Skip to content

Direct Anterior vs. Anterolateral Approach for Hip Arthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture in the Senior Population

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior vs. Anterolateral Approach for Hip Arthroplasty After Femoral Neck Fracture in the Senior Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02959320
Enrollment
69
Registered
2016-11-09
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2022-06-02
Last updated
2023-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fractures

Brief summary

Displaced femoral neck fractures are one group of hip fracture patients that are commonly treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the elective hip arthroplasty population, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has shown to be effective in helping patients to quickly obtain high postoperative function. This approach has also been shown to be effective in arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in a few studies. However, the only studies that directly compare two approaches for hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures utilize the anterolateral approach (ALA) versus posterior approach (PA) or DAA versus PA. No studies of which we are aware directly compare the DAA to the ALA. The DAA and ALA are the two most popular approaches for bipolar hemiarthroplasty at our institution, so we are setting out to determine the differences between them.

Detailed description

Displaced femoral neck fractures are one group of hip fracture patients that are commonly treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Compared to those who receive a THA, recipients of HA tend to be less active, more debilitated, and more dependent on gait aids and the care of others. In this population, the increased stability and decreased operating time associated with HA is thought to be more important than the minimal increase in function this population could achieve with THA. Additionally, cemented femoral stems in HA are thought to result in less pain, increased function, and less periprosthetic fracture risk when compared to cementless stems. With the relative pre-injury debility of the femoral neck fracture population, especially those receiving HA, it is important to optimize all aspects of patient care to allow them to participate in therapy and return them to their preoperative functional level as quickly as possible. Furthermore, any intervention in this population should minimize the physiologic insult of surgery as much as possible. In the elective hip arthroplasty population, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has shown to be effective in helping patients to quickly obtain high postoperative function. This approach has also been shown to be effective in arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in a few studies. However, the only studies that directly compare two approaches for hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures utilize the anterolateral approach (ALA) versus posterior approach (PA) or DAA versus PA. No studies of which we are aware directly compare the DAA to the ALA. The DAA and ALA are the two most popular approaches for bipolar hemiarthroplasty at our institution, so investigators are setting out to determine the differences between them.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHip Hemiarthroplasty

This single-institution, prospective, randomized clinical trial will be performed on consecutive elderly patients admitted for surgical treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures with hemiarthroplasty (HA).

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* isolated displaced femoral neck fracture (AO type 31-B2 and 31 B3) * age≥65 years * preinjury ambulation with or without a gait aid * surgical intervention ≤ 48 hours after fracture.

Exclusion criteria

* age \<65 years * patients with other fractures or dislocations * wheelchair bound * \>48 hours between fracture and surgery, presence or history of infection, active metastatic disease, previous ipsilateral hip prosthesis * active major psychiatric illness * active drug or alcohol abuse * BMI \>40, and actively failing contralateral hip prosthesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients showing improvement using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestBaseline to 12 monthsPurpose of test is to assess mobility and will be administered by a nurse who is blinded to the surgical approach.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026