Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

A Multicenter, Phase 2B, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02963506
Acronym
BE AGILE
Enrollment
303
Registered
2016-11-15
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2023-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Keywords

AS, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Bimekizumab

Brief summary

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of bimekizumab in subjects with active Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).

Interventions

OTHERPlacebo
DRUGBimekizumab

Bimekizumab in different dosages.

Sponsors

UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), determined by documented radiologic evidence fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS including symptoms for \>=3 months and age of onset \<45 years * Subject has moderate to severe active disease as defined by each of the following: 1. BASDAI score \>=4 2. Spinal pain \>=4 on a 0 to 10 NRS (Numeric Rating Scale; from BASDAI item 2) * Subjects must have at least 1 of the following: 1. inadequate response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy 2. intolerance to administration of at least 1 NSAID 3. contraindication(s) to NSAID therapy * Subjects who are regularly taking NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors as part of their AS therapy are required to be on a stable dose for at least 14 days before Baseline * Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on an average daily dose of \<=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent for at least 14 days before Baseline and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 16 * Subjects taking methotrexate (MTX) (\<=25mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if started at least 12 weeks prior to Baseline, with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before randomization * Subjects taking sulfasalazine (up to 3grams/day) or hydroxychloroquine (up to 400mg per day total) are allowed to continue their medication if started at least 12 weeks prior to Baseline, with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before randomization * Subjects may be tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-naïve or may have received 1 prior TNF inhibitor. Subjects who have been on a TNF inhibitor previously must have: 1. experienced an inadequate response to previous treatment given for at least 12 weeks 2. been intolerant to administration (eg, had a side effect/adverse event that led to discontinuation) 3. lost access to TNF inhibitor for other reasons

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with a total ankylosis of the spine, or a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis eg, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or reactive arthritis * Subjects with any current sign or symptom that may indicate an active infection (except for the common cold) * Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections, or a serious or life-threatening infection within the 6 months prior to the Baseline Visit * Subjects receiving any live vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to Baseline * Subjects with known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, with latent TB infection or current or history of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMB) infection * Subjects with concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy during the past 5 years will be excluded, with following exceptions that may be included: 1. \<= 3 excised or ablated basal cell carcinomas of the skin 2. One squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (stage T1 maximum) successfully excised, or ablated only (other treatments, ie, chemotherapy, do not apply), with no signs of recurrence or metastases for more than 2 years prior to Screening 3. Actinic keratosis (-es) 4. Squamous cell carcinoma-in-situ of the skin successfully excised, or ablated, more than 6 months prior to Screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12Week 12The ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS score), Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)), Inflammation (mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12Week 12The ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain \[deterioration was defined as a relative worsening of at least 20% and an absolute worsening of at least 1 unit\]. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12Week 12The ASAS 5/6 response was defined as at least 20% improvement in at least 5 of the 6 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration), spinal mobility (lateral spinal flexion) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)From Baseline to Week 12The BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument, which consists of six 10-unit horizontal Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration, respectively) over the last week. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower disease activity. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random.
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12From Baseline to Week 12The ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the following components: 0.121 x Back pain (BASDAI question 2 result) 0.058 x Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6 result) 0.110 x PGADA 0.073 x Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3 result) 0.579 x (natural logarithm of the (hs-CRP \[mg/L\] + 1)) Back pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and fatigue are all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. There is a minimum score of 0.636 for the total ASDAS score, but no defined upper score since CRP does not have a set upper limit. If one component for the ASDAS-CRP was missing at a given visit, that component was imputed by carrying the last observation forward, and the ASDAS-CRP was calculated accordingly. If the hs-CRP value was below 2 mg/L, then it was imputed as the constant value of 2 mg/L.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the StudyFrom Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the StudyFrom Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardise the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the StudyFrom Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial subject that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. The results of this Secondary Outcome Measure were summarized from the adverse event pages of the Case Report Forms.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)From Baseline to Week 12The BASFI is a validated disease-specific instrument for assessing physical function. The BASFI comprises 10 items relating to the past week. The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 (Easy) to 10 (Impossible), with lower scores indicating better physical function. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study started to enroll participants in October 2016 and concluded in August 2018.

Pre-assignment details

The study included a 28-Day Screening Period, followed by a Double-Blind Period from Day 1 to Week 12, prior to treatment re-randomization, a Dose-blind Period, from Week 12 after the treatment re-randomization and up to Week 48 and a Safety Follow-Up (SFU) Period, post Week 48. The Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set and Dose-Blind Set.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period.
60
BKZ 16 mg
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 16 milligrams (mg) every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period.
61
BKZ 64 mg
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 64 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period.
61
BKZ 160 mg
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period followed by the same dose during the 36 weeks Dose-Blind Period.
60
BKZ 320 mg
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) during the 12 weeks Double-Blind Period followed by the same dose during the 36 weeks Dose-Blind Period.
61
Total Title303
Total606

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012
Dose-Blind PeriodAdverse Event0000013222116
Dose-Blind PeriodLack of Efficacy0000000101000
Dose-Blind PeriodLost to Follow-up0000010010010
Dose-Blind PeriodMeeting exclusion criteria 90000000000001
Dose-Blind PeriodSponsor decision0000010000000
Dose-Blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0000012201000
Double-Blind PeriodAdverse Event0010000000000
Double-Blind PeriodAdverse event, non fatal after Wk120100000000000
Double-Blind PeriodDeath0001000000000
Double-Blind PeriodLost to Follow-up0100000000000
Double-Blind PeriodNo compliance0100000000000
Double-Blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0011000000000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBKZ 16 mgBKZ 64 mgBKZ 160 mgBKZ 320 mgTotal Title
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
60 Participants56 Participants59 Participants56 Participants60 Participants291 Participants
Age, Continuous39.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
43.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.59
40.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.93
42.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11
45.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39
42.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other/Mixed
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
60 Participants58 Participants60 Participants59 Participants61 Participants298 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants11 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants53 Participants52 Participants52 Participants50 Participants256 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 610 / 581 / 1490 / 150
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 602 / 614 / 5842 / 14956 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 600 / 612 / 585 / 1496 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 12

The ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS score), Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)), Inflammation (mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP) and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 1213.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 1229.5 percentage of participants
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 1242.6 percentage of participants
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 1246.7 percentage of participants
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) at Week 1245.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Statistic and p-value were calculated using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (test for non-zero correlation statistic) based on modified ridit scores and including geographic region and prior Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitor exposure as stratification factors.p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor exposure.p-value: =0.0495% CI: [1.04, 6.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: =0.00195% CI: [1.83, 10.86]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.27, 13.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.19, 12.92]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12

The ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the following components: 0.121 x Back pain (BASDAI question 2 result) 0.058 x Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6 result) 0.110 x PGADA 0.073 x Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI question 3 result) 0.579 x (natural logarithm of the (hs-CRP \[mg/L\] + 1)) Back pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and fatigue are all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. There is a minimum score of 0.636 for the total ASDAS score, but no defined upper score since CRP does not have a set upper limit. If one component for the ASDAS-CRP was missing at a given visit, that component was imputed by carrying the last observation forward, and the ASDAS-CRP was calculated accordingly. If the hs-CRP value was below 2 mg/L, then it was imputed as the constant value of 2 mg/L.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (FAS)Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS [CRP]) at Week 12-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Comparison: Least squares (LS) Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.86, -0.24]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.47, -0.83]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.35, -0.72]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.45, -0.82]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)

The BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument, which consists of six 10-unit horizontal Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration, respectively) over the last week. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower disease activity. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-1.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)-2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: =0.09495% CI: [-1.31, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.34, -0.91]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.35, -0.91]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.6, -1.18]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)

The BASFI is a validated disease-specific instrument for assessing physical function. The BASFI comprises 10 items relating to the past week. The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 (Easy) to 10 (Impossible), with lower scores indicating better physical function. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Note: Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation based on the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo method for the intermittent missing data, followed by monotone regression for the monotone missing data assuming missing at random.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)-2.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: =0.07595% CI: [-1.35, 0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: =0.00395% CI: [-1.79, -0.37]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: =0.00295% CI: [-1.84, -0.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: LS Mean, standard error, confidence interval and p-value were derived using the ANCOVA model with treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure as fixed effects and the Baseline value as covariate.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.22, -0.81]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial subject that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. The results of this Secondary Outcome Measure were summarized from the adverse event pages of the Case Report Forms.

Time frame: From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)

Population: The SS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (FAS)Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study1.7 percentage of participants
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study3.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study1.7 percentage of participants
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study4.7 percentage of participants
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study6.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

Time frame: From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)

Population: The SS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study45.0 percentage of participants
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study44.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study34.5 percentage of participants
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study69.8 percentage of participants
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE) During the Study82.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study

A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: * Results in death * Is life-threatening * Requires in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation * Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect * Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics * Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardise the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.

Time frame: From Screening until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 77)

Population: The SS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study3.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study0 percentage of participants
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study3.4 percentage of participants
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study3.4 percentage of participants
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Study4.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 12

The ASAS20 response was defined as an improvement of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is not active and 10 is very active in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain \[deterioration was defined as a relative worsening of at least 20% and an absolute worsening of at least 1 unit\]. Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 1228.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 1241.0 percentage of participants
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 1262.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 1258.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) at Week 1272.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: =0.16395% CI: [0.8, 3.67]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.84, 8.48]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: =0.00195% CI: [1.66, 7.61]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.92, 14.28]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 12

The ASAS 5/6 response was defined as at least 20% improvement in at least 5 of the 6 domains: PGADA, Pain assessment (total spinal pain NRS scores), Function (BASFI), Inflammation (mean of BASDAI questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration), spinal mobility (lateral spinal flexion) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Note: Participants with missing data or who discontinue study treatment prior to Week 12 were counted as non-responders.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had a valid measurement of the primary efficacy variable at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 126.7 percentage of participants
BKZ 16 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 1229.5 percentage of participants
BKZ 64 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 1249.2 percentage of participants
BKZ 160 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 1253.3 percentage of participants
BKZ 320 mg (FAS)Percentage of Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 1254.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: =0.00395% CI: [1.74, 15.96]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.03, 35.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.81, 42.46]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: For differences in relation to placebo: Odds Ratio, confidence interval and p-value were derived from a logistic regression model including fixed effects for treatment, geographic region and prior TNF inhibitor exposure.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.02, 44.27]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026