Skip to content

Phase 3 Trial of Cannabidiol (CBD; GWP42003-P) for Infantile Spasms: Open-label Extension Phase (GWPCARE7)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (CBD; GWP42003-P) in Infants With Infantile Spasms Following an Initial Open-label Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02954887
Enrollment
9
Registered
2016-11-04
Start date
2017-05-12
Completion date
2019-06-13
Last updated
2022-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infantile Spasms

Keywords

GWP42003-P, Cannabidiol

Brief summary

This trial consists of 3 parts: a pilot safety phase, a pivotal randomized controlled phase, and an open-label extension phase. The open-label extension phase only will be described in this record. All participants will receive GWP42003-P.

Interventions

Clear, colorless to yellow solution containing cannabidiol dissolved in the excipients sesame oil and anhydrous ethanol with added sweetener (sucralose) and strawberry flavoring.

Sponsors

Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open-label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Only participants who completed the pilot or pivotal phases of the trial may proceed to take part in this open-label extension phase of the trial. Key eligibility criteria for the blinded phase were as follows: Key Inclusion Criteria: * Participant is diagnosed with IS and has failed to respond adequately following treatment with 1 or more approved IS therapies. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Participant is currently taking or has taken clobazam or any mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor within the 2 weeks prior to the screening visit. * Participant has a QT interval, corrected for heart rate with Bazett's formula (QTcB), of 460 msec or greater on ECG. * Participant's caregiver is currently giving or has given recreational or medicinal cannabis, or synthetic cannabinoid-based medications, within the 1 month prior to the screening visit. * Participant's caregiver is unwilling to abstain from giving the participant (including the participant's mother abstaining themselves, if breastfeeding)recreational or medicinal cannabis, or synthetic cannabinoid-based medications (other than the study drug) during the trial. * Participant has any known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the study drug, such as sesame oil. * Participant has significantly impaired hepatic function at the screening visit. * Participant has received an investigational medicinal product as part of a clinical trial within a minimum of 5 half-lives prior to the screening visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Severe Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From signing of informed consent up to Day 417TEAEs were collected in members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least 1 dose of GWP42003-P. TEAEs are defined as all adverse events not present prior to the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) or placebo administration or any event already present that worsened in severity or frequency following IMP.
Number of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDays 19, 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389
Number of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDays 19, 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDays 19, 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram FindingsFrom signing of informed consent up to Day 389Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign FindingsFrom signing of informed consent up to Day 389Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsFrom signing of informed consent up to Day 389Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of RespondersDays 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379A responder is defined as a participant experiencing a resolution of hypsarrhythmia and free of spasms. Test for responders was conducted by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.
Percentage of RespondersDays 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379A responder is defined as a participant experiencing a resolution of hypsarrhythmia and free of spasms. Test for responders was conducted by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.
Change From Baseline in HeightBaseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study); Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389A positive change indicates an increase in the average participant's height. A negative change indicates a decrease in the average participant's height. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight.Baseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study); Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389A positive change indicates an increase in the average participant's weight. A negative change indicates a decrease in the average participant's weight. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Head CircumferenceBaseline (Day 1 of PIlot Study); Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389A positive change indicates an increase in the average participant's head circumference. A negative change indicates a decrease in the average participant's head circumference. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Baseline; Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, and 379The CGIC is a single-question assessment completed by the caregiver. The question assessed the status of the participant's condition since treatment start. The caregiver provided a rating on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much Improved; 3, slightly improved; 4, no change; 5, slightly worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse.
Number of Participants With Relapse of SpasmsDay 16 to Day 379Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse of SpasmsDay 16 to Day 379Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.
Average Time to Cessation of SpasmsDay 1 to Day 379Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.
Average Time to RelapseDay 16 to Day 379Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.
Change From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoreBaseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study); Day 211, Day 379The Vineland-II scores were assessed by the participant's caregiver. Caregivers were asked to score questions in the following categories: the participant's communication, daily living, physical activity, problem behaviors, and social skills and relationships. Scoring was slightly different for each section, but generally ranged from usually (2) to never (0). The total score is calculated as the sum of standard scores from the domains and converted into the adaptive behavior composite score (ranging from 20 to 160). Higher scores represent greater levels of functioning, and lower scores represent lower levels of functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDays 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379Clinical spasms were determined by video-electroencephalography (VEEG) for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.
Percentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDays 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379Clinical spasms were determined by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.
Number of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDays 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379Resolution of hypsarrhythmia was determined by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.
Percentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDays 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379Resolution of hypsarrhythmia was determined by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.
Number of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDays 19, 29, 127, 211, 295, and 379Caregivers recorded the participant's spasms and seizures by category in a daily diary. Subtypes of spasms and seizure included, clonic, tonic-clonic, myoclonic, focal, and absence.
Physician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Baseline; Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, and 379The PGIC is a single-question assessment completed by the investigator. The question assessed the status of the participant's condition since treatment start. The investigator provided a rating on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much Improved; 3, slightly improved; 4, no change; 5, slightly worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse.

Countries

Poland, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GWP42003-P OS
Following completion of the Pilot Phase (NCT02953548), participants were eligible to participate in the Open Label Extension Phase. Participants continued on the same dose administered in the Pilot Phase for a maximum of 1 year and completed a 10-day taper after completing the study or withdrawing. Participants were administered GWP42003-P oral solution (OS) orally, twice daily, or three times daily if poorly tolerated. The dosage was split evenly across the two or three daily administrations to equal the target or most tolerable dose.
9
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGWP42003-P OS
Age, Continuous12.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.56
Age, Customized
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter Value

Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Days 19, 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 190 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 290 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 430 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 711 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 1270 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 2110 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 2950 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 3790 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Clinically Relevant Urinalysis Parameter ValueDay 3890 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter Value

Time frame: Days 19, 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 19, Low6 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 19, High7 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 29, Low6 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 29, High6 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 43, Low4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 43, High5 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 71, Low2 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 71, High4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 127, Low4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 127, High3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 211, Low2 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 211, High3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 295, Low2 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 295, High3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 379, Low5 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 379, High7 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 389, Low3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Biochemistry Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 389, High2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter Value

Time frame: Days 19, 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 19, Low3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 19, High4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 29, Low3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 29, High4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 43, Low1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 43, High2 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 71, Low1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 71, High3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 127, Low1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 127, High3 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 211, Low1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 211, High2 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 295, Low2 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 295, High0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 379, Low4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 379, High4 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 389, Low1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Any Low or High Hematology Laboratory Parameter ValueDay 389, High4 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings

Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: From signing of informed consent up to Day 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Findings

Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: From signing of informed consent up to Day 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Findings0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Findings

Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: From signing of informed consent up to Day 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Findings0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Severe Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs were collected in members of the Safety Population, comprised of all participants who received at least 1 dose of GWP42003-P. TEAEs are defined as all adverse events not present prior to the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) or placebo administration or any event already present that worsened in severity or frequency following IMP.

Time frame: From signing of informed consent up to Day 417

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all participants who had received ≥ 1 dose of GWP42003-P

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With Severe Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)7 Participants
Secondary

Average Time to Cessation of Spasms

Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

Secondary

Average Time to Relapse

Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.

Time frame: Day 16 to Day 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

Secondary

Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

The CGIC is a single-question assessment completed by the caregiver. The question assessed the status of the participant's condition since treatment start. The caregiver provided a rating on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much Improved; 3, slightly improved; 4, no change; 5, slightly worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline; Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Slightly Improved5 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, No Change1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 29, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Very Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Slightly Improved3 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 43, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Very Much Improved3 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Much Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Slightly Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71 No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Slightly Worse1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 71, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Very Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Slightly Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 127, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Slightly Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 211, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Slightly Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 295, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Very Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Slightly Improved3 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Slightly Worse1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Much Worse1 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSCaregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Day 379, Not Done1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight.

A positive change indicates an increase in the average participant's weight. A negative change indicates a decrease in the average participant's weight. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study); Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Baseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study)9.92 kilogramsStandard Deviation 3.245
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 29, OLE0.39 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.309
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 43, OLE0.75 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.809
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 71, OLE1.10 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.43
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 127, OLE1.25 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.42
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 211, OLE1.17 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.503
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 295, OLE2.10 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.889
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 379, OLE1.19 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.862
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Body Weight.Day 389, OLE0.98 kilogramsStandard Deviation 0.637
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Head Circumference

A positive change indicates an increase in the average participant's head circumference. A negative change indicates a decrease in the average participant's head circumference. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 of PIlot Study); Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceBaseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study)44.71 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.724
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 29, OLE-0.01 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.229
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 43, OLE0.54 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.288
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 71, OLE0.70 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.57
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 127, OLE1.50 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.5
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 211, OLE0.75 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.354
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 295, OLE-0.3 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.31
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 379, OLE1.14 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.707
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Head CircumferenceDay 389, OLE0.90 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.782
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Height

A positive change indicates an increase in the average participant's height. A negative change indicates a decrease in the average participant's height. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study); Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, 379, and 389

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightBaseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study)75.04 centimetersStandard Deviation 9.557
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 29, Open-label Extension (OLE)0.85 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.98
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 43, OLE0.92 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.53
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 71, OLE3.10 centimetersStandard Deviation 0.652
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 127, OLE3.38 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.377
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 211, OLE5.33 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.258
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 295, OLE8.17 centimetersStandard Deviation 1.528
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 379, OLE5.31 centimetersStandard Deviation 4.036
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in HeightDay 389, OLE3.55 centimetersStandard Deviation 4.085
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) Score

The Vineland-II scores were assessed by the participant's caregiver. Caregivers were asked to score questions in the following categories: the participant's communication, daily living, physical activity, problem behaviors, and social skills and relationships. Scoring was slightly different for each section, but generally ranged from usually (2) to never (0). The total score is calculated as the sum of standard scores from the domains and converted into the adaptive behavior composite score (ranging from 20 to 160). Higher scores represent greater levels of functioning, and lower scores represent lower levels of functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Pilot Study); Day 211, Day 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoreBaseline, Day 1 of Pilot Study33.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.27
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoreDay 211 of OLE6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
GWP42003-P OSChange From Baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoreDay 379 of OLE-5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.42
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by Subtype

Caregivers recorded the participant's spasms and seizures by category in a daily diary. Subtypes of spasms and seizure included, clonic, tonic-clonic, myoclonic, focal, and absence.

Time frame: Days 19, 29, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Focal1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Tonic-Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Atonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Myoclonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Focal1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Absence0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 19, Not Done0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Tonic-Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Atonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Myoclonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Focal1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Absence0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 29, Not Done0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, Tonic-Clonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, Atonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, Myoclonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, Focal0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, Absence1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 127, No Done0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Tonic-Clonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Atonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Myoclonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Focal0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Absence1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 211, Not Done0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Clonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Tonic-Clonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Atonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Myoclonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Focal0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Absence1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 295, Not Done0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Clonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Tonic-Clonic1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Atonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Myoclonic0 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Absence1 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Experiencing Spasms and Seizures by SubtypeDay 379, Not Done0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Free of Clinical Spasms

Clinical spasms were determined by video-electroencephalography (VEEG) for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.

Time frame: Days 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 291 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 432 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 1271 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 2111 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 2951 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 3793 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Resolution of Hypsarrhythmia

Resolution of hypsarrhythmia was determined by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.

Time frame: Days 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 291 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 430 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 1271 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 2110 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 2951 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 3793 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Relapse of Spasms

Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.

Time frame: Day 16 to Day 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

Secondary

Number of Responders

A responder is defined as a participant experiencing a resolution of hypsarrhythmia and free of spasms. Test for responders was conducted by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.

Time frame: Days 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P OSNumber of RespondersDay 291 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of RespondersDay 430 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of RespondersDay 1270 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of RespondersDay 2110 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of RespondersDay 2951 Participants
GWP42003-P OSNumber of RespondersDay 3793 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Free of Clinical Spasms

Clinical spasms were determined by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.

Time frame: Days 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 2911.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 4322.2 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 12711.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 21111.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 29511.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants Free of Clinical SpasmsDay 37933.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Resolution of Hypsarrhythmia

Resolution of hypsarrhythmia was determined by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.

Time frame: Days 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 2911.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 430 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 12711.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 2110 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 29511.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of Participants With a Resolution of HypsarrhythmiaDay 37933.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse of Spasms

Analysis could not be conducted for this outcome measure because the study met No Go Criteria. The Pilot Phase concluded after 9 participants completed treatment and demonstrated continued hypsarrhythmia and spasms on follow-up VEEG. The Pivotal Phase was not initiated; however, participants completing the Pilot Phase could roll into the Open Label Extension Phase for up to 1 year.

Time frame: Day 16 to Day 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

Secondary

Percentage of Responders

A responder is defined as a participant experiencing a resolution of hypsarrhythmia and free of spasms. Test for responders was conducted by VEEG for at least 8 hours and up to 24 hours.

Time frame: Days 29, 43, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with evaluable data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of RespondersDay 2911.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of RespondersDay 430 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of RespondersDay 1270 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of RespondersDay 2110 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of RespondersDay 29511.1 percentage of participants
GWP42003-P OSPercentage of RespondersDay 37933.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC is a single-question assessment completed by the investigator. The question assessed the status of the participant's condition since treatment start. The investigator provided a rating on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much Improved; 3, slightly improved; 4, no change; 5, slightly worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline; Days 29, 43, 71, 127, 211, 295, and 379

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Slightly Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, No Change4 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 29, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Much Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Slightly Improved4 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, No Change1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 43, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Slightly Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, No Change1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 71, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Very Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Much Improved2 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Slightly Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, No Change0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 127, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Very Much Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Slightly Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, No Change1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 211, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Very Much Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Slightly Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, No Change1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Slightly Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Much Worse1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 295, Not Done0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Very Much Improved0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Much Improved1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Slightly Improved3 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, No Change2 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Slightly Worse1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Much Worse1 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Very Much Worse0 participants
GWP42003-P OSPhysician Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Day 379, Not Done1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026