Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Intimate Partner Violence, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Women Veterans, Sexual Trauma
Brief summary
Lifetime sexual trauma (ST) (i.e., behaviors that range from unwanted sexual touching to attempted or completed rape) is a significant social and public health problem among women Veterans. For women Veterans, lifetime ST can occur prior to, during or after military service. ST is associated with multiple difficulties and risks, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), intimate partner violence (IPV), and alcohol misuse. Providing an effective, integrated, and low-cost intervention that targets ST-related risks for women Veterans with lifetime ST would advance clinical care for these vulnerable women. This research will develop and assess a computer-delivered intervention (Safety and Health Experiences Program; SHE) that will provide a screening and brief behavior intervention for women Veterans with any lifetime ST. More specifically, the intervention, SHE, will address interrelated health concerns for women Veterans with ST (i.e. alcohol misuse, IPV, and PTSD). SHE will be designed to provide individualized assessment, feedback, and referrals for women Veterans with any lifetime ST. SHE will take place within a primary care setting. Primary care visits are frequent points of health care contact for women Veterans making the visit itself the ideal, and possibly only, opportunity to provide behavioral interventions. This study will lay the groundwork for a larger clinical trial of the SHE program in multiple VA primary care settings. If effective, the intervention, SHE, represents an innovative and low cost service for early identification and intervention that could be implemented nationwide with ease and speed to address the needs of women Veterans with lifetime ST. The long-term goal of the project is to make a significant impact on advancing health services research by introducing and testing a novel and potentially powerful service tool that may improve service delivery to address the co-occurring health concerns for women Veterans with any lifetime ST.
Detailed description
The VA Women's Health Research Agenda underscores the importance of improving the safety and health outcomes of returning Veteran women. With greater numbers of women joining the military, the need for gender-specific VA-based interventions is increasingly important. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), intimate partner violence (IPV), and alcohol use are closely interrelated and significant concerns for women Veterans with a history of sexual trauma (ST). Given that screening for military sexual trauma (MST) is mandated within VAs, a computer delivered intervention has the potential to be easily integrated into the standard of care for women who screen positive for MST and/or other lifetime STs, increasing the identification of high-risk women Veterans. This intervention will provide a computer-based intervention on a VA issued laptop that could improve delivery service and fill a healthcare gap for a vulnerable Veteran population. The long-term goal of the project is to make a significant impact on advancing health services research by introducing and testing a novel and potentially powerful service tool that may improve service delivery to address the co-occurring health concerns for VA women with lifetime ST. The intervention, Safe and Healthy Experiences (SHE), a brief modular, computer-based intervention, will target interrelated health risks for women Veterans with lifetime ST (i.e. alcohol misuse, IPV, and PTSD). SHE will provide individualized assessment, feedback, and referrals for women Veterans with lifetime ST. The intervention is based on motivational interviewing (MI), a well-defined intervention strategy that has yielded particularly promising results in a range of clinical issues, including interpersonal violence, and a range of patient populations, including male and female Veterans. MI is a collaborative and non-confrontational approach that emphasizes increasing a participant's awareness of successful steps towards well-being. MI is consistent with an empowerment model, which is a highly recommended intervention model for victimized women and both MI and an empowerment model converge on important principles for intervening with victimized women. Findings from the study will provide the necessary groundwork to examine the efficacy of SHE in a future, large clinical trial. If the SHE intervention is found to be feasible, acceptable and efficacious in improving outcomes for women Veterans with lifetime ST, the ultimate goal would be for the program to be integrated into clinical care and widely disseminated. There are two phases of research directed toward these aims: 1) develop and refine an integrated screening and behavior intervention for VA women with lifetime ST in a brief modular computer-based format that can be administered in a VA primary care setting, and 2) collect data on the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of the intervention in improving the health of VA women, and increasing utilization of treatment and resources. The study aims are to: 1. Develop the preliminary computer-based intervention, incorporating information gained in informant interviews. 2. Perform a small open trial (n = 20) of SHE to assess feasibility of recruitment of target population and acceptability of intervention and study procedures. 3. Conduct an initial randomized control trial in a sample of 150 women Veterans who screen positive for lifetime sexual trauma (ST) and have at least one risk factor (i.e., screen positive for intimate partner violence (IPV), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and/or heavy drinking) to demonstrate the feasibility of SHE and the acceptability of SHE via participant report of ease of use, helpfulness, and overall satisfaction. 4. Examine preliminary evidence for the hypotheses that, relative to the control condition, screening and referral only (SR), SHE will result in: * Decreases in the number of risks (i.e., heavy drinking (4+ drinks on one occasion), screen positive for PTSD, screen positive for IPV) at the 2- and 4-month follow-up (primary). * Increases in resource and treatment utilization over the 2- and 4-month follow-up period (secondary). The data will be used to demonstrate whether the effects of the intervention look promising to support a future large-scale randomized control trial and to suggest, in concert with results from clinical trials in related fields, the range of effect sizes that would be reasonable to expect in a future trial. This is a multi-site study. At the Providence, RI based site (Women and Infants Hospital and Brown University), the specialized computer-based assessment and interactive intervention sessions will be developed and designed and staff members will also assist with data management. The Central Texas VA Healthcare System site will be the data collection site and the main site for participant recruiting, consenting, enrollment, intervention and follow-up. Staff at the two sites will work collaboratively throughout the project to supervise study staff, for reporting to the DOD and IRB's and in designing the assessment and intervention sessions, however, only the study staff at the Central Texas site will have access to participant PHI.
Interventions
SHE is a computer-delivered intervention (Safety and Health Experiences Program; SHE) that will provide a screening and brief behavior intervention for women Veterans with any lifetime ST. More specifically, the intervention, SHE, will address interrelated health concerns for women Veterans with ST (i.e. alcohol misuse, IPV, and PTSD). SHE will provide individualized assessment, feedback, and referrals for women Veterans with any lifetime ST. SHE will take place within a primary care setting.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Female Veterans * Lifetime history of ST with at least one risk factor: heavy drinking within the past 3 months, screen positive for current PTSD or for IPV within last 12 months * Age 18-65 * Seeking treatment through the Women's Primary Care Clinics at the Central Texas VA Healthcare System. * Ability to understand study procedures in English * Not actively in suicidal or homicidal crisis warranting imminent hospitalization
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Number of Health Risks | Two months | Number of health risks calculated using scores exceeding threshold on CAS, PCL-5 or AUDIT (see secondary outcomes) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adapted Treatment Services Review | 2 month | Self-report and chart review of utilization of mental health and substance abuse treatment. Range is open, as measure assesses women's self-report of treatment appointments. Higher scores indicate a greater number of treatment appointments and thus greater use of treatment (i.e., better outcome). |
| The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | time zero (completed immediately after participant receives intervention session) | 8-item questionnaire which assesses the participant's satisfaction with the intervention. Score range 4-32; higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with the intervention (i.e., better outcome). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PCL-5 | 4 month follow-up | Symptoms of PTSD. Score range 0-80; higher scores indicate more PTSD symptoms (i.e., worse outcome). |
| Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale | 2 month | Assesses women's effectiveness in obtaining resources from 11 different types of community resources including church or clergy, health care, legal services, police, or social services. Reporting the subscale for Things I have been successful at. Score range 0-13; higher scores indicate obtaining more resources (i.e., better outcome). |
| Satisfaction With CIAS Software Scale | time zero (completed immediately after participant receives intervention session) | Assesses participant satisfaction with the computerized software with items on likeability, ease of use, level of interest, and respectfulness. Score range is 7-35; higher numbers indicate higher satisfaction with the software (i.e., better outcome). |
| 30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back | 4 month follow-up | Calendar-assisted measure used to garner a retrospective account of drinking behavior. Scale is in standard alcoholic drinks in an average week in the past month. Higher numbers indicate more drinks per week (i.e., worse outcome). |
| Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) | Four-months | The AUDIT is a 10-item assessment for alcohol use problems, alcohol dependence and problem drinking. Participants respond to each item along 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, whereby higher scores reflect more severe alcohol use patterns. Responses are summed to reflect a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores reflecting higher severity of an individual's use of alcohol. |
| Composite Abuse Scale | 2 month follow up | 30 item measure of chronicity and occurrence of intimate partner violence with current partner in past 12 months. Score range from 0-150; higher scores indicate more intimate partner violence (i.e., worse outcome). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program Participants in the SHE arm of the study will receive a web-based intervention utilizing motivational interviewing and education.
SHE: SHE is a computer-delivered intervention (Safety and Health Experiences Program; SHE) that will provide a screening and brief behavior intervention for women Veterans with any lifetime ST. More specifically, the intervention, SHE, will address interrelated health concerns for women Veterans with ST (i.e. alcohol misuse, IPV, and PTSD). SHE will provide individualized assessment, feedback, and referrals for women Veterans with any lifetime ST. SHE will take place within a primary care setting. | 76 |
| Control Participants randomized to this arm will receive referrals to VA and community resources | 77 |
| Total | 153 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 10 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Safety and Health Experiences Program | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 76 Participants | 77 Participants | 153 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 43.46 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.97 | 43.63 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.28 | 43.55 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 65 Participants | 65 Participants | 130 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 36 Participants | 37 Participants | 73 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 28 Participants | 26 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 76 participants | 77 participants | 153 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 76 Participants | 77 Participants | 153 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 76 | 0 / 77 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 76 | 1 / 77 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 15 / 76 | 12 / 77 |
Outcome results
Change in Number of Health Risks
Number of health risks calculated using scores exceeding threshold on CAS, PCL-5 or AUDIT (see secondary outcomes)
Time frame: Four months
Population: intent to treat sample
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Change in Number of Health Risks | 1.14 number of risks | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Control | Change in Number of Health Risks | 1.00 number of risks | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
Change in Number of Health Risks
Number of health risks calculated using scores exceeding threshold on CAS, PCL-5 or AUDIT (see secondary outcomes)
Time frame: Two months
Population: intent to treat sample
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Change in Number of Health Risks | 1.38 number of risks | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Control | Change in Number of Health Risks | 1.05 number of risks | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
Adapted Treatment Services Review
Self-report and chart review of utilization of mental health and substance abuse treatment. Range is open, as measure assesses women's self-report of treatment appointments. Higher scores indicate a greater number of treatment appointments and thus greater use of treatment (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: 2 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Adapted Treatment Services Review | 7.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.41 |
| Control | Adapted Treatment Services Review | 3.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.56 |
Adapted Treatment Services Review
Self-report and chart review of utilization of mental health and substance abuse treatment. Range is open, as measure assesses women's self-report of treatment appointments. Higher scores indicate a greater number of treatment appointments and thus greater use of treatment (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: 4 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Adapted Treatment Services Review | 4.59 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.34 |
| Control | Adapted Treatment Services Review | 5.03 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.77 |
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
8-item questionnaire which assesses the participant's satisfaction with the intervention. Score range 4-32; higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with the intervention (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: time zero (completed immediately after participant receives intervention session)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire | 26.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back
Calendar-assisted measure used to garner a retrospective account of drinking behavior. Scale is in standard alcoholic drinks in an average week in the past month. Higher numbers indicate more drinks per week (i.e., worse outcome).
Time frame: 4 month follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | 30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back | 8.5 Drinks per week in the past month | Standard Deviation 11.27 |
| Control | 30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back | 8.24 Drinks per week in the past month | Standard Deviation 9.03 |
30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back
Calendar-assisted measure used to garner a retrospective account of drinking behavior. Scale is in standard alcoholic drinks in an average week in the past month. Higher numbers indicate more drinks per week (i.e., worse outcome).
Time frame: 2 month follow up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | 30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back | 10.26 Drinks per week in the past month | Standard Deviation 10.84 |
| Control | 30-day Alcohol Timeline Follow Back | 8.26 Drinks per week in the past month | Standard Deviation 9.46 |
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT)
The AUDIT is a 10-item assessment for alcohol use problems, alcohol dependence and problem drinking. Participants respond to each item along 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, whereby higher scores reflect more severe alcohol use patterns. Responses are summed to reflect a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores reflecting higher severity of an individual's use of alcohol.
Time frame: Two-months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) | 4.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.07 |
| Control | Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) | 5.27 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT)
The AUDIT is a 10-item assessment for alcohol use problems, alcohol dependence and problem drinking. Participants respond to each item along 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, whereby higher scores reflect more severe alcohol use patterns. Responses are summed to reflect a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores reflecting higher severity of an individual's use of alcohol.
Time frame: Four-months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) | 4.52 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.54 |
| Control | Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) | 4.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.01 |
Composite Abuse Scale
30 item measure of chronicity and occurrence of intimate partner violence with current partner in past 12 months. Score range from 0-150; higher scores indicate more intimate partner violence (i.e., worse outcome).
Time frame: 4 month follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Composite Abuse Scale | 7.03 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| Control | Composite Abuse Scale | 5.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.76 |
Composite Abuse Scale
30 item measure of chronicity and occurrence of intimate partner violence with current partner in past 12 months. Score range from 0-150; higher scores indicate more intimate partner violence (i.e., worse outcome).
Time frame: 2 month follow up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Composite Abuse Scale | 11.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.87 |
| Control | Composite Abuse Scale | 6.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale
Assesses women's effectiveness in obtaining resources from 11 different types of community resources including church or clergy, health care, legal services, police, or social services. Reporting the subscale for Things I have been successful at. Score range 0-13; higher scores indicate obtaining more resources (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: 4 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale | 1.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.67 |
| Control | Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.68 |
Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale
Assesses women's effectiveness in obtaining resources from 11 different types of community resources including church or clergy, health care, legal services, police, or social services. Reporting the subscale for Things I have been successful at. Score range 0-13; higher scores indicate obtaining more resources (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: 2 month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale | 1.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
| Control | Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources Scale | 1.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.17 |
PCL-5
Symptoms of PTSD. Score range 0-80; higher scores indicate more PTSD symptoms (i.e., worse outcome).
Time frame: 2 month follow up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | PCL-5 | 47.16 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.54 |
| Control | PCL-5 | 42.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.15 |
PCL-5
Symptoms of PTSD. Score range 0-80; higher scores indicate more PTSD symptoms (i.e., worse outcome).
Time frame: 4 month follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | PCL-5 | 45.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.01 |
| Control | PCL-5 | 44.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.29 |
Satisfaction With CIAS Software Scale
Assesses participant satisfaction with the computerized software with items on likeability, ease of use, level of interest, and respectfulness. Score range is 7-35; higher numbers indicate higher satisfaction with the software (i.e., better outcome).
Time frame: time zero (completed immediately after participant receives intervention session)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Health Experiences Program | Satisfaction With CIAS Software Scale | 30.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |