Skip to content

Diagnostic Use of Lung Ultrasound for Suspected Pneumonia in Nepal

Diagnostic Use of Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest X-Ray for Suspected Pneumonia in Nepal

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02949141
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-10-31
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-05-01
Last updated
2017-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate the use of lung ultrasound compared to chest x-ray to diagnose pneumonia in Nepal. Given the ease, portability, and relative ease of teaching ultrasound, this would be potential technology available for many clinicians throughout Nepal to use for adult and pediatric patients presenting with suspected pneumonia. This would be especially useful in remote areas where clinicians have limited access to x-rays. Despite its utility, use of ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia in resource-limited settings like Nepal has not yet been studied. Therefore, this study is designed as a prospective, clinical diagnostic study to evaluate patients presenting with suspected pneumonia using diagnostic imaging of beside ultrasound compared with chest x-ray using computed tomography as the gold standard for diagnosis of pneumonia.

Detailed description

Study Design: A prospective, convenience sample of participants presenting with suspected pneumonia when trained ultrasound investigator is present in the Patan Hospital Emergency Department will be performed in Patan, Nepal. This study will be done in partnership with Patan Hospital Emergency Department and with the approval of Nepal Health Research Council and Patan Hospital's ethical review committee. Study Setting: Located in the Kathmandu valley, Patan Hospital is a large urban hospital with 35-bed Emergency Department that sees approximately 32,000 patients per year. Study Protocol: Prior to the enrolling patients, investigators in the Emergency Department will save lung ultrasound exams and interpret the exams. These exams will then be independently reviewed by an ultrasonographer to ensure adequate skill in lung ultrasonography. A kappa analysis of these scans will be performed. If kappa \<0.6, we will review lung ultrasound with these investigators and repeat above evaluation until kappa of 0.6 is achieved. For participants meeting inclusion criteria, consent will be obtained from the participant. Consent will include explanation of use of bedside ultrasound and chest CT scan for diagnosis of their condition. This consent will also include explanation of risks and benefits in Nepali. These examinations will be provided free of charge to the participant. The investigator will record patient demographics, symptoms, lung exam findings, and pre-test probability of pneumonia (low, intermediate, high) on the data form. After initial clinical evaluation, a bedside lung ultrasound will be performed. A Sonosite M Turbo (Fujifilm Sonosite, Inc.) ultrasound machine will be used. The ultrasound examination will include ten views, two anterior views, two lateral views (one including the costophrenic angle), and one posterior view on both chest walls. The investigator will then record findings and diagnosis on the data entry form along with their post-test probability of pneumonia (low, intermediate, high). Participants will get a chest x-ray as a part of the standard evaluation. These readings will be recorded on the data sheet. Participants will then undergo a chest computed tomography (CT), as the diagnostic standard to evaluate for pneumonia. The chest x-ray and chest CT will be read by a radiologist. The radiologist will be blinded to the results of the previous studies. The reading and diagnosis according to CT will be recorded on the data form. Statistical Analysis The performance of ultrasound for diagnosis of pneumonia will be expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Since the sensitivity of ultrasound is estimated around 90%, in order to detect a 20% difference based on a CXR sensitivity of 70%, 62 patients will be needed. McNemar's test will be used to evaluate any statistical difference in sensitivity between CXR and US.

Interventions

DEVICELung Ultrasound

All patients will receive lung ultrasound, chest x-ray and computed tomography

DEVICEChest X-ray

All patients will receive chest x-ray as per usual care for evaluation for pneumonia

All enrolled patients will receive a CT scan as the gold standard for diagnosing pneumonia

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Patan Academy of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting to the Emergency Department at Patan Hospital age 18 or older with suspected signs of pneumonia with at least three of the following: temperature greater than 38 or history of fever, cough, dyspnea, heart rate higher than 100 beats per minute, or oxygen saturation lower than 92%.

Exclusion criteria

* Children will be excluded from the study. Also, ultrasound studies completed by physicians not trained in lung ultrasound will not be included.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnosis of Pneumonia9 monthsSensitivity and specificity of ultrasound compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia using Chest CT as the gold standard for diagnosis.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

All patients eligible for the study were included and received all three imaging modalities.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasound
All patients will initially get an ultrasound (interpreted by emergency department physician) followed by chest x-ray (read by independent radiologist) and computed tomography (read by radiologist) Lung Ultrasound: All patients will receive lung ultrasound, chest x-ray and computed tomography. No adverse events were recorded.
62
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUltrasound
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
47 Participants
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Nepal
62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 620 / 620 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 620 / 620 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 620 / 620 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Diagnosis of Pneumonia

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia using Chest CT as the gold standard for diagnosis.

Time frame: 9 months

Population: 62

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
UltrasoundDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) and CT positive pneumonia40 Participants
UltrasoundDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) negative, CT positive4 Participants
UltrasoundDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) positive, CT negative7 Participants
UltrasoundDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) negative, CT negative11 Participants
Chest X-RayDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) negative, CT negative9 Participants
Chest X-RayDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) and CT positive pneumonia32 Participants
Chest X-RayDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) positive, CT negative9 Participants
Chest X-RayDiagnosis of PneumoniaUS (or CXR) negative, CT positive12 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026