Skip to content

Non-interventional Post-authorisation Study to Document the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of NUWIQ

Prospective, Multinational, Non-interventional Post-authorisation Study to Document the Long-term Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of Human-cl rhFVIII (Simoctocog Alfa) in Patients With Haemophilia A Treated in Routine Clinical Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02962765
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-11-11
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2020-08-20
Last updated
2021-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia A

Brief summary

Prospective, multinational, non-interventional post-authorisation study to collect additional clinical data and to ensure consistency in the long-term between the outcome from pre-authorisation clinical studies (in 135 previously treated paediatric and adult patients) and routine clinical practice. Besides aspects such as general product safety and efficacy, there will be a focus on immunogenicity, particularly on inhibitor development. The diagnosis of FVIII inhibitor will be based on clinical observations and confirmed by FVIII inhibitor testing in the laboratory.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Octapharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Haemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤ 2%) based on medical history; at least 100 patients should have severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C \< 1%) * Male patients of any age * Previous treatment with a FVIII concentrate for more than 150 EDs * Availability of detailed documentation (patient diary, log book, etc.) covering either the last 50 EDs or the last 2 years per patient to confirm treatment modality (i.e., prophylaxis, on-demand, recent surgery, or immune tolerance induction) * Inhibitor negative (\< 0.6 BU) at study entry as confirmed by a recovery test with previous FVIII product and inhibitor test in a central laboratory * Immunocompetence (CD4+ count \> 200/µL), HIV-negative, or having a viral load \< 200 particles/µL or \< 400,000 copies/mL * Decision to prescribe Human-cl rhFVIII before enrolment into the study * Written informed consent by the patient or the patient's parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

* Patients treated with any investigational medicinal product (IMP) except FVIII IMP within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or patients planning to undergo treatment with any IMP other than Human-cl rhFVIII are not eligible for enrolment into the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With FVIII InhibitorsScreening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)FVIII inhibitors will be determined based on clinical observations and confirmed by FVIII inhibitor testing in the laboratory.
Number of Patients With Adverse Drug ReactionsRecorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including hypersensitivity reactions will be recorded by patients in treatment diaries which will be reviewed at each Follow-up Visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic TreatmentMonitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 3.7 months; maximum 21.2 months)Total number of bleeding episodes under prophylaxis treatment divided by the duration of prophylactic phase (in years)
Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleMonitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.
Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating PhysiciansFrom start of surgery until end of post-operative periodAt the end of the postoperative period, an overall assessment of the efficacy of treatment in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods using the 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none' scale will be done jointly by the surgeon and the hematologist. Based on this assessment, efficacy ratings assessed as either 'excellent' or 'good' will be considered 'successfully treated'.
Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleRecorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent', 'good', 'moderate', and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

Countries

Argentina, Belarus, Czechia, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
The safety (SAF) population consist of all patients who received at least one infusion of Human-cl rhFVIII (n=78)
78
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLimited access to study medication3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation9
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
Age, Customized
Age
12-<18 yrs
12 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
<12 yrs
40 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
>18 yrs
26 Participants
BMI
12-<18 yrs
23.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.46
BMI
<12 yrs
17.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.34
BMI
>18 yrs
25.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
53 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Intron 22-Inversion
17 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Large Deletion/Insertion
1 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Missense Mutation
2 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Nonsense Mutation
4 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Other
9 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Small Deletion/Insertion
5 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Stop-Mutation
4 Participants
Factor VIII gene defect
Unknown
36 Participants
Factor VIII Inhibitor History
No
68 Participants
Factor VIII Inhibitor History
Yes
10 Participants
Family history of Haemophilia
No
31 Participants
Family history of Haemophilia
Yes
47 Participants
Height
12-<18 yrs
168.8 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.73
Height
<12 yrs
112 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.59
Height
>18 yrs
172.9 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.88
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
Asian
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
More than one race
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
Other
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Patient race
White
61 Participants
Severity of Haemophilia A
Moderate
10 Participants
Severity of Haemophilia A
Severe
68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
78 Participants
Weight
12-<18 yrs
67.1 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.55
Weight
<12 yrs
21.7 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Weight
>18 yrs
76.6 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.21

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 78
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including hypersensitivity reactions will be recorded by patients in treatment diaries which will be reviewed at each Follow-up Visit.

Time frame: Recorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reactions0 Participants
Primary

Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors

FVIII inhibitors will be determined based on clinical observations and confirmed by FVIII inhibitor testing in the laboratory.

Time frame: Screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

Population: FVIII inhibitor testing could be carried out at any time at the physician's discretion. Patients were checked for clinical symptoms suggesting FVIII inhibitor development, any suspicion of inhibitor formation was to be investigated by FVIII inhibitor testing. No symptoms led to suspicion of inhibitor formation in any patient treated with Nuwiq®. Within the FAS population, inhibitor levels were tested in 40 patients at screening, 44 between screening and completion and 21 at study completion.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors0 Participants
FVIII Inhibitors Detected Between Screening and Completion in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors0 Participants
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Completion in Patients Treated With Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII)Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors0 Participants
Secondary

Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic Treatment

Total number of bleeding episodes under prophylaxis treatment divided by the duration of prophylactic phase (in years)

Time frame: Monitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 3.7 months; maximum 21.2 months)

Population: Of the 77 participants within the prophylactic treatment group, 74 patients had at least 3 months under a prophylactic regimen and had at least one bleeding episode and were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic TreatmentAll bleeding events2.39 Number of bleeding episodes per year
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic TreatmentSpontaneous bleeding events0.00 Number of bleeding episodes per year
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic TreatmentTraumatic bleeding events0.00 Number of bleeding episodes per year
Secondary

Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

Time frame: Monitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleNone0 Number of Bleeding episodes
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleExcellent50 Number of Bleeding episodes
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleGood4 Number of Bleeding episodes
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleModerate1 Number of Bleeding episodes
Secondary

Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent', 'good', 'moderate', and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

Time frame: Recorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

Population: Analysis was only performed on patients in the prophylactic treatment group who experienced bleeding episode that required treatment with Nuwiq. Of the 77 patients in the prophylactic treatment group, 48 patients experienced a BE that required treatment with Nuwiq and were assessed using the 4-point efficacy scale

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleNone3 Bleeding episodes
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleExcellent167 Bleeding episodes
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleGood50 Bleeding episodes
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy ScaleModerate26 Bleeding episodes
Secondary

Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating Physicians

At the end of the postoperative period, an overall assessment of the efficacy of treatment in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods using the 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none' scale will be done jointly by the surgeon and the hematologist. Based on this assessment, efficacy ratings assessed as either 'excellent' or 'good' will be considered 'successfully treated'.

Time frame: From start of surgery until end of post-operative period

Population: A total of 4 patients had 6 surgeries that were treated with Nuwiq®. Two of these surgeries were minor and 4 were major. Five surgeries had an overall efficacy assessment performed jointly by the hematologist and surgeon. One of the six surgeries was treated pre-op with another FVIII product and post-op with Nuwiq® and therefore an assessment of Nuwiq® efficacy could not be performed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating PhysiciansModerate0 Surgeries
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating PhysiciansExcellent5 Surgeries
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating PhysiciansGood0 Surgeries
FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating PhysiciansNone0 Surgeries

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026