Skip to content

Using Topical Sirolimus 2% for Patients With Epidermolysis Bullous Simplex (EBS) Study

A Prospective, Double-Blind, Cross-Over, Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Topical Sirolimus 2% in the Treatment of Plantar Blistering in Patients With Epidermolysis Bullous Simplex (EBS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02960997
Enrollment
8
Registered
2016-11-10
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2021-12-01
Last updated
2022-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex, Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex Kobner, Weber-Cockayne Syndrome

Keywords

epidermolysis bullosa simplex

Brief summary

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) simplex is a rare orphan disease caused by a mutation in DNA leading to abnormal dominant keratins in the skin. Patients with EB simplex develop lifelong painful thick soles on their feet, and current standard of care is supportive. This pilot study will target the dominant mutant keratin proteins in the skin to ameliorate the severity of EB simplex. The purpose is to improve the function of EB simplex feet with an application of topical sirolimus, 2%. The investigators plan on inhibiting the mTOR pathway to down regulate the translation of defective keratin proteins and work through anti proliferative pathways.

Detailed description

The proposed 40 week pilot study being conducted is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Participants will be assigned to treat both feet with either topical sirolimus, 2% cream daily or placebo (vehicle-control) for 12 weeks, followed by a 4 week washout period, then re-treatment to both feet will occur by the cross-over intervention. These studies will exploit the naturally occurring transcriptional regulation of keratin sequences, the known gene aberration causing EB simplex, and assess the potential for mTOR pathway inhibition in treatment of the patient's plantar lesions. The objective of this study is to assess (1) the safety of topical rapamycin for plantar lesions for the treatment of EB simplex, and 2) test if topical rapamycin to improves the clinical severity of lesional skin, including pain and itch, in subjects with EB simplex at the end of treatment versus baseline and compared to an intrasubject placebo treated control. Wound size measurement, quality of life evaluation will be assessed using epidermolysis bullosa (QOLEB), and EB disease activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI). With the results of this pilot study, physicians would be able to transition from supportive care (the current state of the art for EB simplex) to targeted molecular therapeutics, leading to improved mobility and quality of life for patients with EB simplex.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus, 2%
DRUGVehicle

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must: * Be capable of understanding the purpose and risks of the study and sign a written Informed Consent Form (ICF); Legally authorized representative of subjects willing and able to give consent for children 4-18 yo. * Be male or female with a diagnosis of EBS * Minimum EBDASI feet activity score of 2/10 * Age - 4 years or older * Ability to complete 12 study visits within a 40-week period, each for approximately 30-60 minutes. * Anticipated life expectancy ≥52 weeks. * Males and females of childbearing potential should be using an effective means of contraception. * Laboratory values within the range of normal for the participating institution unless the PI feels they are not clinically relevant * Be able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to sirolimus or components of the vehicle ointment * Pregnancy, breast feeding * Prior history of liver disease * Serious known concurrent medical illness or infection, which could potentially present a safety risk and/or prevent compliance with the requirements of the treatment program. * Known immunodeficiency virus or syndrome including those with: * Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) * Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) * Hepatitis B * Prior history of grafting surgeries or other surgeries in the dermatologic treatment area * History of significant condition in the dermatologic treatment area such as trauma, which could impair evaluation for the treatment of EBS or non-healing chronic wound. * Use of other investigational drugs within 30 days of the screening visit and/or has not recovered from any side effects of prior investigational drugs or procedure in the affected area (e.g., a biopsy). * Use of acitretin within the last 1 month * Use of Roaccutane within last 3 months * Botox injections to the feet within the last 6 months. * Participant is planning extra physical activities within the next 3 months. * Amputated foot

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodFoot function was assessed utilizing the validated Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Low Score (0) means severely limited in performing a broad range of physical activities. High Score (100) means can perform all desired physical activities. Data are reported per intervention.
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodPhysical Activity was assessed utilizing the validated Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Low Score (0) means severely limited in performing a broad range of physical activities. High Score (100) means can perform all desired physical activities. Data are reported per intervention.
Trough Concentration of SirolimusWeek 12Trough measurements were taken prior to topical sirolimus administration at the week 12 study visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodThe 5-D Pruritus Scale is a 1-page, 5-question tool used in clinical trials to assess 5 dimensions of background itch: degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution. Each question corresponds to 1 of the 5 dimensions of itch; participants were to rate their symptoms over the preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. After the summation of individual score, the total score ranges from 5 (least affected) to 25 (most affected). Data are reported per intervention.
Plantar Defect Size Using 3D PhotographyBaseline, week 12Plantar defect size measurements using 3D photography (% change in total defect area).
Average Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / Pedometer12 weeksAverage number of steps walked per day from baseline to the end of each treatment.
Change in mTOR Pathway InhibitionBaseline, week 12Molecular biology study of skin biopsies assayed for mTOR pathway inhibition (e.g. determination of phosphoprotein inhibition included ribosomal protein S6, S6 kinase and/or eIF-4E binding protein).
Foot Plantar Pressure MeasurementsBaseline, week 12Foot plantar pressure measurements before and after treatment using the Podotech Elftman Foot Scanner.
Child Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodQuality of Life-Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) Questionnaire specifically designed for people with EB. The QOLEB can be used to identify everyday life occurrences negatively affected by EB. It assesses change in quality of life over time, an important measure when assessing the success of new treatments for EB. Scores from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicate greater impact of EB on quality of life. Data are reported per intervention.
Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodThe EBDASI is a validated scoring system that objectively quantifies the severity of EB affecting the entire body. It has been designed to evaluate the response to new therapies for the treatment of EB. Scores range from 0 (absent of EB) to 10 (entire area involved). Data are reported per intervention.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sirolimus, Then Placebo
Participants will receive Sirolimus, 2% topical ointment for 12 weeks followed by placebo to match sirolimus for 12 weeks.
4
Placebo, Then Sirolimus
Participants will receive placebo to match sirolimus for 12 weeks followed by Sirolimus, 2% topical ointment for 12 weeks.
4
Total8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSirolimus, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then SirolimusTotal
5-D Pruritus Score15.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.87
11.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35
13.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Child Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire18.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17
17.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
17.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale2.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
3.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.87
3.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function51.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.16
51.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
51.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.76
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity63.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25
54.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.35
59.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.21
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 88 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain Score

Foot function was assessed utilizing the validated Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Low Score (0) means severely limited in performing a broad range of physical activities. High Score (100) means can perform all desired physical activities. Data are reported per intervention.

Time frame: Week 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SirolimusFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 061.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.48
SirolimusFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 1260.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.37
PlaceboFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 049.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.83
PlaceboFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 1256.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.09
Primary

Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain Score

Physical Activity was assessed utilizing the validated Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Low Score (0) means severely limited in performing a broad range of physical activities. High Score (100) means can perform all desired physical activities. Data are reported per intervention.

Time frame: Week 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SirolimusFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 069.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.37
SirolimusFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 1270.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.37
PlaceboFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 054.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.65
PlaceboFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 1261.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.91
Primary

Trough Concentration of Sirolimus

Trough measurements were taken prior to topical sirolimus administration at the week 12 study visit.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Trough concentration of sirolimus was collected during Sirolimus treatment only, so the Placebo group is not presented in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
SirolimusTrough Concentration of SirolimusNA ng/mL
Secondary

5-D Pruritus Scale Score

The 5-D Pruritus Scale is a 1-page, 5-question tool used in clinical trials to assess 5 dimensions of background itch: degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution. Each question corresponds to 1 of the 5 dimensions of itch; participants were to rate their symptoms over the preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. After the summation of individual score, the total score ranges from 5 (least affected) to 25 (most affected). Data are reported per intervention.

Time frame: Week 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sirolimus5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 012.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
Sirolimus5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 1212.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.46
Placebo5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 011.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Placebo5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 1211.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Average Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / Pedometer

Average number of steps walked per day from baseline to the end of each treatment.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: One participant had no Fitbit data during placebo treatment and is excluded from the analysis. Three participants lost their Fitbit devices for week 12 reporting during sirolimus treatment; their data through week 8 are included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SirolimusAverage Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / Pedometer6624 stepsStandard Deviation 1847
PlaceboAverage Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / Pedometer7130 stepsStandard Deviation 3025
Secondary

Change in mTOR Pathway Inhibition

Molecular biology study of skin biopsies assayed for mTOR pathway inhibition (e.g. determination of phosphoprotein inhibition included ribosomal protein S6, S6 kinase and/or eIF-4E binding protein).

Time frame: Baseline, week 12

Population: Data were not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Child Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire Score

Quality of Life-Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) Questionnaire specifically designed for people with EB. The QOLEB can be used to identify everyday life occurrences negatively affected by EB. It assesses change in quality of life over time, an important measure when assessing the success of new treatments for EB. Scores from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicate greater impact of EB on quality of life. Data are reported per intervention.

Time frame: Week 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SirolimusChild Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 014.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.37
SirolimusChild Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 1214.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
PlaceboChild Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 06.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.79
PlaceboChild Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 1213.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.32
Secondary

Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale Score

The EBDASI is a validated scoring system that objectively quantifies the severity of EB affecting the entire body. It has been designed to evaluate the response to new therapies for the treatment of EB. Scores range from 0 (absent of EB) to 10 (entire area involved). Data are reported per intervention.

Time frame: Week 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SirolimusEpidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 02.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
SirolimusEpidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 122.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
PlaceboEpidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 03.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
PlaceboEpidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 122.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Secondary

Foot Plantar Pressure Measurements

Foot plantar pressure measurements before and after treatment using the Podotech Elftman Foot Scanner.

Time frame: Baseline, week 12

Population: Data were not collected for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Plantar Defect Size Using 3D Photography

Plantar defect size measurements using 3D photography (% change in total defect area).

Time frame: Baseline, week 12

Population: Data were not collected for this outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026