 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyOften16 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyRarely50 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painAlmost always/Always5 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painNever/Almost never85 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painOften18 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painRarely42 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Joint painSometimes46 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painAlmost always/Always5 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painNever/Almost never75 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painOften17 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painRarely39 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Joint painSometimes52 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathNever/Almost never140 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathRarely32 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathAlmost always/Always1 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathNever/Almost never111 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathOften3 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Shortness of breathRarely46 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityAlmost always/Always9 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityNever/Almost never109 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivityRarely31 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heat sensitivitySometimes31 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityAlmost always/Always8 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityNever/Almost never87 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityOften13 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivityRarely47 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heat sensitivitySometimes33 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireAlmost always/Always8 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireNever/Almost never121 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireOften13 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireRarely32 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Sexual desireSometimes22 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireAlmost always/Always11 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireNever/Almost never109 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireOften11 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Sexual desireRarely32 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingAlmost always/Always5 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingNever/Almost never104 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingOften14 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Heavy sweatingSometimes35 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingAlmost always/Always5 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingNever/Almost never92 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Heavy sweatingSometimes27 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaRarely47 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low physical staminaSometimes49 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaAlmost always/Always4 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaOften19 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painAlmost always/Always7 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaRarely56 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low physical staminaSometimes44 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painAlmost always/Always7 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painNever/Almost never108 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painOften12 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painRarely31 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Foot painSometimes38 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painNever/Almost never88 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painOften14 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Foot painRarely39 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingAlmost always/Always4 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingRarely42 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Trouble sleepingSometimes29 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingAlmost always/Always3 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingOften14 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingRarely33 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Trouble sleepingSometimes40 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painAlmost always/Always6 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painNever/Almost never98 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painRarely40 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Back painSometimes44 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painAlmost always/Always4 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painNever/Almost never86 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painOften11 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Back painSometimes42 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyAlmost always/Always2 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energyRarely42 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Low energySometimes50 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 56: Low energyAlmost always/Always4 Participants
PlaceboWeight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Categorical ResponsesWeek 0: Shortness of breathAlmost always/Always0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026