Skip to content

To Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the ProstaCare Water Electrolysis System in Relieving Symptoms of BPH.

ProstaCare Water Electrolysis System for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02962674
Enrollment
49
Registered
2016-11-11
Start date
2016-09-19
Completion date
2020-11-20
Last updated
2021-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

BPH

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the ProstaCare System in relieving symptoms of urinary outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Interventions

DEVICEprostaFix System

Sponsors

ProstaCare Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * 45 years of age or older with a diagnosis of BPH, * International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 12 or greater, * Prostate volume between 25 cm3 and 55 cm3, * Uroflow with peak flow rate (Qmax) no greater than 13 ml/sec with a corresponding voided volume of at least 100 ml and a post void residual (PVR) of 250 ml or less. * Prostate length, width and height must be at least 3.2 cm, 3.5 cm and 2.5 cm, respectively Key

Exclusion criteria

* Obstruction due to an enlarged middle lobe, central gland or significant transverse asymmetry, * Subjects on 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) (inclusion only if washed out prior to treatment), * Subjects on alpha blockers (inclusion only if washed-out before treatment), * Active urinary tract infection at time of treatment, * Interest in maintaining fertility, * Past history of urologic surgery or minimally invasive treatment for BPH, * History of or current medical conditions contraindicating elective urological procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 Months Follow-up Visit3 months after treatmentThe primary effectiveness objective was to demonstrate that mean IPSS improvement (Δ IPSS) following treatment with the prostaFix System exceeded 6.5 points with 95% confidence 3 months after treatment. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated questionnaire used to assess baseline and post treatment BPH symptoms. It is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the subject to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of that particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic): Mild (symptom score less than or equal to 7), Moderate (symptom score range 8-19) and Severe (symptom score range 20-35). Improvement in BPH symptoms is seen as a decrease in IPSS.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)3 months after treatmentThe primary safety objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of subjects affected by serious adverse events (SAEs) associated with the use of the device. This objective was addressed through recording all adverse events (AEs) observed or reported during the course of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) From BaselineBaseline and 3 months after treatmentThe Post Void Residual (PVR) is an indicator of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding. A healthy bladder should be fairly empty following urination. A volume \< 50 mL is normal; \< 100 mL is usually acceptable in patients \> 65 years old. The higher the PVR, the more urine is left in the bladder and this can be seen as a sign of increased obstruction of the urethra.
Mean Change in MSHQ-EjD Score From BaselineBaseline and 3 months after treatmentThe MSHQ-EjD Short Form (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Disfunction) is composed of three questions that rate ejaculatory function in men. A fourth question measures the MSHQ-EjD Bother, this asks the subject if he is bothered by his level of ejaculatory function. MSHQ-EjD total score ranges from 1 to 15 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning. MSHQ-EjD bother score ranges from 0 to 5 with a higher score indicating greater bother. An increase in the MSHQ-EjD Total Score indicates better ejaculation and a decrease in the MSHQ-EjD Bother Score means that the subject is less bothered by his ejaculatory function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.
Change in IIEF Score From BaselineBaseline and 3 months after treatmentThe IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) provides a broad measure of sexual function; an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. This questionnaire consists of five questions that asks the subject of any erection problems that have impacted his sexual life over the past 4 weeks or since the last study visit, whichever is shorter. IIEF total score ranges from 0 to 25 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning and an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.
Mean Change in QOL From BaselineBaseline and 3 months after treatmentQuestion eight of the IPSS questionnaire refers to the subject's perceived quality of life (QOL). The International Scientific Committee (SCI), under the patronage of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), recommends the use of only a single question to assess the quality of life. The answers to this question range from delighted to terrible or 0 to 6.
Mean Change in MSHQ-EjD From BaselineBaseline and 12 months from treatmentThe MSHQ-EjD Short Form (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Disfunction) is composed of three questions that rate ejaculatory function in men. A fourth question measures the MSHQ-EjD Bother, this asks the subject if he is bothered by his level of ejaculatory function. MSHQ-EjD total score ranges from 1 to 15 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning. MSHQ-EjD bother score ranges from 0 to 5 with a higher score indicating greater bother. An increase in the MSHQ-EjD Total Score indicates better ejaculation and a decrease in the MSHQ-EjD Bother Score means that the subject is less bothered by his ejaculatory function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.
Mean Change in IIEF From BaselineBaseline and 12 months from treatmentThe IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) provides a broad measure of sexual function; an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. This questionnaire consists of five questions that asks the subject of any erection problems that have impacted his sexual life over the past 4 weeks or since the last study visit, whichever is shorter. IIEF total score ranges from 0 to 25 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning and an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.
MRI Necrosis Volume3 months after treatmentThe prostaFix System uses pH shifts induced by water electrolysis to induce necrosis in the hyperplastic prostate tissue. The induced necrosis within the borders of the prostate result in a pressure reduction and thereby relieve the symptoms of BPH. This necrosis that resulted from the procedure eventually heals and necrosis volume should reduce overtime. Per protocol, only the first 10-15 subjects would have MRI studies at done to assess subject safety and treatment effect. then MRI was optional. A total of 14 subjects actually had an MRI and the results are reported for those subjects.
Mean Change in IPSS From BaselineBaseline and 12 months from treatmentThe International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated questionnaire used to assess baseline and post treatment BPH symptoms. It is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the subject to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of that particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic): Mild (symptom score less than or equal to 7), Moderate (symptom score range 8-19) and Severe (symptom score range 20-35). Improvement in BPH symptoms is seen as a decrease in IPSS.
Mean Change in Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) From BaselineBaseline and 3 months after treatmentUroflowmetry measures the flow of urine. It tracks how fast urine flows (peak flow rate - Qmax), how much flows out, and how long it takes. It's a diagnostic test to assess how well the urinary tract functions. Uroflowmetry is used in BPH subjects to help the doctors determine how well the subject's urinary tract is doing and the severity of obstruction caused by the prostate. The higher the Qmax is, the less obstructed the urethra.

Countries

New Zealand, Singapore

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Subjects treated with the prostaFix System
46
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor prior to completion of all study protocol visits by enrolled subjects.49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment
Age, Continuous66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Chinese
28 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Indian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Malay
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
New Zealand European
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 Months Follow-up Visit

The primary effectiveness objective was to demonstrate that mean IPSS improvement (Δ IPSS) following treatment with the prostaFix System exceeded 6.5 points with 95% confidence 3 months after treatment. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated questionnaire used to assess baseline and post treatment BPH symptoms. It is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the subject to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of that particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic): Mild (symptom score less than or equal to 7), Moderate (symptom score range 8-19) and Severe (symptom score range 20-35). Improvement in BPH symptoms is seen as a decrease in IPSS.

Time frame: 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 Months Follow-up Visit12.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
Comparison: The null and alternative hypotheses associated with this objective was written as:~H0: μ ΔIPSS ≤ 6.5 points HA: μ ΔIPSS \> 6.5 points where μ ΔIPSS was the true underlying value of mean ΔIPSS following a treatment at the 3-month follow-up visit and 6.5 points was an objective performance goal (OPG). The objective was met at a given time point by rejecting the null hypothesis in a one-sided t-test at the 5% significance level.p-value: 0.004t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

The primary safety objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of subjects affected by serious adverse events (SAEs) associated with the use of the device. This objective was addressed through recording all adverse events (AEs) observed or reported during the course of the study.

Time frame: 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
prostaFix SystemNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Participants
Secondary

Change in IIEF Score From Baseline

The IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) provides a broad measure of sexual function; an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. This questionnaire consists of five questions that asks the subject of any erection problems that have impacted his sexual life over the past 4 weeks or since the last study visit, whichever is shorter. IIEF total score ranges from 0 to 25 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning and an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemChange in IIEF Score From Baseline-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
Secondary

Mean Change in IIEF From Baseline

The IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) provides a broad measure of sexual function; an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. This questionnaire consists of five questions that asks the subject of any erection problems that have impacted his sexual life over the past 4 weeks or since the last study visit, whichever is shorter. IIEF total score ranges from 0 to 25 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning and an increase in score indicates an improvement in sexual function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in IIEF From Baseline-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Secondary

Mean Change in IPSS From Baseline

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated questionnaire used to assess baseline and post treatment BPH symptoms. It is based on the answers to seven questions concerning urinary symptoms and one question concerning quality of life. Each question concerning urinary symptoms allows the subject to choose one out of six answers indicating increasing severity of that particular symptom. The answers are assigned points from 0 to 5. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic): Mild (symptom score less than or equal to 7), Moderate (symptom score range 8-19) and Severe (symptom score range 20-35). Improvement in BPH symptoms is seen as a decrease in IPSS.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in IPSS From Baseline-8.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
Secondary

Mean Change in MSHQ-EjD From Baseline

The MSHQ-EjD Short Form (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Disfunction) is composed of three questions that rate ejaculatory function in men. A fourth question measures the MSHQ-EjD Bother, this asks the subject if he is bothered by his level of ejaculatory function. MSHQ-EjD total score ranges from 1 to 15 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning. MSHQ-EjD bother score ranges from 0 to 5 with a higher score indicating greater bother. An increase in the MSHQ-EjD Total Score indicates better ejaculation and a decrease in the MSHQ-EjD Bother Score means that the subject is less bothered by his ejaculatory function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in MSHQ-EjD From BaselineMSHQ-EjD (Total)-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
prostaFix SystemMean Change in MSHQ-EjD From BaselineMSHQ-EjD (Bother)-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

Mean Change in MSHQ-EjD Score From Baseline

The MSHQ-EjD Short Form (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Disfunction) is composed of three questions that rate ejaculatory function in men. A fourth question measures the MSHQ-EjD Bother, this asks the subject if he is bothered by his level of ejaculatory function. MSHQ-EjD total score ranges from 1 to 15 with a higher score indicating better sexual functioning. MSHQ-EjD bother score ranges from 0 to 5 with a higher score indicating greater bother. An increase in the MSHQ-EjD Total Score indicates better ejaculation and a decrease in the MSHQ-EjD Bother Score means that the subject is less bothered by his ejaculatory function. Due to the sensitive nature of the questions, this questionnaire is voluntary and not all subjects completed it at baseline. Some subjects completed at baseline but decided not to complete at certain follow-up visits which explains the different number of participants during various analysis time frames.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in MSHQ-EjD Score From BaselineMSHQ-EjD (Total)0.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
prostaFix SystemMean Change in MSHQ-EjD Score From BaselineMSHQ-EjD (Bother)-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Secondary

Mean Change in Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) From Baseline

Uroflowmetry measures the flow of urine. It tracks how fast urine flows (peak flow rate - Qmax), how much flows out, and how long it takes. It's a diagnostic test to assess how well the urinary tract functions. Uroflowmetry is used in BPH subjects to help the doctors determine how well the subject's urinary tract is doing and the severity of obstruction caused by the prostate. The higher the Qmax is, the less obstructed the urethra.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) From Baseline0.99 ml/secStandard Error 0.49
Secondary

Mean Change in Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) From Baseline

Uroflowmetry measures the flow of urine. It tracks how fast urine flows (peak flow rate - Qmax), how much flows out, and how long it takes. It's a diagnostic test to assess how well the urinary tract functions. Uroflowmetry is used in BPH subjects to help the doctors determine how well the subject's urinary tract is doing and the severity of obstruction caused by the prostate. The higher the Qmax is, the less obstructed the urethra.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) From Baseline2.36 ml/secStandard Error 0.64
Secondary

Mean Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) From Baseline

The Post Void Residual (PVR) is an indicator of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding. A healthy bladder should be fairly empty following urination. A volume \< 50 mL is normal; \< 100 mL is usually acceptable in patients \> 65 years old. The higher the PVR, the more urine is left in the bladder and this can be seen as a sign of increased obstruction of the urethra.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) From Baseline-1.82 mlStandard Error 9.64
Secondary

Mean Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) From Baseline

The Post Void Residual (PVR) is an indicator of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding. A healthy bladder should be fairly empty following urination. A volume \< 50 mL is normal; \< 100 mL is usually acceptable in patients \> 65 years old. The higher the PVR, the more urine is left in the bladder and this can be seen as a sign of increased obstruction of the urethra.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) From Baseline-3.54 mlStandard Error 9.46
Secondary

Mean Change in QOL From Baseline

Question eight of the IPSS questionnaire refers to the subject's perceived quality of life (QOL). The International Scientific Committee (SCI), under the patronage of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), recommends the use of only a single question to assess the quality of life. The answers to this question range from delighted to terrible or 0 to 6.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months from treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in QOL From Baseline-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Mean Change in QOL From Baseline

Question eight of the IPSS questionnaire refers to the subject's perceived quality of life (QOL). The International Scientific Committee (SCI), under the patronage of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), recommends the use of only a single question to assess the quality of life. The answers to this question range from delighted to terrible or 0 to 6.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months after treatment

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF): All subjects who enrolled in the study, were treated with the prostaFix System, and completed the 3 month follow-up visit without significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMean Change in QOL From Baseline-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Secondary

MRI Necrosis Volume

The prostaFix System uses pH shifts induced by water electrolysis to induce necrosis in the hyperplastic prostate tissue. The induced necrosis within the borders of the prostate result in a pressure reduction and thereby relieve the symptoms of BPH. This necrosis that resulted from the procedure eventually heals and necrosis volume should reduce overtime. Per protocol, only the first 10-15 subjects would have MRI studies at done to assess subject safety and treatment effect. then MRI was optional. A total of 14 subjects actually had an MRI and the results are reported for those subjects.

Time frame: 3 months after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
prostaFix SystemMRI Necrosis Volume0.12 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.25

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026