Skip to content

Know Your Risk: Assessment at Screening for Breast Cancer - Pilot Study

Study of Web-based Decision Aids for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Increasing Breast Cancer Chemoprevention in the Primary Care Setting: Pilot

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02954900
Acronym
KYRAS
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-11-04
Start date
2016-03-15
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2021-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

Breast Cancer Prevention, Risk Assessment, Chemoprevention, Decision Making

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate a decision support website (RealRisks) designed to inform patients about breast cancer chemoprevention. It is coupled with a physician-centered (BNAV) decision support website as part of clinical workflow in the primary care setting. The investigator hypothesizes that improving accuracy of breast cancer risk perception and understanding of the risks/benefits of chemoprevention will enhance informed decision-making and uptake of breast cancer prevention strategies in the primary care setting.

Detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the U.S. and the primary prevention of this disease is a major public health issue. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other professional organizations recommend that clinicians discuss chemoprevention with high-risk women. Breast cancer chemoprevention with anti-estrogens, such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, exemestane, and anastrozole, is under-utilized, despite several randomized controlled trials demonstrating a 40-65% decrease in breast cancer incidence among high-risk women. Compounding this underutilization is the fact that a large proportion of women may be unaware of their high-risk status due to the investigators inability to adequately screen them in the primary care setting. Further research is needed to determine how knowledge about breast cancer, actual/perceived risk, and risks/benefits of chemoprevention are best communicated to women in order to promote breast cancer prevention strategies. This study assesses risk communication and shared decision-making in patient-clinician dyads by administering validated measures at baseline, after interacting with the tools prior to the clinic visit, and after the clinical visit (quantitative analysis); and by using observer-based methods of audio-tape recordings of their clinical encounters (qualitative analysis). The investigator hypothesizes that combining a patient-centered decision aid with a physician-centered decision support tool integrated into clinic workflow will improve accuracy of breast cancer risk perception, facilitate referrals for specialized risk counseling, and increase chemoprevention uptake.

Interventions

RealRisks is a web-based patient decision aid with modules that present information about risk assessment and chemoprevention.

OTHERBNAV

Breast Cancer Risk Navigation (BNAV) tool is a web-based decision support tool with modules that present pertinent information for primary care providers regarding breast cancer risk assessment and preventative measures for their patients.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 5-year breast risk of 1.67% or lifetime risk of 20% according to the Gail model * The participant understands and is willing to provide informed consent in English or Spanish * Has a primary care provider at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) / New York-Presbyterian Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Prior use of a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) for chemoprevention * Prior history of breast cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the accuracy of risk perception (Likert Scale Score)Baseline, 2 weeksTo measure the patient's accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk before and after exposure to the RealRisks decision aid. Perception will be assessed by comparing the difference between a patient's perceived risk and their actual risk based on the Gail breast cancer model. Patients are asked to make a comparative risk assessment about themselves on a 3-point Likert scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in a patient's breast cancer knowledge (Survey Score)Baseline, 2 weeksTo assess patient's breast cancer knowledge before and after exposure to the RealRisks decision aid by comparing the difference between a patient's responses to a 13-item scale assessing knowledge with response options of true, false, or unsure.
Chemoprevention uptake rate among high-risk women6 monthsTo determine the uptake rate in the breast clinic after offering specialized risk counseling to a broader population of racially/ethnically diverse women screened in the primary care setting. Electronic health records will be used to track chemoprevention uptake after exposure to the RealRisks decision aid.
Referral rates to the breast clinic12 monthsTo study appropriate referral rate by primary care providers of high-risk patients to the breast clinic.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026