Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Stabilizing Splint (Michigan-type Occlusal Splint) Versus Anterior Repositioning Splint .

Clinical Evaluation of Stabilizing Splint (Michigan-type Occlusal Splint) Versus Anterior Repositioning Splint in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Anterior Disc Displacement With Reduction . ( Randomized Controlled Clinical Study)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02960048
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-11-09
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2016-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

TMJ Disc Disorder

Keywords

Anterior disc displacement, TMD therapy, internal derangement, occlusal splint, anterior repositioning splint

Brief summary

To evaluate the effectiveness of Michigan-type occlusal splint and anterior repositioning splint in patients with temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction.

Detailed description

To evaluate the effectiveness of Michigan-type occlusal splint and anterior repositioning splint in patients with temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction. PICO: Population (P): Patients with symptomatic anterior disc displacement with reduction. Intervention (I): Michigan splint. Comparator (C): Anterior repositioning splint (ARS) . Outcome(O): Primary outcome: Patients' subjective pain experience. Each patient will be asked to rate his or her current and worst pain intensity on numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10 with zero being no pain and ten corresponds to the worst pain that the patient ever had. Secondary outcome: 1. Maximum mouth opening (MMO). Assessment of MMO will be performed by measuring the distance in mm between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors using a ruler. 2. lateral excursion . Assessment of lateral excursion will be performed by measuring the distance in mm between midline of upper and lower jaws 3. protrusion. distance in mm from the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor to the incisor edge of the mandibular incisor will measured in the maximum protruded position.

Interventions

A 2-mm-thick, hard, clear sheet of resin will be adapted to the maxillary arch . Small amount of self-curing acrylic will be added to the anterior portion of the appliance as a stop for the lower incisor. The area of this stop is approximately 4 to 6 mm. The patient should be instructed to close in Centric relation . Self-curing acrylic will be added to the occluding surface of the appliance. All occluding areas, except the contact on the anterior stop . Excess acrylic surrounding the centric contacts is removed with a hard rubber wheel on a lathe. All areas, except labial to the mandibular canines, are flattened to the contact marks. This area will create the eccentric guidance.

DEVICEAnterior repositioning splint

A 2-mm-thick, hard, clear sheet of resin will be adapted to the maxillary arch . Small amount of self-curing acrylic will be added to the anterior portion of the appliance as a stop for the lower incisor. The area of this stop is approximately 4 to 6 mm. The patient is instructed to protrude the mandible slightly and to open and close the mouth In this position. Self-curing acrylic will be added to the occluding surface of the appliance. All occluding areas, except the contact on the anterior stop . Excess acrylic surrounding the centric contacts is removed with a hard rubber wheel on a lathe.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patient from 15 to 50 years old. 2. Report of pain in preauricular region worsened by functional activities, such as chewing and talking. 3. Presence of disc displacement with reduction and joint clicking 4. positive diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral anterior disc displacement with reduction by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Exclusion criteria

1. . . 2. History of TMJ surgery. 3. Individuals with osteoarthritis. 4. Individuals under TMD management. 5. Individuals wearing full or partial dentures. 6. Individuals with major psychological disorders. 7. Nonreducing dislocations of the articular disc 8. Consequences of condyle fractures and/or fracture of another maxillofacial zone. 9. Articular pathologies of systemic nature (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, arthrosis, psoriasis arthritis). 10. Individuals with a recent history of trauma in the face and/or neck area. Individuals with systemic diseases that can affect TMJ

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' subjective pain experience.3 monthsEach patient will be asked to rate his or her current and worst pain intensity on numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0-10 with zero being no pain and ten corresponds to the worst pain that the patient ever had.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum mouth opening.3 monthsmeasuring the distance between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors using a ruler.Unit:mm
Lateral excursion.3 monthsmeasuring the distance between midline of upper and lower jaws . Unit: mm
Protrusion.3 monthsThe distance in mm from the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor to the incisor edge of the mandibular incisor will measured in the maximum protruded position.

Contacts

Primary ContactMoataz Nasr, BSC
Motaz_52@yahoo.com01000353417
Backup ContactOmniya Abdelaziz, Lecturer
omniya.abdelaziz@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026