Skip to content

A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies

A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Study With Expansion Cohorts to Investigate the Safety, Biologic and Anti-tumor Activity of ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02963831
Enrollment
67
Registered
2016-11-15
Start date
2017-09-07
Completion date
2022-06-25
Last updated
2022-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendiceal Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

Oncos-102, Durvalumab, Peritoneal, Cyclophosphamide

Brief summary

This is a two-part Phase 1/2 dose escalation and dose expansion study of an Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus), ONCOS-102, in combination with anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, durvalumab, in adult subjects with peritoneal disease who have failed prior standard chemotherapy and have histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Detailed description

ONCOS-102 will be administered intraperitoneally (IP) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) will be administered intravenously (IV) 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. Durvalumab will be administered by IV infusion once every four weeks (Q4W) for a total of 12 four-week cycles. Phase 1 of the study is a dose escalation phase, which will use a 3+3 design to evaluate the safety of ONCOS-102 monotherapy before initiation of durvalumab and to identify the recommended combination dose (RCD) of a fixed dose of durvalumab (1500 mg) + ONCOS-102 at 2 dose levels (1 x 10\^11 viral particles (VPs) and 3 x 10\^11 VPs). Subjects treated at the RCD of 3 x 10\^11 VPs ONCOS-102 will be included in the Phase 2 expansion cohort based on their tumor diagnosis. Phase 2 of the study is the dose expansion phase, which will further explore the safety and anti-tumor activity for the RCD in 2 expansion cohorts with peritoneal disease: 1. Epithelial ovarian cancer 2. Metastatic colorectal cancer Simon's 2-Stage MINIMAX Design will be used in Phase 2 for Expansion Cohorts 1 and 2. In the first stage, 18 subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 1 and 13 subjects in Cohort 2 (including the 6 subjects at the RCD from the dose escalation phase). If 5 or more subjects in Cohort 1, or one or more subjects in Cohort 2, demonstrate clinical benefit (defined as percentage of subjects who are not in progression at end of Week 24), 15 additional subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2 of Cohort 1, and 14 additional subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2 of Cohort 2. The primary endpoint is the percentage of subjects who are not in progression at the end of Week 24 as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALONCOS-102

ONCOS-102 was administered by intraperitoneal infusion at weekly intervals for 6 weeks.

DRUGDurvalumab

Durvalumab was administered by IV infusion once every four weeks for a total of 10 (Cohort A) or 12 four-week cycles.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102.

Sponsors

Cancer Research Institute, New York City
CollaboratorOTHER
MedImmune LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Targovax ASA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The Phase 1 cohorts were enrolled sequentially. In Phase 2, the two expansion cohorts are enrolled in parallel.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects with peritoneal disease who have failed prior standard chemotherapy and have histologic confirmation of epithelial ovarian cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) including cancer originating from the appendix. 2. Subject is willing to undergo a core needle biopsy during screening and Cycle 2, Study Week 5. Archival tumor samples are requested but are not required for eligibility. 3. Previously treated for advanced cancer with no additional therapy options available known to prolong survival. 4. Laboratory parameters for vital functions should be in the normal range or not clinically significant. 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1.

Exclusion criteria

1. Treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks of starting study treatment or prior treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 \[CTLA-4\], programmed cell death protein 1 \[PD-1\] or programmed death ligand 1 \[PD-L1\] antibodies). 2. Subject has known active central nervous system metastasis, glioma and nervous system malignancies including carcinomatous meningitis. Subjects with asymptomatic brain metastases or spinal cord compression who have been treated, are considered stable, and who have not received corticosteroids or anticonvulsants for at least 28 days prior to screening may be included. Subject has other active malignancy. 3. Known immunodeficiency or known to have evidence of acute or chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C or other uncontrolled inter-current illnesses. 4. Ongoing bowel perforation or presence of bowel fistula or abscess or history of small or large bowel obstruction within 3 months of registration, including subjects with palliative gastric drainage catheters. Subjects with palliative diverting ileostomy or colostomy are allowed if they have been symptom-free for more than 3 months. 5. Subjects with clinically significant cardiovascular disease, history of organ transplant or allogeneic bone marrow transplant, active known or history of autoimmune disease that might recur or major surgery within 28 days prior to the first dose or still recovering from prior surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)up to 31 months (90 days after the last dose of study medication).All Adverse events (AEs) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 19.0 and classified by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and preferred term. The severity of AEs was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03. Adverse events (AEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and any other medically indicated assessments, including subject interviews, from the time informed consent was signed through 90 days after the last dose of study treatment. TEAEs are those that occurred or worsened after administration of the first dose of study treatment. Deaths within the AE Reporting Period included all deaths that occurred during the study treatment period, or up to 90 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug or initiation of a new treatment.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Up to 24 weeksTumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Up to 24 WeeksTumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the Total Measurable Tumor Burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.
Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier MethodUp to 39 monthsTumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5,7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.
Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier MethodUp to 29 monthsTumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.
Median Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier MethodUp to 39 monthsAfter completion of treatment, all subjects were followed for survival every 6 months up to 3 years following initiation of study treatment or until June 25, 2022 when all post-study follow-up was completed. OS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of death or last follow-up (June 25, 2022 when the last follow-up data was collected or earlier). Subjects lost to follow-up are censored on the date when they were last known to be alive.
Objective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Up to 15 monthsTumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.
Objective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Up to 15 monthsTumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

67 subjects were enrolled and 64 received treatment with study therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose Escalation
ONCOS-102, 1 x 10\^11 viral particles (VPs) monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 71. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered intravenously (IV) 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused intraperitoneally (IP) in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 10 cycles, starting on Day 71. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better. .
4
Cohort BL ONCOS-102 Dose Escalation
ONCOS-102, 1 x 10\^11 VPs + durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 15. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused IP in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose Q4W for 12 cycles, starting on Day 15. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
5
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
ONCOS-102, 3 x 10\^11 VPs + durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 15. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused IP in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose Q4W for 12 cycles, starting on Day 15. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
19
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
ONCOS-102, 3 x 10\^11 VPs + durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 15. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused IP in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose Q4W for 12 cycles, starting on Day 15. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
36
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0112
Overall StudyDeath0002
Overall StudyProgressive Disease331627
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1024

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationTotalCohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerCohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerCohort BL ONCOS-102 Dose Escalation
Age, Continuous54.0 years60.5 years58.5 years67.0 years54.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants7 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants54 Participants30 Participants17 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants54 Participants32 Participants16 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants64 participants36 participants19 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants49 Participants21 Participants19 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants15 Participants15 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 43 / 516 / 1928 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 45 / 519 / 1936 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 43 / 59 / 1922 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

All Adverse events (AEs) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 19.0 and classified by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and preferred term. The severity of AEs was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03. Adverse events (AEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and any other medically indicated assessments, including subject interviews, from the time informed consent was signed through 90 days after the last dose of study treatment. TEAEs are those that occurred or worsened after administration of the first dose of study treatment. Deaths within the AE Reporting Period included all deaths that occurred during the study treatment period, or up to 90 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug or initiation of a new treatment.

Time frame: up to 31 months (90 days after the last dose of study medication).

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Serious Adverse Event (SAE)3 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related SAE0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related Adverse Event (TRAE)4 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Death1 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)DLTs0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)4 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)5 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Serious Adverse Event (SAE)3 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related Adverse Event (TRAE)5 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Death1 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)DLTs0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related SAE2 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)19 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Death6 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)DLTs0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related Adverse Event (TRAE)17 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Serious Adverse Event (SAE)9 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related SAE2 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related Adverse Event (TRAE)30 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)36 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)DLTs0 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Death9 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Treatment-related SAE4 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Serious Adverse Event (SAE)22 Participants
Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)

Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.

Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Who Progressed or Died4 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Without Progression0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Who Progressed or Died4 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Without Progression1 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Without Progression0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Who Progressed or Died19 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Without Progression2 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Subjects Who Progressed or Died34 Participants
Secondary

Median Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method

After completion of treatment, all subjects were followed for survival every 6 months up to 3 years following initiation of study treatment or until June 25, 2022 when all post-study follow-up was completed. OS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of death or last follow-up (June 25, 2022 when the last follow-up data was collected or earlier). Subjects lost to follow-up are censored on the date when they were last known to be alive.

Time frame: Up to 39 months

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationMedian Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method5.9 months
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationMedian Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method10.1 months
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerMedian Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method6.6 months
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerMedian Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method7.1 months
Secondary

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier Method

Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.

Time frame: Up to 29 months

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier Method1.5 months
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier Method1.8 months
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier Method1.8 months
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier Method1.8 months
Secondary

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method

Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5,7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.

Time frame: Up to 39 months

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method1.5 months
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method1.8 months
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method1.8 months
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerMedian Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method1.9 months
Secondary

Objective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)

Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

Time frame: Up to 15 months

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PD4 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)SD0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)CR0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PR0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PR1 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)SD1 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)CR0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PD3 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PR0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PD15 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)SD4 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)CR0 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)CR0 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PD22 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)SD9 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)PR0 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)

Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.

Time frame: Up to 15 months

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irCR0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irSD0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPD4 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPR0 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPR1 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPD3 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irSD1 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irCR0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPR0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irSD4 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irCR0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPD15 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPR0 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irCR0 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irPD20 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerObjective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)irSD11 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)

Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the Total Measurable Tumor Burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria. PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.

Time frame: Up to 24 Weeks

Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline disease assessment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Without Progression0 Participants
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Who Progressed or Died4 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Who Progressed or Died4 Participants
Cohort B ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Without Progression1 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Without Progression0 Participants
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Who Progressed or Died18 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Without Progression3 Participants
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerProgression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)Subjects Who Progressed or Died29 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026