Ankylosing Spondylitis
Conditions
Keywords
AS, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Bimekizumab
Brief summary
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of bimekizumab in subjects with active Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).
Interventions
Bimekizumab in different dosages.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subject has active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), determined by documented radiologic evidence fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS including symptoms for \>=3 months and age of onset \<45 years * Subject has moderate to severe active disease as defined by each of the following: 1. BASDAI score \>=4 2. Spinal pain \>=4 on a 0 to 10 NRS (Numeric Rating Scale; from BASDAI item 2) * Subjects must have at least 1 of the following: 1. inadequate response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy 2. intolerance to administration of at least 1 NSAID 3. contraindication(s) to NSAID therapy * Subjects who are regularly taking NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors as part of their AS therapy are required to be on a stable dose for at least 14 days before Baseline * Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on an average daily dose of \<=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for at least 14 days before Baseline and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 16 * Subjects taking methotrexate (MTX) (\<=25mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if started at least 12 weeks prior to Baseline, with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before randomization * Subjects taking sulfasalazine (up to 3grams/day) or hydroxychloroquine (up to 400mg per day total) are allowed to continue their medication if started at least 12 weeks prior to Baseline, with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before randomization * Subjects may be tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-naïve or may have received 1 prior TNF inhibitor. Subjects who have been on a TNF inhibitor previously must have: 1. experienced an inadequate response to previous treatment given for at least 12 weeks 2. been intolerant to administration (eg, had a side effect/adverse event that led to discontinuation) 3. lost access to TNF inhibitor for other reasons
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects with a total ankylosis of the spine, or a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis eg, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or reactive arthritis * Subjects with any current sign or symptom that may indicate an active infection (except for the common cold) * Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections, or a serious or life-threatening infection within the 6 months prior to the Baseline Visit * Subjects receiving any live vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to Baseline * Subjects with known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, with latent TB infection or current or history of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMB) infection * Subjects with concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy during the past 5 years will be excluded, with following exceptions that may be included: 1. \<= 3 excised or ablated basal cell carcinomas of the skin 2. One squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (stage T1 maximum) successfully excised, or ablated only (other treatments, ie, chemotherapy, do not apply), with no signs of recurrence or metastases for more than 2 years prior to Screening 3. Actinic keratosis (-es) 4. Squamous cell carcinoma-in-situ of the skin successfully excised, or ablated, more than 6 months prior to Screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12 | Week 12 | The ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS score), Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)), Inflammation (mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12 | Week 12 | The ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain \[deterioration was defined as a relative worsening of at least 20% and an absolute worsening of at least 1 unit\]. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders. |
| Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | The ASAS 5/6 response was defined as at least 20% improvement in at least 5 of the 6 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration), spinal mobility (lateral spinal flexion) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | From Baseline to Week 12 | The BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument, which consists of six 10-unit horizontal Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration, respectively) over the last week. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower disease activity. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random. |
| Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12 | From Baseline to Week 12 | The ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the following components: 0.121 x Back pain (BASDAI question 2 result) 0.058 x Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6 result) 0.110 x PGADA 0.073 x Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3 result) 0.579 x (natural logarithm of the (hs-CRP \[mg/L\] + 1)) Back pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and fatigue are all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. There is a minimum score of 0.636 for the total ASDAS score, but no defined upper score since CRP does not have a set upper limit. If one component for the ASDAS-CRP was missing at a given visit, that component was imputed by carrying the last observation forward, and the ASDAS-CRP was calculated accordingly. If the hs-CRP value was below 2 mg/L, then it was imputed as the constant value of 2 mg/L. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77) | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study | From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77) | A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardise the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial subject that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. The results of this Secondary Outcome Measure were summarized from the adverse event pages of the Case Report Forms. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | From Baseline to Week 12 | The BASFI is a validated disease-specific instrument for assessing physical function. The BASFI comprises 10 items relating to the past week. The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 (Easy) to 10 (Impossible), with lower scores indicating better physical function. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random. |
Countries
Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study started to enroll participants in October 2016 and concluded in August 2018.
Pre-assignment details
The study included a 28-Day Screening Period, followed by a Double-Blind Period from Day 1 to Week 12, prior to treatment re-randomization, a Dose-blind Period, from Week 12 after the treatment re-randomization and up to Week 48 and a Safety Follow-Up (SFU) Period, post Week 48. The Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set and Dose-Blind Set.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period. | 60 |
| BKZ 16 mg Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 16 milligrams (mg) every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period. | 61 |
| BKZ 64 mg Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 64 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period. | 61 |
| BKZ 160 mg Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period followed by the same dose during the 36 weeks Dose-Blind Period. | 60 |
| BKZ 320 mg Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period followed by the same dose during the 36 weeks Dose-Blind Period. | 61 |
| Total Title | 303 |
| Total | 606 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 | FG008 | FG009 | FG010 | FG011 | FG012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose-Blind Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Dose-Blind Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dose-Blind Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dose-Blind Period | Meeting exclusion criteria 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dose-Blind Period | Sponsor decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dose-Blind Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Period | Adverse event, non fatal after Wk12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Period | Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Period | No compliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-Blind Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | BKZ 16 mg | BKZ 64 mg | BKZ 160 mg | BKZ 320 mg | Total Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 60 Participants | 56 Participants | 59 Participants | 56 Participants | 60 Participants | 291 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 39.65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 43.31 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.59 | 40.41 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.93 | 42.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 | 45.02 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39 | 42.16 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian/Alaskan Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other/Mixed | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 60 Participants | 58 Participants | 60 Participants | 59 Participants | 61 Participants | 298 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 49 Participants | 53 Participants | 52 Participants | 52 Participants | 50 Participants | 256 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 60 | 0 / 61 | 0 / 58 | 1 / 149 | 0 / 150 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 60 | 2 / 61 | 4 / 58 | 42 / 149 | 56 / 150 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 60 | 0 / 61 | 2 / 58 | 5 / 149 | 6 / 150 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12
The ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS score), Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)), Inflammation (mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP) and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12 | 13.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12 | 29.5 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12 | 42.6 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12 | 46.7 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12 | 45.9 percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12
The ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the following components: 0.121 x Back pain (BASDAI question 2 result) 0.058 x Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6 result) 0.110 x PGADA 0.073 x Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3 result) 0.579 x (natural logarithm of the (hs-CRP \[mg/L\] + 1)) Back pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and fatigue are all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. There is a minimum score of 0.636 for the total ASDAS score, but no defined upper score since CRP does not have a set upper limit. If one component for the ASDAS-CRP was missing at a given visit, that component was imputed by carrying the last observation forward, and the ASDAS-CRP was calculated accordingly. If the hs-CRP value was below 2 mg/L, then it was imputed as the constant value of 2 mg/L.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12 | -0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12 | -0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12 | -1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12 | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12 | -1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.17 |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
The BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument, which consists of six 10-unit horizontal Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration, respectively) over the last week. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower disease activity. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -1.0 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -1.6 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -2.6 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -2.6 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | -2.9 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
The BASFI is a validated disease-specific instrument for assessing physical function. The BASFI comprises 10 items relating to the past week. The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 (Easy) to 10 (Impossible), with lower scores indicating better physical function. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -1.8 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) | -2.2 scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial subject that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. The results of this Secondary Outcome Measure were summarized from the adverse event pages of the Case Report Forms.
Time frame: From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)
Population: The SS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 6.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Time frame: From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)
Population: The SS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 45.0 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 44.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 34.5 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 69.8 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study | 82.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardise the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
Time frame: From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)
Population: The SS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study | 0 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study | 3.4 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study | 3.4 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study | 4.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12
The ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain \[deterioration was defined as a relative worsening of at least 20% and an absolute worsening of at least 1 unit\]. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12 | 28.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12 | 41.0 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12 | 62.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12 | 58.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12 | 72.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12
The ASAS 5/6 response was defined as at least 20% improvement in at least 5 of the 6 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration), spinal mobility (lateral spinal flexion) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12 | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 16 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12 | 29.5 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 64 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12 | 49.2 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 160 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12 | 53.3 percentage of participants |
| BKZ 320 mg (FAS) | Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12 | 54.1 percentage of participants |