Skip to content

Delineating Swallowing Impairment and Decline in ALS

Delineating Physiologic Mechanisms of Swallowing Impairment and Decline in ALS

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02962050
Enrollment
109
Registered
2016-11-11
Start date
2017-05-31
Completion date
2023-02-16
Last updated
2023-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to 1) evaluate the discriminant ability of simple clinical markers to detect swallowing impairment in individuals with ALS, 2) develop and validate a minimally invasive clinical screening tool for use at multidisciplinary ALS clinics, and 3) determine the natural history of swallowing impairment and decline in ALS.

Detailed description

This research study is being performed to determine screening tools or tests that are able to identify and track swallowing problems associated with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) over time. Also, this study will provide insight into the natural progression of swallowing impairment in persons with ALS over time. Participants enrolled in this study will complete an evaluation at the University of Florida Aerodigestive Research Core laboratory located at Shands Hospital, Gainesville every three months. Each evaluation will take approximately 90 minutes. During these evaluations, a videofluoroscopy (X-ray of swallowing) examination, cough tests and questionnaires will be completed.

Interventions

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study will be performed to measure oropharyngeal swallowing

Voluntary peak cough flow testing will be performed to determine the peak expiratory flow (PEF) and volume of air expelled (FEV1) during voluntary coughing.

The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) is a device that measures the peak pressure performance of lingual strength and endurance via the action of a bulb placed on the hard palate.

A capsaicin challenge with three randomized blocks of 0, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μM capsaicin. The capsaicin will be dissolved in a vehicle solution consisting of 80% physiological saline, and 20% ethanol. Participants will be given the instruction cough if you need to prior to capsaicin delivery.The solution will be administered automatically upon detection of an inspired breath and there will be a minimum of one minute between each trial. This is to test the reflexive cough testing for upper airway sensitivity and motor thresholds.

Pulmonary Function testing will be performed using conventional methods and will include the following outcomes: forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) expressed as a percentage of predicted values.

OTHEREating Assessment Tool 10

The Eating Assessment Tool-10 will be used for participant reporting of swallowing system severity.

OTHERThe Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale

The Center for Neurologic Studies Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) will be used to report bulbar function in study participants.

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of probable or definite ALS

Exclusion criteria

* allergies to barium or capsaicin * History of stroke * Head and Neck Cancer * Other disorder that might contribute to swallowing impairment * Not enrolled in other research investigations that might impact swallowing * Not pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Swallowing FunctionBaseline, every 3 months through study completion, an average of 2 years.The DIGEST scale will be used by trained, blinded raters to assign ratings of safety to bolus trials. Both efficiency and safety will be assigned a score from 0-4 (more safe/efficient - less safe/efficient) and based on these ratings, will be given a total score ranging from 0-4 that captures their DIGEST rating.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026