Skip to content

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study of Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02958917
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-11-08
Start date
2017-06-05
Completion date
2021-03-02
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interstitial Lung Disease

Brief summary

Patients are being offered participation in this pirfenidone trial because They have been diagnosed with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP), a type of interstitial lung disease (ILD). This is a disease where scarring of lung tissue occurs as the result of inhaling substances called antigens. These antigens can be substances such as molds, chemicals or dust. As a result of this scarring the lungs are is not able to move oxygen into the bloodstream to reach other organs. Currently over 1400 subjects have been treated with pirfenidone in 15 clinical trials. This drug has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, a different type of ILD, but requires special permission for use in your condition. The use of pirfenidone has not been approved for the treatment of FHP. It is considered experimental treatment in this study.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential benefits and the safety of treatment with pirfenidone compared to placebo in subjects with FHP. STUDY SUMMARY This study will include about 42 subjects at National Jewish Health. This is a double-blind study which means neither the subject nor the study staff will know if the subject is getting pirfenidone or placebo during the study. This is done to be sure that no one knows who is getting pirfenidone or placebo and the effects of the treatment can be measured objectively, without bias. Subject's that enroll in this study will have an equal chance of getting pirfenidone or placebo. The decision about which treatment the subject will receive (randomization) is made through a central organization. Subjects in the study will receive either pirfenidone (2403 mg every day) or placebo capsules (a safe, inactive substance that will look the same as the pirfenidone capsules). Both the placebo and pirfenidone will be supplied in opaque, hard, white gelatin capsules and will be taken as 3 capsules by mouth, 3 times a day (a total of 9 capsules per day) and should be taken with food. Subjects who participate in this study will be asked to take the capsules as prescribed every day for 52 weeks (12 months).

Interventions

DRUGPirfenidone

This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of pirfenidone in subjects with FHP. Approximately 42-45 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or placebo for 52 weeks.

This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of pirfenidone in subjects with FHP. Approximately 42-45 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or placebo for 52 weeks.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Evans Fernandez Perez
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis of FHP, defined from the first instance in which a patient was informed of having FHP for at least 3 to 6 months. 2. Age 18 through 80 years at randomization. 3. Diagnosis of typical or compatible FHP by HRCT according to pre-specified criteria (Note: HRCT scan performed within 6 months of the start of screening may be used if it meets image acquisition guidelines): a. Typical FHP: Evidence of lung fibrosis (reticular abnormality and/or, traction bronchiectasis and/or, architectural distortion, and/or honeycombing) with either of the following: i. Profuse poorly defined centrilobular nodules of ground-glass opacity affecting all lung zones. ii. Inspiratory mosaic attenuation with the three-density sign. AND iii. Lack of features suggesting an alternative diagnosis. b. Compatible FHP: Evidence of lung fibrosis (as above) with any of the following: i. Patchy or diffuse ground-glass opacity. ii. Patchy, non-profuse centrilobular nodules of ground-glass attenuation iii. Mosaic attenuation and lobular air-trapping that do not meet the criteria for typical fibrotic HP. AND iv. Lack of features suggesting an alternative diagnosis. c. Indeterminate FHP: CT signs of fibrosis without other features suggestive of HP and lack of features suggesting an alternative diagnosis. These patients are required to have a known antigen exposure and BAL lymphocytosis (≥20%) or transbronchial biopsies demonstrating non-necrotizing granuloma(s) or lymphocytosis, or surgical lung histology consistent with HP. FHP Disease Severity and Progression 4. FVC ≥40%, DLCO ≥30% based either on historical pulmonary function tests obtained in the 30 days prior to screening or on tests obtained during screening 5. In the investigator's opinion, evidence of disease progression: worsening respiratory symptoms and an increased in the extent of fibrosis on HRCT or relative decline in the FVC% of at least 5%. 6. Able to walk ≥100 m during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at Screening. Informed Consent and Protocol Adherence 7. Able to understand and sign a written informed consent form. 8. Able to understand the importance of adherence to study treatment and the study protocol and willing to follow all study requirements, including the concomitant medication restrictions, throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

* Disease-Related Exclusions 1. Not a suitable candidate for enrollment or unlikely to comply with the requirements of this study, in the opinion of the investigator 2. Cigarette smoking at Screening or unwilling to avoid tobacco products throughout the study 3. Known explanation for the interstitial lung disease, including but not limited to radiation, drug toxicity, sarcoidosis, pneumoconiosis. 4. Clinical diagnosis of any connective tissue disease, including but not limited to scleroderma, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and rheumatoid arthritis. 5. Expected to receive a lung transplant within 6 to12 months from randomization or on a lung transplant waiting list at randomization. Medical Exclusions 6. Any condition other than FHP that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to result in the death of the patient within 6 to12 months. 7. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might be significantly exacerbated by the known side effects associated with the administration of pirfenidone. 8. Pregnancy or lactation. Women of childbearing capacity are required to have a negative serum pregnancy test before treatment and must agree to maintain highly effective contraception by practicing abstinence or by using at least two methods of birth control from the date of consent through the end of the study. If abstinence is not practiced, one of the two methods of birth control should be an oral contraceptive (e.g., oral contraceptive and a spermicide). 9. History of ongoing alcohol or substance abuse. 10. History of severe hepatic impairment or end-stage liver disease. 11. History of end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. 12. Clinical evidence of active infection including, but not limited to, bronchitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, or urinary tract infection. 13. Unstable or deteriorating cardiac disease, including but not limited to the following: 1. Unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction. 2. Congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization. 3. Uncontrolled clinically significant arrhythmias. Laboratory Exclusions 14. Any of the following liver function test criteria above specified limits: total bilirubin \> 2.0 mg/dL, excluding patients with Gilbert's syndrome; aspartate or alanine aminotransferase (AST/SGOT or ALT/SGPT) \>3 ULN; alkaline phosphatase \>2.5 ULN within past 30 days. 15. Creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula within the past 30 days. 16. Electrocardiogram with a QTc interval \>500 msec at Screening. Medication Exclusions 17. Prior use of pirfenidone, nintadinib or known hypersensitivity to any of the components of study treatment. 18. Introduction, increase or escalation of immunosuppressive pharmacological therapy within 1 month (e.g., prednisone, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid and mycophenolate mofetil). 19. Use of any of the following therapies within 28 days before Screening: 1. Bosentan, ambrisentan, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, etanercept, iloprost, infliximab, methotrexate, tacrolimus, tetrathiomolybdate, TNF-α inhibitors, imatinib mesylate, Interferon gamma-1b, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 2. Fluvoxamine. 3. Sildenafil (daily use). Note: intermittent use for erectile dysfunction is allowed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Percent Predicted FVC.Up to 52 weeks.The primary efficacy analysis will estimate the mean rank change in percent predicted FVC from Baseline to Week 52. Data will be analyzed using a rank linear regression model with the rank change in percent predicted FVC from Baseline to Week 52 as the outcome variable and rank Baseline percent predicted FVC and HP therapy (placebo or pirfenidone) and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy as covariates. The treatment effect will be tested using the Wald test. The primary efficacy analysis will be tested at an alpha level of 0.05. Missing data due to reasons other than death will be replaced with imputed values using the MICE method (multiple imputations via chained equation). Subjects with missing assessments due to death will be ranked worse than those who remain alive. Subjects who die will be ranked according to the time until death, with the shortest time until death as the worst rank.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Slope of FVC Over Treatment Period.Up to 52 weeks.The slope for the annual rate of FVC decline
Mean Change in Percent Predicted DLCOUp to 52 weeks.Mean change in percent predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) from baseline to week 52
Number of Participants With All-cause HospitalizationUp to 52 weeks.Proportion of patients with all-cause hospitalization
Number of Participant With Hospitalization for a Respiratory CauseUp to 52 weeks.The proportion of patients with hospitalization for a respiratory cause
Visual Extent in the Percentage of Lung CT FibrosisUp to 52 weeks.Mean change from baseline to week 52 in the visual extent of the percentage of lung CT fibrosis.
Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Defined as the Time From Study Treatment Randomization to the First Occurrence of Any of the Following Events:Up to 52 weeks.a. Relative decline from baseline in ≥10% in FVC and/or DLCO b. Acute exacerbation of FHP defined as acute respiratory declined leading to hospitalization or ER or Urgent care evaluation; or evidence of all of the following criteria within a 4-week period in the outpatient setting: i. Increase from baseline FIO2 ≥1 L O2. ii. Clinically significant worsening of dyspnea and/or cough. iii. New, superimposed ground-glass opacities or consolidation or new alveolar opacities on chest x-ray or CT. c. A decrease from baseline of at least 50 meters in 6mw distance. d. Change in background therapy (need for a new course of PO or IV steroids or for the patient receiving maintenance prednisone, as a need to increase the dose by 10 mg or more; and/or addition of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or mycophenolic acid). e. Death

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
University of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire Score.Up to 52 weeks.Mean change from Baseline to Week 52 in dyspnea as measured by the University of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire score. Scores range from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater breathlessness.
Data-driven Texture-based Quantitative Analysis of the Percent of Lung CT Fibrosis.Up to 52 weeks.The extent of the percentage of lung fibrosis computed by data-driven texture-based quantitative analysis. The data-driven texture-based quantitative analysis is computed as the percentage of the total lung with fibrosis.
Living With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeUp to 52 weeks.Mean change from baseline in health-related quality of life, measured by the Living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire includes 5 subscores. Scores range for each of the 5 subscores go from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.Up to 52 weeks.Mean change from baseline in health-related quality of life, measured by SGRQ The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/d
Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or a placebo equivalent. Pirfenidone: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of pirfenidone in subjects with FHP. Approximately 40 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or placebo for 52 weeks. Placebo controlled: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of pirfenidone in subjects with FHP. Approximately 40 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or placebo for 52 weeks.
27
Placebo
The placebo will be visually similar to pirfenidone. Pirfenidone: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of pirfenidone in subjects with FHP. Approximately 40 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or placebo for 52 weeks. Placebo controlled: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study of pirfenidone in subjects with FHP. Approximately 40 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/d or placebo for 52 weeks.
13
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPirfenidone 2403 mg/dPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Former smoker14 participants7 participants21 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-hispanic White
25 participants12 participants37 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants13 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants8 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants5 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 271 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 2713 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Percent Predicted FVC.

The primary efficacy analysis will estimate the mean rank change in percent predicted FVC from Baseline to Week 52. Data will be analyzed using a rank linear regression model with the rank change in percent predicted FVC from Baseline to Week 52 as the outcome variable and rank Baseline percent predicted FVC and HP therapy (placebo or pirfenidone) and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy as covariates. The treatment effect will be tested using the Wald test. The primary efficacy analysis will be tested at an alpha level of 0.05. Missing data due to reasons other than death will be replaced with imputed values using the MICE method (multiple imputations via chained equation). Subjects with missing assessments due to death will be ranked worse than those who remain alive. Subjects who die will be ranked according to the time until death, with the shortest time until death as the worst rank.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: The primary efficacy analysis will be analyzed using a rank linear regression model with the rank change in %FVC from Baseline to Week 52 as the outcome variable and rank Baseline %FVC and HP therapy (placebo or pirfenidone) and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy as covariates. The treatment effect will be tested using the Wald test at an alpha level of 0.05.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dMean Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Percent Predicted FVC.-0.28 percent predictedStandard Deviation 8.09
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Percent Predicted FVC.0.58 percent predictedStandard Deviation 12.42
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change in Percent Predicted DLCO

Mean change in percent predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) from baseline to week 52

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: The diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was analyzed using a rank linear regression model with the rank change in DLCO% predicted from baseline to week 52 as the outcome variable and rank baseline percent predicted DLCO and FHP therapy as covariates.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dMean Change in Percent Predicted DLCO1.02 percent predictedStandard Deviation 12.21
PlaceboMean Change in Percent Predicted DLCO-2.12 percent predictedStandard Deviation 16.41
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization

Proportion of patients with all-cause hospitalization

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: logistic regression

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization5 Participants
p-value: <0.05Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Defined as the Time From Study Treatment Randomization to the First Occurrence of Any of the Following Events:

a. Relative decline from baseline in ≥10% in FVC and/or DLCO b. Acute exacerbation of FHP defined as acute respiratory declined leading to hospitalization or ER or Urgent care evaluation; or evidence of all of the following criteria within a 4-week period in the outpatient setting: i. Increase from baseline FIO2 ≥1 L O2. ii. Clinically significant worsening of dyspnea and/or cough. iii. New, superimposed ground-glass opacities or consolidation or new alveolar opacities on chest x-ray or CT. c. A decrease from baseline of at least 50 meters in 6mw distance. d. Change in background therapy (need for a new course of PO or IV steroids or for the patient receiving maintenance prednisone, as a need to increase the dose by 10 mg or more; and/or addition of cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or mycophenolic acid). e. Death

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: Progression-free survival was compared between the pirfenidone and placebo groups using the log-rank test. A proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dNumber of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Defined as the Time From Study Treatment Randomization to the First Occurrence of Any of the Following Events:14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Defined as the Time From Study Treatment Randomization to the First Occurrence of Any of the Following Events:12 participants
p-value: <0.05Regression, Cox
Secondary

Number of Participant With Hospitalization for a Respiratory Cause

The proportion of patients with hospitalization for a respiratory cause

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: logistic regression

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dNumber of Participant With Hospitalization for a Respiratory Cause1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participant With Hospitalization for a Respiratory Cause3 Participants
p-value: <0.05Log Rank
Secondary

Slope of FVC Over Treatment Period.

The slope for the annual rate of FVC decline

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: The slope for the annual rate of FVC% decline will be analyzed using a random coefficient regression model with treatment and baseline FVC% as covariates

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dSlope of FVC Over Treatment Period.1.69 percent predicted/yearStandard Error 1.57
PlaceboSlope of FVC Over Treatment Period.-0.34 percent predicted/yearStandard Error 2.07
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Visual Extent in the Percentage of Lung CT Fibrosis

Mean change from baseline to week 52 in the visual extent of the percentage of lung CT fibrosis.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: The visual assessment of the extent of the percentage of lung CT fibrosis will be compared between the pirfenidone and placebo groups using logistic regression accounting for possible over- or under-dispersion in the outcome. This is not a range but the percentage extent or percent amount of fibrosis visually identified by a radiologist on the lung CT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dVisual Extent in the Percentage of Lung CT Fibrosis2.22 percent of fibrosisStandard Deviation 4
PlaceboVisual Extent in the Percentage of Lung CT Fibrosis6.15 percent of fibrosisStandard Deviation 8.45
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Data-driven Texture-based Quantitative Analysis of the Percent of Lung CT Fibrosis.

The extent of the percentage of lung fibrosis computed by data-driven texture-based quantitative analysis. The data-driven texture-based quantitative analysis is computed as the percentage of the total lung with fibrosis.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: a linear regression model with a separate intercept for each subject, a dichotomous time-point effect, and a multiplicative interaction between time-point and treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dData-driven Texture-based Quantitative Analysis of the Percent of Lung CT Fibrosis.2.06 percent of fibrosis
PlaceboData-driven Texture-based Quantitative Analysis of the Percent of Lung CT Fibrosis.4.11 percent of fibrosis
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Living With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of Life

Mean change from baseline in health-related quality of life, measured by the Living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire includes 5 subscores. Scores range for each of the 5 subscores go from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: L-PF baseline to 52 weeks was analyzed using a linear regression model with a separate intercept for each subject, a dichotomous time-point effect, and a multiplicative interaction between time-point and treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeDyspnea1.33 units on a scale
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeImpact-3.44 units on a scale
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeEnergy2.10 units on a scale
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeCough5.56 units on a scale
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeSymptoms2.99 units on a scale
PlaceboLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeCough5.71 units on a scale
PlaceboLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeSymptoms11.8 units on a scale
PlaceboLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeDyspnea15.6 units on a scale
PlaceboLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeEnergy6.28 units on a scale
PlaceboLiving With Pulmonary Fibrosis Health-Related Quality of LifeImpact1.48 units on a scale
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

Mean change from baseline in health-related quality of life, measured by SGRQ The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: SGRQ baseline to 52 weeks was analyzed using a linear regression model with a separate intercept for each subject, a dichotomous time-point effect, and a multiplicative interaction between time-point and treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dSt. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.0.890 score on a scale
PlaceboSt. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.7.61 score on a scale
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

University of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire Score.

Mean change from Baseline to Week 52 in dyspnea as measured by the University of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire score. Scores range from 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater breathlessness.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks.

Population: UCSD-SOBQ baseline to 52 weeks was analyzed using a linear regression model with a separate intercept for each subject, a dichotomous time-point effect, and a multiplicative interaction between time-point and treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Pirfenidone 2403 mg/dUniversity of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire Score.2.06 score on a scale
PlaceboUniversity of California at San Diego Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire Score.4.11 score on a scale
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026