Skip to content

IPG Replacement Study (PREFERENCE-H)

Prospective Evaluation Comparing the Effects of Constant Current Versus Constant Voltage in Deep Brain Stimulation Using Hybrid Systems

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02963259
Acronym
PREFERENCE-H
Enrollment
17
Registered
2016-11-15
Start date
2017-03-29
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2024-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

SJM Infinity™, SJM Brio™, Implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacement, SJM-CIP-10135, Deep brain stimulation (DBS)

Brief summary

This post-marketing evaluation has been designed to consistently investigate the subject's preference when switching from a Medtronic® constant voltage or constant current device to a St Jude Medical Infinity™ or St Jude Medical Brio™ constant current system. As electrodes will not be re-positioned, differences in subject's preference are to be explained by the difference in shape of the delivered pulse or waveform between the two systems.

Interventions

DEVICESJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system

Implanted Medtronic® IPG will be explanted and replaced by a SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject (and caregiver, if applicable) signed the approved Informed Consent; * Subject is ≥ 18 and ≤ 74 years of age; * Subject is bilaterally treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) using a constant voltage device (i.e. Soletra™, Itrel™, Kinetra™, ActivaPC™ or ActivaRC™ IPG) and is responding satisfactory to CV stimulation in the Investigator's opinion; * In the physician's opinion, the subject is a suitable candidate for an IPG replacement with different stimulation paradigm; * Subject needs and/or requests an IPG replacement within 12 months after consent and the current IPG has at least 2.6 V output left (i.e. approx. 30% of full battery capacity) at the time of subject enrollment; * PD symptom onset is no longer than 20 years; * Subject has a Hoehn & Yahr score \<IV (on stim); * Subject with a normal cognitive function (MMSE ≥25); * Subject is fluent speaker (as judged by the investigator) of the language spoken in the country where the investigational site is located.

Exclusion criteria

* IPG battery has less than 30% battery life at the time of consent; * Need to replace or reposition the leads or extensions during the IPG replacement procedure; * Subject had \>10 recurrent falls experienced in the 3 months prior to consent; * Subject is unwilling to change to either a St Jude Medical Infinity™ or Brio™ DBS system for the IPG replacement; * Subject is unable to attend the study visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Subjects Who Indicate Preference on Constant Current Over Constant Voltage at the 3 Month Follow-up Visit.3 MonthsProportion of subjects who preferred constant current device over constant voltage, tested against a performance goal (PG) of 50.0% at the 3-month follow-up visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Events Per Patient-year of Follow-up12 months after IPG replacementTotal number of safety events related to battery replacement surgical procedures for hybrid systems divided by total follow-up duration from IPG replacement visit to either 12M visit or withdrawal visit (patient-years).
Incidence Rate12 months after IPG replacementNumber of subjects who underwent IPG replacement and encountered safety events related to battery replacement surgical procedure for hybrid system divided by total subjects who underwent IPG replacement.

Countries

Germany, Italy, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study enrolled a total of 17 subjects in 5 centers across Europe and United States between 29 March 2017 and 3 December 2018. Of the 17 enrolled subjects, 16 subjects were evaluated at the baseline visit and 12 completed the 3- and 12-month visit.

Pre-assignment details

Of the total 17 participants enrolled, 5 were withdrawn for the reasons listed and only 16 completed the baseline.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG System
Subjects will be implanted with SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system: Implanted Medtronic® IPG will be explanted and replaced by a SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system
16
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyIPG Replacement not Done with Abbott Device2
Overall StudySubject Did Not Meet Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria1
Overall StudySubject Participation Terminated by Investigator1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG System
Age, Continuous62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
UPDRS Score
UPDRS III off stimulation
39.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.24
UPDRS Score
UPDRS III on stimulation
23.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

The Percentage of Subjects Who Indicate Preference on Constant Current Over Constant Voltage at the 3 Month Follow-up Visit.

Proportion of subjects who preferred constant current device over constant voltage, tested against a performance goal (PG) of 50.0% at the 3-month follow-up visit.

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG SystemThe Percentage of Subjects Who Indicate Preference on Constant Current Over Constant Voltage at the 3 Month Follow-up Visit.4 participants
Secondary

Incidence Rate

Number of subjects who underwent IPG replacement and encountered safety events related to battery replacement surgical procedure for hybrid system divided by total subjects who underwent IPG replacement.

Time frame: 12 months after IPG replacement

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG SystemIncidence Rate0 subjects
Secondary

Number of Events Per Patient-year of Follow-up

Total number of safety events related to battery replacement surgical procedures for hybrid systems divided by total follow-up duration from IPG replacement visit to either 12M visit or withdrawal visit (patient-years).

Time frame: 12 months after IPG replacement

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG SystemNumber of Events Per Patient-year of Follow-up0 events per patient-year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026