Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Trial of ACZONE (Dapsone) Gel, 7.5% in 9 to 11 Year-Old Patients With Acne Vulgaris

An Open-Label Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Trial of ACZONE (Dapsone) Gel, 7.5% in 9 to 11 Year-Old Patients With Acne Vulgaris

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02959970
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-11-09
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2018-03-09
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of ACZONE Gel, 7.5% administered topically once-daily for 12 weeks in 9 to 11 year-olds with acne vulgaris.

Interventions

Dapsone (ACZONE) 7.5% gel topically once daily.

Sponsors

Allergan
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Almirall, S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Has acne vulgaris on the face, including the nose, with 20 to 100 total lesions (noninflammatory and/or inflammatory).

Exclusion criteria

* Has uncontrolled systemic disease(s) * Has severe cystic acne, acne conglobata, acne fulminans, or secondary acne (chloracne, drug-induced acne) * Has used topical dapsone within 1 month prior to the screening * Has used oral dapsone within 2 months prior to screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in WeightBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Change from baseline in weight was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)From Baseline (Day 1) until Week 12An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant (regardless of the administration of the study drug and its causal relationship to it). An AE could therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended medical occurrence during the participant's participation in the trial, including deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition, an abnormal clinically significant finding in a laboratory assessment, or an abnormal clinically significant finding in the physical examination or vital sign.
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was evaluated. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Heart RateBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Change from baseline in heart rate was evaluated. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Respiratory RateBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Change from baseline in respiratory rate was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Change From Baseline in HeightBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Change from baseline in height was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Body TemperatureBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Change from baseline in body temperature was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorWeek 12Local dermal tolerability was evaluated by investigator in terms of presence and absence of dryness, scaling and erythema symptoms and its severity in the areas of body where medication was applied. These symptoms were assessed by using a 4 - point scale of 0 - 3, where 0 = none (no dryness, scaling and erythema) and 3 = severe (marked roughness, heavy scale production and intense redness). The higher score indicated severe symptoms.
Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsWeek 12Local dermal tolerability was evaluated by participants in terms of presence and absence of prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of dosing) and its severity in the areas of body where medication was applied (face). Stinging/burning symptoms were graded on a 4-point scale of 0 - 3 where 0 = none (no stinging/burning), 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), 2 = moderate (definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome), 3 = severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort). The higher score indicated severe symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak Plasma Concentration of Dapsone,Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1Week 1 (Pre-dose and 10 hours post-dose)The mean plasma peak (10 hours postdose) concentrations of dapsone, dapsone hydroxylamine and N-acetyl dapsone were reported.
Percentage of Participants With None (0) or Minimal (1) Score Plus at Least a 2-Grade Improvement on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) for FaceWeek 12Overall severity of acne vulgaris was evaluated by using a 5-point IGA scale: Clear (0) - (no comedones; papules or pustules, residual hyperpigmentation and erythema may be present); Almost clear (1) - (rare comedones; no more than a few small papules and pustules); Mild (2) - (easily recognizable comedones in limited numbers; +/- presence of small papules and pustules); Moderate (3) - (many comedones; +/- easily recognizable small and medium-sized papules; no nodules or cysts; Severe (4) - (widespread and numerous comedones; many small, medium-sized and large papules and pustules; nodules or cysts may or may not be present).
Trough Plasma Concentration of Dapsone, Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1Week 1 (Pre-dose)The trough plasma concentrations of Dapsone, Dapsone hydroxylamine and N-acetyl dapsone were reported.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion CountsBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Inflammatory lesion counts were the sum of counts of the following lesion types (face only): Papule - a small, red, solid elevation less than (\<) 1.0 centimeter (cm) in diameter; Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate; Nodule - a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth; Cyst - a smooth, dome-shaped, elevated, freely moveable, skin-colored, round to ovoid lesion greater than 0.7 cm in diameter. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-inflammatory Lesion CountsBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Noninflammatory lesion counts were defined as the sum of counts of the following lesion type (face only): open comedone - a pigmented dilated pilosebaceous orifice (blackhead); closed comedone - a tiny white papule (whitehead).
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion CountsBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Inflammatory lesion counts were the sum of counts of the following lesion types (face only): Papule - a small, red, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter; Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate; Nodule - a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth; Cyst - a smooth, dome-shaped, elevated, freely moveable, skin colored, round to ovoid lesion greater than 0.7 cm in diameter.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-inflammatory Lesion CountsBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Non-inflammatory lesion counts were defined as the sum of counts of the following lesion type (face only): open comedone - a pigmented dilated pilosebaceous orifice (blackhead); closed comedone - a tiny white papule (whitehead). Change from baseline was be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from the baseline value.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts on FaceBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Total lesion counts were defined as the sum of inflammatory lesion counts and noninflammatory lesion counts (face only). Change from baseline was be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from the baseline value.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts on FaceBaseline (Day 1), Week 12Total lesion counts were defined as the sum of inflammatory lesion counts and noninflammatory lesion counts (face only).
Percentage of Participants With None (0) or Minimal (1) Score on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) for FaceWeek 12Overall severity of acne vulgaris was evaluated by using a 5-point IGA scale: Clear (0) - (no comedones; papules or pustules, residual hyperpigmentation and erythema may be present); Almost clear (1) - (rare comedones; no more than a few small papules and pustules); Mild (2) - (easily recognizable comedones in limited numbers; +/- presence of small papules and pustules); Moderate (3) - (many comedones; +/- easily recognizable small and medium-sized papules; no nodules or cysts; Severe (4) - (widespread and numerous comedones; many small, medium-sized and large papules and pustules; nodules or cysts may or may not be present).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 20 sites in United States (US) between 31 October 2016 (first participant first visit) and 09 March 2018 (last participant last visit).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 105 participants were screened, out of which 100 participants were enrolled into either of the 2 cohorts, Pharmacokinetic (PK) Cohort and Non-PK Cohort.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%
Participants applied ACZONE 7.5 % gel topically, once-daily to the entire face, neck, upper chest, upper back and shoulders starting from Day 1 under maximal use conditions (2 grams per day) for Day 8 consecutive days, followed by a thin layer to their face and acne-affected areas on the upper chest, upper back, and shoulders for next 11 weeks.
17
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%
Participants applied ACZONE 7.5% gel topically, once-daily in a thin layer to their face and acne-affected areas on upper chest, upper back, and shoulders for 12 weeks.
83
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up15
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Total
Age, Continuous10.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
10.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
10.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants23 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants60 Participants74 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants9 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants19 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants53 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants59 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants24 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 83
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 1716 / 83
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 83

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Body Temperature

Change from baseline in body temperature was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Body Temperature0.08 degree celsius (°C)Standard Deviation 0.26
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Body Temperature0.10 degree celsius (°C)Standard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Change from baseline in heart rate was evaluated. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Heart Rate-0.8 beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 14
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Heart Rate0.6 beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 9.5
Primary

Change From Baseline in Height

Change from baseline in height was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Height0.21 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 0.76
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Height1.01 centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 1.77
Primary

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

Change from baseline in respiratory rate was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate0.5 breaths per minute (breaths/min)Standard Deviation 2.4
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate-0.1 breaths per minute (breaths/min)Standard Deviation 1.6
Primary

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was evaluated. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure3.9 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8.2
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure2.3 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 5.9
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure0.1 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.1
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure0.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.1
Primary

Change From Baseline in Weight

Change from baseline in weight was assessed. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Weight0.70 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.98
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Change From Baseline in Weight1.48 kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 1.72
Primary

Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by Investigator

Local dermal tolerability was evaluated by investigator in terms of presence and absence of dryness, scaling and erythema symptoms and its severity in the areas of body where medication was applied. These symptoms were assessed by using a 4 - point scale of 0 - 3, where 0 = none (no dryness, scaling and erythema) and 3 = severe (marked roughness, heavy scale production and intense redness). The higher score indicated severe symptoms.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug. Here, number analyzed signifies number of participants with available data for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: None (0)15 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: Mild (1)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: Moderate (2)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: Severe (3)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: None (0)15 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: Mild (1)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: Moderate (2)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: Severe (3)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: None (0)13 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: Mild (1)2 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: Moderate (2)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: Severe (3)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: Moderate (2)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: None (0)71 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: Moderate (2)1 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: Mild (1)6 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: Mild (1)12 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: Moderate (2)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: Severe (3)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorDryness: Severe (3)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: Severe (3)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: None (0)70 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorErythema: None (0)65 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Dryness, Scaling and Erythema as Assessed by InvestigatorScaling: Mild (1)6 participants
Primary

Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by Participants

Local dermal tolerability was evaluated by participants in terms of presence and absence of prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of dosing) and its severity in the areas of body where medication was applied (face). Stinging/burning symptoms were graded on a 4-point scale of 0 - 3 where 0 = none (no stinging/burning), 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), 2 = moderate (definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome), 3 = severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort). The higher score indicated severe symptoms.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug. Here, number analyzed signifies number of participants with available data for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsNone (0)15 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsMild (1)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsModerate (2)0 participants
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsSevere (3)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsSevere (3)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsNone (0)75 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsModerate (2)0 participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Local Dermal Tolerability: Number of Participants With Stinging/Burning Symptoms as Assessed by ParticipantsMild (1)2 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant (regardless of the administration of the study drug and its causal relationship to it). An AE could therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended medical occurrence during the participant's participation in the trial, including deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition, an abnormal clinically significant finding in a laboratory assessment, or an abnormal clinically significant finding in the physical examination or vital sign.

Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) until Week 12

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)5 Participants
Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)16 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts

Inflammatory lesion counts were the sum of counts of the following lesion types (face only): Papule - a small, red, solid elevation less than (\<) 1.0 centimeter (cm) in diameter; Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate; Nodule - a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth; Cyst - a smooth, dome-shaped, elevated, freely moveable, skin-colored, round to ovoid lesion greater than 0.7 cm in diameter. Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment. This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts-6.2 lesionsStandard Deviation 9.3
Other Pre-specified

Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts

Non-inflammatory lesion counts were defined as the sum of counts of the following lesion type (face only): open comedone - a pigmented dilated pilosebaceous orifice (blackhead); closed comedone - a tiny white papule (whitehead). Change from baseline was be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment. This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Absolute Change From Baseline in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts-17.8 lesionsStandard Deviation 17
Other Pre-specified

Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts on Face

Total lesion counts were defined as the sum of inflammatory lesion counts and noninflammatory lesion counts (face only). Change from baseline was be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment.This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts on Face-24.0 lesionsStandard Deviation 23
Other Pre-specified

Peak Plasma Concentration of Dapsone,Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1

The mean plasma peak (10 hours postdose) concentrations of dapsone, dapsone hydroxylamine and N-acetyl dapsone were reported.

Time frame: Week 1 (Pre-dose and 10 hours post-dose)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who received applications of study drug for at least 8 days under maximal use conditions and had evaluable blood samples for PK analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Peak Plasma Concentration of Dapsone,Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1Dapsone20.0 nanogram per milliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 12.5
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Peak Plasma Concentration of Dapsone,Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1Dapsone hydroxylamine1.40 nanogram per milliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1.1
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Peak Plasma Concentration of Dapsone,Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1N-acetyl dapsone9.01 nanogram per milliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.37
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With None (0) or Minimal (1) Score on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) for Face

Overall severity of acne vulgaris was evaluated by using a 5-point IGA scale: Clear (0) - (no comedones; papules or pustules, residual hyperpigmentation and erythema may be present); Almost clear (1) - (rare comedones; no more than a few small papules and pustules); Mild (2) - (easily recognizable comedones in limited numbers; +/- presence of small papules and pustules); Moderate (3) - (many comedones; +/- easily recognizable small and medium-sized papules; no nodules or cysts; Severe (4) - (widespread and numerous comedones; many small, medium-sized and large papules and pustules; nodules or cysts may or may not be present).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment. This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Percentage of Participants With None (0) or Minimal (1) Score on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) for Face46.7 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With None (0) or Minimal (1) Score Plus at Least a 2-Grade Improvement on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) for Face

Overall severity of acne vulgaris was evaluated by using a 5-point IGA scale: Clear (0) - (no comedones; papules or pustules, residual hyperpigmentation and erythema may be present); Almost clear (1) - (rare comedones; no more than a few small papules and pustules); Mild (2) - (easily recognizable comedones in limited numbers; +/- presence of small papules and pustules); Moderate (3) - (many comedones; +/- easily recognizable small and medium-sized papules; no nodules or cysts; Severe (4) - (widespread and numerous comedones; many small, medium-sized and large papules and pustules; nodules or cysts may or may not be present).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment.This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Percentage of Participants With None (0) or Minimal (1) Score Plus at Least a 2-Grade Improvement on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) for Face19.6 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts

Inflammatory lesion counts were the sum of counts of the following lesion types (face only): Papule - a small, red, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter; Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate; Nodule - a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth; Cyst - a smooth, dome-shaped, elevated, freely moveable, skin colored, round to ovoid lesion greater than 0.7 cm in diameter.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment.This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts-56.38 percent changeStandard Deviation 43.43
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts

Noninflammatory lesion counts were defined as the sum of counts of the following lesion type (face only): open comedone - a pigmented dilated pilosebaceous orifice (blackhead); closed comedone - a tiny white papule (whitehead).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment. This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Percent Change From Baseline in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts-46.45 percent changeStandard Deviation 69.9
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts on Face

Total lesion counts were defined as the sum of inflammatory lesion counts and noninflammatory lesion counts (face only).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment. This population was presented as combined data from both cohorts (PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5% and Non-PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts on Face-51.91 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.53
Other Pre-specified

Trough Plasma Concentration of Dapsone, Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1

The trough plasma concentrations of Dapsone, Dapsone hydroxylamine and N-acetyl dapsone were reported.

Time frame: Week 1 (Pre-dose)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who received applications of study drug for at least 8 days under maximal use conditions and had evaluable blood samples for PK analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Trough Plasma Concentration of Dapsone, Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1N-acetyl dapsone7.02 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.28
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Trough Plasma Concentration of Dapsone, Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1Dapsone17.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14
PK Cohort: ACZONE 7.5%Trough Plasma Concentration of Dapsone, Dapsone Hydroxylamine and N-acetyl Dapsone at Week 1Dapsone hydroxylamine1.05 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.979

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026