Skip to content

Antiplaque Effect of Essential Oils With and Without Alcochol on an in Situ Model of Oral Biofilm Growth

Antiplaque Effect of Essential Oils and 0.2% Chlorhexidine on an in Situ Model of Oral Biofilm Growth. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02946801
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-10-27
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2016-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biofilms, Oils, Essential, Periodontitis

Keywords

Biofilms, essential oils, alcohol, microscopy, confocal, mouthwashes

Brief summary

The accumulation and maturation of oral biofilm in the gingival margin is widely recognised to be the primary aetiological factor in the development of chronic gingivitis. Based on this association, the current treatment of gingivitis is focused on biofilm disruption, which will normally include mechanical processes, both professionally and at home. However, for patients, it is not easy to achieve a proper level of plaque control. The efficient plaque control techniques are very time consuming and require a special motivation and skills for their optimum use. It was at this point where mouthwashes become important, due to the fact that they include diverse types of antimicrobial agents to complement the results of mechanical oral hygiene measures. The essential oils have been presented as a realiable alternative to the gold Standard (Chlorhexidine). However, it use has been limited clinically due to their alcohol contain. Some years ago, a new alternative without alcohol has been launched to the market. This formulation has not been already deeply tested specific antiplaque studies in which the structure of the biofilm remained intact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ antiplaque effect of 2 antimicrobial agents (based on an essential oils formulation with and without alcohol) in the short term with a posterior analysis on non-destructured biofilm with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope combined with fluorescence staining.

Interventions

DRUGEssential oils without alcohol
DRUGSterile water

Sponsors

University of Santiago de Compostela
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy adults. * Minimum of 24 permanent teeth. * No gingivitis (Community Periodontal Index score = 0). * No periodontitis (Community Periodontal Index score = 0). * Absence of untreated caries.

Exclusion criteria

* Smoker or former smoker. * Presence of dental prostheses. * Presence of orthodontic devices * Antibiotic treatment or routine use of oral antiseptics in the previous 3 months. * Presence of any systemic disease that could alter the production or composition of saliva.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of bacterial viability96 hours after the volunteer has worn the splints with the disks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Thickness in microns96 hours after the volunteer has worn the splints with the disks
Percentage of area covered by the biofilm96 hours after the volunteer has worn the splints with the disks

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026