Skip to content

A Partnership to Translate an Evidence-based Intervention (Take Heart) for Vulnerable Older Adults With Heart Disease

A Partnership to Translate an Evidence-based Intervention for Vulnerable Older Adults With Heart Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02950818
Enrollment
453
Registered
2016-11-01
Start date
2016-12-10
Completion date
2019-10-18
Last updated
2022-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Diseases

Keywords

self-care, health education, chronic disease, heart diseases, risk factors for heart disease

Brief summary

To evaluate the effectiveness of Take Heart, a behavioral/educational program for adults age 50+ with heart disease, or with at least two risk factors for heart disease, that helps them to better manage their health condition(s). Take Heart is a new version of an evidence-based program that has recently been adapted to be suitable for the needs of adults residing in Detroit.

Detailed description

In this study, a heart disease self-management program will be tested in a low-income, predominantly African-American community via a partnership with the Detroit Area Agency on Aging (DAAA), the Detroit Medical Center (DMC), and University of Michigan School of Public Health's Center for Managing Chronic Disease (CMCD). The specific aims of the research are to: (1) adapt existing program materials to be appropriate for the new target population, getting feedback from various sources including focus group interviews; (2) conduct a pilot study of the adapted Take Heart program; (3) refine the intervention and conduct a randomized trial with 376 participants age 50 years and over, to assess health outcomes; (4) assess the translation and implementation of the intervention in the target setting and identify factors that help and hinder the process; (5) assess cost savings associated with the intervention; and (6) develop guidelines for scaling up, that is, for replicating the program in other low-income areas through the national network of Area Agencies on Aging.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTake Heart

Participants receive an evidence-based heart disease self management program consisting of a combination of five two and a half hour group sessions and telephone counseling offered by a trained facilitator employed by the Detroit Area Agency on Aging. The program is designed so that participants select an area to work on (e.g., diet, exercise, medication taking, communication with health care professionals) and receive support, information, and encouragement from group members and program facilitators, to help them reach their goals.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Detroit Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Detroit Area Agency on Aging
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

50 years or older 1 or more diagnosed cardiovascular conditions, including: * Atrial fibrillation * Angina * Myocardial infarction * Congestive heart failure * Valvular disease (aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation) * Peripheral vascular disease * Pulmonary hypertension * OR \>2 major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD; high cholesterol, high blood pressure, smoking, diabetes, chronic kidney disease-stage 3 or 4) * Must have access to a mobile or landline telephone * Must be able to travel to group sessions, with or without transportation assistance

Exclusion criteria

• Limited fluency in English posing significant barrier to deriving program benefit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HospitalizationsBaseline and 12-month follow upThis will be measured by asking participants to report the number of nights they have stayed overnight in the hospital during the past year, for something related to their own health. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported hospitalizations with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.
Emergency Department VisitsBaseline and 12 month follow upThis will be measured by asking participants to report the number of times they went to the emergency department for something related to their own health, during the past year. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported Emergency Department visits with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related Quality of LifeBaseline and 12-month follow-upHealth-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29) profile measure, which assesses depression, anxiety, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, satisfaction with social role participation, and sleep disturbance (4 items each, 5 point Likert scales). Higher values indicate poorer health. One item (11 point scale) measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 -10, 0=no pain, 10=worst pain). The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Profile%20Scoring%20Manual.pdf This table indicates the mean score in each domain at the 12-month follow up time point for both intervention and control groups, as well as the difference between the means of the two groups at the 12-month time point.
Cardiac Symptom ExperienceBaseline and 12-month follow-upThe cardiac symptom subscale of the Symptom and Health Problem Profile (Janz et al., 1999) asks about the frequency of chest pain/discomfort; shortness of breath; waking up from sleep because of chest pain or pressure; waking up from sleep because of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing; and irregular heartbeat or palpitations (not present, once or twice/week, a few times/week, once/day, several times/day) in the prior 12 months. Symptom frequency (0 to 4) was summed, yielding an overall symptom burden score that ranged from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse health. Change is indicated by the difference in mean frequency from baseline to follow-up.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Take Heart Self-management Program
Group and telephone-based educational program to enhance self-management of heart disease and related risk factors. Take Heart: Participants receive an evidence-based heart disease self management program consisting of a combination of five two and a half hour group sessions and telephone counseling offered by a trained facilitator employed by the Detroit Area Agency on Aging. The program is designed so that participants select an area to work on (e.g., diet, exercise, medication taking, communication with health care professionals) and receive support, information, and encouragement from group members and program facilitators, to help them reach their goals.
228
Waitlist Control
Control group participants will be offered the opportunity to participate in Take Heart following the conclusion of their study involvement.
225
Total453

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWaitlist ControlTotalTake Heart Self-management Program
Age, Continuous65.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Comorbidities
Arthritis
158 particiapnts304 particiapnts146 particiapnts
Comorbidities
Asthma
64 particiapnts121 particiapnts57 particiapnts
Comorbidities
Cancer
35 particiapnts70 particiapnts35 particiapnts
Comorbidities
COPD
71 particiapnts121 particiapnts50 particiapnts
Comorbidities
Depression
80 particiapnts171 particiapnts91 particiapnts
Comorbidities
Prediabetes
84 particiapnts188 particiapnts104 particiapnts
Comorbidities
Stroke
42 particiapnts75 particiapnts33 particiapnts
Education
College Graduate or Higher
52 Participants93 Participants41 Participants
Education
<High School
30 Participants53 Participants23 Participants
Education
High School Grad or GED
56 Participants111 Participants55 Participants
Education
Some College
87 Participants194 Participants107 Participants
Employment Status
Employed
19 Participants45 Participants26 Participants
Employment Status
Other
46 Participants92 Participants46 Participants
Employment Status
Retired
119 Participants226 Participants107 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed
41 Participants86 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
197 Participants400 Participants203 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
26 Participants49 Participants23 Participants
Healthcare Utilization - ED Visits1.7 ED Visits in past 12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
1.5 ED Visits in past 12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
1.3 ED Visits in past 12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Healthcare Utilization - Hospitalizations2.4 Hospitalizations in past 12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
2.1 Hospitalizations in past 12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
1.8 Hospitalizations in past 12 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Angina
44 participants77 participants33 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Atrial Fibrilation
44 participants86 participants42 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Congestive Heart Failure
45 participants78 participants33 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Myocardial Infarction
38 participants79 participants41 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Other Heart Disease Condition
6 participants15 participants9 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Peripheral Vascular Disease
26 participants53 participants27 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Pulmonary Hypertension
7 participants18 participants11 participants
Heart Disease Diagnoses
Valvular Disease
22 participants34 participants12 participants
Heart Disease Risk Factors
Chronic Kidney Disease
16 participants26 participants10 participants
Heart Disease Risk Factors
Current Smoker
70 participants133 participants63 participants
Heart Disease Risk Factors
Diabetes
88 participants197 participants109 participants
Heart Disease Risk Factors
High Blood Pressure
204 participants414 participants210 participants
Heart Disease Risk Factors
High Cholesterol
170 participants354 participants184 participants
Heart Related Symptoms1.7 symptoms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
1.5 symptoms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
1.3 symptoms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Marital Status
Married/Partnered
33 Participants57 Participants24 Participants
Marital Status
Single
192 Participants392 Participants200 Participants
PROMIS-29
Anxiety
54.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
53.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
53.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
PROMIS-29
Depression
51.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
50.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
50.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
PROMIS-29
Fatigue
53.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
52.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
51.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
PROMIS-29
Pain Intensity
5.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
4.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
PROMIS-29
Pain Interference
58.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
58.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
57.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
PROMIS-29
Physical Functioning
34.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
33.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
33.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
PROMIS-29
Sleep
52.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
52.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
51.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
PROMIS-29
Social
38.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
38.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
38.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
187 Participants380 Participants193 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
21 Participants41 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants11 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
225 Participants453 Participants228 Participants
Self-Rated Health
Excellent
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Self-Rated Health
Fair
88 Participants177 Participants89 Participants
Self-Rated Health
Good
67 Participants146 Participants79 Participants
Self-Rated Health
Poor
45 Participants80 Participants35 Participants
Self-Rated Health
Very Good
19 Participants41 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
179 Participants334 Participants155 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants118 Participants73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2281 / 225
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2280 / 225
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 2280 / 225

Outcome results

Primary

Emergency Department Visits

This will be measured by asking participants to report the number of times they went to the emergency department for something related to their own health, during the past year. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported Emergency Department visits with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Take Heart Self-management ProgramEmergency Department Visits2.55 ED visits
Waitlist ControlEmergency Department Visits2.74 ED visits
Primary

Hospitalizations

This will be measured by asking participants to report the number of nights they have stayed overnight in the hospital during the past year, for something related to their own health. We will ask this at baseline and then at the 12 month mark after the completion of the baseline survey, so that we can compare the year prior to the intervention to the year they completed the intervention. In addition, when possible, we will verify self-reported hospitalizations with Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from our partners at the Detroit Medical Center (DMC). We will only be able to look into the EMRs of those participants that are patients at the DMC. Change will be indicated by difference between count at baseline and count at follow-up.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHospitalizations0.98 hospitalizations
Waitlist ControlHospitalizations1.48 hospitalizations
Secondary

Cardiac Symptom Experience

The cardiac symptom subscale of the Symptom and Health Problem Profile (Janz et al., 1999) asks about the frequency of chest pain/discomfort; shortness of breath; waking up from sleep because of chest pain or pressure; waking up from sleep because of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing; and irregular heartbeat or palpitations (not present, once or twice/week, a few times/week, once/day, several times/day) in the prior 12 months. Symptom frequency (0 to 4) was summed, yielding an overall symptom burden score that ranged from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate worse health. Change is indicated by the difference in mean frequency from baseline to follow-up.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Take Heart Self-management ProgramCardiac Symptom Experience1.96 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlCardiac Symptom Experience2.74 units on a scale
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29) profile measure, which assesses depression, anxiety, pain interference, physical function, fatigue, satisfaction with social role participation, and sleep disturbance (4 items each, 5 point Likert scales). Higher values indicate poorer health. One item (11 point scale) measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 -10, 0=no pain, 10=worst pain). The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Profile%20Scoring%20Manual.pdf This table indicates the mean score in each domain at the 12-month follow up time point for both intervention and control groups, as well as the difference between the means of the two groups at the 12-month time point.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-month follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifeDepression51 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifeFatigue51.3 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifePain Intensity5.1 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifeAnxiety54.1 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifeSleep51.9 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifePain Interference57.6 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifePhysical Functioning33 units on a scale
Take Heart Self-management ProgramHealth-related Quality of LifeSocial38.9 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifePhysical Functioning34.1 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifePain Interference58.9 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifePain Intensity5.4 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeDepression51.3 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeSocial40.1 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeFatigue54.2 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeSleep52.6 units on a scale
Waitlist ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeAnxiety54.1 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifePain Intensity-0.318 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifeAnxiety0.001 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifeDepression-0.26 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifeFatigue-2.82 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifeSleep-0.727 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifeSocial-1.129 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifePain Interference-1.332 units on a scale
Means Difference Between GroupsHealth-related Quality of LifePhysical Functioning-1.1 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026