Skip to content

High Definition White-Light Colonoscopy vs. Chromoendoscopy for Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome.

High Definition White-Light Colonoscopy Versus Chromoendoscopy for Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome. A Prospective, Multicenter and Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02951390
Acronym
EndoLynch
Enrollment
280
Registered
2016-11-01
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lynch Syndrome

Keywords

Surveillance, Colorectal cancer, Colonoscopy, Adenoma, Chromoendoscopy

Brief summary

Adenomas in Lynch syndrome have an accelerated progression to colorectal cancer (CRC) which might occur despite a regular follow-up. Despite low evidence, high-definition technology (HD) and indigo-carmine chromoendoscopy (CE) are recommended for surveillance in Lynch syndrome.The investigators will conduct a prospective multicenter randomized non-inferiority study. The principal aim is to compare the adenoma detection rate with WLE vs CE. Our hypothesis is that HD-white-light endoscopy (WLE) is not inferior to CE. Therefore - under expert hands - HD-CE does not add any significant advantage over HD-WLE on adenoma detection rate in patients with Lynch syndrome.

Detailed description

The investigators will conduct a prospective multicenter randomized non-inferiority study. Eligible patients will be those with Lynch syndrome (known germline mutation in mismatch repair genes) who undergo surveillance colonoscopies. Patients will be sequentially assigned in a 1:1 ratio to HD-WLE or HD-CE. The method of stratified randomization based on partial colectomy history will be used to avoid proportion imbalance between groups. Participant centers must have an organized high-risk of CRC clinic and endoscopic unit provided with HD technology. Endoscopists must have a documented high adenoma detection rate and experience in performing CE in patients with high-risk conditions of CRC. The principal aim is to compare the adenoma detection rate with WLE vs CE. Principal outcome measures will be: 1) adenoma detection rate, defined as the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma in each arm; 2) number of adenomas per patient, defined as the total number of detected adenomas in each arm (HD-WLE or HD-CE) divided by the number of colonoscopies in each arm. The sample size calculation was determined for a non-inferiority study. Assuming an ADR of 28% with conventional chromoendoscopy in patients with Lynch syndrome, a 15% non-inferiority margin, a one-sided significance level of 0.05 powered at 80% and a 10% of drop-off. Based on these assumptions, it was determined that 122 patients were required for each arm (a total of 244).

Interventions

OTHERHigh-definition white-light endoscopy

The intervention is do not perform chromoendoscopy

Sponsors

Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with proven pathologic germline mutation in one of the mismatch-repair (MMR) gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 or Epcam) who will undergo surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with total colectomy * Concomitant inflammatory bowel disease * Inadequate bowel preparation (Boston scale \<2 in any colonic segment) * Incomplete procedure (without intubation of cecum or ileo-colonic anastomosis) * Previous colonoscopy in less than one year * Inability to sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adenoma detection rateone yearAdenoma detection rate is defined as the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma in each arm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean number per patient of total polypsone year
Mean number per patient of total serrated lesionsone year
Polyp detection rateone year
Mean of adenomas per patientone yearthe total number of adenomas detected in each group (HD-WLE or HD-CE) divided by the number of colonoscopies in each group
Withdrawal time30 minutesExtubation time from the cecum to scope removal from the anus, with exception of time taken for any therapeutic intervention
Total procedure time30 minutesStarting with endoscope insertion and withdrawal time including therapeutic interventions
Serrated lesions detection rateone year

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026