Skip to content

Gaze Contingent Feedback in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Gaze Contingent Feedback in Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02945735
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-10-26
Start date
2016-11-06
Completion date
2019-01-07
Last updated
2019-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Unipolar, Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major

Keywords

depression, cognitive bias modification, MDD, major depressive disorder, attention bias modification treatment

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether giving gaze-contingent feedback is an effective attention modification procedure, helping in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Detailed description

The study examines giving depressive participants gaze-contingent feedback as a novel attention training procedure. Half of the participants will receive contingent feedback while the other half would receive non-contingent placebo feedback.

Interventions

Feedback according to participants' viewing patterns, in order to modify their attention.

Sponsors

Tel Aviv University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A signed consent form * Men and women between the ages of 18 and 65. * Meeting a current diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) according to the DSM-IV * MDD as the primary diagnosis: In cases of co-morbidity, MDD will be deemed as the most distressing and clinically significant condition among the co-morbid disorders * Stable pharmaco-therapy: Participants receiving a pharmacological treatment who are taking a stable medication for at least 3 months before the beginning of the procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Psychotic episode in the past or the present time. * Co-morbidity with any neurological disorder (i.e., epilepsy, brain injury). * Another psychotherapeutic treatment during the study. * Usage of neuroleptic medication. * Change in medication status during the study. * Substantial usage of drugs or alcohol in the present time. * Poor judgment capacity (i.e., children under 18 and special populations). * High Risk of Suicide.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline - Structured Interview for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA)post treatment (1 week after treatment completion) and 3-month follow upThe SIGMA is a ten-item diagnostic structured interview which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. Each item is rated on scale ranging from 0 to 6 with a possible total score of 60, with regard to the passing week.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline - BDI-II - Beck Depression Inventorypost treatment (1 week after treatment completion) and 3-month follow upThe BDI -II is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory. Each item is rated on scale ranging from 0 to 3, Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) diagnosisapproximately 20 mina structured diagnostic interview for DSM - IV and ICD-10 psychiatric disorders, which takes approximately 20 min to administer and is a valid and time-efficient alternative to the SCID-P and CIDI.

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026