Skip to content

Study of Magrolimab (Hu5F9-G4) in Combination With Cetuximab in Participants With Solid Tumors and Advanced Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 1b/2 Trial of Hu5F9-G4 in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Solid Tumors and Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02953782
Enrollment
78
Registered
2016-11-03
Start date
2016-11-02
Completion date
2020-02-10
Last updated
2021-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Solid Tumor

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study are: (Phase 1b) to investigate the safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for magrolimab in combination with cetuximab; and (Phase 2) to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) of magrolimab in combination with cetuximab in participants with Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutant and KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC).

Interventions

DRUGMagrolimab

Administered intravenously

DRUGCetuximab

Administered intravenously

Sponsors

California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
CollaboratorOTHER
Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Histological Diagnosis * Phase 1b only: Advanced solid malignancy with an emphasis on colorectal cancer (CRC), head and neck, breast, pancreatic and ovarian cancers who have been treated with at least one regimen of prior systemic therapy, or who refuse systemic therapy, and for which there is no curative therapy available. * Phase 2: * KRAS Mutant CRC: Advanced KRAS mutant CRC who have progressed or are ineligible for both irinotecan and oxaliplatin based chemotherapy * KRAS Wild-Type CRC: Advanced KRAS wild type CRC who have progressed or are ineligible for fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin based chemotherapy and who are relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic therapy that included an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody, such as cetuximab, panitumumab or others. * Adequate performance status and hematological, liver, and kidney function * Phase 2 only: Willing to consent to 1 mandatory pre-treatment and 1 on-treatment tumor biopsy Key

Exclusion criteria

* Active brain metastases * Prior treatment with cluster of differentiation 47 (CD47) or signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) targeting agents. * Phase 2 only: second malignancy within the last 3 years. * Known active or chronic hepatitis B or C infection or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Pregnancy or active breastfeeding Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)From first dose up to Day 28DLT was defined as any Grade (GR) 3 or greater adverse event (AE) that was assessed as related to study treatment with the exceptions of: GR 3: anemia (hemolytic anemia that is medically significant tis considered a DLT), indirect/unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, electrolyte abnormalities, elevation in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 with supportive care within 1 week and is not associated with other clinically significant consequences; nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 with supportive care within 72 hours; fatigue that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 within 2 weeks on study; drug-related infusion reactions in the absence of an optimal pretreatment regimen; tumor lysis syndrome or electrolyte disturbances, hypomagnesemia, that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 or baseline within 1 week; GR 3 or 4: lymphopenia or leukopenia.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose date up to last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 15.3 months)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, and/or laboratory or physiological observation that may or may not be related to the investigational medicinal product. A TEAE was defined as AEs worsening or occurring during or after a participant's first exposure to study drug and within 30 days after the last administration of study drug or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)From Screening until 38.89 months (assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 3 then every 8 weeks [Q8W] from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective response which consisted of complete response (CR)+ partial response (PR) determined by RECIST v 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm short axis). Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabPre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8) and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)AUCtau is defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).
Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline; post-treatment (assessed continuously up to 30 days after last dose; maximum 15.3 months )Percentage of Participants With Positive ADA at any timepoint was reported.
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.1From Screening until 38.89 months (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with disease control which consisted of CR+PR+SD. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters measured while on study. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum measured while on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabPre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1), 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8), and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by RECIST v1.1From first dose until documented PD/death (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)PFS was measured from first dose until the first date of objectively documented PD or death. Participants who did not have objectively documented PD and not died was censored at their last documented progression-free date. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum measured while on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan Meier estimate was used for analysis.
Overall Survival (OS)From first dose until death (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)OS was measured from first dose until death. Participants who did not die were censored at their last known alive date. Kaplan Meier estimate was used for analysis.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.1From first objective response until documented PD (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)DOR was measured from when the first (objective) response was met (i.e., CR or PR) until the first date of objectively documented PD. Participants who did not have objectively PD was censored at their last documented progression-free date. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum measured while on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan Meier estimate was used for analysis.
PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabPre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8) and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.
PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabPre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8) and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in United States. The first participant was screened on 02 November 2016. The last study visit occurred on 10 February 2020.

Pre-assignment details

105 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2
Participants with solid tumor received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 10 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 300 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 200 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. After Cycle 1 and thereafter, weekly maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab, started on Day 1. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
6
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with solid tumor received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 10 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. After Cycle 1 and thereafter, weekly maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab, started on Day 1. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
3
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with solid tumor received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 20 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. After Cycle 1 and thereafter, weekly maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab, started on Day 1. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
9
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with solid tumor received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 30 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. After Cycle 1 and thereafter, weekly maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab, started on Day 1. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
8
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with solid tumor received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 45 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. Participants also received a loading dose of magrolimab 45 mg/kg of body weight on Day 11 of Cycle 1. After Cycle 1, maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab started on Day 1 with weekly dose in Cycle 2 and bi-weekly dose in Cycle 3 onwards for magrolimab. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
6
Phase 2 Cohort 1 (KRASwt): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with advanced CRC who were KRASwt and were refractory to anti-EGFRmAb therapy received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 30 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. After Cycle 1, maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab started on Day 1; Days 8 and 22 were removed from Cycle 2 onwards for magrolimab. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
16
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with advanced CRC with KRASm who had progressed or were not candidates for oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based therapy received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 30 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. After Cycle 1, maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab started on Day 1; Days 8 and 22 were removed from Cycle 2 onwards for magrolimab. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
15
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2
Participants with advanced CRC with KRASm who had progressed or were not candidates for oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based therapy received a priming dose of magrolimab 1 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 3 hours infusion) on Day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of magrolimab 45 mg/kg of body weight by IV infusion (approximately 2 hours infusion) weekly starting on Day 8 followed by Days 15 and 22 in combination with cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m\^2 infused over 120-minutes on Day 8 followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m\^2 infusions given over 60 minutes on Days 15 and 22, in Cycle 1. Participants also received a loading dose of magrolimab 45 mg/kg of body weight on Day 11 of Cycle 1. After Cycle 1, maintenance dose for both magrolimab and cetuximab started on Day 1; Days 8 and 22 were removed from Cycle 3 onwards for magrolimab. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks (28 days). Cetuximab was administered 1 hour prior to magrolimab infusion on days when both were given. Treatment was administered until unacceptable toxicity, voluntary withdrawal, or documented PD.
15
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Phase 1b (Maximum Duration: 14.3 Months)Death52664000
Phase 1b (Maximum Duration: 14.3 Months)Discontinued by Sponsor01011000
Phase 1b (Maximum Duration: 14.3 Months)Participant placed in hospice care00110000
Phase 1b (Maximum Duration: 14.3 Months)Withdrawal by Subject10201000
Phase 2 (Maximum Duration: 11.1 Months)Death0000014118
Phase 2 (Maximum Duration: 11.1 Months)Discontinued by Sponsor00000114
Phase 2 (Maximum Duration: 11.1 Months)Lost to Follow-up00000010
Phase 2 (Maximum Duration: 11.1 Months)Withdrawal by Subject00000123

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Phase 2 Cohort 1 (KRASwt): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Total
Age, Continuous62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.72
68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.05
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.38
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.13
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants8 Participants5 Participants12 Participants13 Participants11 Participants65 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants3 Participants7 Participants8 Participants6 Participants8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants5 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants7 Participants10 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 98 / 1030 / 3614 / 203 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 910 / 1036 / 3620 / 203 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 96 / 1010 / 365 / 201 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with objective response which consisted of complete response (CR)+ partial response (PR) determined by RECIST v 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\< 10 mm short axis). Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame: From Screening until 38.89 months (assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 3 then every 8 weeks [Q8W] from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in All Treated with available data were analyzed. Efficacy results were planned to be reported separately for all CRC participants with KRASwt and KRASm tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)6.3 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, and/or laboratory or physiological observation that may or may not be related to the investigational medicinal product. A TEAE was defined as AEs worsening or occurring during or after a participant's first exposure to study drug and within 30 days after the last administration of study drug or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: From first dose date up to last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 15.3 months)

Population: All Treated included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drugs.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Magrolimab Priming Dose OnlyPercentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)100.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

DLT was defined as any Grade (GR) 3 or greater adverse event (AE) that was assessed as related to study treatment with the exceptions of: GR 3: anemia (hemolytic anemia that is medically significant tis considered a DLT), indirect/unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, electrolyte abnormalities, elevation in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 with supportive care within 1 week and is not associated with other clinically significant consequences; nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 with supportive care within 72 hours; fatigue that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 within 2 weeks on study; drug-related infusion reactions in the absence of an optimal pretreatment regimen; tumor lysis syndrome or electrolyte disturbances, hypomagnesemia, that resolved to ≤ Grade 2 or baseline within 1 week; GR 3 or 4: lymphopenia or leukopenia.

Time frame: From first dose up to Day 28

Population: DLT Evaluable Analysis Set included participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drugs during Phase 1b if the participant either experienced a DLT any time during the DLT assessment period (the first 4 weeks of treatment) or completed at least 4 infusions of magrolimab and 2 infusions of cetuximab.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)16.7 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)0.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)0.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)14.3 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)0.0 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.1

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with disease control which consisted of CR+PR+SD. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters measured while on study. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum measured while on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: From Screening until 38.89 months (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in All Treated with available data were analyzed. Efficacy results were planned to be reported separately for all CRC participants with KRASwt and KRASm tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.150.0 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.138.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.1

DOR was measured from when the first (objective) response was met (i.e., CR or PR) until the first date of objectively documented PD. Participants who did not have objectively PD was censored at their last documented progression-free date. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum measured while on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan Meier estimate was used for analysis.

Time frame: From first objective response until documented PD (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in All Treated with available data were analyzed. Efficacy results were planned to be reported separately for all CRC participants with KRASwt and KRASm tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by RECIST v1.19.7 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured from first dose until death. Participants who did not die were censored at their last known alive date. Kaplan Meier estimate was used for analysis.

Time frame: From first dose until death (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in All Treated with available data were analyzed. Efficacy results were planned to be reported separately for all CRC participants with KRASwt and KRASm tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS)9.5 months
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS)7.6 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)

Percentage of Participants With Positive ADA at any timepoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline; post-treatment (assessed continuously up to 30 days after last dose; maximum 15.3 months )

Population: Immunogenicity Analysis Set included participants with at least one reported ADA result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA33.3 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA33.3 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA14.3 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA14.3 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA12.5 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA6.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA6.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA13.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA13.3 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Baseline ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Post-Treatment ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Overall ADA0.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Magrolimab

Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug.

Time frame: Pre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1), 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8), and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set (participants who received any amount of magrolimab with at least one detectable post-treatment serum concentration of magrolimab) with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)209 μg/mLStandard Deviation 82
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)312 μg/mLStandard Deviation 121
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)1.04 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.769
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)230 μg/mLStandard Deviation 54.6
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.629 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.437
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)352 μg/mLStandard Deviation 68.4
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)728 μg/mLStandard Deviation 207
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.662 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.374
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)455 μg/mLStandard Deviation 105
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)558 μg/mLStandard Deviation 168
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.432 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.173
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)982 μg/mLStandard Deviation 182
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.517 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.311
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)1100 μg/mLStandard Deviation 287
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)2140 μg/mLStandard Deviation 590
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.479 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.17
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)513 μg/mLStandard Deviation 148
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.559 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.254
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)616 μg/mLStandard Deviation 121
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)775 μg/mLStandard Deviation 110
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)901 μg/mLStandard Deviation 131
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)1790 μg/mLStandard Deviation 49.5
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of MagrolimabDay 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1)0.525 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0.296
Secondary

PK Parameter: AUClast of Magrolimab

AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.

Time frame: Pre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8) and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)1420 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 711
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)676 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 75.3
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)1560 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 413
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)3330 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 1270
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)1530 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 513
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)4480 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 1220
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)2140 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 726
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)7340 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 2380
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)2920 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 600
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUClast of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)1930 day*μg/mL
Secondary

PK Parameter: AUCtau of Magrolimab

AUCtau is defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).

Time frame: Pre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8) and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)1640 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 604
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)1560 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 413
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)676 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 75.3
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)1630 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 649
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)3630 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 1040
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)2140 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 726
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)4480 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 1220
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)8770 day*μg/mLStandard Deviation 1120
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: AUCtau of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)1930 day*μg/mL
Secondary

PK Parameter: Tmax of Magrolimab

Tmax is defined as the time (observed time point) of Cmax.

Time frame: Pre-magrolimab dose (within 12 hours) and 1-hour post-magrolimab dose (infusion duration = approximately 3 hours on Day 1 and 2 hours on other days) on Days 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8) and 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1) (1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in the PK Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.10 days
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.94 days
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.12 days
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.13 days
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.12 days
Phase 1b Cohort 3: Magrolimab 20 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.13 days
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.13 days
Phase 1b Cohort 4: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.14 days
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.13 days
Phase 1b Cohort 5: Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.12 days
Phase 2 Cohort 1 Safety Run-in: Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.12 days
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.13 days
Phase 2 Cohort 2 (KRASm): Magrolimab 30 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.14 days
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 29 (Cycle 2 Day 1)0.12 days
Phase 2 Cohort 3 (KRASm): Magrolimab 45 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2PK Parameter: Tmax of MagrolimabDay 8 (Cycle 1 Day 8)0.12 days
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by RECIST v1.1

PFS was measured from first dose until the first date of objectively documented PD or death. Participants who did not have objectively documented PD and not died was censored at their last documented progression-free date. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum measured while on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Kaplan Meier estimate was used for analysis.

Time frame: From first dose until documented PD/death (assessed on Cycle 3 Day 1 then every 8 weeks from Cycle 5 onwards up to 38.89 months; 1 cycle = 4 weeks)

Population: Participants in All Treated with available data were analyzed. Efficacy results were planned to be reported separately for all CRC participants with KRASwt and KRASm tumors.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1b Cohort 1: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 200 mg/m^2Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by RECIST v1.13.6 months
Phase 1b Cohort 2: Magrolimab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by RECIST v1.11.9 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026