Skip to content

Treatment of Knee Arthrosis With Platelet-derived Growth Factors vs. Hyaluronic Acid.

Treatment of Knee Arthrosis: Platelet-derived Growth Factors vs. Hyaluronic Acid. A Phase II-III Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02958761
Enrollment
58
Registered
2016-11-08
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2016-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthrosis

Keywords

knee arthrosis, platelet-derived growth factors

Brief summary

Primary aim of this trial was to assess efficacy three intraarticular injections of platelet lysate when compared to hyaluronic acid. Additional objectives were to compare the treatment groups in terms of a number of functional scales and of number of adverse events.

Detailed description

Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid are effective in improving symptoms and slow disease progression, but are not able to revert the damage mechanism and trigger cartilage healing. Growth factors included in PRP could stimulate cartilage repair, normalize synovial fluid viscoelasticity, induce a correction in tissue damage, improve articular function, control pain and ameliorate quality of life. Primary aim of this trial was to assess, among patients with grade II/III osteoarthrosis of the knee, efficacy (as determined by improvement at MRI 6 months after the first injection) of three intraarticular injections of platelet lysate when compared to hyaluronic acid. Additional objectives were to compare the treatment groups in terms of a number of functional scales (WOMAC, Lysholm, Tegner Knee, Scale, AKS, Lequesne, VAS) and of number of adverse events.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALintraarticular injections of platelet lysate
DRUGhyaluronic acid

intraarticular hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2 mL; Hyalgan, Fidia, Abano Terme, Italy) injections at the same intervals

Sponsors

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* grade II/III OA of the knee demonstrated at MRI17,18, according to Shahriaree Classification System - modified * no previous OA treatment with local hyaluronic acid or steroid injections * ife expectancy \>1 year * no ongoing pregnancy * ability to understand and complete clinical and functional scales Lysholm, WOMAC, AKS, VAS * written consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy (as determined by improvement at MRI 6 months after the first injection) of intraarticular injections of platelet lysateSix months after the last infiltrationEach knee was improvement, from baseline, by at least one degree the maximum MRI score (Shahriaree Classification System - modified) at 6 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lysholm functional scaleAt baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 yearmultilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
Tegner Knee functional scaleAt baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 yearmultilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
AKS functional scaleAt baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 yearmultilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
WOMAC functional scaleAt baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 yearmultilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
VAS for painAt baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 yearmultilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group
Adverse event1 yearnumber of patients and knees with adverse event (any); anticipated potential adverse events were infection, anaphylaxis, hematoma
Lequesne functional scaleAt baseline (prior to treatment), at 15 days form the last injection, 6 months from the last infiltration and at 1 yearmultilevel generalized linear models (for panel-data) with interaction between time and treatment group

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026