Skip to content

SPI-2012 vs Pegfilgrastim in Management of Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Participants With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide

Randomized, OpEn-Label, Active-ContrOl Trial of SPI-2012 (Eflapegrastim) Versus Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Early-Stage BReast Cancer Patients Receiving Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) (RECOVER)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02953340
Enrollment
237
Registered
2016-11-02
Start date
2017-05-10
Completion date
2019-05-06
Last updated
2022-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Neutropenia

Keywords

Neutropenia, Breast Cancer, Long-acting Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, Early Stage Breast Cancer, Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer treated with TC chemotherapy as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN). Each cycle was 21 days. Four cycles were evaluated for this study. On Day 1 of each cycle, participants received TC chemotherapy. On Day 2 of each cycle, participants received study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim). After cycle 1, as applicable, participants who received at least one dose of study drug will be followed for safety for 12 months after the last dose of study treatment.

Interventions

Supplied in prefilled single-use syringes for subcutaneous injection, administered on Day 2 of each cycle

DRUGPegfilgrastim

Subcutaneous injection administered on Day 2 of each cycle.

DRUGDocetaxel

75mg/m\^2 IV infusion administered on Day 1 of each cycle

DRUGCyclophosphamide

600mg/m\^2 IV infusion administered on Day 1 of each cycle

Sponsors

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * New diagnosis of histologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), defined as operable Stage I to Stage IIIA breast cancer * Candidate for adjuvant or neo-adjuvant TC chemotherapy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \<= 2 * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>=1.5×10\^9/L * Platelet count \>=100×10\^9/L * Hemoglobin \>9 g/dL * Calculated creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min * Total bilirubin \<=1.5 mg/dL * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) / Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) \<=2.5×ULN (upper limit of normal) * Alkaline phosphatase \<=2.0×ULN Key

Exclusion criteria

* Active concurrent malignancy (except non melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) or life-threatening disease * Locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer * Known sensitivity to E. coli-derived products * Concurrent adjuvant cancer therapy * Previous exposure to filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or other G-CSF products in clinical development within 12 months prior to the administration of study drug * Active infection, receiving anti-infectives, or any underlying medical condition that would impair ability to receive protocol treatment * Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplant * Used any investigational drugs, biologics, or devices within 30 days prior to study treatment or plans to use any of these during the course of the study• Radiation therapy within 30 days prior to enrollment * Major surgery within 30 days prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<0.5×10\^9 per liter \[L\]) from the first occurrence of ANC below the threshold.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 1Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)The depth of ANC Nadir was defined as the lowest ANC value after administration of study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) in Cycle 1.
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 1Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)FN was defined as an oral temperature \>38.3 degree Celsius (°C) (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit \[°F\]) or two consecutive readings of \>38.0°C (100.4°F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle = 21 days)DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5×10\^9/L) from the first occurrence of ANC below the threshold.
Number of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 1Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)Neutropenic complications refer to hospitalizations due to neutropenic events and/or the use of anti-infectives due to neutropenia.
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 1Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)Time to ANC recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until the participants ANC increased to \>=1.5×10\^9/L after the expected nadir. For participants with ANC value \>=1.5×10\^9/L at all times, time to ANC Recovery was assigned a value of 0.
Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC ChemotherapyCycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (each cycle = 21 days)RDI was defined as the percentage of the planned dose of TC chemotherapy that each participant actually received during the study, and is expressed as the total dose received, divided by total dose planned multiplied by 100. The planned dose was defined as the dose that would be given if no doses were missed and/or no dose reductions were made for the number of cycles started. The total planned dose was the sum of planned doses over all cycles.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathUp to 4 cycles (each cycle = 21 days) plus a 12-month follow-up from the last dose (up to 15 months)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or study procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is any AE that occurred from the first dose of study treatment through 12 months after the last dose of study treatment or 35 (±5) days after date of participant early discontinuation. SAE is defined as any AE which meets any of the following criteria: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, includes important medical events.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to 4 cycles (each cycle = 21 days) plus a 12-month follow-up from the last dose (up to 15 months)The number of participants with clinically significant hematology (including basophils, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes, monocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes, platelets, and white blood cells) and serum chemistry (including alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], alkaline phosphatase \[ALP\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], bilirubin, calcium, cholesterol, creatinine, potassium, sodium, and triglycerides) laboratory abnormalities were reported. Clinically significant findings in laboratory parameters were based on investigator's discretion according to Common Technical Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03.
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle = 21 days)FN was defined as an oral temperature \>38.3°C (101.0°F) or two consecutive readings of \>38.0°C (100.4°F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.

Countries

Canada, Hungary, India, Poland, South Korea, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 74 sites in the United States, Canada, Hungary, Poland, India, Korea from 10 May 2017 to 06 May 2019. The study was conducted in two periods: treatment period (first dose of TC until 35 (± 5) days after last dose of treatment) and safety follow-up period (End of Treatment Visit through 12 months after last dose of study treatment).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 237 participants were randomized into study, 118 participants in Arm 1 (SPI-2012 and TC) and 119 participants in Arm 2 (Pegfilgrastim and TC). 235 participants were treated, out of which 181 participants completed the study. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug (treatment period) entered the safety follow-up period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TC
At each cycle for 4 cycles, participants received SPI-2012 at a fixed dose of 13.2 mg/0.6 mL, \[3.6 mg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor {G-CSF}\] SC approximately 24-26 hours after receiving IV infusion of docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care. All participants were followed for 35 (±5) days after last study treatment or patient discontinuation and long-term safety follow-up continued for 12 months after last dose of study treatment.
118
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TC
At each cycle for 4 cycles, participants received pegfilgrastim 6 mg (6 mg/0.6 mL G-CSF) SC approximately 24-26 hours after receiving IV infusion of docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care. All participants were followed for 35 (±5) days after last study treatment or patient discontinuation and long-term safety follow-up continued for 12 months after last dose of study treatment.
119
Total237

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyInitiated Non-Protocol Therapy514
Overall StudyInvestigator Decision33
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up32
Overall StudyMyeloid Growth Factors Treatment01
Overall StudyReason not specified22
Overall StudySponsor decision02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject99

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TC(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCTotal
Age, Continuous57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.27
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.67
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
100 Participants104 Participants204 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
20 Participants16 Participants36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
85 Participants96 Participants181 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
118 Participants119 Participants237 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1171 / 1180 / 1170 / 118
other
Total, other adverse events
115 / 117116 / 11833 / 11748 / 118
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 11719 / 1182 / 1174 / 118

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1

DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<0.5×10\^9 per liter \[L\]) from the first occurrence of ANC below the threshold.

Time frame: Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 10.31 DaysStandard Deviation 0.688
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 10.39 DaysStandard Deviation 0.949
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.292, 0.129]t-statistics
Secondary

Depth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 1

The depth of ANC Nadir was defined as the lowest ANC value after administration of study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) in Cycle 1.

Time frame: Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCDepth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 12.67 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 3.504
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCDepth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 12.06 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.034
Secondary

Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4

DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5×10\^9/L) from the first occurrence of ANC below the threshold.

Time frame: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 30.07 DaysStandard Deviation 0.252
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 20.08 DaysStandard Deviation 0.267
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 40.07 DaysStandard Deviation 0.252
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 30.07 DaysStandard Deviation 0.283
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 20.09 DaysStandard Deviation 0.432
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCDuration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 40.08 DaysStandard Deviation 0.266
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

The number of participants with clinically significant hematology (including basophils, basophils/leukocytes, eosinophils, eosinophils/leukocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, lymphocytes/leukocytes, monocytes, monocytes/leukocytes, neutrophils, neutrophils/leukocytes, platelets, and white blood cells) and serum chemistry (including alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], alkaline phosphatase \[ALP\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], bilirubin, calcium, cholesterol, creatinine, potassium, sodium, and triglycerides) laboratory abnormalities were reported. Clinically significant findings in laboratory parameters were based on investigator's discretion according to Common Technical Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03.

Time frame: Up to 4 cycles (each cycle = 21 days) plus a 12-month follow-up from the last dose (up to 15 months)

Population: SAF population included all participants who received at least one dose of any protocol-specified drug (TC or SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Lymphocytes0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Basophils/Leukocytes0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Eosinophils0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Eosinophils/Leukocytes0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Hematocrit4 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Hemoglobin6 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Basophils0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes6 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Monocytes0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Monocytes/Leukocytes0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Neutrophils17 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Neutrophils/Leukocytes12 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Platelets10 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: White Blood Cells16 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Alanine aminotransferase2 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Alkaline phosphatase0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Aspartate aminotransferase1 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Bilirubin0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Calcium1 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Cholesterol0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Creatinine0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Potassium0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Sodium0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Triglycerides0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Sodium2 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Basophils0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Platelets2 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Basophils/Leukocytes0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Calcium1 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Eosinophils0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: White Blood Cells18 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Eosinophils/Leukocytes0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Potassium1 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Hematocrit2 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Alanine aminotransferase1 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Hemoglobin4 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Cholesterol0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Lymphocytes0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Alkaline phosphatase1 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Lymphocytes/Leukocytes13 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Triglycerides0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Monocytes0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Aspartate aminotransferase1 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Monocytes/Leukocytes0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Creatinine0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Neutrophils23 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChemistry: Bilirubin0 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematology: Neutrophils/Leukocytes9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 1

FN was defined as an oral temperature \>38.3 degree Celsius (°C) (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit \[°F\]) or two consecutive readings of \>38.0°C (100.4°F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.

Time frame: Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 11 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 14 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4

FN was defined as an oral temperature \>38.3°C (101.0°F) or two consecutive readings of \>38.0°C (100.4°F) for 2 hours and ANC \<1.0×10\^9/L.

Time frame: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 20 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 30 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 40 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 22 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 30 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3 and 4Cycle 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 1

Neutropenic complications refer to hospitalizations due to neutropenic events and/or the use of anti-infectives due to neutropenia.

Time frame: Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 11 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Death

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or study procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is any AE that occurred from the first dose of study treatment through 12 months after the last dose of study treatment or 35 (±5) days after date of participant early discontinuation. SAE is defined as any AE which meets any of the following criteria: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, includes important medical events.

Time frame: Up to 4 cycles (each cycle = 21 days) plus a 12-month follow-up from the last dose (up to 15 months)

Population: SAF population included all participants who received at least one dose of any protocol-specified drug (TC or SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim). Data was summarized and reported for Treatment and Follow-up period separately for both groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathTEAEs115 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathDeath0 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathSAEs12 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathTEAEs116 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathDeath1 Participants
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathSAEs19 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TC: Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathSAEs2 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TC: Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathTEAEs33 Participants
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TC: Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathDeath0 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC: Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathTEAEs48 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC: Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathDeath0 Participants
Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and TC: Follow-up PeriodNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and DeathSAEs4 Participants
Secondary

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC Chemotherapy

RDI was defined as the percentage of the planned dose of TC chemotherapy that each participant actually received during the study, and is expressed as the total dose received, divided by total dose planned multiplied by 100. The planned dose was defined as the dose that would be given if no doses were missed and/or no dose reductions were made for the number of cycles started. The total planned dose was the sum of planned doses over all cycles.

Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: Safety analysis (SAF) population included all participants who received at least one dose of any protocol-specified drug (TC or SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC ChemotherapyDocetaxel96.9 Percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 7.7
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC ChemotherapyCyclophosphamide98.4 Percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 5.27
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC ChemotherapyDocetaxel98.4 Percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 7.89
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCRelative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC ChemotherapyCyclophosphamide98.8 Percentage of planned doseStandard Deviation 6.4
Secondary

Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 1

Time to ANC recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until the participants ANC increased to \>=1.5×10\^9/L after the expected nadir. For participants with ANC value \>=1.5×10\^9/L at all times, time to ANC Recovery was assigned a value of 0.

Time frame: Day 1 and daily on Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
(Arm 1): SPI-2012 and TCTime to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 13.49 DaysStandard Deviation 3.723
(Arm 2): Pegfilgrastim and TCTime to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 13.35 DaysStandard Deviation 3.745

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026