Comparing Between XP Endo Finisher and Conventional Irrigation Method On Post-Operative Flare Ups In Necrotic Teeth

Comparison Of The Effect of Adding XP Endo Finisher To The Irrigation Protocol Versus Conventional Irrigation Method On Post-Operative Flare Ups In Necrotic Teeth

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02952326

Enrollment

Registered

2016-11-02

Start date

2016-12-31

Completion date

2018-01-31

Last updated

2016-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp Necroses

Brief summary

Comparing the postoperative flare ups and pain after adding the XP Endo Finisher to the final irrigation protocol on necrotic mandibular premolars.

Detailed description

patients are randomized into 2 groups after meeting the eligibility criteria, 1. Each patient will be given pain scale chart in order to record his /her pain level before any intervention. 2. The tooth is anesthetized, accessed and mechanical instrumentation to be made 3 A) For the experimental group: The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation B) For the control group : The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. 4\) Obturation is done and postoperative instructions are given to the patient

Interventions

PROCEDUREXP Endo Finsher as final step of the irrigation protocol

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation

PROCEDUREConventional needle irrigation only

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 45 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

i. Age between 18-50 years old. ii. Males or Females. iii. mandibular Premolars * Asymptomatic. * Non-vital response of pulp tissue (negative response). * With or without periapical radiolucency.

Exclusion criteria

i. Patients allergic to penicillin. ii. Pregnant females. iii. Patients having significant systemic disorder. iv. If antibiotics have been administrated during the past two weeks preoperatively. v. Patients having bruxism or clenching. vi. Teeth that have : * Vital pulp tissues. * Association with swelling * Acute peri-apical abscess * Periodontally affected teeth * No possible restorability * Previous endodontic treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Post-operative pain recorded by the patient using a four step pain scale (0-3)	up to 5 days after the treatment

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Post-operative swelling	up to 5 days after the treatment
Need\ number of Analgesic tablets	up to 5 days after the treatment
Need for systemic antibiotics	up to 5 days after the treatment

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026