Skip to content

Clinical Study to Investigate the PK, Efficacy, and Safety of Wilate in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

Clinical Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Wilate in Previously Treated Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02954575
Enrollment
57
Registered
2016-11-03
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2018-03-29
Last updated
2021-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Hemophilia A

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to obtain additional data on the safety and efficacy of Wilate in PTPs with hemophilia A with at least 150 previous exposure days (EDs) to a FVIII concentrate who undergo prophylactic treatment with Wilate for 6 months and at least 50 EDs, thus supplementing the existing database to obtain approval of Wilate for the indication hemophilia A in the USA.

Interventions

DRUGWilate

Sponsors

Octapharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Severe hemophilia A (\<1% FVIII:C) according to medical history 2. Male patients aged ≥12 years 3. Previous treatment with a FVIII concentrate for at least 150 exposure days (EDs) 4. Immunocompetence (CD4+ count \>200/µL) 5. Good documentation of the historical bleeding rate (at least for the 6 months preceding study start) 6. Voluntarily given, fully informed written and signed consent obtained by the patient (or parent/legal guardian in case of adolescents) before any study-related procedures are conducted Whenever possible, the interval between the Screening Visit and the PK or Non-PK Visit should not exceed 30 days. If the 30-day interval is exceeded, determination of the CD4+ count is to be repeated and must be \>200/µL for patients to be enrolled (i.e., exclusion criterion no. 4).

Exclusion criteria

1. Any coagulation disorders other than hemophilia A 2. History of FVIII inhibitor activity (≥0.6 BU) or detectable FVIII inhibitory anti-bodies (≥0.6 BU using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay) at screening, as determined by the central laboratory 3. Severe liver or kidney diseases (alanine aminotransferase \[ALAT\] and aspartate transaminase \[ASAT\] levels \>5 times of upper limit of normal, creatinine\>120 µmol/L) 4. Patients receiving or scheduled to receive immunomodulating drugs (other than anti-retroviral chemotherapy) such as alpha-interferon, prednisone (equivalent to \>10 mg/day), or similar drugs 5. Treatment with any investigational medicinal product in another interventional clinical study currently or within 4 weeks before enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)6 monthsThe total number of bleeding events (BEs) was documented by patients in a patient diary (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments), which was reviewed at each follow-up visit by site personnel.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)6 monthsThe number of spontaneous bleeding events (BEs) was documented by patients in a patient diary (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments), which was reviewed at each follow-up visit by site personnel.
Efficacy of Wilate in the Treatment of Breakthrough BEs6 monthsThe proportion of BEs successfully treated with Wilate were documented by the patient (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments) in the patient diary for all BEs according to a 4-point hemostatic efficacy scale including the four items: 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none', where 'excellent' was defined as Abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection (best outcome) and 'none' was defined as No improvement within 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than two injections for complete resolution (worst outcome). All efficacy ratings assessed as either 'excellent' or 'good' were considered 'successfully treated.'
Wilate Consumption Data (Average Total Normdose of FVIII IU/kg Per Month of Study) for Prophylaxis6 monthsThe average consumption of Wilate per month of study (IU/kg) for all patients receiving prophylaxis.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Area Under the Curve [AUC] Norm) of FVIII:CInitial PK visit (Day -1) and PK study completion visit (6 months); data collected 1 h prior to injection and 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 24 h, 30 h and 48 h after the end of injectionPK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The value of the AUCnorm of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (in Vivo Half-Life (t1/2)) of FVIII:CInitial PK assessment (Day -1) and PK study completion visit (6 months); data collected 1 h prior to infusion and 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 24 h, 30 h and 48 h after the end of injectionPK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The in vivo half-life of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]) of FVIII:CInitial PK assessment (Day -1) and 6 monthsPK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The maximum plasma concentration of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.
Association Between ABO Blood Type and the FVIII:C Half-life of Wilate (OS Assay)6 monthsAnalysis of variance (ANOVA) was used in an exploratory sense to assess an association between ABO blood type and the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate. This was analyzed by calculating the mean square in a one-stage assay.
Association Between VWF:Ag Concentration and the FVIII:C Half-life of Wilate6 monthsANOVA was used in an exploratory sense to assess an association between VWF:Ag with the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate. This was analyzed by calculating the mean square in a one-stage assay.
Safety and Tolerability of Wilate by Monitoring Adverse Events (AEs) Throughout the Study6 monthsAt each (scheduled or unscheduled) study visit, AEs were documented by the investigator throughout the study.
Immunogenicity of Wilate by Testing for FVIII Inhibitors6 monthsFVIII inhibitor activity was determined at each study visit before the injection of Wilate using the modified Bethesda assay (Nijmegen modification).
Virus Safety Measured by the Number of Parvovirus B19 Seroconversions Between Baseline (BL) and End of Study6 monthsVirus safety was evaluated by taking a plasma sample for parvovirus B19 antibody testing before the first injection of Wilate. All patients negative at screening were tested again at the study completion visit. The number with Parvovirus B19 seroconversions between BL and end of study was recorded.
Incremental in Vivo Recovery (IVR) of Wilate Over TimeBaseline, 3 and 6 monthsThe rise in FVIII activity in IU/dl per unit dose administered in IU/kg was determined from all patients at baseline, 3 and 6 months, using the OS assay.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Wilate in Surgical Prophylaxis6 monthsHemostatic efficacy was assessed at the end of surgery by the surgeon and at end of the postoperative period by the hematologist, using a 4-point hemostatic efficacy scale including the four items: 'excellent' (best possible outcome), 'good', 'moderate' and 'none' (worst outcome). Overall efficacy was assessed by the investigator, taking both the intra and postoperative assessments into account, and using the 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none' scale.

Countries

Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Wilate
SAF population (All patients who received at least one administration of Wilate during the study (N=55)
55
Total55

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWilate
Age, Continuous35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Blood groups
0
19 Participants
Blood groups
A
23 Participants
Blood groups
AB
5 Participants
Blood groups
B
8 Participants
Body mass index (BMI)26.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Previous annualized bleeding rate (ABR)32.98 No. BEs per patient per year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.12
Previous Factor (F) VIII treatment
Combination
5 Participants
Previous Factor (F) VIII treatment
On-demand
32 Participants
Previous Factor (F) VIII treatment
Prophylaxis
18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants
von Willebrand factor activity (VWF:Ac)103.7 IU/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.5
von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag)118.4 IU/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.9
Weight83.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)

The total number of bleeding events (BEs) was documented by patients in a patient diary (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments), which was reviewed at each follow-up visit by site personnel.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The total annualized bleeding rate (TABR) was calculated for all patients included in the PP population (N=52).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilateTotal Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR)2.10 No. of BEs / year (ABR)Standard Deviation 3.44
Comparison: A confirmative one-sided, one-sample Poisson test was used to test whether the mean annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in patients treated prophylactically with Wilate was below the threshold of 29 BEs per patient year (alpha = 2.5%). This threshold corresponds to 50% of the TABR reported in the GENA-01 study (NCT00989196), which observed 58.1 BEs per patient per year. A corresponding two-sided 95% CI for the TABR was also analyzed.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.64, 2.76]Poisson test estimate
Secondary

Association Between ABO Blood Type and the FVIII:C Half-life of Wilate (OS Assay)

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used in an exploratory sense to assess an association between ABO blood type and the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate. This was analyzed by calculating the mean square in a one-stage assay.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
WilateAssociation Between ABO Blood Type and the FVIII:C Half-life of Wilate (OS Assay)15.867 Beta coefficient
p-value: 0.0346ANOVA
Secondary

Association Between VWF:Ag Concentration and the FVIII:C Half-life of Wilate

ANOVA was used in an exploratory sense to assess an association between VWF:Ag with the FVIII:C half-life of Wilate. This was analyzed by calculating the mean square in a one-stage assay.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
WilateAssociation Between VWF:Ag Concentration and the FVIII:C Half-life of Wilate5.104 Beta coefficient
p-value: 0.4244ANOVA
Secondary

Efficacy of Wilate in the Treatment of Breakthrough BEs

The proportion of BEs successfully treated with Wilate were documented by the patient (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments) in the patient diary for all BEs according to a 4-point hemostatic efficacy scale including the four items: 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none', where 'excellent' was defined as Abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection (best outcome) and 'none' was defined as No improvement within 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than two injections for complete resolution (worst outcome). All efficacy ratings assessed as either 'excellent' or 'good' were considered 'successfully treated.'

Time frame: 6 months

Population: In the PP population, efficacy of Wilate in the treatment of breakthrough BEs was analyzed for all patients experiencing breakthrough BEs (N=24)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in the Treatment of Breakthrough BEsExcellent16 Number of BEs
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in the Treatment of Breakthrough BEsGood32 Number of BEs
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in the Treatment of Breakthrough BEsModerate9 Number of BEs
Comparison: Confirmatory statistical testing tested the null hypotheses that the percentage of success is ≤70% (alternative hypothesis: percentage \>70%); the test procedure based on the generalized estimation equation took into account several BEs in one patient as correlated repeated measurements (alpha = 2.5%). Thus, π denotes the proportion of success and the following pair of hypotheses was tested:~H0: π ≤ 0.7 vs. H1: π \> 0.7p-value: 0.009695% CI: [72.13, 92.52]Confirmatory data analysis
Secondary

Immunogenicity of Wilate by Testing for FVIII Inhibitors

FVIII inhibitor activity was determined at each study visit before the injection of Wilate using the modified Bethesda assay (Nijmegen modification).

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
WilateImmunogenicity of Wilate by Testing for FVIII Inhibitors0 Participants
95% CI: [0, 16.11]
Secondary

Incremental in Vivo Recovery (IVR) of Wilate Over Time

The rise in FVIII activity in IU/dl per unit dose administered in IU/kg was determined from all patients at baseline, 3 and 6 months, using the OS assay.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilateIncremental in Vivo Recovery (IVR) of Wilate Over TimeFirst PK/non-PK visit2.14 kg/dLStandard Deviation 0.51
WilateIncremental in Vivo Recovery (IVR) of Wilate Over Time3 months2.14 kg/dLStandard Deviation 0.49
WilateIncremental in Vivo Recovery (IVR) of Wilate Over TimePK/non-PK completion 6 months1.97 kg/dLStandard Deviation 0.64
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Area Under the Curve [AUC] Norm) of FVIII:C

PK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The value of the AUCnorm of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.

Time frame: Initial PK visit (Day -1) and PK study completion visit (6 months); data collected 1 h prior to injection and 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 24 h, 30 h and 48 h after the end of injection

Population: AUC divided by dose (IU\*h/dL per IU/kg)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilatePharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Area Under the Curve [AUC] Norm) of FVIII:CInitial PK28.61 IU*h/dL per IU/kgStandard Deviation 9.31
WilatePharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Area Under the Curve [AUC] Norm) of FVIII:CPK completion 6 months30.75 IU*h/dL per IU/kgStandard Deviation 11.32
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (in Vivo Half-Life (t1/2)) of FVIII:C

PK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The in vivo half-life of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.

Time frame: Initial PK assessment (Day -1) and PK study completion visit (6 months); data collected 1 h prior to infusion and 15 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 24 h, 30 h and 48 h after the end of injection

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilatePharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (in Vivo Half-Life (t1/2)) of FVIII:CInitial PK10.82 HoursStandard Deviation 2.5
WilatePharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (in Vivo Half-Life (t1/2)) of FVIII:CPK completion 6 months11.50 HoursStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]) of FVIII:C

PK assessments of FVIII:C were conducted using the one-stage (OS) assay. The maximum plasma concentration of FVIII:C was calculated based on the FVIII:C values measured in the patients participating in the PK study.

Time frame: Initial PK assessment (Day -1) and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilatePharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]) of FVIII:CInitial PK106.70 IU/dLStandard Deviation 22.45
WilatePharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment (Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]) of FVIII:CPK completion 6 months103.49 IU/dLStandard Deviation 26.53
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability of Wilate by Monitoring Adverse Events (AEs) Throughout the Study

At each (scheduled or unscheduled) study visit, AEs were documented by the investigator throughout the study.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: In the FAS population (N=55), the safety and tolerability of Wilate was analysed for all patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) throughout the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
WilateSafety and Tolerability of Wilate by Monitoring Adverse Events (AEs) Throughout the StudyNumber of Treatment-emergent AEs16 Number of adverse events
WilateSafety and Tolerability of Wilate by Monitoring Adverse Events (AEs) Throughout the StudyNumber of AEs17 Number of adverse events
Secondary

Spontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)

The number of spontaneous bleeding events (BEs) was documented by patients in a patient diary (together with the investigator in case of on-site treatments), which was reviewed at each follow-up visit by site personnel.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (SABR) was calculated for all patients included in the PP population (N=52).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilateSpontaneous Annualized Bleeding Rate (SABR)1.51 No. of spontaneous BEs/year (SABR)Standard Deviation 3.03
Comparison: A confirmative one-sided, one-sample Poisson test was used to test whether the mean SABR in patients treated prophylactically with Wilate was below the threshold of 19.1 BEs per patient year (alpha = 2.5%). This threshold corresponds to 50% of the SABR in the GENA-01 study (NCT00989196), which observed 38.2 spontaneous BEs per patient per year. A corresponding two-sided 95% CI for the SABR was also analyzed.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.13, 2.08]Poisson test estimate
Secondary

Virus Safety Measured by the Number of Parvovirus B19 Seroconversions Between Baseline (BL) and End of Study

Virus safety was evaluated by taking a plasma sample for parvovirus B19 antibody testing before the first injection of Wilate. All patients negative at screening were tested again at the study completion visit. The number with Parvovirus B19 seroconversions between BL and end of study was recorded.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: In the FAS population (N=55), the viral safety of Wilate was analyzed for all patients at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
WilateVirus Safety Measured by the Number of Parvovirus B19 Seroconversions Between Baseline (BL) and End of Study0 Participants
Secondary

Wilate Consumption Data (Average Total Normdose of FVIII IU/kg Per Month of Study) for Prophylaxis

The average consumption of Wilate per month of study (IU/kg) for all patients receiving prophylaxis.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WilateWilate Consumption Data (Average Total Normdose of FVIII IU/kg Per Month of Study) for Prophylaxis405.06 IU/kgStandard Deviation 83.7
Other Pre-specified

Efficacy of Wilate in Surgical Prophylaxis

Hemostatic efficacy was assessed at the end of surgery by the surgeon and at end of the postoperative period by the hematologist, using a 4-point hemostatic efficacy scale including the four items: 'excellent' (best possible outcome), 'good', 'moderate' and 'none' (worst outcome). Overall efficacy was assessed by the investigator, taking both the intra and postoperative assessments into account, and using the 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none' scale.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in Surgical ProphylaxisExcellent0 Participants
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in Surgical ProphylaxisGood1 Participants
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in Surgical ProphylaxisModerate0 Participants
WilateEfficacy of Wilate in Surgical ProphylaxisNone0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026