Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
Study B9991011 is a multi-center, international, randomized, open label, 2 component (Phase 1b followed by Phase 3), parallel-arm study of avelumab in combination with various agents for the treatment of Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).
Detailed description
The target study population of this Phase 1b/3 registrational study is patients with R/R DLBCL who have completed at least 2 (but not more than 4) lines of prior rituximab-containing multi-agent chemotherapy, and/or in whom autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has failed, or who are not candidates for ASCT or who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Patients who are ineligible for intensive second line chemotherapy must have received at least one prior rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. The study will assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity of the 3 avelumab-based combination regimens tested, and collect patient reported outcome (PRO) data.
Interventions
Investigational fully human anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody
Investigational, fully human IgG2 CD 137/4-1BB agonist
CD20-directed cytolytic antibody
Antimetabolite antineoplastic agent and demethylation agent.
Alkylating drug
Nucleoside analogue
Platinum-based drug
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: -Any of the following as defined by the WHO, 2016 lymphoid neoplasm classifications and histologically confirmed: * Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Not Otherwise Specified (NOS): Germinal center B-cell type (GCB), Activated B-cell type (ABC) * High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) NOS * HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements * T-cell histocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma * EBV+ DLBCL, NOS * HHV8+ DLBCL, NOS Relapsed or refractory disease following at least 2 lines (and a maximum of 4 lines) of prior rituximab containing multi-agent chemotherapy which may include an autologous stem cell transplantation unless patients are not considered suitable for intensive second-line chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients who are ineligible for intensive second line chemotherapy,must have received at least one prior rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. Patients who are ineligible for intensive second line chemotherapy, must have received at least one prior rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. * Baseline measurable disease with at least 1 bi dimensional lesion with longest diameter (LDi) \>1.5cm on CT scan which is FDG avid on PET scan. * A biopsy (archived or Screening/recent) will be collected at Screening. * At least 18years of age (or ≥20 years in Japan). * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1. Key
Exclusion criteria
* Active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. * Prior organ transplantation including prior allogeneic SCT. * Prior therapy with an anti PD 1, anti PD L1, anti PD L2, anti CD137, or anti cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA 4) antibody (including ipilimumab, tremelimumab or any other antibody, or drug specifically targeting T cell co stimulatory or immune checkpoint pathways).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) | Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks | AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade \>=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of \>38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of \>=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade \>=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade \>=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade \<=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade \<=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months) | ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to \[\<=\] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \[\<\] mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months) | ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (\>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value \>450 ms, \>480 ms and \>500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline \>=20 bpm; absolute value \>=120 bpm and increase from baseline \>=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value \>=220 ms and increase from baseline \>=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value \>=120 ms. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months) | Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake \<=mediastinum),or 3(uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS,for lymph nodes extralymphatic sites;no new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,\>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments. |
| Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months) | TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. |
| Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months) | Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: \<50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed \>=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months) | Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event. |
| Overall Survival | From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months) | Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6 | — |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months) | AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported. |
| Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status | From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months) | ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. |
| Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months) | ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. |
| Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months) | nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point. |
| Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status | From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months) | nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point. |
| Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months) | nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point. |
| Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment) | Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline. |
| Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 | Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months) | ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months) | Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported. |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Italy, Poland, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study included participants with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after completion of at least 2 and not more than 4 lines of rituximab-containing multi-agent chemotherapy (prior to this study), and/or in whom autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has failed, or who were not candidates for ASCT or who were not eligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Pre-assignment details
This study was planned to be conducted into two phases: Phase 1b and Phase 3. Phase 3 of the study was never conducted due to early termination of study because of Phase 1b enrollment closure.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days. | 9 |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days. | 9 |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days. | 11 |
| Total | 29 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Other | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race: Other | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race: White | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 24 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 8 | 8 / 9 | 6 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 8 | 9 / 9 | 11 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 8 | 6 / 9 | 7 / 11 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade \>=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of \>38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of \>=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade \>=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade \>=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade \<=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade \<=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks
Population: DLT evaluable set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and either experienced DLT during the first cycle, or completed the primary DLT observation period of 4 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) | 0 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to \[\<=\] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \[\<\] mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.
Time frame: Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Time frame: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6
Population: Avelumab pharmacokinetic concentration analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had at least 1 post-dose concentration measurement above the lower limit of quantitation for avelumab. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 25.00 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 4.667 |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 75.14 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 21.357 |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 16 | 25.33 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 13.197 |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 183.29 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 83.809 |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 68.44 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 18.553 |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 198.43 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 29.387 |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 16 | 26.53 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 9.237 |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 62.00 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | — |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 7.57 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | — |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 16 | 19.36 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.81 |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 65.33 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 17.913 |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 1 Day 2 | 193.30 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 29.702 |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 120.88 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 165.187 |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 39.43 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 18.327 |
Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: \<50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed \>=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake \<=mediastinum),or 3(uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS,for lymph nodes extralymphatic sites;no new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,\>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments.
Time frame: First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Participants who were randomized and achieved an objective response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 1.81 Months |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | NA Months |
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.
Time frame: Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Avelumab immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 ADA sample collected for avelumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: ADA never-positive | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Post Baseline: ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Post Baseline: ADA never-positive | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Post Baseline: ADA never-positive | 9 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Post Baseline: ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: ADA never-positive | 9 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Post Baseline: ADA never-positive | 11 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: ADA never-positive | 10 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Post Baseline: ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | Baseline: ADA ever-positive | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.
Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Rituximab immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 ADA sample collected for rituximab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA never-positive | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA never-positive | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.
Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Utomilumab immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 ADA sample collected for utomilumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA ever-positive | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA never-positive | 7 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA ever-positive | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | ADA never-positive | 7 Participants |
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (\>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value \>450 ms, \>480 ms and \>500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline \>=20 bpm; absolute value \>=120 bpm and increase from baseline \>=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value \>=220 ms and increase from baseline \>=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value \>=120 ms.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >480 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >500 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >450 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >450 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >480 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >500 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >450 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >480 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >500 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Heart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Heart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | PR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QRS: >=120 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >450 ms | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >480 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Heart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QRS: >=120 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >500 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >480 ms | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >480 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >450 ms | 5 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | PR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Heart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >500 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >450 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >500 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >500 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | PR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >450 ms | 9 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >480 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Heart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: >500 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QRS: >=120 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | Heart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >480 ms | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >450 ms | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >480 ms | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: Increase from baseline >30 ms | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: Increase from baseline >60 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QT: >450 ms | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF: >500 ms | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypophosphatemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypertriglyceridemia | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Cholesterol high | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Neutrophil count decreased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Cpk increased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Serum amylase increased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypermagnesemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Creatinine increased | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyponatremia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | GGT increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Platelet count decreased | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyperglycemia | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lymphocyte count decreased | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypokalemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | White blood cell decreased | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypoglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lipase increased | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Anemia | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypocalcemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypoalbuminemia | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Anemia | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lymphocyte count decreased | 7 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Neutrophil count decreased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Platelet count decreased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | White blood cell decreased | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 5 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Blood bilirubin increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Cholesterol high | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Cpk increased | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Creatinine increased | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | GGT increased | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypercalcemia | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyperglycemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypermagnesemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypertriglyceridemia | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypoalbuminemia | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypoglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypokalemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyponatremia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypophosphatemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lipase increased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Serum amylase increased | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Blood bilirubin increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypophosphatemia | 5 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypertriglyceridemia | 7 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lymphocyte count decreased | 9 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypoalbuminemia | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypocalcemia | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | White blood cell decreased | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Serum amylase increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypoglycemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Platelet count decreased | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lipase increased | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypokalemia | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypomagnesemia | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Neutrophil count decreased | 9 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypercalcemia | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | GGT increased | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyperglycemia | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Creatinine increased | 10 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyponatremia | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hyperkalemia | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Cpk increased | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypermagnesemia | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Cholesterol high | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Anemia | 10 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | Hypernatremia | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: Positive | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: NE | 5 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: Positive | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: NE | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: Positive | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: NE | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: Positive | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: NE | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: Positive | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: Negative | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: NE | 8 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: Positive | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: NE | 6 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: Negative | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: NE | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: Positive | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: NE | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: Negative | 3 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: Negative | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 3 Day 1: NE | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 9 Day 1: NE | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 12 Day 1: NE | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: Positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Baseline: Negative | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 6 Day 1: Negative | 2 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status | Cycle 18 Day 1: Negative | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.
Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected since there was no participants with post-baseline ADA ever positive sample for avelumab.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.
Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Data for this this outcome measure was not collected since there was no participant with rituximab ADA ever positive sample.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.
Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Utomilumab immunogenicity analysis set included participants from the safety analysis set who had at least one ADA/nAb sample collected for utomilumab. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants who were ADA positive and whose samples were further analyzed for nAb.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | nAb ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | nAb never-positive | 1 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | nAb ever-positive | 0 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status | nAb never-positive | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)
Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | 4 Participants |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | 7 Participants |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03 | 10 Participants |
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Overall Survival | 14.8 Months |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Overall Survival | 4.0 Months |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Overall Survival | 5.2 Months |
Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline
Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline.
Time frame: Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Tumor Cells (membrane) | 0 Percentage of cells staining positive |
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Immune Cells | 7.5 Percentage of cells staining positive |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Immune Cells | 7.5 Percentage of cells staining positive |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Tumor Cells (membrane) | 0.5 Percentage of cells staining positive |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Tumor Cells (membrane) | 0 Percentage of cells staining positive |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline | Immune Cells | 17.5 Percentage of cells staining positive |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months)
Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 1.8 Months |
| Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 1.5 Months |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 2.7 Months |
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months)
Population: Participants who were randomized and achieved an objective response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab | Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 1.8 Months |
| Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab | Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria | 1.9 Months |