Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Basmisanil in Participants With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia (CIAS) Treated With Antipsychotics

A Phase IIb, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Basmisanil (RO5186582) as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia Treated With Antipsychotics

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02953639
Enrollment
214
Registered
2016-11-03
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2019-12-12
Last updated
2021-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

This multicenter study assessed the effects of 24 weeks of basmisanil treatment on cognition and functioning of stable schizophrenia participants treated with antipsychotics.

Interventions

Participants received either 80 milligrams (mg) or 240 mg of Basmisanil, as per the dosing schedules described above.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil, as per the dosing schedules described above.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of schizophrenia of any type utilizing the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) direct clinical assessments, family informants and past medical records * Evidence of stability of symptoms for 3 months at screening, that is, without hospitalizations for schizophrenia or increase in level of psychiatric care due to worsening of symptoms of schizophrenia * Participants with schizophrenia clinical symptom severity defined by the following: hallucinatory behavior item score less than or equal to (\</=) 5 and a delusion item score \</= 5 of the PANSS * Participants on a stable regimen of antipsychotic therapy for at least 3 months at screening and receiving no more than two antipsychotics

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with current DSM-5 diagnosis other than schizophrenia including bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder * Clinically significant neurological illness or significant head trauma that affects cognitive function, in the judgment of the principal investigator * Full scale intelligence quotient \</=65 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence at screening * Positive result at screening for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus-1 and 2 * Moderate to severe substance use disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine), as defined by the DSM-5, within the last 12 months * Suicide attempt within 1 year or currently at risk of suicide in the opinion of the Investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreBaseline up to Week 24The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). The MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score is a standardized mean of the six domain scores (excluding social cognition). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher composite T-score represents lower impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline up to Week 24The SQLS is a patient reported scale consisting of 33 items: 2 domain scores (Cognition & Vitality Score \[SQLS-CV\] and Psycho-social Score \[SQLS-P\]) as well as a Total score (SQLS-T) are derived. The overall score range is from 0 to 100. On all scales, higher scores represent a lower quality of life.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline up to Week 24The Paired Associates Learning (PAL I and II) of the WMS-IV (Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth edition) is a test of verbal learning and memory that requires the participant to learn novel word pairs. The participant learns the word pairs across learning trials and is asked to recall them immediately (PAL I) or after a 30-minute delay (PAL II). Data is presented here for 3 Scores: VPA I total raw score, VPA II total raw score and VPA II Recognition total raw score. The total raw score ranges for these 3 Scores are 0 to 56, 0 to 14 and 0 to 40 respectively, with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreBaseline up to Week 24Logical memory (LM) assesses narrative memory under free-recall conditions. Two short stories are presented orally. The examinee is asked to retell each story from memory immediately after hearing it (LM I). In the delayed condition (LM II), the examinee is asked to retell both stories from the immediate condition (delayed free recall). Data is presented here for 2 Scores: LM I total raw score and LM II total raw score. The total raw score range is from 0 to 50 with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresBaseline up to Week 24The TMT consists of two parts: Trail Making Part A, which is a part of the standard MCCB and Trail Making Part B additionally included in this study. Circles containing numbers (Part A) or both numbers and letters (Part B) must be sequentially connected. The difference (ratio) in performance between Part A and Part B reflects executive processes and will be used to assess executive functioning including cognitive set shifting abilities and data for this ratio is presented here. Smaller ratio values, hence decreases from baseline (TMT-B/TMT-A ratio values below 1) indicate higher executive functioning capabilities.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreBaseline up to Week 24The PSP Total Score is an integer result in the range of 0 to 100. Larger values, hence increases from baseline in the PSP total score, indicate higher social and personal functioning.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreBaseline up to Week 24The main parameter of interest for the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is the SCoRS 'Total Score'. The total score range is from 0 to 80 with lower scores indicating better day-to-day functioning.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline up to Week 24The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher T-score represents lower impairment.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) RatingBaseline up to Week 24Values for the CGI-I Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 28 weeks)An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An Adverse Event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as Adverse Events.
Apparent Clearance of Basmisanil at Steady State (CL/F,ss)Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168Population PK model estimated apparent oral clearance of Basmisanil at steady-state.
Apparent Volume of Distribution of Basmisanil at Steady State (Vz/F,ss)Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168Population PK model estimated apparent volume of distribution of Basmisanil at steady-state.
Area Under the Curve of Basmisanil at Steady State (AUC,ss)Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168Population PK model estimated AUC of Basmisanil at steady-state.
Maximum Plasma Concentration of Basmisanil at Steady State (Cmax,ss)Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168Population PK model estimated maximum plasma concentration of Basmisanil at steady-state (ss).
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingBaseline up to Week 24Values for the CGI-S Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 37 centers in 1 country.

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 214 participants were enrolled into the study across 37 sites in the US. Of these, 213 participants received study treatment and were included in the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) and Safety populations. One participant randomized to the placebo arm withdrew prior to the first study treatment administration.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received matching Placebo to Basmisanil orally twice daily for 24 weeks.
81
Basmisanil 80mg BID
Participants received Basmisanil 80 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
54
Basmisanil 240mg BID
Participants received Basmisanil 240 mg orally twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks.
78
Total213

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event201
Overall StudyCompleted or Discontinued information is missing100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up843
Overall StudyMultiple Reasons101
Overall StudyNon-Compliance With Study Drug021
Overall StudyPhysician Decision100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7810

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBasmisanil 80mg BIDBasmisanil 240mg BIDTotal
Age, Continuous36.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
36.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
37.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
36.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
51 Participants30 Participants51 Participants132 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants7 Participants12 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
MULTIPLE
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
68 Participants47 Participants66 Participants181 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
UNKNOWN
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
25 Participants23 Participants23 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants12 Participants18 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants42 Participants60 Participants163 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 810 / 540 / 78
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 8110 / 5412 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 810 / 544 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite Score

The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). The MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score is a standardized mean of the six domain scores (excluding social cognition). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher composite T-score represents lower impairment.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreBaseline32.50 Composite T-ScoreStandard Deviation 14.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreWeek 12 Day 84-0.17 Composite T-ScoreStandard Deviation 5.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreWeek 24 Day 1681.08 Composite T-ScoreStandard Deviation 5.78
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreBaseline32.36 Composite T-ScoreStandard Deviation 11.44
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreWeek 12 Day 84-0.28 Composite T-ScoreStandard Deviation 6.08
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Neurocognitive Composite ScoreWeek 24 Day 1681.36 Composite T-ScoreStandard Deviation 4.8
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84p-value: 0.7390% CI: [-2.11, 1.38]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168p-value: 0.79390% CI: [-1.47, 2.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Apparent Clearance of Basmisanil at Steady State (CL/F,ss)

Population PK model estimated apparent oral clearance of Basmisanil at steady-state.

Time frame: Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Population: Please note that for this Outcome Measure, incomplete PK data was collected as a result of early termination of the study which meant that data for the (CL/F,ss) parameter could not be generated via the Population PK model.

Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution of Basmisanil at Steady State (Vz/F,ss)

Population PK model estimated apparent volume of distribution of Basmisanil at steady-state.

Time frame: Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Population: Please note that for this Outcome Measure, incomplete PK data was collected as a result of early termination of the study which meant that data for the (Vz/F,ss) parameter could not be generated via the Population PK model.

Secondary

Area Under the Curve of Basmisanil at Steady State (AUC,ss)

Population PK model estimated AUC of Basmisanil at steady-state.

Time frame: Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Population: The Safety-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. Data are summarized according to actual treatment arm participants were randomized to. Data presented below is only for participants included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboArea Under the Curve of Basmisanil at Steady State (AUC,ss)41640 ng*mL/hr
Basmisanil 240mg BIDArea Under the Curve of Basmisanil at Steady State (AUC,ss)87624 ng*mL/hr
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Rating

Values for the CGI-I Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) RatingWeek 12 Day 84-0.45 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) RatingWeek 24 Day 168-0.62 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) RatingWeek 12 Day 84-0.45 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) RatingWeek 24 Day 168-0.64 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84p-value: 0.86590% CI: [-0.28, 0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168p-value: 0.96490% CI: [-0.31, 0.29]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Rating

Values for the CGI-S Scale are encoded by the numerical values from 1 to 7 respectively. Higher numerical values represent greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingBaseline2.45 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingWeek 12 Day 84-0.21 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingWeek 24 Day 168-0.19 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingBaseline2.39 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingWeek 12 Day 84-0.24 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) RatingWeek 24 Day 168-0.29 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84p-value: 0.83990% CI: [-0.22, 0.17]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168p-value: 0.62590% CI: [-0.27, 0.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain Scores

The MCCB is a cognitive battery to assess 7 domains recommended by the MATRICS initiative (i.e., working memory, verbal learning, speed of processing, attention/vigilance, visual learning, social cognition, reasoning and problem solving). Raw scores are converted to age and sex adjusted t-scores which are standardized to normative data, and have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general healthy population. A higher T-score represents lower impairment.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Attention/Vigilance)40.75 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Attention/Vigilance)-0.16 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Attention/Vigilance)0.63 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Reasoning and Problem Solving)42.75 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)0.05 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)1.69 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Social Cognition)37.79 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Social Cognition)0.62 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Social Cognition)-1.71 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Speed of Processing)37.08 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Speed of Processing)-1.48 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Speed of Processing)0.37 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Verbal Learning)37.34 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Verbal Learning)0.26 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Verbal Learning)0.46 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Visual Learning)35.96 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Visual Learning)-0.91 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Visual Learning)-0.98 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Working Memory)35.99 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Working Memory)1.62 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Working Memory)2.37 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.34
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Speed of Processing)-1.66 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.07
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Attention/Vigilance)39.66 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.08
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Working Memory)36.23 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.09
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Attention/Vigilance)-0.14 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.8
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Speed of Processing)0.13 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.88
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Attention/Vigilance)0.51 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.49
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Visual Learning)-0.48 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.35
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Reasoning and Problem Solving)43.71 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.12
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Verbal Learning)36.53 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.41
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)0.05 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.07
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Working Memory)1.76 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.68
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)2.18 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.13
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Verbal Learning)0.45 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.01
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Social Cognition)38.38 T-scoreStandard Deviation 13.09
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Visual Learning)0.53 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.33
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Social Cognition)-0.62 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.55
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Verbal Learning)0.36 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.53
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 24 Day 168 (Social Cognition)0.96 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.1
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresWeek 12 Day 84 (Working Memory)0.76 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.41
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Speed of Processing)37.81 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.7
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in MCCB Cognitive Domain ScoresBaseline (Visual Learning)35.38 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.98
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Attention/Vigilance)p-value: 0.55690% CI: [-3.46, 1.64]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Attention/Vigilance)p-value: 0.84890% CI: [-2.59, 2.05]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)p-value: 0.97390% CI: [-2.08, 2.16]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Reasoning and Problem Solving)p-value: 0.65190% CI: [-1.53, 2.67]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Social Cognition)p-value: 0.3590% CI: [-3.89, 1.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Social Cognition)p-value: 0.12190% CI: [-0.14, 4.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Speed of Processing)p-value: 0.91190% CI: [-2.1, 1.83]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Speed of Processing)p-value: 0.98790% CI: [-1.99, 2.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Verbal Learning)p-value: 0.80390% CI: [-2.62, 1.93]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Verbal Learning)p-value: 0.50290% CI: [-3.26, 1.38]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Visual Learning)p-value: 0.94590% CI: [-2.74, 2.52]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Visual Learning)p-value: 0.48890% CI: [-1.54, 3.76]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (Working Memory)p-value: 0.26290% CI: [-3.38, 0.64]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (Working Memory)p-value: 0.48990% CI: [-3.01, 1.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total Score

The PSP Total Score is an integer result in the range of 0 to 100. Larger values, hence increases from baseline in the PSP total score, indicate higher social and personal functioning.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreBaseline59.82 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreWeek 12 Day 843.13 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreWeek 24 Day 1683.75 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreBaseline60.88 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.87
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreWeek 12 Day 842.26 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.68
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Total ScoreWeek 24 Day 1684.14 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84p-value: 0.32390% CI: [-3.63, 0.91]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168p-value: 0.57990% CI: [-3.77, 1.88]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A Scores

The TMT consists of two parts: Trail Making Part A, which is a part of the standard MCCB and Trail Making Part B additionally included in this study. Circles containing numbers (Part A) or both numbers and letters (Part B) must be sequentially connected. The difference (ratio) in performance between Part A and Part B reflects executive processes and will be used to assess executive functioning including cognitive set shifting abilities and data for this ratio is presented here. Smaller ratio values, hence decreases from baseline (TMT-B/TMT-A ratio values below 1) indicate higher executive functioning capabilities.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresBaseline3.27 RatioStandard Deviation 1.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresWeek 12 Day 84-0.37 RatioStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresWeek 24 Day 168-0.23 RatioStandard Deviation 2
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresBaseline3.12 RatioStandard Deviation 1.58
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresWeek 12 Day 84-0.12 RatioStandard Deviation 1.34
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Ratio Between Trail Making Test (TMT)- Part B and TMT- Part A ScoresWeek 24 Day 168-0.06 RatioStandard Deviation 1.22
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84p-value: 0.52790% CI: [0.94, 1.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168p-value: 0.63690% CI: [0.92, 1.17]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total Score

The main parameter of interest for the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is the SCoRS 'Total Score'. The total score range is from 0 to 80 with lower scores indicating better day-to-day functioning.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreBaseline37.07 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreWeek 12 Day 84-2.91 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreWeek 24 Day 168-3.71 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.19
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreBaseline36.53 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreWeek 12 Day 84-3.66 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.78
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Total ScoreWeek 24 Day 168-4.02 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.79
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84p-value: 0.49390% CI: [-2.27, 0.94]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168p-value: 0.92690% CI: [-2.32, 2.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)

The SQLS is a patient reported scale consisting of 33 items: 2 domain scores (Cognition & Vitality Score \[SQLS-CV\] and Psycho-social Score \[SQLS-P\]) as well as a Total score (SQLS-T) are derived. The overall score range is from 0 to 100. On all scales, higher scores represent a lower quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Total Score)-1.38 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.89
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)33.81 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)-2.26 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)-0.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline (SQLS Psychosocial Score)31.48 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)-0.88 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)-1.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline (SQLS Total Score)32.40 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Total Score)-1.42 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline (SQLS Total Score)32.14 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.19
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)0.80 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.49
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)34.21 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.59
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Total Score)-2.66 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.31
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)0.21 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)-1.58 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.27
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Cognition & Vitality Score)-4.32 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.59
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Total Score)0.57 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.98
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)Baseline (SQLS Psychosocial Score)30.84 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.88
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Cognition \& Vitality Score)p-value: 0.14290% CI: [-0.4, 6.95]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Cognition \& Vitality Score)p-value: 0.41690% CI: [-7.04, 2.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)p-value: 0.39490% CI: [-1.86, 5.83]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Psychosocial Score)p-value: 0.77690% CI: [-3.44, 4.87]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (SQLS Total Score)p-value: 0.25490% CI: [-1.09, 5.94]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (SQLS Total Score)p-value: 0.81690% CI: [-4.64, 3.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) Score

Logical memory (LM) assesses narrative memory under free-recall conditions. Two short stories are presented orally. The examinee is asked to retell each story from memory immediately after hearing it (LM I). In the delayed condition (LM II), the examinee is asked to retell both stories from the immediate condition (delayed free recall). Data is presented here for 2 Scores: LM I total raw score and LM II total raw score. The total raw score range is from 0 to 50 with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreBaseline (LM I)16.55 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (LM I)-2.60 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (LM I)-3.02 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreBaseline (LM II)13.72 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (LM II)-2.91 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (LM II)-2.73 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.94
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (LM II)-2.63 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.08
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreBaseline (LM I)16.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreBaseline (LM II)14.29 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.22
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (LM I)-0.83 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.66
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (LM II)-3.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.15
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Logical Memory Test (WMS IV-LM) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (LM I)-2.29 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.29
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (LM I)p-value: 0.16490% CI: [-0.27, 3.17]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (LM I)p-value: 0.55990% CI: [-1.02, 2.14]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (LM II)p-value: 0.91290% CI: [-1.7, 1.94]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (LM II)p-value: 0.70690% CI: [-1.93, 1.22]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) Score

The Paired Associates Learning (PAL I and II) of the WMS-IV (Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth edition) is a test of verbal learning and memory that requires the participant to learn novel word pairs. The participant learns the word pairs across learning trials and is asked to recall them immediately (PAL I) or after a 30-minute delay (PAL II). Data is presented here for 3 Scores: VPA I total raw score, VPA II total raw score and VPA II Recognition total raw score. The total raw score ranges for these 3 Scores are 0 to 56, 0 to 14 and 0 to 40 respectively, with larger total raw scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The EAP2 Population was defined as all participants in the Efficacy Analysis Population (EAP) who were randomized to placebo or 240mg Basmisanil (excluded participants randomized to 80mg Basmisanil due to the results of a futility analysis which meant that enrolment into the 80mg Basmisanil arm was discontinued). Data presented below is only for participants that were included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (VPA I total raw score)2.14 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (VPA II total raw score)0.69 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline (VPA II total raw score)9.25 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline (VPA II recognition total raw score)36.24 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (VPA I total raw score)4.42 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (VPA II recognition total raw score)0.48 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (VPA II total raw score)0.12 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (VPA II recognition total raw score)1.12 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline (VPA I total raw score)31.14 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.53
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (VPA II recognition total raw score)0.36 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline (VPA I total raw score)32.30 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.75
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (VPA I total raw score)0.36 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.33
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (VPA I total raw score)5.09 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline (VPA II total raw score)9.77 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (VPA II total raw score)0.26 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 24 Day 168 (VPA II total raw score)1.60 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreBaseline (VPA II recognition total raw score)37.36 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.12
Basmisanil 240mg BIDChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Wechsler Memory Scale Fourth Edition, Verbal Paired Associates (WMS IV-PAL) ScoreWeek 12 Day 84 (VPA II recognition total raw score)-0.55 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (VPA I total raw score)p-value: 0.21190% CI: [-3.78, 0.52]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (VPA I total raw score)p-value: 0.78790% CI: [-1.81, 2.52]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (VPA II total raw score)p-value: 0.47790% CI: [-0.37, 0.94]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (VPA II total raw score)p-value: 0.02890% CI: [0.23, 1.58]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 12 Day 84 (VPA II recognition total raw score)p-value: 0.68390% CI: [-1.51, 0.91]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Week 24 Day 168 (VPA II recognition total raw score)p-value: 0.95490% CI: [-1.13, 1.22]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Basmisanil at Steady State (Cmax,ss)

Population PK model estimated maximum plasma concentration of Basmisanil at steady-state (ss).

Time frame: Pre-dose (hour 0) in Days 7, 14, 42, 84, 168

Population: The Safety-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. Data are summarized according to actual treatment arm participants were randomized to. Data presented below is only for participants included in the actual analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboMaximum Plasma Concentration of Basmisanil at Steady State (Cmax,ss)2079 ng/mL
Basmisanil 240mg BIDMaximum Plasma Concentration of Basmisanil at Steady State (Cmax,ss)4374 ng/mL
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An Adverse Event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as Adverse Events.

Time frame: Baseline up to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 28 weeks)

Population: The Safety-evaluable population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study medication, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not. Data are summarized according to actual treatment arm participants were randomized to.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)39.5 Percentage of Participants
Basmisanil 240mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)46.3 Percentage of Participants
Basmisanil 240mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)48.7 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026