Skip to content

SOLFAMU Study of Nasal Brushing Collected OLFActory MUcosa Samples in the Diagnosis of Human Encephalopathies

Study of Nasal Brushing Collected OLFActory MUcosa Samples in the Diagnosis of Human Encephalopathies

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02951559
Enrollment
250
Registered
2016-11-01
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2022-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Encephalopathy, HIV-encephalopathy, Alzheimer Dementia

Brief summary

Encephalopathies are a group of central nervous system (CNS) affection with heterogeneous etiology. Several causes have been recognized including neurodegenerative, vascular, infectious, autoimmune, toxic or allergic affections or secondary to systemic disorders. While 30-50% of acute encephalitis remains without etiological definition, definitive criteria for neurodegenerative diseases are usually unavailable in vivo and possible or probable definitions are used. The Olfactory mucosa (OM) is the part of the nasal mucosa that carries the specialized sensory organ for the modality of smell; the olfactory epithelium is composed of five principal cell types including olfactory receptor neurons. A sample of OM may be collected through a rhinoscopy-guided brushing: it is well-accepted by patients, not-contraindicated in patients with raised intracranial pressure and associated with almost no side-effects. Nasal brushing has recently been proposed for the in vivo diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). Aims of the project are: 1. Training of ear throat and nose (ETN), Infectious disease (ID) and neurology (NEU) specialists in the technique of nasal brushing; 2. Conducting a prospective study comparing the use of nasal brushing with gold-standard criteria in the diagnosis of Encephalopathies; 3. Increasing the diagnostic and prognostic power in the diagnosis of encephalopathies. A prospective, case control, multicentric study enrolling 400 patients and 100 controls (patients with nasal stenosis undergoing rhinoscopy for clinical reasons). Patients will be diagnosed and followed according to international guidelines and local clinical practice. Cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging will be used, where indicated, for the diagnosis according to the clinical or radiological suspect.

Interventions

Nasal brushing will be performed in non-sedated patients as follows. After administration of a local vasoconstrictor (1% epinephrine) with the use of a nasal tampon, inserted into the nasal cavity of the patient to locate the olfactory mucosa lining the nasal vault. A sterile, disposable brush (Copanflock, Copan, Brescia, Italy) will be inserted gently rolled on the mucosal surface, withdrawn,and immersed in 0.9% saline solution, UTM (Universal Transporter Medium) or 4% formaldehyde. Two swabs will be collected for each nostril.

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Diagnostic study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for cases: * age\>18 years; * signing a written informed consent (by the patients or his/her legal representant); * clinical suspect of encephalopathy (acute or subacute) including acute encephalitis, neurodegenerative disorders and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Inclusion criteria for controls: * age\>18 years; * signing a written informed consent (by the patients or his/her legal representant); • clinical indication for rhinoscopy for stenotic disease of nasal sept or turbinates.

Exclusion criteria

* Nasal anatomical abnormalities precluding the execution of nasal brushing; * Serious general conditions and/or comorbidities in patients for whom nasal brushing may be a risk factor precipitating their pre-existing condition; * Anti-coagulant treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic concordance with gold standard diagnostic proceduresSingle-visitPositive and negative predictive values and correct classification rates of OM tests versus gold standard diagnostic procedures

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side effects of the nasal brushingUp to 6 months after the procedurePrevalence of side effects reported during the brushing and up to 6 months afterwards
Cytological and immunohistochemistry examination of nasal brushing smear (neuronal abnormalities and expression of specific markers according to the different aetiologies)single-visitPrevalence of samples showing: abnormalities in cytological examination, antiOMP (Olfactory Marker Protein) positive cells, white blood cells and subtypes.
OM markers of neuronal damage and amyloid depositionsingle-visitQuantification of tau, p-tau, 1-42 beta amyloid, S100beta, alpha synuclein, TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein 43) on cell blocks and supernatant

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactANDREA CALCAGNO, MD, DTM&H
andrea.calcagno@unito.it+390114393884

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026