Skip to content

rTMS in Spasmodic Dysphonia

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Spasmodic Dysphonia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02957942
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-11-08
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngeal Dystonia, Spasmodic Dysphonia

Keywords

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Spasmodic dysphonia, Dystonia

Brief summary

Focal dystonia is a neurological movement disorder characterized by excessive involuntary muscle contractions of any body part. Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is a type of focal dystonia characterized by excessive contraction of intrinsic muscles in the larynx, leading to difficulty in speaking and affecting effective communication. The cause of SD is unknown and there are no treatments that produce long-term benefits. Previous studies have suggested that SD and other focal dystonias are associated with decreased inhibition in sensorimotor areas in the brain. However, no studies have investigated the effects of modulating excitability of the laryngeal motor cortex in healthy individuals or SD. The goal of this pilot project is to determine if brain excitability of the laryngeal motor cortex can be changed with low-frequency inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in individuals with SD and healthy controls. Considering that rTMS at low frequencies (≤1 Hz) produces lasting inhibition in the brain, and that SD is associated with decreased cortical inhibition, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine safety, feasibility and response to 1Hz rTMS to the laryngeal motor cortex in individuals with SD and healthy people. The results will help understand changes associated with the disorder, as well as contribute to the development of future clinical interventions for SD.

Interventions

DEVICE1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes)

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primary inclusion for spasmodic dysphonia: 1. Diagnosis of adductor spasmodic dysphonia 2. Symptoms at worst severity if receiving regular botulinum injections * Primary inclusion for healthy participants (controls): 1. Absence of vocal fold pathology

Exclusion criteria

* Primary exclusion for participants with spasmodic dysphonia: 1. Other forms of dystonia 2. Vocal fold pathology or paralysis 3. Diagnosis of voice tremor 4. Laryngeal surgery 5. Laryngeal cancer or neurological condition other than dystonia 6. Contraindication to TMS 7. Medications with effect on central nervous system 8. Inability to complete tasks associated with study 9. Adult lacking ability to consent * Primary exclusion for healthy participants (controls): 1. Any health condition or disability that would interfere with participation 2. Contraindications to TMS 3. Medications with effect on central nervous system 4. Adult lacking ability to consent TMS contraindications: * The only absolute contraindication to TMS/rTMS is the presence of metallic hardware in close contact to the discharging coil (such as cochlear implants, deep brain stimulator, or medication pumps). In such instances there is a risk of inducing malfunctioning of the implanted devices. * Conditions classified as of increased or uncertain risk are listed below (Rossi et al., 2009; Rossini et al., 2015). Persons under those circumstances will be excluded from the study. 1. Pregnancy 2. Bipolar disorder 3. Epilepsy or history of seizure episodes in the past two years 4. Vascular, traumatic, tumoral, infectious, or metabolic lesion of the brain, even without history of seizure, and without anticonvulsant medication 5. Use of medications that potentially lower seizure threshold 6. Severe or recent heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Response to rTMS2.5 hoursCount of participants who experience and adverse response to rTMS treatment.
Change in Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP)baseline and 2.5 hoursThe change from baseline in CSP duration will be reported. The CSP is an interruption of voluntary muscle contraction after single pulse transcranial stimulation. The duration of the period of silent muscle activity will be measured to test the effects of rTMS intervention. There is no known clinical relevance for this outcome measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Number of Voice Breaksbaseline and 2.5 hoursChanges from baseline in the number of voice breaks during speech will be reported. Voice breaks will be measured by asking subjects to repeat 10 sentences. The frequency of voice breaks in the recorded 10 sentences will be counted.
Change in Voice Quality (Overall Severity) With the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)baseline and 2.5 hoursCAPE-V (overall severity) testing before and after rTMS consisted of the repetition of six sentences and two sustained vowels (/a/;/i/). A short sample of spontaneous speech (approximately 60s) was also collected for qualitative analysis of voice. The CAPE-V ratings were completed by three assessors who were blinded to group and pre/post-test. The assessors listened to the voice recordings for each participant and rated them for all six parameters listed above from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse severity. Ratings for each voice parameter were then averaged across the three assessors. We chose to analyze the change in the CAPE-V parameter for Overall Severity to represent an overall assessment of voice quality from pre- to post-rTMS (Post Score - Pre Score) as it had the greatest likelihood of detecting any small changes that may be perceived.
Change in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS)baseline and 2.5 hoursQuantitative assessment of voice quality was completed with acoustic analysis of each participant's production of the ten sentences from the Spasmodic Dysphonia Attribute Inventory (SDAI). A custom script in Praat (Boersma & Weenink, 2018) was used to calculate cepstral peak prominence smoothed (CPPS) for each sentence production. CPPS is a relatively new measure that reflects vocal fold periodicity and noise components in the vocal spectrum. CPPS has been found to be correlated with perceived severity of voice symptoms and higher CPPS values represent a more normal vocal quality. CPPS values (in dB) were averaged across the ten sentences of the SDAI to derive an average CPPS for each participant before and after rTMS. Change for each participant was calculated as the average CPPS at post-rTMS minus average CPPS at pre-rTMS. The values for each group were then averaged to report the average change in CPPS for Controls and Spasmodic Dysphonia.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Spasmodic Dysphonia
1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes)
7
Healthy Control
Healthy adults 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 1 session of low-frequency rTMS (1Hz, 1200 pulses, 20 minutes)
6
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPracticing experiment protocol06
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy ControlTotalSpasmodic Dysphonia
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Age, Continuous53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants13 participants7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 76 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Adverse Response to rTMS

Count of participants who experience and adverse response to rTMS treatment.

Time frame: 2.5 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Spasmodic DysphoniaAdverse Response to rTMS0 Participants
Healthy ControlAdverse Response to rTMS0 Participants
Primary

Change in Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP)

The change from baseline in CSP duration will be reported. The CSP is an interruption of voluntary muscle contraction after single pulse transcranial stimulation. The duration of the period of silent muscle activity will be measured to test the effects of rTMS intervention. There is no known clinical relevance for this outcome measure.

Time frame: baseline and 2.5 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spasmodic DysphoniaChange in Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP)-2.4 millisecondsStandard Deviation 10.6
Healthy ControlChange in Duration of Cortical Silent Period (CSP)3.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.8
Secondary

Change in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS)

Quantitative assessment of voice quality was completed with acoustic analysis of each participant's production of the ten sentences from the Spasmodic Dysphonia Attribute Inventory (SDAI). A custom script in Praat (Boersma & Weenink, 2018) was used to calculate cepstral peak prominence smoothed (CPPS) for each sentence production. CPPS is a relatively new measure that reflects vocal fold periodicity and noise components in the vocal spectrum. CPPS has been found to be correlated with perceived severity of voice symptoms and higher CPPS values represent a more normal vocal quality. CPPS values (in dB) were averaged across the ten sentences of the SDAI to derive an average CPPS for each participant before and after rTMS. Change for each participant was calculated as the average CPPS at post-rTMS minus average CPPS at pre-rTMS. The values for each group were then averaged to report the average change in CPPS for Controls and Spasmodic Dysphonia.

Time frame: baseline and 2.5 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spasmodic DysphoniaChange in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS)0.1 dBStandard Deviation 0.7
Healthy ControlChange in Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS)0.3 dBStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Change in Number of Voice Breaks

Changes from baseline in the number of voice breaks during speech will be reported. Voice breaks will be measured by asking subjects to repeat 10 sentences. The frequency of voice breaks in the recorded 10 sentences will be counted.

Time frame: baseline and 2.5 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spasmodic DysphoniaChange in Number of Voice Breaks-1.3 total voice breaksStandard Deviation 4.7
Healthy ControlChange in Number of Voice Breaks0 total voice breaksStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change in Voice Quality (Overall Severity) With the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)

CAPE-V (overall severity) testing before and after rTMS consisted of the repetition of six sentences and two sustained vowels (/a/;/i/). A short sample of spontaneous speech (approximately 60s) was also collected for qualitative analysis of voice. The CAPE-V ratings were completed by three assessors who were blinded to group and pre/post-test. The assessors listened to the voice recordings for each participant and rated them for all six parameters listed above from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse severity. Ratings for each voice parameter were then averaged across the three assessors. We chose to analyze the change in the CAPE-V parameter for Overall Severity to represent an overall assessment of voice quality from pre- to post-rTMS (Post Score - Pre Score) as it had the greatest likelihood of detecting any small changes that may be perceived.

Time frame: baseline and 2.5 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spasmodic DysphoniaChange in Voice Quality (Overall Severity) With the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Healthy ControlChange in Voice Quality (Overall Severity) With the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026